Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To explain what an immigration detention centre actually is

137 replies

ThesebeautifulthingsthatIvegot · 05/05/2026 20:18

AIBU to explain what an immigration detention centre is? We have a major political party stating that they want to build new detention centres in constituencies that vote for another party. But even they seem confused, if not intentionally misleading people. So I thought I'd save people a bit of Googling as there seems to be some serious misunderstanding. So below is a Google summary. Happy to be told I'm unreasonable for trying to educate people.

An immigration detention centre (or Immigration Removal Centre - IRC) is a secure facility where foreign nationals are held, often in prison-like conditions, while the government resolves their immigration status. These centres are used to detain asylum seekers, undocumented migrants, or those awaiting deportation.
Administrative Process:
Detention is not a criminal sentence ordered by a court, but an administrative decision often made by immigration authorities.
Purpose: Centers are primarily used for initial processing, establishing identity, or holding individuals for removal/deportation from the country.
Conditions: Despite not being prisons, many facilities are high-security with locked cells, limited contact with the outside world, and often managed by private companies.
Legal Standing: People detained often include asylum seekers and people whose visas have expired

OP posts:
ThesebeautifulthingsthatIvegot · 06/05/2026 07:01

Stnam · 06/05/2026 06:38

I thought you had been held in one or worked in one. That would have been a lot more interesting.

I do know that 100s of people attempt to bring drugs into the country every day. If they are caught, they are arrested, sentenced and deported. Presumably they often end up in immigration detention centres at some stage of that process. It is a lot more humane than what a lot of other countries do to people smuggling in drugs. I also suspect that in the life of a drug mule it is probably not the worst thing that happens to them.

Edited

I have worked with people who have been in one, but not extensively nor on aspects related to their stay in one. I wouldn't say I have any great insight compared to you or the average person.

The people that I worked with weren't drug runners. They were mainly people who had illegally outstayed visa requirements. Personally, I don't feel that this should lead to imprisonment and I would be happy with looser immigration laws that would allow people easier access to a visa if they have been working and contributing successfully for years. I do appreciate that this is an easier position to have as a person whose job is extremely unlikely to go to an new immigrant (such as me). I am able to see the big picture that immigration supports economic growth without any direct threat to my short-term income; others do not have that luxury. I don't believe that we should have open borders because a rapid increase in immigration would be harmful.

I do think that people who commit harmful crimes should be detained. This would include drug running, murder, rape etc. I don't think that immigration detention centres should be eradicated because they are necessary for people who cause public harm, as well as a short-term measure while processing asylum claims.

OP posts:
Stnam · 06/05/2026 06:38

ThesebeautifulthingsthatIvegot · 05/05/2026 20:36

As I said in the opening, I copied from Google. I couldn't explain it as well in my own words.

Edited

I thought you had been held in one or worked in one. That would have been a lot more interesting.

I do know that 100s of people attempt to bring drugs into the country every day. If they are caught, they are arrested, sentenced and deported. Presumably they often end up in immigration detention centres at some stage of that process. It is a lot more humane than what a lot of other countries do to people smuggling in drugs. I also suspect that in the life of a drug mule it is probably not the worst thing that happens to them.

Tattletale26 · 06/05/2026 06:36

OneTealShaker · 05/05/2026 20:22

What’s your point?

People who didn’t vote for mass immigration don’t want these facilities where they live. It’s quite simple.

Yep. Nailed it.

ThesebeautifulthingsthatIvegot · 06/05/2026 06:35

OneTealShaker · 06/05/2026 06:24

I wonder, if after, this valiant, brave, courageous and public service minded attempt to explain what a detention centre is, OP has managed to convince everyone that they want one in their neighbourhood. A bit like a Waitrose.

I don't want to convince anyone that they want one in their neighbourhood.

OP posts:
Peony1985 · 06/05/2026 06:33

EvelynBeatrice · 05/05/2026 23:54

Elements of this post - not all - bear some similarities to the deliberate blindness and obfuscation of the trans debate.

Any suggestion that dangers to women increase by allowing universal unchallenged access by any man into spaces where women formerly relied on single sex spaces receives shouts of transphobia- whereas in reality none of the objecting women are remotely concerned about transmen being present - just males. Call it misandry if you wish, but it’s not transphobia!

What drives many women’s concerns about
immigration is the contingent of large numbers of single poor young men from cultures that often regard women as lesser, in some cases akin to livestock - naturally they feel that these males are unlikely to have a positive impact on our society or the safety of women and children. It’s their maleness and misogyny that is regarded as objectionable, not the colour of their skin. It’s not racism.

Some women feel that the interests of women and children must always give way to those of needy men. Those views are no more worthy or moral than the opposite view.

Agreed.

OneTealShaker · 06/05/2026 06:24

I wonder, if after, this valiant, brave, courageous and public service minded attempt to explain what a detention centre is, OP has managed to convince everyone that they want one in their neighbourhood. A bit like a Waitrose.

NeelyOHara · 06/05/2026 06:19

EvelynBeatrice · 05/05/2026 23:54

Elements of this post - not all - bear some similarities to the deliberate blindness and obfuscation of the trans debate.

Any suggestion that dangers to women increase by allowing universal unchallenged access by any man into spaces where women formerly relied on single sex spaces receives shouts of transphobia- whereas in reality none of the objecting women are remotely concerned about transmen being present - just males. Call it misandry if you wish, but it’s not transphobia!

What drives many women’s concerns about
immigration is the contingent of large numbers of single poor young men from cultures that often regard women as lesser, in some cases akin to livestock - naturally they feel that these males are unlikely to have a positive impact on our society or the safety of women and children. It’s their maleness and misogyny that is regarded as objectionable, not the colour of their skin. It’s not racism.

Some women feel that the interests of women and children must always give way to those of needy men. Those views are no more worthy or moral than the opposite view.

Excellently explained.

Cheese55 · 06/05/2026 06:00

PoliteSquid · 05/05/2026 21:49

IRCs have existed in England for about 25 years, probably more! I worked at one briefly, supporting single women asylum seekers.

All the asylum seekers I met had been detained for out staying visas (usually by several YEARS) and working illegally! It was only when caught they claimed to be fleeing persecution.

I still have friends working in the immigration sector. Detention is now rare, the more common way of dealing with an asylum claim is to grant “immigration bail” which means they are left to fend for themselves with no recourse to public funds (no benefits, housing, education, NHS etc) and no right to work. And from there most will go and work illegally as a way of supporting themselves.

We don’t have any idea where people are or how many people are living here ‘illegally’ A removal centre solves that issue!

NRPF still includes NHS (for all ) and education (for children). Its housing ,which is the most expensive for individual councils to provide, in the South anyway so they support granting asylum.

saraclara · 06/05/2026 00:43

Dollymylove · 05/05/2026 22:56

Nothing wrong with it, if only the many of our own homeless people with nowhere safe to sleep were treated in the same way

Most homeless people don't want a roof over their heads, even when it's offered. Mental ill health, alcoholism and addiction are the issues that prevent them leading a safer life.

I volunteered to help at a winter night shelter, but only if was literally freezing, would people choose to stay overnight. They might come in for an evening meal and for breakfast, but it was a struggle for them to manage to sleep indoors and many didn't want to stick to the (very few and very fair) rules, so they went back to where they usually slept.

There is accommodation available to rough sleepers, but many choose not to take advantage of it. Immigration detention centres are not depriving the homeless of a roof.

justinhawkinsnavalfluff · 06/05/2026 00:33

EvelynBeatrice · 05/05/2026 23:54

Elements of this post - not all - bear some similarities to the deliberate blindness and obfuscation of the trans debate.

Any suggestion that dangers to women increase by allowing universal unchallenged access by any man into spaces where women formerly relied on single sex spaces receives shouts of transphobia- whereas in reality none of the objecting women are remotely concerned about transmen being present - just males. Call it misandry if you wish, but it’s not transphobia!

What drives many women’s concerns about
immigration is the contingent of large numbers of single poor young men from cultures that often regard women as lesser, in some cases akin to livestock - naturally they feel that these males are unlikely to have a positive impact on our society or the safety of women and children. It’s their maleness and misogyny that is regarded as objectionable, not the colour of their skin. It’s not racism.

Some women feel that the interests of women and children must always give way to those of needy men. Those views are no more worthy or moral than the opposite view.

Very well put!

saraclara · 06/05/2026 00:29

ThesebeautifulthingsthatIvegot · 05/05/2026 21:31

Where would those people have been previously?

I'm a cynic - do you think this was done so that the percentage staying in the UK decreased, to appease people who want this?

No. I think it was just done so that those people coming out of prison couldn't disappear before they were deported. More of an efficiency decision, as far as I know.

EvelynBeatrice · 05/05/2026 23:54

Plasticdreams · 05/05/2026 20:26

I believe this goes against human rights. I would personally look at the centres/camps Trump has set up in the U.S. to see how it is working out for them. Check all news sources not just Fox News.
If this ever happens (which I hope it doesn’t) and I live in a Green run area, I welcome them and the new jobs they will create in my local area.

Reform actually think that the left won’t want the camps near their homes, but what they don’t realise is that we are not afraid like they are! It would be scary if you think anyone brown is a threat, but we don’t!

Elements of this post - not all - bear some similarities to the deliberate blindness and obfuscation of the trans debate.

Any suggestion that dangers to women increase by allowing universal unchallenged access by any man into spaces where women formerly relied on single sex spaces receives shouts of transphobia- whereas in reality none of the objecting women are remotely concerned about transmen being present - just males. Call it misandry if you wish, but it’s not transphobia!

What drives many women’s concerns about
immigration is the contingent of large numbers of single poor young men from cultures that often regard women as lesser, in some cases akin to livestock - naturally they feel that these males are unlikely to have a positive impact on our society or the safety of women and children. It’s their maleness and misogyny that is regarded as objectionable, not the colour of their skin. It’s not racism.

Some women feel that the interests of women and children must always give way to those of needy men. Those views are no more worthy or moral than the opposite view.

EmeraldRoulette · 05/05/2026 23:42

ThesebeautifulthingsthatIvegot · 05/05/2026 23:32

@EmeraldRoulette it was clear a while back that our politics weren't exactly aligned, but praising Boris Johnson is shocking!

I'm also off as this is far too much for this time of night!

I wasn't praising him 😂😂😂

Oh dear, it's too late to edit

No, I meant it all turned to shit with Boris Johnson being asleep at the wheel

He seems to have set the bar there

I blame him for lots of things - most things in fact

I thought I had phrased that fine, but obviously not - hang on isn't it Obvious that saying "since Boris Johnson" includes Boris Johnson?

Dollymylove · 05/05/2026 23:39

Gealach · 05/05/2026 23:17

Are you calling for rough sleepers to be locked up in detention centres? When would they get to leave?

No, just a roof over their heads, instead of a sleeping bag on the pavement outside a hotel with illegals hanging out of the windows laughing at them.
Oh and before you proclaim that "this doesn't happen" ....it does becaue i have witnessed it

ThesebeautifulthingsthatIvegot · 05/05/2026 23:32

@EmeraldRoulette it was clear a while back that our politics weren't exactly aligned, but praising Boris Johnson is shocking!

I'm also off as this is far too much for this time of night!

OP posts:
EmeraldRoulette · 05/05/2026 23:21

@Plasticdreams I'm descended from immigrants

I know all of this

It does not sit well with how we handle the situation now

I don't feel as if you are thinking in terms of 2026. There is a difference between having a thoughtful and considered system - of anything - and what we have now.

Actually, careful thought doesn't seem to have factored into politics for awhile now! It's like everyone's been asleep at the wheel since Boris Johnson!

I'm not voting Reform but some of their candidates in the south-east I think are descended from immigrants as well. As I said, I don't feel as if you are up-to-date on this.

I really am leaving the thread now... must stop doom scrolling...

ThesebeautifulthingsthatIvegot · 05/05/2026 23:20

@EmeraldRoulette I misread and that's on me - it probably came across as disingenuous but it was an error. I hope that sharing your experience wasn't harmful and that your cheerful TV is successful.

What you've said is so personal and also insightful as to the real nature of things.

In all communities, some people are bad, and will do bad things. Many more people behave poorly because they are desperate (I know of this from working with young offenders, as well as from the rat/cocaine experiment). The proportion of desperate people in a migrant hotel is going to be off the charts. And putting lots of desperate people together seems mad to me. In a detention centre, they are no short-term risk to people outside of the centre. In a hotel, they are.

Both the greens and reform think that they have a solution to the kind of experience you and your neighbors went through. The greens propose reducing red tape around immigration so that the people who would have been in a hotel are in the community. Reform propose tightening controls so that people are detained instead of being in a hotel (I think - anyone correct me if I'm wrong). There is logic in both arguments but I am personally not on board with either. However, the current system is clearly not working either.

In the end, like many things, it is complicated. I've said I wanted to start a debate and it tracks that I'm now more confused than ever. I know that reform 100% isn't for me, but you have made me think about some issues with the current system.

OP posts:
MyNieceWentToGreece · 05/05/2026 23:19

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 05/05/2026 23:00

Oh you mean the people who didn’t vote to leave the EU? Thats what kicked off massively increased immigration, and people were warned before voting. So all Remain voting areas should be safe. That’s good to know!

That simply isn’t true. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy0w9zw57glo

The small boat numbers began increasing in 2018. Well before we stopped being able to utilise the Dublin Agreement (which did not play the role you might think it did). And the reason for that is that it is far easier and safer for the traffickers to load 80 people onto a poor quality rhib on a French beach with no security guards or PAF, than it is to get a handful of people into the back of a lorry and through UK Border Force, and have to do that over and over again until the lorry they’re in gets through BF and onto a ferry bound for the UK. Much less work, much less risk, much more money. It’s hardly surprising that numbers increased.

A group of people, many wearing life jackets, are on a small boat off the coast, with two others trying to climb aboard.

A decade of small boat migrants - how did it begin?

A former Dover coastguard, an ex-border security chief and a customs boss recall the first landings.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy0w9zw57glo

Gealach · 05/05/2026 23:17

Dollymylove · 05/05/2026 22:56

Nothing wrong with it, if only the many of our own homeless people with nowhere safe to sleep were treated in the same way

Are you calling for rough sleepers to be locked up in detention centres? When would they get to leave?

Plasticdreams · 05/05/2026 23:16

EmeraldRoulette · 05/05/2026 22:57

@Plasticdreams "Have you thought to fact check or do you follow blindly the rich white men"

i'm not rich, I'm not white. I'm not a man.

I have listed the problems I had living near an asylum seeker hotel - problems that were experienced by many people in the local community, more for women though for obvious reasons

If you don't want to listen to us, there's nothing I can do, but plenty of us are speaking out

The ONS and the MOJ do not keep statistics but if you have a look at Court News or just listen to those of us who have the experience, you might learn more about it.

No one is blaming all their problems on this

But to deny that it's a problem is unfair.

I’m not denying that some of the people coming into the country will cause problems and we need a better system to manage immigration,

But the staff in our care homes, and the nurses and doctors in this country aren’t voting for reform! Why is that? Because we don’t trust reform and predominantly these people are immigrants.

Have you been to the memorial in Trinity Square in London for all of those who lost their lives at sea, defending England in WW1 and 2. Thousands of names of immigrants who fought and died to defend us.

We are nothing in this country without immigration. The old version of the UK will never be again, we have to evolve. Crime in London is at its lowest in decades and it’s never been so diverse. This information is readily available if you want to look.

white men in this country still pose more of a danger to us statistically.

We have problems with wealth inequality, like we never had in the past and this pushes people towards crime. We need to tackle this and give younger people more support in community to spot radicalisation, drug dealing etc and invest more money in mental health services and policing again amongst other things

Papersquidge · 05/05/2026 23:13

I think we should be more like some other countries and force integration if it’s not happening. So breaking up ghettos and mandating that all children attend day care for a set period each week where they learn English and British values.

Illegal immigrants should absolutely be automatically detained and background checked so we can assess whether they are suitable for entry into our society. Allowing people to work during this time would be helpful….jobs within the bounds of the detention centre.

There’s nothing wrong with the above. People can still be treated with respect and given a safe place to live. We need people who come here to integrate.

Gealach · 05/05/2026 23:12

Castellio · 05/05/2026 22:38

I can’t see a problem with detaining undocumented migrants until they either produce a passport or their home state verifies they are who they say they are. Then we check for criminal records, hear their asylum claim and decide whether they have a right to remain in the UK until their country is safe enough to return to.

if you wanted a successful migrant scheme look to Denmark. If you gain asylum you are expected to integrate fully, and are only given temporary residence with the expectation that you’ll return when safe. Seems reasonable.

So people would be “vouched for” by the Taliban, the Iranian regime…

Do you think it’s a good idea to only take in Afghans that the Taliban have given the thumbs up to?

EmeraldRoulette · 05/05/2026 23:06

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 05/05/2026 23:00

Oh you mean the people who didn’t vote to leave the EU? Thats what kicked off massively increased immigration, and people were warned before voting. So all Remain voting areas should be safe. That’s good to know!

So how do you explain the same problem happening in European countries who are still in the EU?

EmeraldRoulette · 05/05/2026 23:05

@ThesebeautifulthingsthatIvegot you might also be interested in the work of Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who was born in Somalia and suffered FGM. She has a huge catalogue of work so I won't link anything.

I had the great privilege of meeting her not long after Theo van Gogh was murdered, so very difficult times for her. A huge impressive woman and well beyond my intellectual stature! Yes, I felt intimidated to meet her 😂 (also met her husband, Niall Ferguson, in later years. He is gorgeous in real life. Not that anyone asked, but just in case you wanted to know 😂)

worcesterpear · 05/05/2026 23:05

I don't support Reform but you posting an ai summary is hardly going to convince any people who were going to vote for them otherwise. It is like Brexit all over again, but more dumbed down.

Swipe left for the next trending thread