Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

What would you do if you got a copy of someone else’s confidential GP records

230 replies

Twinkletoesandspaghettios · 09/05/2026 23:09

No poll just wondering exactly what you would do?

The summary care report was in with mine and had name, address, DOB, full medical history including details on social services and CAMHS involvement

OP posts:
DungareesTrombonesDinos · 10/05/2026 06:52

I work in the NHS and I would have to report this as an incident and it would be thoroughly investigated. The person who's files were shared with you would receive an apology and they would be free to make a complaint as this is a serious data breach.

I would hope the GP would be following a similar procedure.

Serenitymummy · 10/05/2026 06:49

I know you've dealt with it now, but I actually think the best thing here would just have been to shred it and not tell anybody. I wouldn't want someone getting in trouble for what was probably an accident/oversight. We've all made mistakes

Waitingforthesunnydays · 10/05/2026 06:42

Firstly I would read it

Daffodilsinthespring · 10/05/2026 06:41

Bellasmellsofwee · 09/05/2026 23:26

Phew, so they got away with it then. Yeah; I bet the GP was very grateful.

I know that’s sarky of me, but this is how the NHS gets away with shit like this, people don’t make them take any responsibility.

Edited

They did not get away with it. I work in a surgery. I would need to report the breech, investigate how it happened, have an internal enquiry, discuss with all staff, maybe bring in new policies, retrain all staff and inform the other patient, fully document everything plus lots of other things.

The OPs mistake was informing the gp when it should have been the practice manager. The gp could choose to say nothing.

ValenciaOrangeJawline · 10/05/2026 06:32

EmeraldShamrock000 · 09/05/2026 23:35

It happens more than you think. Let them know about the error and return the paperwork.
Not ideal, but it is a human error.
I wouldn’t report above calling the office.

Edited

That’s not OK, and “human error” is never a valid root cause of an error.

There is always, always an underlying cause, be it incompetence, negligence, or more likely poor systems of work/inadequate checking processes etc.

I hope you are not one of my NHS colleagues.

Dazedanddiscombobulated · 10/05/2026 06:28

msbevvy · 10/05/2026 05:54

You might not want to be told but the person whose informed was leaked might have thought differently. In your place I would have sent the document to them and let them decide what to do.

I would be very uncomfortable with a total stranger contacting me with my confidential personal data. I would want it returned to the data controller for them to manage it, I wouldn’t want Joe Bloggs from three roads over calling me up or turning up at my house with it.

DallasMajor · 10/05/2026 06:27

PhaedraTwo · 10/05/2026 01:55

It's a huge data breach. Why do you think there is legislation about this? Why do you think the Information Commissioner's Office exists?

It is not a huge data breach and the ICO wouldn't be interested.

If they were, can you begin to imagine how many people would have to work for them if they investigated every single human error?

auserna · 10/05/2026 06:27

Thatsanotherfinemess1 · 09/05/2026 23:27

This happened to us, we were sent a child's health records several times, despite contacting the hospital each time as our address was similar and the postcode was the same. Was very difficult as the child was in care, at our local school, and was being treated for an incurable and transmissible disease (think hepatitis/hiv seriousness ) which wasn't disclosed. Obviously we didn't say a word but I was always worried in case another child contacted it from a playground accident

Several times?! That is utterly appalling.

SparklyGlitterballs · 10/05/2026 06:27

Twinkletoesandspaghettios · 09/05/2026 23:23

So I called the GP surgery and the doctor called me back (not a recorded line as I specifically asked). I explained what happened and I will admit I did say “I haven’t shared this with anyone and I will not report it to the ICO but I some internal training so this doesn’t happen again maybe in order” I then left the records back in a sealed envelope half an hour later marked for the attention of the GP.

I don’t think they reported it as the GP was extremely grateful for how I had let her know.

It’s such an easy mistake to make. If it were my records (provided it didn’t end up online or copies being made) and it was handed back to the surgery I wouldn’t even want to be told

Well they were lucky that they sent them in error to someone honest who didn't report them. What if it were your records and they had been sent to someone with no moral compass who then either shared them around or used your private data to try and defraud you? Things like this need reporting to try and prevent it happening again.

Dazedanddiscombobulated · 10/05/2026 06:24

ThePieceHall · 09/05/2026 23:59

No, this has happened to me. I was delighted that I found out. Equally, I was the recipient of another family’s highly confidential information (Child Protection report). I handed it over to them at their home as it had their address on; their solicitor was very pleased. I hope the family was compensated appropriately by children’s social care. I flagged it up to the local authority’s information officer; I was bombarded with emails asking if I had destroyed the document. I realised that all they were concerned about was not having to report the breach to the ICO. Not about any potential distress or shame to the family. Apparently, if you can demonstrate that any breaches have been mitigated, then it’s not reportable. Sod that. Children and families deserve better.

That’s not quite right. It’s reportable if there’s a likelihood of harm to the individual(s) rights and freedoms as a result of the breach.

In @Twinkletoesandspaghettios case, as the recipient of the breached data has voluntarily returned the information promptly, the GP surgery is likely to make an assessment that the breach is limited and contained and therefore not reportable. They still have to take action internally to prevent it happening again.

Soontobe60 · 10/05/2026 06:23

alexandrasm · 10/05/2026 00:08

It absolutely did. He still has the emails to prove it.

House deeds don’t exist in paper format anymore. There’s absolutely no break in confidentiality in sending someone an old paper copy of house deeds, as all such paper copies are available online to anyone who wants to pay £4 to download them.
It definitely didn’t happen!

Soontobe60 · 10/05/2026 06:16

Thatsanotherfinemess1 · 09/05/2026 23:27

This happened to us, we were sent a child's health records several times, despite contacting the hospital each time as our address was similar and the postcode was the same. Was very difficult as the child was in care, at our local school, and was being treated for an incurable and transmissible disease (think hepatitis/hiv seriousness ) which wasn't disclosed. Obviously we didn't say a word but I was always worried in case another child contacted it from a playground accident

The only way you could have known about the medical status would be if you opened the envelope which would have had the child’s name on it and read the contents. That’s actually illegal.

Soontobe60 · 10/05/2026 06:12

I’m not sure how this could have happened. Someone at the surgery would have had to go through all your records to print them off or photocopy them before sending them to you. So it means that a substantial amount of someone’s records had been filed within your records. If that had happened, surely the surgery would have already been in contact with you to follow up those records when they were received at the surgery?

ChocolateCinderToffee · 10/05/2026 06:11

There are some horrible, self-righteous and vindictive people on here. None of you ever make a mistake, then?

And to the NHS-bashers, do you really think things like this don’t happen in the private sector?

msbevvy · 10/05/2026 05:54

Twinkletoesandspaghettios · 09/05/2026 23:23

So I called the GP surgery and the doctor called me back (not a recorded line as I specifically asked). I explained what happened and I will admit I did say “I haven’t shared this with anyone and I will not report it to the ICO but I some internal training so this doesn’t happen again maybe in order” I then left the records back in a sealed envelope half an hour later marked for the attention of the GP.

I don’t think they reported it as the GP was extremely grateful for how I had let her know.

It’s such an easy mistake to make. If it were my records (provided it didn’t end up online or copies being made) and it was handed back to the surgery I wouldn’t even want to be told

You might not want to be told but the person whose informed was leaked might have thought differently. In your place I would have sent the document to them and let them decide what to do.

MrsVBS · 10/05/2026 04:47

Call the office that sent it they’ll need to complete a Datix if it’s NHS and they’ll either ask you to shred it or return to the office.

bigboykitty · 10/05/2026 04:44

CanSeeClearlyNowTheRainHasGone · 10/05/2026 03:28

A huge data breach would require 000's of records to be compromised, and generally requires that leakage to be digital.

It's a minor cock-up.

When you talk about ICO and need for serious investigation etc, you also need to think of being proportionate.

Have you ever thought that the NHS is struggling and that the nett effect of such an action for a single data record would affect the availability of services to other patients.

It is neither a huge data breach nor a minor cock up. To accidentally release a patient's entire patient record with full personal and sensitive information is more than a cock up. It's much more serious than accidentally picking up an extra letter from the printer and putting it in the envelope to the wrong patient.

BizzyLizzyDooDah · 10/05/2026 04:33

alexandrasm · 09/05/2026 23:56

Because they could’ve ended up being reported to the ICO and facing some pretty awful punishments. Think the other guy got compensation too

Of all the things that didn't happen this didn't happen the most!!

CanSeeClearlyNowTheRainHasGone · 10/05/2026 03:28

PhaedraTwo · 10/05/2026 01:55

It's a huge data breach. Why do you think there is legislation about this? Why do you think the Information Commissioner's Office exists?

A huge data breach would require 000's of records to be compromised, and generally requires that leakage to be digital.

It's a minor cock-up.

When you talk about ICO and need for serious investigation etc, you also need to think of being proportionate.

Have you ever thought that the NHS is struggling and that the nett effect of such an action for a single data record would affect the availability of services to other patients.

CanSeeClearlyNowTheRainHasGone · 10/05/2026 03:22

ColdAsAWitches · 10/05/2026 00:44

"Because before the digital days, written house deeds were proof of ownership"

But you said he still has the emails, so this isn't from a pre-digital time! There's no way a bank wrote off a 50k loan AND gave compensation for accidentally sending a set of deeds. Banks don't throw away that kind of money as a thank you!

There was a time when emails existed but before Land Registry went digital, and even then properties were only registered as and when they were sold/mortgaged.

That said, the only way this story even remotely works is if the chap in question effectively blackmailed the bank for the return of the deeds.

MsAmerica · 10/05/2026 02:53

I'm not familiar with the terms - I gather it's medical records?

I'd want to send it to the head of the office with a tart suggestion that the staff be more careful.

PhaedraTwo · 10/05/2026 01:57

AllTheChaos · 10/05/2026 00:08

That’s not how it works, I’m afraid he told you a porkie. A fine isn’t issued just because of an error. Systematic errors, failure of procedures, lack of adequate procedures, ongoing inadequate security, inadequate training, basically things other than human error, would be needed to mean a fine was possible, unless that human error had resulted in pretty damned serious harm. Especially if this was pre-GDPR enforcement, when the ICO was fairly toothless.

Indeed - that really isn't how it works.

LBFseBrom · 10/05/2026 01:55

Give or send it back to the surgery. What else would you do for goodness sake? You don't need it.

PhaedraTwo · 10/05/2026 01:55

Twinkletoesandspaghettios · 09/05/2026 23:36

It was probably a stressed out receptionist who accidently fired it in a brown envelope. Yes not ideal but with all the ridiculous pressure GP surgeries are under do they really need the ballache of dealing with an admin error?

I have no doubt the GPS will have highlighted it and changed the practice so it doesn’t happen again going forward but what would reporting it actually achieve?

Edited

It's a huge data breach. Why do you think there is legislation about this? Why do you think the Information Commissioner's Office exists?

Zanatdy · 10/05/2026 01:45

They should report it as a potential breach for ICO to investigate. Would I personally report it? No.

Swipe left for the next trending thread