Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU - Keir Starmer's ok - getting rid of him wouldn't help Labour

219 replies

Twiglets1 · 09/05/2026 08:44

As a result of the disastrous results for Labour in the recent elections, many people - even within his own party - are now calling for Keir Starmer to stand down.

Would that really help Labour though? It seems to me that a lot of the reasons people are fed up - like the cost of living & housing crisis for example, are not his fault personally but more a result of years of underinvestment, mainly by previous Conservative governments.

Yes he does lack charisma and personally I think the Conservatives have a better leader in Kemi Badenoch. But I wouldn't vote for a political party purely based on how charismatic their leader is.

When you look at the alternatives - I like Wes Streeting but would he be able to turn around the fortunes of the Labour party before the next General Election - I doubt it. And the same goes for Andy Burnham, even if they did find a way to make him eligible for party leadership in time.

The Tories caused turmoil with their constant leadership challenges and it didn't help their brand. Starmer hasn't done anything too awful that I'm aware of - wouldn't it be better just to keep him in post?

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 09/05/2026 10:45

InWithPeaceOutWithStress · 09/05/2026 10:42

That is a hobby site by one person.

InWithPeaceOutWithStress · 09/05/2026 10:42

MsGreying · 09/05/2026 10:34

p10 of manifesto
https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Labour-Party-manifesto-2024.pdf

Delivery economic stability
Cut waiting list times
launch a new border security command
Set up Great British Energy
Recruit 6500 teachers

P23
 Deliver economic stability with tough spending rules
 A new partnership with business to boost growth everywhere
 A National Wealth Fund to invest in jobs
 Planning reform to build 1.5 million new homes
 Devolution of power across England
 A New Deal for Working People

P47
 Set up Great British Energy to cut bills for good
 Energy independence from dictators like Putin
 650,000 new high-quality jobs
 Warmer homes to slash fuel poverty
 Water companies forced to clean up our rivers

P61
 Crack down on antisocial behaviour with more neighbourhood police
 Tough new penalties for offenders
 A plan to get knives off our streets
 A specialist rape unit in every police force
 A new network of Young Futures hubs

P75
 Recruit 6,500 new expert teachers in key subjects
 3,000 new primary school-based nurseries
 Free breakfast clubs in every primary school
 A modern curriculum so young people are ready for work and life
 High-quality apprenticeships and specialist technical colleges

P91
 Cut NHS waiting times with 40,000 more appointments every week
 Double the number of cancer scanners
 A new Dentistry Rescue Plan
 8,500 additional mental health staff
 Return of the family doctor

P105
 A new Ethics and Integrity Commission
 Modernise the House of Commons
 Immediate reform of the House of Lords
 A reset between Westminster and Holyrood, Cardiff Bay, and Stormont
 Votes at 16

P115
 An unshakeable commitment to NATO and our nuclear deterrent
 Standing up for our armed forces and veterans
 New trade agreements
 Britain leading a Clean Power Alliance
 Modernise international development

Is there a labourite in the house who'll go through and say what they've done for each point?

(I can see the standing up for armed forces above and instantly am reminded of: While Keir did not directly prosecute soldiers, the case he led helped establish that Human Rights law applied to soldiers in Iraq, leading to extensive investigations and criticism from veterans)

https://pledgeprogress.co.uk

Pledge Progress - Keeping politics honest

Helping you to track the current UK government's progress toward meeting their election pledges.

https://pledgeprogress.co.uk

InWithPeaceOutWithStress · 09/05/2026 10:39

Agree. I’m so bored of the anti Keir rhetoric. Whoever replaces him will be faced with the same tricky policy decisions and will face the same barrage of hate from the media and public.

I felt the same way about Theresa May and all the subsequent prime ministerial changes in the conservative government.

People need to grow up and recognise that there isn’t a utopia around the corner if only we had the right leader.

BlackRowan · 09/05/2026 10:37

Stupid Labour Party with its infighting

if they didn’t block his reforms of welfare and benefits they wouldn’t be in such trouble now, a bit rich blaming him instead of taking responsibility for the fact they as a party can’t deliver

MsGreying · 09/05/2026 10:34

p10 of manifesto
https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Labour-Party-manifesto-2024.pdf

Delivery economic stability
Cut waiting list times
launch a new border security command
Set up Great British Energy
Recruit 6500 teachers

P23
 Deliver economic stability with tough spending rules
 A new partnership with business to boost growth everywhere
 A National Wealth Fund to invest in jobs
 Planning reform to build 1.5 million new homes
 Devolution of power across England
 A New Deal for Working People

P47
 Set up Great British Energy to cut bills for good
 Energy independence from dictators like Putin
 650,000 new high-quality jobs
 Warmer homes to slash fuel poverty
 Water companies forced to clean up our rivers

P61
 Crack down on antisocial behaviour with more neighbourhood police
 Tough new penalties for offenders
 A plan to get knives off our streets
 A specialist rape unit in every police force
 A new network of Young Futures hubs

P75
 Recruit 6,500 new expert teachers in key subjects
 3,000 new primary school-based nurseries
 Free breakfast clubs in every primary school
 A modern curriculum so young people are ready for work and life
 High-quality apprenticeships and specialist technical colleges

P91
 Cut NHS waiting times with 40,000 more appointments every week
 Double the number of cancer scanners
 A new Dentistry Rescue Plan
 8,500 additional mental health staff
 Return of the family doctor

P105
 A new Ethics and Integrity Commission
 Modernise the House of Commons
 Immediate reform of the House of Lords
 A reset between Westminster and Holyrood, Cardiff Bay, and Stormont
 Votes at 16

P115
 An unshakeable commitment to NATO and our nuclear deterrent
 Standing up for our armed forces and veterans
 New trade agreements
 Britain leading a Clean Power Alliance
 Modernise international development

Is there a labourite in the house who'll go through and say what they've done for each point?

(I can see the standing up for armed forces above and instantly am reminded of: While Keir did not directly prosecute soldiers, the case he led helped establish that Human Rights law applied to soldiers in Iraq, leading to extensive investigations and criticism from veterans)

https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Labour-Party-manifesto-2024.pdf

Shedmistress · 09/05/2026 10:33

Twiglets1 · 09/05/2026 08:59

He seems a decent person - no scandals attached to him that I am aware of. Why do you think he isn't ok? (him as a person not Labour generally).

No scandals? Again, you mean a different Starmer surely?

Shoola · 09/05/2026 10:33

Twiglets1 · 09/05/2026 09:09

Thank you - I'm not a Labour member (floating voter) but I did vote for them at the last General election so have been a bit disappointed with their performance.

Having said that, I don't know that I really expected they would be able to make any big improvements quickly after so many years of Tory underinvestment.

I take your point about taking away the pensioners heating allowance, that was unexpected in a Labour government. However, I sense a lot of resentment from younger voters towards older people in society and Labour's voting base does tend to be younger than the Torys. So maybe Labour didn't think it would be too contentious to target pensioners that were not on benefits (those on benefits would still have got the heating allowance).

Anyway, Labour did make a mistake there and again trying to cut the welfare bill - though if Conservatives or Reform get in they would almost definitely do that so to my mind, anyone concerned about that would still be better off voting Labour.

Any government who gets in has exactly the same problem. We don't have enough money to pay for the things we want. The government publish all the figures so it is very easy to see how much everything costs.

Shedmistress · 09/05/2026 10:32

Twiglets1 · 09/05/2026 08:57

Yes the lack of charisma doesn't help, his somewhat robotic delivery makes him easy to mock.

But - I do think that behind the scenes he and his party and doing good things and he made the right call with a big decision recently by not getting the UK too involved in the Iran war.

He's cautious and has an obsession with doing things by the book - probably because of his legal background. There have been times I wished he would be more proactive - such as prescribing the IRGC as a terrorist organisation faster, in line with the rest of Europe.

BUT - all leaders do things that can be criticised. Overall, I don't see how it will help the Labour party to replace him at this point.

By the book, what like giving Peter Mandleson the top job?

Are you talking about a different Starmer?

Twiglets1 · 09/05/2026 10:32

SkipAd · 09/05/2026 10:25

I’m stepping away now because I really have to go out but I just wanted to thank you all for one of the calmest, well reasoned political discussion that’s been on here for a while, it’s made a really nice change.

And thank you for being part of the pleasant discussion. I agree it makes it so much nicer when we can all discuss differences of opinion politely and who knows, maybe even learn something from others!

OP posts:
Makingsenseofitall · 09/05/2026 10:31

OnceUponATimed · 09/05/2026 08:47

I am so split about this
He is very uncharismatic and a good leader should have charisma. He is also lacking a a strong vision, hence everything seems directionless.
They are bringing around some quite significant improvements to the country, but obviously the press, predominantly right wing in this country, are ignoring all of that.

I do feel it's a bit now, or never to allow time for a new leader to bed in.

Edited

I am left wing so really am desperate to agree with you but what are the improvements you can see Labour are bringing? I can only see a litany of very bad decisions which are compounding the disaster that was brexit and further bringing the country to its knees. That said I don’t see how a new prime
minister would help at this point…

EasternStandard · 09/05/2026 10:26

Boomer55 · 09/05/2026 10:19

I voted for them, but to be honest, I don’t think any of them are much good.

Starmer’s more middle manager than leader, but if he had the right people around him, it wouldn’t matter too much.

The MPs are panicking because the council elections have shown them what way the wind is blowing politically, and they’re fearful of being out of work in a couple of years.

I hope Starmer has a big reshuffle (predicted anyway) to try and improve the whole thing. 🤷‍♀️

I don’t think a reshuffle will help.

Skinnysaluki · 09/05/2026 10:26

Changingplace · 09/05/2026 09:58

‘Up north’ where exactly? Labour lost a lot of seats in Manchester but they’ve held the majority in most councils.

Mainly where not all seats were up for grabs.
I was thinking of places such as Sunderland, Wigan

SkipAd · 09/05/2026 10:25

I’m stepping away now because I really have to go out but I just wanted to thank you all for one of the calmest, well reasoned political discussion that’s been on here for a while, it’s made a really nice change.

SkipAd · 09/05/2026 10:21

nothereyesterday · 09/05/2026 10:00

But he’s not conviction led. Thats his big problem. He flails changing his position depending on what he thinks is most popular. He says women have penises ( which no one will have thought he truly believes), until he thinks that’s not popular now when he trumpets in parliament that labour protects single sex spaces, before going quiet again when there is more backlash than he expected. He’s managed to piss off both sides of opinion on the ME by his contrary positioning. he cuts welfare, then doesn’t. He is weak and without conviction. Who knows what he actually believes on anything.

People actually respect clear ,strong leaders who take positions they genuinely believe are in the best interests of the country, even when those positions will cause them to be unpopular with some major groups. KS is not that conviction politician.

OK, that’s interesting.
I did mean that I believe he went into politics because of his beliefs rather than it being something traditionally the second son did, or to advance his career prospects, but I take your point.
I always hated it when Thatcher said “this lady’s not for turning” even when the mood of her backbenchers or the country was against her. It smacked of not listening to others to me. But maybe you’re right and the country wants somebody who will stick to his guns regardless.

Boomer55 · 09/05/2026 10:19

I voted for them, but to be honest, I don’t think any of them are much good.

Starmer’s more middle manager than leader, but if he had the right people around him, it wouldn’t matter too much.

The MPs are panicking because the council elections have shown them what way the wind is blowing politically, and they’re fearful of being out of work in a couple of years.

I hope Starmer has a big reshuffle (predicted anyway) to try and improve the whole thing. 🤷‍♀️

Monty36 · 09/05/2026 10:18

In the social media age I am afraid how you come across does matter. He is flat.
There are too many people who just listen to soundbites. And don’t look at things any further.
He came in with a large majority and has, frankly, squandered it.
Rachel Reeves as Chancellor was a terrible choice.
He does have a troublesome party which helps nobody who leads Labour. They have no self discipline.
And has flipped and flopped. The U turns. He seems to have no stomach or conviction for any policy.
The freebies were a disaster as was Mandelson.

This election was a protest vote. But a bloody nose. They don’t know what they believe. They shouldn’t have to go back and think about what the electorate wants. They should stand on what they believe in.
What is that ? I don’t know. Nor I think, do they.

MulberryBrandy · 09/05/2026 10:18

Twiglets1 · 09/05/2026 10:15

Not quite always been like that. I remember when Tony Blair & "new Labour" was first in power there was a real sense of optimism in the air and even the media gave them an easy time for a while.

That has been lacking for a long time now!

Edited

I agree it was like a burden had rolled off our shoulders after the oppression of the Thatcher years. Remember though, Blair had the unusual advantage of a Labour leader close to Rupert Murdoch. Of course, that all went sour .... but that is another story

Twiglets1 · 09/05/2026 10:15

MulberryBrandy · 09/05/2026 10:13

It has always been like that - we just hear about it through so many channels. And all day, every day, the media clambering to put out a scoop or dig up some dirt. There were huge scandals in the Major government, for instance.

Not quite always been like that. I remember when Tony Blair & "new Labour" was first in power there was a real sense of optimism in the air and even the media gave them an easy time for a while.

That has been lacking for a long time now!

OP posts:
cubistqueen · 09/05/2026 10:14

Eskarina1 · 09/05/2026 09:21

I am with you on desperately not wanting a leadership change. Stability is needed more than anything else.

I saw a Labour spokesperson yesterday explain they need to create a coalition at the centre to win votes from the left and right but it doesn't feel like that's what they're doing. I imagine I'm the kind of voter they want- my instincts lean left but I generally vote centre-left. I've previously been a Labour party member. However, I see them dismissing appealing to Green voters because that would be too extreme, while chasing hard after reform loudest voters. I'm never going to vote for a party that pretends climate change isn't an issue, sound-bites that SEN is overdiagnosed or talks about stopping the boats and describes asylum seekers as illegal immigrants rather than having a proper grown up conversation about the negative impacts of immigration and how we tackle these.

Reform voters are never going to be won over by attempts to implement Reform policies because the reality of delivering these things is very different to radical soundbites.

They need a rational Labour plan and narrative. I don't want to see election campaigns fought by smear campaigns, I want them to deserve to win.

Yes, this. They have spent too much time trying to appeal to people who aren’t going to vote for them anyway. Reform might be new, but there’s always been a lot of extreme right wing people in working class areas (I know because I grew up in a community like that - all voted for Thatcher even though she was making them poorer).

Scotiasdarling · 09/05/2026 10:14

Melarus · 09/05/2026 10:08

He should stay on while the newly elected Greens and Reform use the time before the next GE to fuck up royally, as they almost certainly will.

Then, shortly before the next GE, Labour should roll out a shiny new leader who will energise the backbenchers, promise to put past mistakes behind them and generally get the party back on track.

At least that's what I'm hoping for

Which "shiny new leader" would that be though? The Labour ranks just don't look that impressive. As Starmer has found out, actually being in charge is a lot more difficult than offering advice from the Opposition benches.
They will need to find someone with financial as well as political nous, and a lot more brains than the current incumbent.

MulberryBrandy · 09/05/2026 10:13

WonderingWanda · 09/05/2026 10:10

I am so disillusioned by politics these days. Every day there is another scandal, another member of a party trying to oust their leader, another billionaire donor with an ulterior motive sponsoring a political party, politicians branding rhetoric that bares no relation to the actual numbers / problems and totally ignores lots of real issues. And it feels like we are in a slow motion car crash. I don't know what the solution is and I certainly don't feel that any of our politicians have a handle on the bigger picture, they are all too busy squabling over who's the leader. It's like Lord of the Flies.

It has always been like that - we just hear about it through so many channels. And all day, every day, the media clambering to put out a scoop or dig up some dirt. There were huge scandals in the Major government, for instance.

Twiglets1 · 09/05/2026 10:12

Crikeyalmighty · 09/05/2026 10:06

I like Andy Burnham too but the idea he did well was because of his own talent isn’t the full story - Manchester had a ton of money thrown at it by the EU - and has. It benefited from comfortably off professionals moving to cheaper areas and plenty of developers following suit . Some of the success was luck in timing -

True but at least he hasn't fucked up too badly over his years as Mayor of Manchester.

Realise I am sounding disillusioned with all these leaders when I judge someone positively just for not fucking up too badly or being "ok" at their job.

OP posts:
WonderingWanda · 09/05/2026 10:10

I am so disillusioned by politics these days. Every day there is another scandal, another member of a party trying to oust their leader, another billionaire donor with an ulterior motive sponsoring a political party, politicians branding rhetoric that bares no relation to the actual numbers / problems and totally ignores lots of real issues. And it feels like we are in a slow motion car crash. I don't know what the solution is and I certainly don't feel that any of our politicians have a handle on the bigger picture, they are all too busy squabling over who's the leader. It's like Lord of the Flies.

Crikeyalmighty · 09/05/2026 10:09

@OnceUponATimed Trump has a lot of charisma - still is an arse - Johnson did too, corrupt and couldn’t cope with reading more than a 2 sheet summary and lead by the public clapometer - it’s not the apprentice! However it’s clear the public are more than happy with a charismatic tosser even if their policies make them worse off - so hey ho those voting for that will get what they deserve.

Melarus · 09/05/2026 10:08

He should stay on while the newly elected Greens and Reform use the time before the next GE to fuck up royally, as they almost certainly will.

Then, shortly before the next GE, Labour should roll out a shiny new leader who will energise the backbenchers, promise to put past mistakes behind them and generally get the party back on track.

At least that's what I'm hoping for