Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to feel scared ahead of a Clare's Law disclosure call?

436 replies

Justpickitup · 11/05/2026 16:14

So I did a Clare’s law request on a guy I have been seeing for a few months. I’ve never felt the need to do this before but I just had a gut feeling. He is quite protective and needy. Anyway I did it and now I have to have a video call as they are ready to disclose? I’m really really scared.

OP posts:
Justpickitup · 12/05/2026 17:28

If he had told me he had done a Clare’s law request and he had children I would absolutely support that, you wouldn’t carry on dating somebody who had a history of DV so surely it’s better to know?

OP posts:
northernlight20 · 12/05/2026 17:27

@Justpickitup i did a clares law check on my now husband when i met him. i also have kids and wouldnt introduce till i knew the outcome of the check. i also told him id done a check on him and was prepared to dump him on the spot depending on his reaction. you can never be too careful, you have done the right thing and the people on here questioning that are beyond weird. and if i ever find myself single again, it would be the first thing if i met a new man.

Justpickitup · 12/05/2026 17:27

And I don’t just mean for men either,

OP posts:
Justpickitup · 12/05/2026 17:26

It shouldn’t be done lightly I admit that. Like I said I have had ONS and dates and wouldn’t have done it. If I am
inviting somebody to my children’s home absolutely I would like to know anything.

OP posts:
Justpickitup · 12/05/2026 17:25

nevernotmaybe · 12/05/2026 17:24

What are you talking about? You just responded to someone saying it's not for general vetting and you need to have an actual concern, with "they had a concern so you are wrong" . . . .

My response was accurate, because it was talking about OP wanting to do it just for the sake of it always to anyone.

To protect myself and my children from
somebody I should have avoided surely?

OP posts:
nevernotmaybe · 12/05/2026 17:24

ThreadGuardDog · 12/05/2026 11:18

Codswallop. OP has children and had some concerns about his behaviour. What do you want people to do - wait until someone gets hurt before they check? And where has OP lied ? She hasn’t told her partner and doesn’t need to, but quite frankly any man who would have a problem with being checked out in this way would be a potential red flag.

What are you talking about? You just responded to someone saying it's not for general vetting and you need to have an actual concern, with "they had a concern so you are wrong" . . . .

My response was accurate, because it was talking about OP wanting to do it just for the sake of it always to anyone.

nevernotmaybe · 12/05/2026 17:23

Levithecat · 12/05/2026 11:05

I think all men could fit that criteria? The reason I gave was my own past experience of abuse - they were content with this

All humans could including women who are covered by it, the law isn't that stupid
and you should have been told your application wasn't appropriate if you don't have an issue.

Justpickitup · 12/05/2026 17:20

It is there so that you know about a person and can make an informed decision about the relationship.

OP posts:
Justpickitup · 12/05/2026 17:19

Moveoverdarlin · 12/05/2026 17:14

I couldn’t agree with this more. This check should not be done lightly. OP has said several times he hasn’t done anything wrong but was a bit clingy, but better now.

This law has saved the lives of vulnerable women against horrendous men. Millions of women and mothers are back on the dating scene after years, everyone will be hesitant and have reservations about men they date. I think it diminishes the work of the Police if everyone uses this service just to be on the safe side.

When I was single I would google the hell out of potential dates, I’d look at social media, work websites, companies house, you name it. You have to be vigilant - but this guy has done nothing wrong.

If I thought he was horrendous I would have just dumped him, I didn’t as we get on so well and didn't want to throw something away that could have potential. I’m sure if another woman thought a guy was horrendous they wouldn’t at do the same without the checks?

OP posts:
Justpickitup · 12/05/2026 17:17

Moveoverdarlin · 12/05/2026 17:14

I couldn’t agree with this more. This check should not be done lightly. OP has said several times he hasn’t done anything wrong but was a bit clingy, but better now.

This law has saved the lives of vulnerable women against horrendous men. Millions of women and mothers are back on the dating scene after years, everyone will be hesitant and have reservations about men they date. I think it diminishes the work of the Police if everyone uses this service just to be on the safe side.

When I was single I would google the hell out of potential dates, I’d look at social media, work websites, companies house, you name it. You have to be vigilant - but this guy has done nothing wrong.

IM sorry but I have heard too many stories of women introducing their children to new men and it all goes pear shaped due to jealousy etc. even dating apps, people meet and god knows who you are actually meeting! I know this isn’t solid proof that he isn’t a bad guy. He was open and honest with me that he wasn’t the best when he was younger. It’s up to you if you want to believe I jumped the gun, I don’t think I did and that’s ok.

OP posts:
Justpickitup · 12/05/2026 17:14

the guy had recently told
me that I have made him realise what a healthy relationship should ship should feel like and it feels amazing. I don’t want constant texting, worrying if I go out incase I cheat on him. He seemed to lack self esteem but with a bit of reassurance he is getting there.

OP posts:
Moveoverdarlin · 12/05/2026 17:14

Cherry8809 · 12/05/2026 12:52

I wish people wouldn’t use Claire’s Law as a personal dating screening service.

If he ever needs police certificates or a SAR for clearances or immigration purposes, this will absolutely show up on there, and he will find himself having to answer some difficult and imposing questions.

It’s unfair to someone who hasn’t done anything wrong.

I couldn’t agree with this more. This check should not be done lightly. OP has said several times he hasn’t done anything wrong but was a bit clingy, but better now.

This law has saved the lives of vulnerable women against horrendous men. Millions of women and mothers are back on the dating scene after years, everyone will be hesitant and have reservations about men they date. I think it diminishes the work of the Police if everyone uses this service just to be on the safe side.

When I was single I would google the hell out of potential dates, I’d look at social media, work websites, companies house, you name it. You have to be vigilant - but this guy has done nothing wrong.

summerchild82 · 12/05/2026 17:14

Justpickitup · 12/05/2026 17:12

My gosh haha! Sorry shouldn’t laugh but that is enough to put anybody off

Haha, yep! Glad you could see the funny side :) x

Justpickitup · 12/05/2026 17:12

summerchild82 · 12/05/2026 17:09

You can't just go to the police and say "something feels a little bit off about this man, please could you use your valuable resources doing the background checks". You had a reason (the clingy behaviour) which warranted the checks being done.

I once went back to a date's house and in the morning he was wearing a spiderman dressing gown. I didn't phone the police in this situation!! I just never saw him again.

My gosh haha! Sorry shouldn’t laugh but that is enough to put anybody off

OP posts:
summerchild82 · 12/05/2026 17:09

Justpickitup · 12/05/2026 17:06

Well
maybe you should have?

You can't just go to the police and say "something feels a little bit off about this man, please could you use your valuable resources doing the background checks". You had a reason (the clingy behaviour) which warranted the checks being done.

I once went back to a date's house and in the morning he was wearing a spiderman dressing gown. I didn't phone the police in this situation!! I just never saw him again.

Justpickitup · 12/05/2026 17:06

IMightNotGoToWorkTodayIMightNotGoAgainTomorrow · 12/05/2026 16:59

No one has disputed that.

All people are saying is that, when there are red flags, it's OK to end a relationship even if they've never been convicted of anything.

God, I've dumped loads of men (including one I really, really didn't want to!) because something felt a bit 'off' about him. I've never made an enquiry about anyone I've dated.

Well
maybe you should have?

OP posts:
IMightNotGoToWorkTodayIMightNotGoAgainTomorrow · 12/05/2026 16:59

Justpickitup · 12/05/2026 16:32

I don’t really understand the red flag thing either, people are nice in the beginning look at Ian Huntley’s wife for example.

No one has disputed that.

All people are saying is that, when there are red flags, it's OK to end a relationship even if they've never been convicted of anything.

God, I've dumped loads of men (including one I really, really didn't want to!) because something felt a bit 'off' about him. I've never made an enquiry about anyone I've dated.

summerchild82 · 12/05/2026 16:58

Justpickitup · 12/05/2026 16:50

Drink driving 20 years ago!

So he's a nearly 40 year old man who has never had a long term relationship?

I'm really pleased you've had that reassurance from SS and as I said earlier, they would have viewed what you did as a protective factor.

Hopefully you're keeping your relationship away from the children at this early stage, as you get to know more about him. You still haven't said if you have made any changes to your behaviour (i.e. being more available, not going out late etc) which have made him calm his neediness down. I expect you have, sadly.

You have a lot of advice here and people acting as a critical friend - which is likely to be coming from a lot of women who have experienced DA. A lot of DA work focuses around insight and although it might feel like a pile on, there's actually a lot of people who want you to be okay.

Justpickitup · 12/05/2026 16:54

I did some graffiti on a wall when I was 12, had a wee on a superstore car park, all
of which I wouldn’t do now.

OP posts:
Justpickitup · 12/05/2026 16:50

TFImBackIn · 12/05/2026 16:42

Overly protective, needy, police record...

Come on, OP.

Drink driving 20 years ago!

OP posts:
clearlyy · 12/05/2026 16:49

YANBU. I was so scared before mine and I was right to be to be honest. It’s not a nice call. But you can talk to them about what they disclose, I cried and I was shaking and the lady held my hand through the call. Luckily I never saw the person again. However, it can also be that there is nothing to disclose.

if you are so worried, please leave. The gut feeling may get stronger and you won’t be able to come back from that feeling. You’re better off without this anxiety.

TFImBackIn · 12/05/2026 16:42

Overly protective, needy, police record...

Come on, OP.

rosie1873 · 12/05/2026 16:40

Excellent news, I am very pleased for you.

Justpickitup · 12/05/2026 16:38

Polkadotpompom · 12/05/2026 16:36

OP I think you did the right thing and can't understand the snarky comments.

I have done a claire's law and it came back clear but the police person I spoke too did gently explain to me that we should listen to our instincts and that it's right to be cautious in new relationships when we have doubts or concerns.

The person I did the claire's law check on, I ended things anyway. I did later find out he'd been charged with drunk driving and banned from driving (he hadn't told me and had been asking to drive my car and I'd refused). And that he HAD been an abusive partner in the past, but had never been charged with anything. They can only tell you about "relevant" charges that they've been found guilty of.

I think it's wise to have new partners checked.
I think it's even wiser to wait as long as possible before introducing them to our children, and then even longer again before moving in together etc.

Edited

He has opened up and told me that he was a b it of a bugga when he was younger, banned from
driving when he was 18. I think most men have a few wild years before they decide enough is enough.

OP posts:
Polkadotpompom · 12/05/2026 16:36

OP I think you did the right thing and can't understand the snarky comments.

I have done a claire's law and it came back clear but the police person I spoke too did gently explain to me that we should listen to our instincts and that it's right to be cautious in new relationships when we have doubts or concerns.

The person I did the claire's law check on, I ended things anyway. I did later find out he'd been charged with drunk driving and banned from driving (he hadn't told me and had been asking to drive my car and I'd refused). And that he HAD been an abusive partner in the past, but had never been charged with anything. They can only tell you about "relevant" charges that they've been found guilty of.

I think it's wise to have new partners checked.
I think it's even wiser to wait as long as possible before introducing them to our children, and then even longer again before moving in together etc.