Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU - Keir Starmer's ok - getting rid of him wouldn't help Labour

219 replies

Twiglets1 · 09/05/2026 08:44

As a result of the disastrous results for Labour in the recent elections, many people - even within his own party - are now calling for Keir Starmer to stand down.

Would that really help Labour though? It seems to me that a lot of the reasons people are fed up - like the cost of living & housing crisis for example, are not his fault personally but more a result of years of underinvestment, mainly by previous Conservative governments.

Yes he does lack charisma and personally I think the Conservatives have a better leader in Kemi Badenoch. But I wouldn't vote for a political party purely based on how charismatic their leader is.

When you look at the alternatives - I like Wes Streeting but would he be able to turn around the fortunes of the Labour party before the next General Election - I doubt it. And the same goes for Andy Burnham, even if they did find a way to make him eligible for party leadership in time.

The Tories caused turmoil with their constant leadership challenges and it didn't help their brand. Starmer hasn't done anything too awful that I'm aware of - wouldn't it be better just to keep him in post?

OP posts:
Shedmistress · 10/05/2026 08:34

Twiglets1 · 10/05/2026 08:25

Yes exactly.

We’ve learnt some reasons why.

Though in my heart I still feel like every political leader is flawed and the new Labour leader if they get one will also be unpopular. Partly because of their own personality but mainly because of the state of the country & general discontent. This is something Labour inherited to a large degree and can’t be easily fixed even if they knew how to fix it ( not sure they do).

It isn't them not knowing how to fix it, it is that they are all driven by ideology and have no idea why, they are unable to identify experts who do, as even attending briefings or getting people around the table to discuss possible solutions means they would be shunned by their own people. Because the understanding is that you do not talk to people not on your side. And the only people on their side are also ideologically driven.

They are completely underpinned by their union and activist backers and do what they are told to do.

Twiglets1 · 10/05/2026 08:30

Shedmistress · 10/05/2026 08:29

Unfortunately Wes used to be on a group that was dedicated to kicking women out of the Labour Party just because they had once expressed that they knew the dfferencce between man and women. He is no friend of any woman.

Oh dear and he would have been my preferred choice to replace Starmer. Will need to look into this.

OP posts:
Shedmistress · 10/05/2026 08:29

curious79 · 10/05/2026 07:08

His judgement is terrible, he has the charisma of a mouldy flannel, he sounds awful… he’s not in control

Wes Streeting I love
Andy Burnham just no

Unfortunately Wes used to be on a group that was dedicated to kicking women out of the Labour Party just because they had once expressed that they knew the dfferencce between man and women. He is no friend of any woman.

Twiglets1 · 10/05/2026 08:25

SkipAd · 10/05/2026 07:56

No we get that. We are asking WHY there is a deep loathing?
And to be fair, many people have given their reasons and we’ve learnt a lot.

To me, it’s a bit like the blue dress/gold dress thing. I agree with @Twiglets1 and think he’s a good, sensible, well meaning PM so I am genuinely trying, like she is to understand the deep loathing for him.

Yes exactly.

We’ve learnt some reasons why.

Though in my heart I still feel like every political leader is flawed and the new Labour leader if they get one will also be unpopular. Partly because of their own personality but mainly because of the state of the country & general discontent. This is something Labour inherited to a large degree and can’t be easily fixed even if they knew how to fix it ( not sure they do).

OP posts:
MulberryBrandy · 10/05/2026 08:24

SkipAd · 10/05/2026 07:56

No we get that. We are asking WHY there is a deep loathing?
And to be fair, many people have given their reasons and we’ve learnt a lot.

To me, it’s a bit like the blue dress/gold dress thing. I agree with @Twiglets1 and think he’s a good, sensible, well meaning PM so I am genuinely trying, like she is to understand the deep loathing for him.

I think we will continue to ask various questions about this subject. To widen it a bit again - for perspective rather than being just in a groove - on many Mumsnet threads there seemed to be huge dislike for Polanski. However, the Greens have won many seats at the elections.

It is important for this wider discussion not to be shut down. 😀

EasternStandard · 10/05/2026 08:03

SkipAd · 10/05/2026 07:56

No we get that. We are asking WHY there is a deep loathing?
And to be fair, many people have given their reasons and we’ve learnt a lot.

To me, it’s a bit like the blue dress/gold dress thing. I agree with @Twiglets1 and think he’s a good, sensible, well meaning PM so I am genuinely trying, like she is to understand the deep loathing for him.

Your best bet is to just listen and read stuff, not on mn pretty much, but if you see someone being shouted down re Starmer views it’s probably close.

There’s a good journo quote from the coverage elections aren’t earthquakes they’re aftershocks. Meaning voters decided much earlier and the day is just reflecting those choices.

Having picked up commentary neither the results nor the reasons coming in are a surprise.

Just be more open to what people are saying and you’ll find out the why.

SkipAd · 10/05/2026 07:56

EasternStandard · 10/05/2026 07:44

Well yes exactly his lack of charisma was known, which is why I said it’s not that.

There’s still a deep loathing there, and it’s that part you are missing.

No we get that. We are asking WHY there is a deep loathing?
And to be fair, many people have given their reasons and we’ve learnt a lot.

To me, it’s a bit like the blue dress/gold dress thing. I agree with @Twiglets1 and think he’s a good, sensible, well meaning PM so I am genuinely trying, like she is to understand the deep loathing for him.

EasternStandard · 10/05/2026 07:44

Twiglets1 · 10/05/2026 07:39

I think the word “we” in the post by @SkipAd is appropriate.

Most of us defending Starmer do not deny he lacks charisma so in a sense, his personality is part of the problem.

But he had the same personality when Labour got voted into power and we knew who we were getting as Leader. So his personality is not likely to be the biggest issue as to why voters have turned against Labour, in my opinion anyway. They blame him because he represents Labour but a different person would soon be blamed too.

Well yes exactly his lack of charisma was known, which is why I said it’s not that.

There’s still a deep loathing there, and it’s that part you are missing.

Twiglets1 · 10/05/2026 07:39

I think the word “we” in the post by @SkipAd is appropriate.

Most of us defending Starmer do not deny he lacks charisma so in a sense, his personality is part of the problem.

But he had the same personality when Labour got voted into power and we knew who we were getting as Leader. So his personality is not likely to be the biggest issue as to why voters have turned against Labour, in my opinion anyway. They blame him because he represents Labour but a different person would soon be blamed too.

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 10/05/2026 07:26

SkipAd · 09/05/2026 22:04

Hi, I’m back.
The question is not IF it’s Starmer? We get its Starmer to a certain degree.
Our question all along, for those who keep saying it’s Starmer, is why?

I’m not sure about the ‘we’ part in this, some are still blaming the media, guilt over shifting to Reform, or other stuff.

The best way to understand why is to just read posts on it, here or elsewhere as mn is quite pro Starmer.

If the party can accept there is a leader problem they can decide what to do. It still might be ok nothing, we’ll have to live with that for various reasons. Just don’t ignore the feedback from the electorate.

Twiglets1 · 10/05/2026 07:16

ChocolateBiscuitsandaCuppa · 10/05/2026 07:10

100% agree with you.

It also doesn't help that the UK has a strong right-leaning media (owned by multimillionaires/billionaires - what a surprise) who have not reported on all that Labour have achieved.

As others have said, Labour were handed a country in distress, thanks to repeated voting for Conservatives. It is not possible to change that around in a short time-frame. Sadly I don't think it's possible in a medium time-frame for the whole nation.

Keir lacks charisma (possibly more so now that before!), but he is steady and not rudderless, which England needs. I wish he'd directly address people's concerns better. I can't see how he isn't for the chop, but it's not going to improve anything.

Yup I agree with all that.

I get most of my information from the BBC and the Telegraph (I know it has a right wing bias but they were the most informative about new developments during the Covid years and I've stuck with them since).

I thought the BBC was supposed to be neutral - but they don't report on Labour achievements either. Someone up thread posted a website on where Labour are with their commitments and some that have already been achieved, I was completely unaware of until reading that post.

It doesn't help that our media prefers to talk about bad news than good news.

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 10/05/2026 07:15

Freysimo · 10/05/2026 06:41

Labour moving further to the left won't pick up disaffected Reform voters. Tony Blair was successful because he was left of centre. Even I voted for him and I'm centre right!

Many did. But he also was very different to the current PM. Plus happy to grow the private sector unlike now.

EasternStandard · 10/05/2026 07:12

Twiglets1 · 10/05/2026 06:32

I would say the constituencies that voted predominantly Reform have sent a pretty clear message about their main concerns.

Yet some people don't seem to be picking up the signal and are suggesting instead that the issue could be solved by choosing a new leader or Labour moving further to the Left.

That is a factor, and a new leader might not resolve it. But really all that needs to happen for some of the questions is to turn on the radio - Times in particular.

All this stuff is being discussed, with people who were talking to the electorate directly. Loathing of Starmer came up repeatedly. It’s now up to Labour to decide what to do about that.

As for moving left or right with policy, neither will help much as votes are being shed in both directions.

Sladuf1 · 10/05/2026 07:12

MyFellowScroller · 09/05/2026 14:52

Starmer makes new mistakes today.
He has appointed Gordon Brown as a kind of Economic Ambassador and Harriet Harman to advise on Women and Girls.
What do those appointments say about his opinion of the present Parliamentary Party. Instead of using current MPs he calls up aged Reservists. Harperson born 1950, Broon 1951.
Can you imagine how the Red Tops will write about HH and the links to the Paedophile Information Exchange. Another paedophile story.
How fucking ridiculous!

It is fucking ridiculous. The Mandelson business hasn’t gone away, the other crony Matthew Doyle’s friendship with another convicted pedo (who had been a Labour councillor🙄) was back in the headlines again a few weeks ago. What’s Starmer gone and done? Given Harperson a job. Nice one. Keir. Just continue to fan the flames of Labour being the pedophile apologists party.

I remember when the whole links to Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) issue blew up. I was initially prepared to give Harman the benefit of the doubt but her Newsnight interview with Laura Kuenssberg changed that. Harman didn’t give a satisfactory account to questions Laura K asked. Then more details emerged.
It all sounded far too cosy a relationship with PIE when Harman had been working for what is now called Liberty.

Another ridiculous aspect to Harman and Brown getting roles is they were both at the helm when Labour lost the 2010 election and went into Opposition for 14 years. So you appoint those 2 just after the calamitous election results yesterday! It’s beyond.

ChocolateBiscuitsandaCuppa · 10/05/2026 07:10

100% agree with you.

It also doesn't help that the UK has a strong right-leaning media (owned by multimillionaires/billionaires - what a surprise) who have not reported on all that Labour have achieved.

As others have said, Labour were handed a country in distress, thanks to repeated voting for Conservatives. It is not possible to change that around in a short time-frame. Sadly I don't think it's possible in a medium time-frame for the whole nation.

Keir lacks charisma (possibly more so now that before!), but he is steady and not rudderless, which England needs. I wish he'd directly address people's concerns better. I can't see how he isn't for the chop, but it's not going to improve anything.

Twiglets1 · 10/05/2026 07:09

Freysimo · 10/05/2026 06:41

Labour moving further to the left won't pick up disaffected Reform voters. Tony Blair was successful because he was left of centre. Even I voted for him and I'm centre right!

I agree and I voted for Blair too - more than once.

He somehow seemed to be able to convince everyone that Labour filled the whole spectrum from left of centre to right of centre.

I think the current Labour party is also trying to appeal to everyone, but unfortunately failing to do so. Immigration has become a big issue and voters seem to want parties to have a clear stance on whether they are fully against managing the numbers of both legal and illegal immigrants (Reform) or fully in favour of open borders (Green).

OP posts:
curious79 · 10/05/2026 07:08

His judgement is terrible, he has the charisma of a mouldy flannel, he sounds awful… he’s not in control

Wes Streeting I love
Andy Burnham just no

punkhairbrush · 10/05/2026 07:00

@Twiglets1they are fucking idiotic and any MP that thinks like that is self serving and doesn’t give a shit about the electorate! And any leftie calling for Starmer’s resignation is the same and might as well defect to the god awful Green Party or the utter shite that is Your Party!

Freysimo · 10/05/2026 06:41

Labour moving further to the left won't pick up disaffected Reform voters. Tony Blair was successful because he was left of centre. Even I voted for him and I'm centre right!

Twiglets1 · 10/05/2026 06:32

punkhairbrush · 10/05/2026 06:25

Totally agree! And then some tit of a back bencher, who obviously hasn’t got a clue about the mood of the country or what we’re all pissed off about is trying to kickstart a leadership contest! To be honest it’s the Labour backbenchers that’s I’m more pissed off with than Starmer himself!

I would say the constituencies that voted predominantly Reform have sent a pretty clear message about their main concerns.

Yet some people don't seem to be picking up the signal and are suggesting instead that the issue could be solved by choosing a new leader or Labour moving further to the Left.

OP posts:
punkhairbrush · 10/05/2026 06:32

@MulberryBrandyi totally agree. This is not a Starmer problem. Trouble is Labour traditionalists don’t like him because he had attempted to help out middle earners and kickstart the economy! But the back benchers didn’t like that, so we got U Turn after U Turn. Instead of sorting out the welfare system we’re giving even more towards it, leaving a bitter taste in middle earners mouths. I blame the back benchers for this mess and that utter idiot Catherine West piping up yesterday to send the country into more chaos. But unfortunately Starmer is the fall guy. The majority of us want stability and to kick start the economy, not to be constantly told more hand outs are coming at the expensive of small businesses and hard working middle earners! Most people just want more money in their pockets.

punkhairbrush · 10/05/2026 06:25

Totally agree! And then some tit of a back bencher, who obviously hasn’t got a clue about the mood of the country or what we’re all pissed off about is trying to kickstart a leadership contest! To be honest it’s the Labour backbenchers that’s I’m more pissed off with than Starmer himself!

Twiglets1 · 10/05/2026 06:06

EasternStandard · 09/05/2026 22:47

You’re missing the uptick in Greens, PC and SNP due to similar factors.

Look at Wales and Lewisham for a start, but many other places.

True but the main shift in England has been away from Labour and towards Reform.

Given what Reform is best known for, my guess is that a lot of people are fed up that Labour are not doing enough to tackle illegal immigration.

OP posts:
Twiglets1 · 10/05/2026 06:02

MushMonster · 09/05/2026 22:49

I think there are lots of wrongs with Starmer himself. He is an elitist idiot. I put up with him because of Labour. Because I liked Labour. But I am done with him.
Will it be convenient for the country to switch PM? Likely no, in light of international chaos.
Would it be good for Labour? Absolutelly yes. But only if they manage to pick a real labour leader. Both words. Someone who thinks like a labour member (Starmer does not) and that has leading qualities ( which Starmer does not even know what they are)

Who do you have in mind?

OP posts:
Twiglets1 · 10/05/2026 06:01

user1497787065 · 09/05/2026 22:42

No scandals? Is that because there is a media blackout on the Ukrainian rent boy/arson case?

He was the victim in the case of Ukranian men setting fire to his car and 2 properties if that's what you're referring to.

I would say provide a source if you know different but it seems you get your information from dubious sources.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj6p7ekwwn7o

OP posts: