To think we don’t know how lucky we are under Starmer.

For information, 60 million people did not vote for the Labour Party with Sir Keir Starmer as leader.

The Labour Party won with 33.7% of the total votes cast. Also remember that many of those eligible to vote did not do so.

So the country did not overwhelmingly support Starmer's Labour Party. Quite a lot of those votes were in protest at the Tories' record.

Starmer may not do so badly on the International stage but if he can't control his backbenchers and make the much needed welfare reform changes and bowed to them and ditched the 2 child UC benefit cap when it was very popular with the voting public who wished to keep it, why should he keep his position?

Then on top of that he appoints untrustworthy people like Mandelson, whilst ignoring all the warnings given to him. And then blames and fires others for his poor decisions.

Such inept behaviour from a former human rights lawyer! But then again he has forgotten his past career and now overlooks human rights and international law abuses and let's them go unchallenged when it suits him.

This is why he should be considering his position.

He has no backbone. The public sees that and his own backbenchers sees that.

So unless he has a total personality change and finds some charisma from somewhere he should be gone.

However, the Labour Party backbenchers seem to be very keen on self destructing if they think the public will vote for a more left leaning Party fronted by the likes of Ed Miliband or Angela Rayner! Even Andy Burnham will not change their fortunes if he won't take serious steps to reform welfare and align the numbers eligible to receive it with the European average, which is way, way lower than the in the UK.

Yep, that was a dick move. He needs more trustworthy advisors for sure.

Labour has massively reduced immigration.

I've said this all along. KS has a PR problem. Blair also had Alistair Campbell.

And to people talking about Ed Milliband as a good possible successor: all The Sun had to do was print a front page picture of the man eating a bacon roll on election day to put people off voting Labour.

Whoever replaces KS is already on borrowed time.

So unless he has a total personality change and finds some charisma from somewhere he should be gone

So that's his problem. FFS.

For information, 60 million people did not vote for the Labour Party with Sir Keir Starmer as leader.

The Labour Party won with 33.7% of the total votes cast. Also remember that many of those eligible to vote did not do so.

So the country did not overwhelmingly support Starmer's Labour Party. Quite a lot of those votes were in protest at the Tories' record.

Starmer may not do so badly on the International stage but if he can't control his backbenchers and make the much needed welfare reform changes and bowed to them and ditched the 2 child UC benefit cap when it was very popular with the voting public who wished to keep it, why should he keep his position?

Then on top of that he appoints untrustworthy people like Mandelson, whilst ignoring all the warnings given to him. And then blames and fires others for his poor decisions.

Such inept behaviour from a former human rights lawyer! But then again he has forgotten his past career and now overlooks human rights and international law abuses and let's them go unchallenged when it suits him.

This is why he should be considering his position.

He has no backbone. The public sees that and his own backbenchers sees that.

So unless he has a total personality change and finds some charisma from somewhere he should be gone.

However, the Labour Party backbenchers seem to be very keen on self destructing if they think the public will vote for a more left leaning Party fronted by the likes of Ed Miliband or Angela Rayner! Even Andy Burnham will not change their fortunes if he won't take serious steps to reform welfare and align the numbers eligible to receive it with the European average, which is way, way lower than the in the UK.

It’s the usual. The right wing parties can do whatever they like and get little scrutiny, Labour or left leaning have their backgrounds scoured to find a mole to make a headline mountain. Case in point, Farage’s multiple donations totalling over £5million from Christopher Harborne and £200k from JCB, also accepting donations in crypto that are untraceable - very little reaction. Starmer and wife getting football tickets and some clothes - utter fucking outrage.
It’s the fact that the media peddles this shite and people believe it without thinking critically about why it’s being fed to them this way that convinces me we’ll continually vote against our own interests.

I like him and have done since his impassioned anti-Brexit speeches back in the day. I am slightly disappointed he's not quite so impassioned these days but fear he is stymied by the media who all seem to hate him for no real reason. I think the Labour party ARE getting on with stuff but all anyone hears is about welfare scroungers and small boats. It will take a LONG time to get over the Tory years but instead of supporting the necessary, all the media focus is on fecking Reform and Farage who have no policies or plans at all. I like it that the Labour party is not blaming immigrants for all the woes of society and actually trying to do something. I think even they realise they need to work faster. They certainly need some better PR.

For information, 60 million people did not vote for the Labour Party with Sir Keir Starmer as leader.

The Labour Party won with 33.7% of the total votes cast. Also remember that many of those eligible to vote did not do so.

So the country did not overwhelmingly support Starmer's Labour Party. Quite a lot of those votes were in protest at the Tories' record.

Starmer may not do so badly on the International stage but if he can't control his backbenchers and make the much needed welfare reform changes and bowed to them and ditched the 2 child UC benefit cap when it was very popular with the voting public who wished to keep it, why should he keep his position?

Then on top of that he appoints untrustworthy people like Mandelson, whilst ignoring all the warnings given to him. And then blames and fires others for his poor decisions.

Such inept behaviour from a former human rights lawyer! But then again he has forgotten his past career and now overlooks human rights and international law abuses and let's them go unchallenged when it suits him.

This is why he should be considering his position.

He has no backbone. The public sees that and his own backbenchers sees that.

So unless he has a total personality change and finds some charisma from somewhere he should be gone.

However, the Labour Party backbenchers seem to be very keen on self destructing if they think the public will vote for a more left leaning Party fronted by the likes of Ed Miliband or Angela Rayner! Even Andy Burnham will not change their fortunes if he won't take serious steps to reform welfare and align the numbers eligible to receive it with the European average, which is way, way lower than the in the UK.

I've said this all along. KS has a PR problem. Blair also had Alistair Campbell.

And to people talking about Ed Milliband as a good possible successor: all The Sun had to do was print a front page picture of the man eating a bacon roll on election day to put people off voting Labour.

Whoever replaces KS is already on borrowed time.

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood is among cabinet ministers calling for Starmer to set out a timetable for his resignation

Thats disappointing because i thought she had some capabilities, but now she’s just being another egotistical PM wannabe going by what serves her career rather than what’s best for the country.

Are we actually being serious that 80 snakes can seriously overturn the democratic vote of 60 million people. Because I have had enough of this. I am starting to think this is actually what’s wrong with our country. We cannot chop and change PM like this!

The same is true of The Guardian and any Tory leader

Could you post your evidence for these claims please?