Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Angela Raynor still doesnt get it.

512 replies

ThisDandyWriter · 11/05/2026 08:08

I’ve just read Angela’s Raynor’s statement about why Labour did so badly and what they need to do to change….aibu to think SHE STILL DOESNT GET IT!! Nothing mentioned about welfare, nothing mentioned about immigration-these are 2 subjects most talked about as the reasons why people didn’t vote for Labour.
she might not like it-but id they want to stay in power, they MUST tackle these subjects and not just ignore them because they dint fit her narrative.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
Paganpentacle · 11/05/2026 15:34

BananaPeels · 11/05/2026 14:54

What is wrong with a temporary ‘prison’ to process people who have arrived whilst it is established who they are? I find it absolutely baffling that public safety is not put ahead of everything. No one should be allowed to turn up, often undocumented, and allowed to freely roam a community. I am actually appalled this has been allowed to continue for so long.

This.
100%
Perhaps if they were kept for 'processing' there would be fewer rapes and sexual assaults.
And whilst they at it perhaps educating these invaders that raping and sexual assault isnt tolerated ... that way they can't claim they 'didnt know' it was wrong 😡

Zebedee999 · 11/05/2026 15:30

OnceUponATimed · 11/05/2026 08:14

There is absolutely no way they should go more anti.Immigration. it will alienate many of their voters, and they will never hopefully be as anti immigration as the right wing parties.

The working class have been deserting Labour in droves ever since 2010 when Brown called Mrs Duffy a bigot when she raised such concerns. Nowadays only Islington intellectual types and welfare claimants support Labour.

Labours pro-immigration stance resulted in the working classes wages being undercut, housing given to others as the priority, banged up in jail if they dare to speak out, new laws to ensure they do not speka oiut etc.

It's too late for Labour to get the working class vote now, they have long gone to Reform (created by Labour and the Tories to fill a void).

Thefastandthecurious5 · 11/05/2026 15:29

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 11/05/2026 14:26

Your dishonesty is quite shameless.

This is the actual proposal:

Key Details of the Policy Proposal:
Targeted Assets: Officials indicated that high-value assets such as cars, e-bikes, and significant amounts of cash or gold (e.g., "a bag full of gold rings") could be seized.
Exemptions: Mahmood clarified that items of high sentimental value, specifically wedding rings, would not be confiscated.

Mahmood insisted asylum seekers would not have any items of sentimental value, such as wedding rings, taken away.
However, she said individuals with a "flashy Rolex" watch, e-bike, car or other high-value assets "should make a contribution" towards the cost of their stay.
She gave the example of an asylum seeker who was being given £800 a month by his family and had bought an Audi.
"He was not required under any of our rules to contribute towards the cost of his asylum accommodation," Mahmood said.

She was also proposing to pay failed asylum seekers to leave the country instead of just putting them in a plane (a ludicrous plan in my mind)

Whereas Hitler stripped his victims of their homes, artworks, gold teeth, personal jewellery and even hair on his route to genocide.

Your dishonest and repeated attempts to draw a parallel are now getting obscene.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj41r4l0v9jo?app-referrer=deep-link

I am not trying to be dishonest at all, and I sincerely apologise for appearing dishonest or unclear in how I expressed myself in my earlier post.

I think I have a very clear understanding of what the Nazis did, from having studied it at school and university

But when I first read about the Home Office’s plans to get rid of asylum seekers’ jewellery, my immediate thoughts went to the Nazis’ policies of confiscating Jewish people’s jewellery, artwork, houses, teeth and anything else valuable they had (as you write).

Yes, I realise the HO policy and the Nazi policies are VERY different in terms of their aims.

But the optics of this HO policy are really poorly designed and clumsy, and have really unpleasant echoes of the Nazis’ policy. It was the reference to jewellery and valuables that sparked the comparison for me.

Instead of welcoming people who have fled persecution or been displaced, we’re seizing their assets? It sounds very degrading and undignified.

I’m really concerned that no one at the HO seemed to consider these optics, and how the policy would come across, before Shabana Mahmood talked about it publicly.

Did anyone else here not see a parallel between these policies and the Nazis’ policies?

Happyjoe · 11/05/2026 15:22

Itchthescratch · 11/05/2026 11:11

The Danes are significantly richer than us. The UK's GDP per capita is only 60% of the Danish figure. This means they can afford to pay more tax and still take home more money than us (well over $4k a month versus just over $3k a month for UK workers).

It's understandable why the UK population are against paying more tax when their standard of living and purchasing power is already much lower. There is simply less money in the pot in the first place to redistribute through taxes. It's a completely different proposition.

Yes, it's not one I came up with, I was responding to someone saying how much better Denmark NHS was etc.

Thefastandthecurious5 · 11/05/2026 15:15

domenica1 · 11/05/2026 14:27

What about the rape of a young woman on Brighton beach by 3 asylum seekers? That’s just the most recent example I can think of.
you seem to be saying you’ve not come across evidence of lots of things, but many of these incidents are reported fairly regularly in the mainstream press.

Sorry - I’d not come across that. I’ve now looked it up. I’ve not yet come across any other gang rapes though.

Crocsarentslippers · 11/05/2026 15:13

ThisDandyWriter · 11/05/2026 08:25

Or listen to what the people of this country actually want? People do not (in general) want more illegal immigrants. They do not want their taxes going up at the same time as welfare spending going up whilst dealing with increased COL themselves.

Labour are not LISTENING.

They are LISTENING

They have made as many changes as they can in a short space of time to tackle this without breaking the law and within financial common sense.

It would of course help if, as a majority, the general public

  1. Knew what illegal immigration actual was
  2. Understood that the ludicrous Brexit has made it incredibly difficult to prevent small boats crossing as France has no need to work with us

Just because a bunch of ill informed shouty , racist bigots keep repeating ' Stop The Boats' , it doesn't mean that they will be any better equipped to solve the issue.

As for Welfare cuts, what people really mean is punish the poor and the sick because, hey, we are OK, why should we pay for other people?.

Itchthescratch · 11/05/2026 15:07

PrettyDamnCosmic · 11/05/2026 15:00

They are not prisons. This is a matter of fact not of opinion.

What is a place where the government detains people against their will called except a prison? You can call it a detention centre but it's still a prison.

You are wrong! Under your (wrong) definition then mental health units would also be defined as prisons when that is clearly nonsense.

Prisons have to contain people that have been convicted of a crime by definition. Detention Centres are basically processing centres. The profile of the type of people on each centre will be completely different.

SmashThePatriarchy · 11/05/2026 15:05

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 11/05/2026 14:49

It’s nothing to do with what the media presents her as - I listen to what she says and look at her behaviour. And it’s not good.

What has Nigel Farage smoking got to do with Angela? I’m quite sure he hasn’t been photographed in his undies floating around in a rubber dinghy sucking on a vape.

You look at how she is portrayed in the media. Do you think the media, in particular, certain sources of media are impartial and objective?

The thread is about her not listening and lots of people are throwing out the usual insults about her so I am drawing valid comparisons. I am sure Farage could have been photographed in the media in lots of uncompromising positions but he hasn’t been. He is a man of the people when he is photographed with his pint and cigarette. Rayner, because of her background (and a woman), is uncouth and uneducated.

BananaPeels · 11/05/2026 15:04

PrettyDamnCosmic · 11/05/2026 15:00

They are not prisons. This is a matter of fact not of opinion.

What is a place where the government detains people against their will called except a prison? You can call it a detention centre but it's still a prison.

I’m sorry but if I am fleeing war and persecution and the country I flee to tells me, in return for giving me asylum, that I have to stay full bed and board in a facility for a month or so whilst they process my claim - id say absolutely no problem. Completely understandable in the circumstances. I’d just be very relieved and grateful to be given the opportunity quite frankly.

PrettyDamnCosmic · 11/05/2026 15:00

Itchthescratch · 11/05/2026 14:55

They are not prisons. This is a matter of fact not of opinion.

Maybe Reform would only build the centres where the Greens have a large majority. This would undermine your argument somewhat.

They are not prisons. This is a matter of fact not of opinion.

What is a place where the government detains people against their will called except a prison? You can call it a detention centre but it's still a prison.

ThisDandyWriter · 11/05/2026 14:59

nixon1976 · 11/05/2026 12:51

You used the term 'an illegal.' Not 'an illegal immigrant' (which they aren't, by the way) but 'an illegal.'

Can you not see how that dehumanises people? Are you surprised PPs refer to you as racist when you use language like that?

He nicked my phone which caused me a huge amount of grief, plus all the other stuff he nicked off other people so I literally give no fucks if he feels dehumanised because I refer to him as an illegal rather than someone who came here illegally.

OP posts:
HelmholtzWatson · 11/05/2026 14:58

HappiestSleeping · 11/05/2026 12:18

They care about unskilled economic migrants abusing the asylum system

The unskilled economic migrants don't abuse the system though. They turn up, and they apply. Criteria are used to decide whether to grant asylum. They are actually following the process. If we don't like the criteria used, we should change it, but nobody is abusing the system.

If someone is claiming they are gay when they are not, or pretending to convert to Christianity when they are not, and they do this to stay here when they would otherwise not be entitled, then yes, they are abusing the system.

Itchthescratch · 11/05/2026 14:55

PrettyDamnCosmic · 11/05/2026 14:50

They are prisons & it's a quite extraordinary proposal that constituencies should be punished for electing a Green MP. A constituency with a 51%:49% Reform:Green vote won't get a migrant prison but a constituency with a 49%:51% Reform:Green vote will. A constituency could elect a Green on just 30% of the vote with the rest split Labour:LibDemReform 20%:21%:29% so even if 70% of the electorate vote against the Greens they would still get a migrant prison.

They are not prisons. This is a matter of fact not of opinion.

Maybe Reform would only build the centres where the Greens have a large majority. This would undermine your argument somewhat.

BananaPeels · 11/05/2026 14:54

PrettyDamnCosmic · 11/05/2026 14:50

They are prisons & it's a quite extraordinary proposal that constituencies should be punished for electing a Green MP. A constituency with a 51%:49% Reform:Green vote won't get a migrant prison but a constituency with a 49%:51% Reform:Green vote will. A constituency could elect a Green on just 30% of the vote with the rest split Labour:LibDemReform 20%:21%:29% so even if 70% of the electorate vote against the Greens they would still get a migrant prison.

What is wrong with a temporary ‘prison’ to process people who have arrived whilst it is established who they are? I find it absolutely baffling that public safety is not put ahead of everything. No one should be allowed to turn up, often undocumented, and allowed to freely roam a community. I am actually appalled this has been allowed to continue for so long.

PrettyDamnCosmic · 11/05/2026 14:50

Itchthescratch · 11/05/2026 14:42

They're not prisons though. They are centres to hold migrants whilst their claims are being processed. This is a very different prospect and there is clearly a significant proportion of Green voters that do not view asylum seekers or other kinds of immigrants as intrinsically 'bad' people to have around the lock community. This is hugely different to prisoners.

They are prisons & it's a quite extraordinary proposal that constituencies should be punished for electing a Green MP. A constituency with a 51%:49% Reform:Green vote won't get a migrant prison but a constituency with a 49%:51% Reform:Green vote will. A constituency could elect a Green on just 30% of the vote with the rest split Labour:LibDemReform 20%:21%:29% so even if 70% of the electorate vote against the Greens they would still get a migrant prison.

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 11/05/2026 14:49

SmashThePatriarchy · 11/05/2026 14:45

Farage is a big smoker. I am sure he could have been pictured in many scenarios looking less than “politician”. Have you ever wondered why the media presents a working class woman in that way and no one else? Everything you have said suggests it is all about her background too.

It’s nothing to do with what the media presents her as - I listen to what she says and look at her behaviour. And it’s not good.

What has Nigel Farage smoking got to do with Angela? I’m quite sure he hasn’t been photographed in his undies floating around in a rubber dinghy sucking on a vape.

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 11/05/2026 14:46

Lifeomars · 11/05/2026 14:41

Whereas Farage with his pint and his ciggie is a class act?

Where did I say that? This thread is about Angela Rayner - feel free to start one about Farage if you’re that interested.

SmashThePatriarchy · 11/05/2026 14:45

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 11/05/2026 14:37

It’s nothing to do with her background or education.

I don’t care about that but like PP, we listen to what comes out of her mouth now and it’s often tripe.

She behaves in a thuggish manner with little self control and would be an embarrassment to us on a world stage because of that. Nothing else.

Except maybe that awful picture of her vaping in a rubber dinghy.

Farage is a big smoker. I am sure he could have been pictured in many scenarios looking less than “politician”. Have you ever wondered why the media presents a working class woman in that way and no one else? Everything you have said suggests it is all about her background too.

StarlightLady · 11/05/2026 14:44

Lifeomars · 11/05/2026 14:41

Whereas Farage with his pint and his ciggie is a class act?

Don’t worry about that, with his track record he won’t show up for anything!

Itchthescratch · 11/05/2026 14:42

PrettyDamnCosmic · 11/05/2026 14:36

It can never be fair. Public construction projects are often given to constituencies as a usual part of pork barrel politics e.g. the Humber bridge but punishing constituencies for not voting for Reform UK Party Ltd by constructing prisons is a very novel disincentive & eminently subject to judicial review.

They're not prisons though. They are centres to hold migrants whilst their claims are being processed. This is a very different prospect and there is clearly a significant proportion of Green voters that do not view asylum seekers or other kinds of immigrants as intrinsically 'bad' people to have around the lock community. This is hugely different to prisoners.

Lifeomars · 11/05/2026 14:41

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 11/05/2026 14:37

It’s nothing to do with her background or education.

I don’t care about that but like PP, we listen to what comes out of her mouth now and it’s often tripe.

She behaves in a thuggish manner with little self control and would be an embarrassment to us on a world stage because of that. Nothing else.

Except maybe that awful picture of her vaping in a rubber dinghy.

Whereas Farage with his pint and his ciggie is a class act?

Tryagain26 · 11/05/2026 14:39

Why should she talk about issues that are not actually going to make people's lives better? And issues she doesn't believe in. The media hype and rhetoric from Reform has made those things into big issues.
For the record though immigration is falling and the UK may actually have negative net migration by next year.
And the welfare bill is also reducing. But if we want to live in a caring society where vulnerable people are supported then we have to accept that welfare costs will always be high. Incidentally over half of the welfare bill goes on pensioners either through the state pension or pension credit with an aging population that isn't going to get smaller and almost 39% of benefits go to those in work.

Also to note more people voted for progressive parties than voted for Reform.

Lifeomars · 11/05/2026 14:39

BananaPeels · 11/05/2026 13:52

Right but so what? Even if they do, the people in those areas should be saying no problem , we welcome you. Why would any government want to put them in an area that doesn’t want one? You have said you would be happy to have one so what’s the issue. What cause problems where there aren’t any. Those who wish to have one can volunteer. Those are going to be, most likely, areas where these is a Green majority.

Where did I say I would "be happy to have one"? I said that I live in an area with a high number of immigrants and that this was not an issue for me in response to your assertion that I saw living alongside immigrants as a punishment. These proposed centres are being touted by Reform as a negative thing hence the intention to put them in non Reform supporting areas. Aside from the fact that this won't happen or if it does it will be a very much watered down version . I mentioned this whole thing because I feel it is a good example of the negativity of Reform, What are their plans for education, for the NHS, how are they intending to address the housing crisis, student loans, the terrible pollution of our waterways, the ever increasing cost of food and fuel? The country is in a real mess and I fail to see how it is all caused by the small boats.

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 11/05/2026 14:37

SmashThePatriarchy · 11/05/2026 12:36

What a patronisingly classist response. A one that always pops up with Rayner. Just because someone doesn’t have a PPR degree from Oxbridge it doesn’t mean they don’t understand wider societal issues.

It’s nothing to do with her background or education.

I don’t care about that but like PP, we listen to what comes out of her mouth now and it’s often tripe.

She behaves in a thuggish manner with little self control and would be an embarrassment to us on a world stage because of that. Nothing else.

Except maybe that awful picture of her vaping in a rubber dinghy.

PrettyDamnCosmic · 11/05/2026 14:36

Itchthescratch · 11/05/2026 14:31

Maybe they could work in descending order, building detention centres first in those areas with the largest Green majority? Would this be fair?

It can never be fair. Public construction projects are often given to constituencies as a usual part of pork barrel politics e.g. the Humber bridge but punishing constituencies for not voting for Reform UK Party Ltd by constructing prisons is a very novel disincentive & eminently subject to judicial review.

Swipe left for the next trending thread