Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

So what can in practical terms fully halt illegal immigration?

662 replies

Wellwhatnowbellaboo · 09/05/2026 10:06

Reform has won by a landslide .... immigration is probably by the look of it the biggest issue. What can realistically without breaking laws be done to really halt this with a big impact ? What would Farage actually do ? Would and should we as a country break some laws to get this done and speak to what people really feel is an issue ? (Many countries do). This is not in labour's dna so I doubt anything will come if it now ... but if you've thought about it or you have solutions what are they ?
And if you are opposed- why and what's the answer ?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
Allisnotlost1 · 10/05/2026 15:53

WilfredsPies · 10/05/2026 15:44

I don’t know why you can’t understand why I said 2018 rather than the handful of arrivals several years earlier, so there we are then.

If you want a discussion, or a debate, then fine. But if you just want a row over something ridiculous, then go and pick a fight with someone else. I’m not interested.

The only person picking a fight here is you. It was a minor point that you’ve now quoted me on three times. I can understand why you chose to say 2018, but if you cite something that immediately contradicts you, you’re not going to persuade people who don’t know/agree. Hopefully you can calm down and understand why facts are important on a subject where many don’t grasp them. 2018 is not factual.

WilfredsPies · 10/05/2026 15:44

Allisnotlost1 · 10/05/2026 15:36

For the (2nd, 3rd?) time, at least get your numbers right when criticising others. I don’t know what’s complicated about it.

Edited

I don’t know why you can’t understand why I said 2018 rather than the handful of arrivals several years earlier, so there we are then.

If you want a discussion, or a debate, then fine. But if you just want a row over something ridiculous, then go and pick a fight with someone else. I’m not interested.

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · 10/05/2026 15:39

Tryagain26 · 09/05/2026 11:32

I read a post online saying "With luck we will wake up on Friday with Nigel Farage in number 10.'
The level of ignorance about our political system amazes me.
I am beginning to think there is no hope for the UK.

I read a post online saying "With luck we will wake up on Friday with Nigel Farage in number 10.'
Surely they were trolling?! That's just too depressing to think otherwise 😭😂

Allisnotlost1 · 10/05/2026 15:36

WilfredsPies · 10/05/2026 15:12

So why are you being so argumentative about a point that you don’t even disagree with?

For the (2nd, 3rd?) time, at least get your numbers right when criticising others. I don’t know what’s complicated about it.

Allseeingallknowing · 10/05/2026 15:21

HobGobblynne · 10/05/2026 14:55

PIP Is for the most life impacting conditions. Of course it makes sense that the majority aren’t in work. It’s not a gotcha.

I’ve heard discussions where some say most who get pip are in work. Obviously don’t do their research.,

WilfredsPies · 10/05/2026 15:12

Allisnotlost1 · 10/05/2026 14:43

At no point did I say it was Brexit.

So why are you being so argumentative about a point that you don’t even disagree with?

ElfAndSafetyBored · 10/05/2026 15:11

I just read the Reform policy on small boats and while I can see ‘No more free housing’ will attract voters, there’s no obvious plan behind that. What will they do with asylum seekers? Just leave them out in a back yard?

’No more benefits’ - fine but how will we clothe and feed them? Let them starve in the clothes they arrived in?

I know something needs to be done but Reform are not the answer.

There must be some adults somewhere who can figure this out with compassion.

WilfredsPies · 10/05/2026 15:10

Allisnotlost1 · 10/05/2026 14:35

I know the facts myself, my issue was that they posted something that was contradicted by the first line of their source.

🙄 Because 2018 was when the numbers started increasing. If I’d posted that they started coming several years earlier, some other smartarse would have been moaning that it was only a handful of boats so didn’t count.

HobGobblynne · 10/05/2026 14:55

Allseeingallknowing · 09/05/2026 19:40

Correct, but a lot try and convince us its a much higher percentage!

PIP Is for the most life impacting conditions. Of course it makes sense that the majority aren’t in work. It’s not a gotcha.

ElfAndSafetyBored · 10/05/2026 14:47

How do Australia do it? Do they not have to try so much because they are harder to reach?

Why doesn’t the world condemn them for not letting more people in?

Why isn’t there more discussion about why people want to come here and addressing that?

What do people think Reform can do about it?

Why can’t we employ more people to shift the back log. We find money for all sorts of crap f we want to.

Id like to see a cross party working group, including proper professions from relevant backgrounds and with proper knowledge (not CEOs who are really figureheads) sit down to discuss what to do for the best of everyone, ourselves and those who decide they need to migrate here.

Allisnotlost1 · 10/05/2026 14:43

EasternStandard · 10/05/2026 14:41

What she’s saying is right. It’s not Brexit, the DA etc

At no point did I say it was Brexit.

Allseeingallknowing · 10/05/2026 14:42

QOFfE · 10/05/2026 10:59

Conkersinautumn is absolutely 100% right. We do not have an immigration problem. The boats crossing the channel is 5% of overall immigration and only started after Brexit. And who started the whole Brexit thing? Farage. We need safe legal routes here and employ more people to process the asylum claims in a timely manner, not just create a backlog and then say, oh my god, our country is getting taken over by migrants!

And that 5% need housing, feeding etc!

EasternStandard · 10/05/2026 14:41

Allisnotlost1 · 10/05/2026 14:35

I know the facts myself, my issue was that they posted something that was contradicted by the first line of their source.

What she’s saying is right. It’s not Brexit, the DA etc

ElfAndSafetyBored · 10/05/2026 14:39

AyeDeadOn · 09/05/2026 10:36

Why arent they seeking asylum in the first safe country? Once they choose to go through another safe country, or many other safe countries, imo they are no longer asylum seekers. They have other reasons for wanting to come specifically here, not just to a safe place.

Why should the country nearest to the issue shoulder it all? It’s not their problem either.

Presumably they come here for a wide range of reasons: family, perceived opportunity, language. Loads of other reasons I am clueless about.

Allisnotlost1 · 10/05/2026 14:35

EasternStandard · 10/05/2026 14:33

Tbf @WilfredsPiesis getting it right. If you read her posts you’ll see the facts around small boats / the DA and Brexit etc

I know the facts myself, my issue was that they posted something that was contradicted by the first line of their source.

Allisnotlost1 · 10/05/2026 14:34

Vivienne1000 · 10/05/2026 13:35

If they all wanted to leave their regime behind then why are some of them committing crimes, some of which are murders and rapes. Some are coming over to do exactly that and try and infiltrate into our way of life.

You’re right, some are committing crimes. Let’s deport everyone from that country then, including the little girls in your school and their surgeon fathers.

EasternStandard · 10/05/2026 14:33

Allisnotlost1 · 10/05/2026 14:30

Yes, but if you’re going to berate someone quite so forcefully at least get your facts straight.

Tbf @WilfredsPiesis getting it right. If you read her posts you’ll see the facts around small boats / the DA and Brexit etc

Allisnotlost1 · 10/05/2026 14:30

WilfredsPies · 10/05/2026 12:50

That was just a handful of arrivals; the numbers started increasing in 2018, after Tony Smith confirms that Border Force made it harder to get though due to increased security.

The point remains that it’s nothing to do with Brexit.

Yes, but if you’re going to berate someone quite so forcefully at least get your facts straight.

Vivienne1000 · 10/05/2026 13:35

Allisnotlost1 · 10/05/2026 09:39

That’s great they were in a position to migrate legally. You recognise those men as contributing so presumably are not afraid they have imported the regime’s values - why would they, when they chose to escape it?

I wonder why you would deny that opportunity to people who, for whatever reason, came via an irregular route. Because they’re not surgeons? Because you think they’re dangerous?

If they all wanted to leave their regime behind then why are some of them committing crimes, some of which are murders and rapes. Some are coming over to do exactly that and try and infiltrate into our way of life.

WilfredsPies · 10/05/2026 12:50

Allisnotlost1 · 10/05/2026 12:38

The article you’ve posted said the BBC first reported on small boat arrivals in 2014 and 2015.

That was just a handful of arrivals; the numbers started increasing in 2018, after Tony Smith confirms that Border Force made it harder to get though due to increased security.

The point remains that it’s nothing to do with Brexit.

Southwestten · 10/05/2026 12:41

So yes, many people need interpreters but don’t want to pay for them.

@EstrellaPolar in these cases are the non-Spanish speaking English people given interpreters for free?

Allisnotlost1 · 10/05/2026 12:38

WilfredsPies · 10/05/2026 12:25

The boats didn’t only start after Brexit ffs! We left the EU in January 2020. Small boat arrivals began in 2018 and numbers started increasing when the traffickers realised how much easier it was to stick 70 people on a boat, on a deserted beach with no security trying to stop them, rather than trying to get 10 people through angry lorry drivers and port security in the back of a lorry, again and again and again until they managed to get through.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy0w9zw57glo

The article you’ve posted said the BBC first reported on small boat arrivals in 2014 and 2015.

WilfredsPies · 10/05/2026 12:25

QOFfE · 10/05/2026 10:59

Conkersinautumn is absolutely 100% right. We do not have an immigration problem. The boats crossing the channel is 5% of overall immigration and only started after Brexit. And who started the whole Brexit thing? Farage. We need safe legal routes here and employ more people to process the asylum claims in a timely manner, not just create a backlog and then say, oh my god, our country is getting taken over by migrants!

The boats didn’t only start after Brexit ffs! We left the EU in January 2020. Small boat arrivals began in 2018 and numbers started increasing when the traffickers realised how much easier it was to stick 70 people on a boat, on a deserted beach with no security trying to stop them, rather than trying to get 10 people through angry lorry drivers and port security in the back of a lorry, again and again and again until they managed to get through.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy0w9zw57glo

A group of people, many wearing life jackets, are on a small boat off the coast, with two others trying to climb aboard.

A decade of small boat migrants - how did it begin?

A former Dover coastguard, an ex-border security chief and a customs boss recall the first landings.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy0w9zw57glo

WilfredsPies · 10/05/2026 12:18

likelysuspect · 10/05/2026 09:14

It does make it a lot harder! I regularly sit in on the substantive interviews with the HO and their solicitors appointments. Lack of documentation causes barriers, not easy to overcome, not impossible either. There is a big difference in the length of time decisions are made for people who come from different countries.

Some of our client group get their asylum within 6 months, a year perhaps. Many are waiting for years. Thats the difference.

It’s not the difference at all. You may sit in on those interviews but you are very clearly not privy to what goes on behind the scenes. You have seen one thing and another thing, you’ve put them together and have drawn incorrect conclusions to why one person might have their claim decided very quickly and why another person’s claim might take longer.

EstrellaPolar · 10/05/2026 12:16

Southwestten · 10/05/2026 11:17

I wonder how many of the 400,000 or so Brits living in Spain mix with Spanish people, have adopted their norms and speak the language.

If they want or need interpreters then they have to pay for them.
Paying for interpreters in UK costs the tax payer tens of millions.

Actually, many show up at the town hall or hospital without an interpreter, then demand they be helped in English by local staff. I’ve seen many people get frustrated and annoyed at the fact that nobody could speak English (or they could, but chose not to and instead used their native language, as legally entitled at their place of work).

So yes, many people need interpreters but don’t want to pay for them.