Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Does labour want to make itself unelectable ?

60 replies

glasslightly · 10/05/2026 17:46

The country has ‘spoken’, even if you consider it a protest vote for Reform. It’s clear that hard left politics are not popular. Fair enough if that’s your committed political philosophy but if you’re a member of the Labour Party and your job/ any shred of political influence you want rest on any form of political clout, surely you don’t aim for a new hard left leadership ?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
acourtofmistandfury · 11/05/2026 09:23

Safarisagoody · 11/05/2026 07:37

It’s not. I understand though if you’re a hard core supporter why it is annoying to hear, but you’d have to be deaf dumb and blind, whilst living under a rock to not know.

It is. It’s exactly what reform wants you to think though so that people don’t vote for them

EasternStandard · 11/05/2026 09:19

tobee · 11/05/2026 00:07

Ooh look! It’s another non serious thread where the op makes ludicrous claims and then fucks off. 🙄

Idk about the op coming back but Labour are making themselves more unelectable, as seen by the results last week.

Safarisagoody · 11/05/2026 07:37

acourtofmistandfury · 11/05/2026 07:36

This is bollocks

It’s not. I understand though if you’re a hard core supporter why it is annoying to hear, but you’d have to be deaf dumb and blind, whilst living under a rock to not know.

acourtofmistandfury · 11/05/2026 07:36

Safarisagoody · 11/05/2026 07:36

It’s done op. They are already unelectable, they can’t come back from this. They will limp on till the next election, I would predict two more leaders in that time. Then it will be reform and Tory as the two parties.

there are some real hard core Labour supporters on here, where no matter how bad it gets, someone up thread even tried to claim they’ve only been in power for a year, it’s two years in July.

Edited

This is bollocks

Safarisagoody · 11/05/2026 07:36

It’s done op. They are already unelectable, they can’t come back from this. They will limp on till the next election, I would predict two more leaders in that time. Then it will be reform and Tory as the two parties.

there are some real hard core Labour supporters on here, where no matter how bad it gets, someone up thread even tried to claim they’ve only been in power for a year, it’s two years in July.

5128gap · 11/05/2026 07:31

mellongoose · 11/05/2026 05:24

What a sorry picture you paint.

To take just your first point; you want all these people languishing on benefits, rather than having a society with a variety and abundance of jobs for all ages, experience and ability?

Invest in employers. They are not ‘ the rich’. They are the key to unlocking the doom spiral.

No, I don't want people languishing on benefits. I want to see all those capable of work in decently paid jobs that dont require benefits to top up to a level people can live on, with robust legislation that prevents them being discriminated against and exploited.
I'd like to see jobs adjusted so ill and disabled people who feel they can work are enabled to.
I'd like to see all those who have or chose to rent have the opportunity of social housing, and where private renting is necessary, strict requirements for landlords, and rent caps so the tax payer doesn't have to subsidise rents.
Because you can spout any unevidenced nonsense you like about what WC people want. Common sense tells you the absolute basics are enough money to live on, a secure roof over their head, and fair treatment in return for their labour.
At the moment many don't have these things. Rents are too high, wages too low.
So either employers and landlords take the necessary hits to square the circle, or the tax payer needs to keep digging deep to fill the gap between what people can afford and the profit other people want to make from them.

Hallamule · 11/05/2026 05:30

mumofoneAloneandwell · 10/05/2026 18:27

Oh excuse me, 2 years**

Still, sorry, what people are protest voting reform for, bar immigration i dont know

Labour havent done anything remotely left wing

The renters reform bill was fairly left wing (and a good thing imo). Same with lifting the 2 child cap.

mellongoose · 11/05/2026 05:24

5128gap · 10/05/2026 22:28

I'd be amazed if people living on benefits don't want more money. There are millions of people who are ill, disabled, carers, who can barely make ends meet, pay their bills and eat without using foodbanks. Why would they not want more?
Similarly who living in a rented property doesn't want rights that give them more security, ensures the property is kept in good order and restricts extortionate rent increases?
And if everyone wants private landlords, it begs the question why the lists for affordable not for profit social housing are so long?
I can't imagine anyone with a job without much autonomy and authority who doesn't want protection from employers who might otherwise exploit or discriminate against them.
I trust you have evidence for your confident assertions to the contrary?

What a sorry picture you paint.

To take just your first point; you want all these people languishing on benefits, rather than having a society with a variety and abundance of jobs for all ages, experience and ability?

Invest in employers. They are not ‘ the rich’. They are the key to unlocking the doom spiral.

Villanousvillans · 11/05/2026 00:11

Gosh, the political threads on here degenerate very quickly.

tobee · 11/05/2026 00:07

Ooh look! It’s another non serious thread where the op makes ludicrous claims and then fucks off. 🙄

5128gap · 10/05/2026 22:28

Bunnyofhope · 10/05/2026 21:15

Working class people don't want this. They are not lame ducks. They don't want more benefits or more job security or renters rights. They are not charity cases. Those things are what Labour want to give them.
They want the opportunity to thrive. They want employers who make enough money to recruit. They want private landlords so they can have the option of cheap and not very cheerful or something better. They don't want net zero. They don't care about hereditary peers or private schools or nationalised railways. Labour care about those things. They don't care about immigrants but they want a level playing field. They don't want benefits being given to people who won't work or have just rocked up in the UK. They don't want to hear patronising bollocks about flags, Palestine or cross dressers.
They want small government. As we can very well see from how they have voted.

I'd be amazed if people living on benefits don't want more money. There are millions of people who are ill, disabled, carers, who can barely make ends meet, pay their bills and eat without using foodbanks. Why would they not want more?
Similarly who living in a rented property doesn't want rights that give them more security, ensures the property is kept in good order and restricts extortionate rent increases?
And if everyone wants private landlords, it begs the question why the lists for affordable not for profit social housing are so long?
I can't imagine anyone with a job without much autonomy and authority who doesn't want protection from employers who might otherwise exploit or discriminate against them.
I trust you have evidence for your confident assertions to the contrary?

Theolittle · 10/05/2026 22:19

The welfare bill is mostly pensions. It’s going up because of he triple lock and because the pensioner to worker ratio is growing year on year and has been for decades

SisterTeatime · 10/05/2026 22:14

we have the highest energy prices in Europe, they u-turned on WFA, the messaging is all wrong and it’s not good enough to say ‘sorry, you’ll have to pay more until we decide supplies are stable’ - it may be true it may not but they are going about it in an incredibly annoying way.

I rate Wes Streeting but honestly, I don’t feel grateful about any of this stuff.

I blame austerity for a great many of the problems we face today, but I am sorry, a welfare bill that is higher than income tax is appalling and - self-evidently - unsustainable.

The employment reforms are like something designed for 30 years ago. The rent reforms may have a positive outcome once things have shaken down, which could take some time. However I don’t believe these reforms were needed or wanted.

I agree with pp who said that they insist on inflicting things on people that people don’t necessarily want.

Theolittle · 10/05/2026 21:35

SisterTeatime · 10/05/2026 20:47

Employment reforms and rent reforms are going to have a lot of negative consequences.

The right wing press is having a field day with Miliband’s energy stuff and we’re all paying through the nose for energy.

They are dragging their feet disgracefully on the Supreme Court ruling, it’s an insult to women and girls, Harriet Harman is the horrible icing on that particularly unpalatable cake.

The NHS is in many ways unfixable by any government and giving it more funding simply produces a different set of negative headlines than not funding it. It isn’t possible to disguise the fact that it needs structural reform -
i dont blame this govt but they don’t get credit from voters for a bit more funding.

The u-turns, the tone-deafness, the lack of preparation in opposition, the all-round crapness of this government is plain to see.

The fact that they think we just need to be told
again what a good job they’re doing and then we’ll understand really demonstrates how incredibly hard they’re not listening to the country.

Edited

Labour have made lots of changes meankng long term support for social housing providers

wes steering has kicked off major reform including plans to abolish nhs England, women’s health reforms, pefoemance based incentives, cutting bureaucracy, building neighbourhood health centres

Energy prices won’t come down in any meaningful way until we have energy security and wean off fossil fuels

The outcome of rent reforms and employment reforms remains to be seen

They can’t fix the country overnight, the problems are immense. People expect too much and the hugely mostly right wing press give them no quarter, all they want is tax cuts for their wealthy owners

Who else can fix the country 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️. Right wing austerity has not created growth and has left the UK a basket case. Fecking Farage has all the signs of being the UK Trump and just lining pockets of the super rich

EasternStandard · 10/05/2026 21:33

Theolittle · 10/05/2026 21:21

And of course your personal views reflect the whole uk population 🤷‍♀️. Or are you just talking about the 26% that voted reform?

Labour didn’t just lose votes to one party.

Lougle · 10/05/2026 21:30

MandingoAteMyBaby · 10/05/2026 18:33

And in that 2 years they have achieved:

  • Settled major public sector pay disputes, including junior doctors, reducing strike action across parts of the NHS and public sector
  • Increased NHS funding commitments and achieved modest reductions in waiting lists from post-pandemic peaks
  • Introduced the Employment Rights Bill with stronger protections on dismissal, sick pay, zero-hours contracts and union rights
  • Advanced renters’ reform legislation including abolition of Section 21 “no-fault” evictions in England
  • Introduced planning reforms aimed at accelerating infrastructure and housebuilding
  • Set a target to deliver 1.5 million homes during the parliament
  • Began rail renationalisation by legislating to bring passenger services into public ownership as contracts expire
  • Created Great British Energy as a publicly owned clean energy investment company
  • Expanded support for renewable energy, grid upgrades, nuclear power and carbon capture projects
  • Set a goal for a largely clean electricity system by 2030
  • Created a National Wealth Fund intended to support industrial and infrastructure investment
  • Announced major investment plans for apprenticeships, technical training and manufacturing skills
  • Provided more multi-year funding settlements for government departments and public services
  • Passed legislation removing hereditary peers from the House of Lords
  • Improved diplomatic and operational relations with the EU compared with the post-Brexit period
  • Scrapped the Rwanda asylum deportation scheme
  • Increased focus on organised people-smuggling gangs and cross-border enforcement cooperation
  • Launched a new statutory national inquiry into grooming gangs and institutional failures relating to child sexual exploitation
  • Tightened planning rules around stalled development sites and some green belt areas near transport hubs
  • Accelerated approvals for nationally significant infrastructure and energy projects
  • Expanded state-led industrial strategy in areas including AI, energy and advanced manufacturing
  • Maintained strong support for Ukraine and NATO commitments
  • Increased defence spending commitments and emphasis on domestic defence manufacturing
  • Introduced breakfast club expansion plans for primary schools
  • Expanded childcare and school support commitments
  • Began reform work on NHS digitisation and procurement processes
  • Re-established more regular engagement structures with business groups and trade unions
  • Committed additional investment into regional transport outside London, including buses and rail
  • Strengthened enforcement plans around water company pollution and sewage discharges
  • Advanced industrial strategy work tied to decarbonisation and energy security
  • Introduced legislation to strengthen regulation of football club ownership and governance
  • Expanded powers and resources targeting retail crime and antisocial behaviour
  • Reversed some restrictions on onshore wind development in England
  • Approved or accelerated several large renewable and energy infrastructure projects
  • Increased cooperation with European partners on defence, migration and trade matters
  • Introduced measures intended to speed up asylum decision processing
  • Increased funding commitments for affordable and social housing programmes
  • Established Skills England to coordinate national skills strategy and workforce planning
  • Announced reforms intended to simplify planning for major infrastructure projects
  • Strengthened commitments around AI regulation, AI safety and sovereign compute capacity
  • Increased support commitments for semiconductor, battery and clean technology industries

Eg fucking LOADS.

The difficulty I have, is that DD2 asked me what the different parties stand for. I took her to each party website and tried to show her as neutrally as possible, what they were saying. Labour's site doesn't actually say what they will do. When you click on their 'change' headings, it just leads you back to what they've done. I've since found the manifesto which outlines plans, but their home page doesn't point to it clearly.

Theolittle · 10/05/2026 21:21

WellErrr · 10/05/2026 17:55

I find it unbelievable that Starmer’s response was - ‘the public have spoken, and they are unhappy with the pace of change.’

Er, nope, that’s not it. Try again!

Next effort - ‘we are going to strengthen ties with Europe, and renew the scheme for youngsters to travel freely here for work.’

Even worse Starmer, that is literally no one’s priority and no one asked for that. Have one more go!

<wheels out Gordon Brown and Harriet Harman>

I mean, you couldn’t write it.

And of course your personal views reflect the whole uk population 🤷‍♀️. Or are you just talking about the 26% that voted reform?

acourtofmistandfury · 10/05/2026 21:16

Bunnyofhope · 10/05/2026 21:15

Working class people don't want this. They are not lame ducks. They don't want more benefits or more job security or renters rights. They are not charity cases. Those things are what Labour want to give them.
They want the opportunity to thrive. They want employers who make enough money to recruit. They want private landlords so they can have the option of cheap and not very cheerful or something better. They don't want net zero. They don't care about hereditary peers or private schools or nationalised railways. Labour care about those things. They don't care about immigrants but they want a level playing field. They don't want benefits being given to people who won't work or have just rocked up in the UK. They don't want to hear patronising bollocks about flags, Palestine or cross dressers.
They want small government. As we can very well see from how they have voted.

Who are you to say what working class people want?

Bunnyofhope · 10/05/2026 21:15

MandingoAteMyBaby · 10/05/2026 18:33

And in that 2 years they have achieved:

  • Settled major public sector pay disputes, including junior doctors, reducing strike action across parts of the NHS and public sector
  • Increased NHS funding commitments and achieved modest reductions in waiting lists from post-pandemic peaks
  • Introduced the Employment Rights Bill with stronger protections on dismissal, sick pay, zero-hours contracts and union rights
  • Advanced renters’ reform legislation including abolition of Section 21 “no-fault” evictions in England
  • Introduced planning reforms aimed at accelerating infrastructure and housebuilding
  • Set a target to deliver 1.5 million homes during the parliament
  • Began rail renationalisation by legislating to bring passenger services into public ownership as contracts expire
  • Created Great British Energy as a publicly owned clean energy investment company
  • Expanded support for renewable energy, grid upgrades, nuclear power and carbon capture projects
  • Set a goal for a largely clean electricity system by 2030
  • Created a National Wealth Fund intended to support industrial and infrastructure investment
  • Announced major investment plans for apprenticeships, technical training and manufacturing skills
  • Provided more multi-year funding settlements for government departments and public services
  • Passed legislation removing hereditary peers from the House of Lords
  • Improved diplomatic and operational relations with the EU compared with the post-Brexit period
  • Scrapped the Rwanda asylum deportation scheme
  • Increased focus on organised people-smuggling gangs and cross-border enforcement cooperation
  • Launched a new statutory national inquiry into grooming gangs and institutional failures relating to child sexual exploitation
  • Tightened planning rules around stalled development sites and some green belt areas near transport hubs
  • Accelerated approvals for nationally significant infrastructure and energy projects
  • Expanded state-led industrial strategy in areas including AI, energy and advanced manufacturing
  • Maintained strong support for Ukraine and NATO commitments
  • Increased defence spending commitments and emphasis on domestic defence manufacturing
  • Introduced breakfast club expansion plans for primary schools
  • Expanded childcare and school support commitments
  • Began reform work on NHS digitisation and procurement processes
  • Re-established more regular engagement structures with business groups and trade unions
  • Committed additional investment into regional transport outside London, including buses and rail
  • Strengthened enforcement plans around water company pollution and sewage discharges
  • Advanced industrial strategy work tied to decarbonisation and energy security
  • Introduced legislation to strengthen regulation of football club ownership and governance
  • Expanded powers and resources targeting retail crime and antisocial behaviour
  • Reversed some restrictions on onshore wind development in England
  • Approved or accelerated several large renewable and energy infrastructure projects
  • Increased cooperation with European partners on defence, migration and trade matters
  • Introduced measures intended to speed up asylum decision processing
  • Increased funding commitments for affordable and social housing programmes
  • Established Skills England to coordinate national skills strategy and workforce planning
  • Announced reforms intended to simplify planning for major infrastructure projects
  • Strengthened commitments around AI regulation, AI safety and sovereign compute capacity
  • Increased support commitments for semiconductor, battery and clean technology industries

Eg fucking LOADS.

Working class people don't want this. They are not lame ducks. They don't want more benefits or more job security or renters rights. They are not charity cases. Those things are what Labour want to give them.
They want the opportunity to thrive. They want employers who make enough money to recruit. They want private landlords so they can have the option of cheap and not very cheerful or something better. They don't want net zero. They don't care about hereditary peers or private schools or nationalised railways. Labour care about those things. They don't care about immigrants but they want a level playing field. They don't want benefits being given to people who won't work or have just rocked up in the UK. They don't want to hear patronising bollocks about flags, Palestine or cross dressers.
They want small government. As we can very well see from how they have voted.

Isthisacondition · 10/05/2026 21:04

@Eviebeans that's what they promised and to tread lightly on our lives.
Everything is just worse.

Isthisacondition · 10/05/2026 21:00

@OfTheirOwn many councils in some areas has been hit with undocumented unprecedented immigration that no budgets accounted for .
Re Blair era. .then we got the global credit crisis.
Then apprently the EU wanted austerity?

Anyway I agree op it's awful how much further do they think they can push us with this utter nonsense.

Eviebeans · 10/05/2026 20:53

I would really like to see an objective audit of how all that was promised by the Labour Party at the beginning is working.
How many houses that were promised have been built
How many breakfast clubs/extended childcare settings are still up and running
Smashing the gangs/cutting migration - how is that panning out?

It is very easy to make promises but it only counts if they keep their word and see it through
We don’t want change for changes sake we want to see improvement in our everyday life
We haven’t got time to wait and see while they conjure up their next big thing

SisterTeatime · 10/05/2026 20:47

Employment reforms and rent reforms are going to have a lot of negative consequences.

The right wing press is having a field day with Miliband’s energy stuff and we’re all paying through the nose for energy.

They are dragging their feet disgracefully on the Supreme Court ruling, it’s an insult to women and girls, Harriet Harman is the horrible icing on that particularly unpalatable cake.

The NHS is in many ways unfixable by any government and giving it more funding simply produces a different set of negative headlines than not funding it. It isn’t possible to disguise the fact that it needs structural reform -
i dont blame this govt but they don’t get credit from voters for a bit more funding.

The u-turns, the tone-deafness, the lack of preparation in opposition, the all-round crapness of this government is plain to see.

The fact that they think we just need to be told
again what a good job they’re doing and then we’ll understand really demonstrates how incredibly hard they’re not listening to the country.

Vivienne1000 · 10/05/2026 20:39

OfTheirOwn · 10/05/2026 20:31

But that isn’t only in the last two years.
Austerity instilled by a Conservative government left such big cuts. My LA had to save millions £3-4,5) year on year. They did that by cutting services (and then having to out source to the private sector when there was no service left to meet statutory responsibilities, shareholders love it! )

Benefit claimants who can work, mortgage rises - all been happening for much longer than the Labour tenure.

Mortgage rates were very low until the famous mini budget…. That was part of the Tories downfall.

mikemag · 10/05/2026 20:35

@MandingoAteMyBaby Your list is directly from Labour Party handouts.
Nearly everything on that list will need extra tax to finance it. Many items are not needed. That bollocks phrase about decarbonising the energy industry. We do not need to do it so quickly. It is pointless ideology. The extra carbon tax is going to destroy jobs in the glass industry because other countries do not pay it. Cheaper to import empty beer bottles from abroad than make them in Britain. How mad is that?
The PM who promised us growth is going to close down another industry.