Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Don't understand 100% joint finances

320 replies

Lorendo · 12/05/2026 21:45

I know I'll get flamed for this but I don't get it when couples only have joint finances and nothing separate.

Me and DH have a joint account to cover joint expenses (house, cars childcare) etc. We each put same in each month as earn similar.

We also have joint saving pots for certain things where we put certain amount into eg holiday, emergency fund, kids stuff.

That's it. Anything left stays in our separate personal accounts for whatever we please.

This seems like a logical way to do it. All joint obligations are sorted together but we still retain independence with what's left.

A friend of mine only does joint. She only works part time so a different situation to us but husband monitors every penny in and out. If she buys something he doesn't agree with or that she didn't clear with him first, he brings it up.

I told her my arrangement and she just said 'yes well we like to manage all the money together, as a team'. Right ok, sounds more like financial abuse than team work but hey ho

OP posts:
coulditbeme2323 · 13/05/2026 14:40

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 14:39

Well that's you. I certainly wouldn't be slogging my guts out for someone who CBA to work and had no good reason not to

We both choose for me not to work!

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 14:40

MyMilchick · 13/05/2026 14:38

I didn't necessarily mean that everything has to be lumped in to a joint account, I just mean that neither should have more money to spend on luxuries than the other. If your husband was that bad with money then he's not being a team player either, hopefully he recognised he was bad with money and you two had a system that worked and was fair to everyone

Yeah it was called trying my best to get a household contribution on payday 50/50 and then divorcing him thankfully before his bankruptcy. Luckily as such a short married the divorce put us is same financial position as when we married

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 14:39

coulditbeme2323 · 13/05/2026 14:31

I could chose to work more.

Well that's you. I certainly wouldn't be slogging my guts out for someone who CBA to work and had no good reason not to

Mt563 · 13/05/2026 14:39

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 14:24

By the same scale how would people look in the mirror knowing they are too idle to work full time but want a luxury life and get someone else to pay for it

I earn twice my husband. I encouraged him to go part time to allow a career change. I love that I can facilitate him having a great job he enjoys and us both enjoying a good life. We both benefit from his extra day at home too.

MyMilchick · 13/05/2026 14:38

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 14:28

My marriage would've been an absolute disaster with a joint account. Although he earned slightly more I had more expenses as was supporting 2 kids. He was totally irresponsible with no ey.

If we had a joint account he'd have spent the lot before the bills had been paid and my kids would have gone hungry

I didn't necessarily mean that everything has to be lumped in to a joint account, I just mean that neither should have more money to spend on luxuries than the other. If your husband was that bad with money then he's not being a team player either, hopefully he recognised he was bad with money and you two had a system that worked and was fair to everyone

Tessasanderson · 13/05/2026 14:36

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 14:24

By the same scale how would people look in the mirror knowing they are too idle to work full time but want a luxury life and get someone else to pay for it

Where has anyone given you an example where one of the partnership/marriege wants a luxury life and not work full time and get someone else to pay for it?

Bringing up the family. Looking after the home. Cooking. Cleaning. Insurance. Family issues. School Issues. Birthdays. Christmas. Elderly parents. Hospital. Doctors. Dentist. Clothing. Shopping

The list is endless but its about equality and if someone deems someone to be too idle to share their income my guess is they have bigger problems in their relationship than finances.

Of course there are situations where one earns so much they get happiness from allowing their partner to not work so hard. Again, as long as this is done in an equal manner (Pensions, financial control etc) then this is fine.

SENsupportplease · 13/05/2026 14:33

Everything joint. We moved in together straight out of uni into first proper jobs earning pretty much the same. Everything was equal because it made sense and it’s stayed that way ever since even with income changes and marriage, children, house, redundancy etc.

coulditbeme2323 · 13/05/2026 14:31

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 14:31

Yes people who could work more and choose not to then want the lifestyle someone else is slogging their guts out for.

So where did you get SAHMs from

I could chose to work more.

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 14:31

coulditbeme2323 · 13/05/2026 14:30

You didn't specifically mention SAHM, but you used the word subsidized.

Yes people who could work more and choose not to then want the lifestyle someone else is slogging their guts out for.

So where did you get SAHMs from

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 14:30

Mt563 · 13/05/2026 14:28

The one working long hours would still likely be relying on the other partner picking up the slack that they can't do (shopping, food, house maintenance, kids, admin).

People can do what they like. I really don't care. But joint makes sense for us.

And if the 70 hours person lived alone they'd still have to do this stuff.

coulditbeme2323 · 13/05/2026 14:30

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 14:29

And where was I speaking about SAHMs. Stop putting words in my mouth and read my posts properly

You didn't specifically mention SAHM, but you used the word subsidized.

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 14:29

coulditbeme2323 · 13/05/2026 14:25

Not sure that's the word I would use to describe a SAHM.

And where was I speaking about SAHMs. Stop putting words in my mouth and read my posts properly

Mt563 · 13/05/2026 14:28

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 14:25

And as I said sometimes it's through choice.

The one working long hours would still likely be relying on the other partner picking up the slack that they can't do (shopping, food, house maintenance, kids, admin).

People can do what they like. I really don't care. But joint makes sense for us.

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 14:28

MyMilchick · 13/05/2026 14:13

If that's your attitude you're not really behaving like a team. Each to their own I suppose

My marriage would've been an absolute disaster with a joint account. Although he earned slightly more I had more expenses as was supporting 2 kids. He was totally irresponsible with no ey.

If we had a joint account he'd have spent the lot before the bills had been paid and my kids would have gone hungry

coulditbeme2323 · 13/05/2026 14:25

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 14:24

By the same scale how would people look in the mirror knowing they are too idle to work full time but want a luxury life and get someone else to pay for it

Not sure that's the word I would use to describe a SAHM.

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 14:25

Mt563 · 13/05/2026 14:24

Because most of us are working in the assumption that marriage is a team sport.

Usually if one person is working less its because of other responsibilities they're picking up for the family or due to health. In that case, why should they have less money?

And as I said sometimes it's through choice.

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 14:24

Tessasanderson · 13/05/2026 14:21

How do people look in the mirror knowing their partner hasnt got access to the same money they have?

Seriously, how can you do that with someone you love? Does the same thing apply to your children? When you are buying dinner for the family are they only allowed to order at the same level as the lower income or are they allowed a % of your income too?

By the same scale how would people look in the mirror knowing they are too idle to work full time but want a luxury life and get someone else to pay for it

AddictedToTea · 13/05/2026 14:24

We do exactly the same as you OP. He can spunk his left over money on expensive car parts and I can spaff mine on coffee and cake. Both happy!

Mt563 · 13/05/2026 14:24

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 14:07

But why? If someone is flogging their guts out 70 hours a week and their partner does 16 hours a week in an office why shouldn't the harder worker have more?

Because most of us are working in the assumption that marriage is a team sport.

Usually if one person is working less its because of other responsibilities they're picking up for the family or due to health. In that case, why should they have less money?

MyMilchick · 13/05/2026 14:23

coulditbeme2323 · 13/05/2026 14:19

I grew up in a 3 bedroom end terrace and my husband grew up in a house that in today's value is circa £6 million pounds.

Both him and his sister have been gifted high 7 figures, which is the sole reason we live in the house we do today.

Perhaps I should live in the shed at the bottom of the garden though?

Right? Madness 😂

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 14:22

moonshineandsun · 13/05/2026 14:20

I think once children come into play this has to be factored in. Is the one lazing around on 16 hours also doing night wakes and school picks up? Who manages the house? Is the person working weekends and night shifts able to do this because the other person minds the children? You’re dismissing so much work if you only count paid work.

I wasn't counting children was I. I was speaking about people who choose this

But speaking of children how does it work when the child is only one partners

coulditbeme2323 · 13/05/2026 14:22

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 14:20

But it is .

I really don't think it is the right word in anyway, shape or form.

Tessasanderson · 13/05/2026 14:21

How do people look in the mirror knowing their partner hasnt got access to the same money they have?

Seriously, how can you do that with someone you love? Does the same thing apply to your children? When you are buying dinner for the family are they only allowed to order at the same level as the lower income or are they allowed a % of your income too?

coulditbeme2323 · 13/05/2026 14:21

moonshineandsun · 13/05/2026 14:20

I think once children come into play this has to be factored in. Is the one lazing around on 16 hours also doing night wakes and school picks up? Who manages the house? Is the person working weekends and night shifts able to do this because the other person minds the children? You’re dismissing so much work if you only count paid work.

Exactly

MyMilchick · 13/05/2026 14:21

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 14:17

Not always the case. Sometimes people work less or lower paid jobs through choice

They still getting subsided as it would cost them much more to live without someone putting in a higher %

And what when the " kids" only belong to one person? Why should the others have to subsidy that

Edited

The fact of the matter is most people who work less hours, do more of the housework and childcare so there's a balance there. Of course there's people who take the piss and take advantage just like there are on the other side where sometimes the working/higher earning person is financially abusive