I am not trying to be dishonest at all, and I sincerely apologise for appearing dishonest or unclear in how I expressed myself in my earlier post.
I think I have a very clear understanding of what the Nazis did, from having studied it at school and university
But when I first read about the Home Office’s plans to get rid of asylum seekers’ jewellery, my immediate thoughts went to the Nazis’ policies of confiscating Jewish people’s jewellery, artwork, houses, teeth and anything else valuable they had (as you write).
Yes, I realise the HO policy and the Nazi policies are VERY different in terms of their aims.
But the optics of this HO policy are really poorly designed and clumsy, and have really unpleasant echoes of the Nazis’ policy. It was the reference to jewellery and valuables that sparked the comparison for me.
Instead of welcoming people who have fled persecution or been displaced, we’re seizing their assets? It sounds very degrading and undignified.
I’m really concerned that no one at the HO seemed to consider these optics, and how the policy would come across, before Shabana Mahmood talked about it publicly.
Did anyone else here not see a parallel between these policies and the Nazis’ policies?