Immigration Detention Centres in Green Constituencies

Ok they can’t be detained, are the greens happy to have non detained asylum seekers funnelled to green voting areas? I’m not a reform voter, I just find it interesting how hysterical greens have been about this.

I don’t understand why they don’t just say “no to detention centres, yes to migrants in our areas”.

And the stories in the French news suggesting that his wife might not have as much money as she said and he bought a house for her/them but put it in her name to dodge the stamp duty...

Deflection tactics?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8jv8xl17l8o

Reform is planning to deport refugees (incl women and children) from the detention centres.

And when they can't, they will not allow them to move into communities.

You know the difference between migrant, refugee and asylum seeker?

What makes you think it's deliberate concealment?
I taught in a predominantly Muslim area, and I'd guess that half of the boys were officially Mohamed, but were actually called something else. The name is given to first born sons as a gesture of respect to the prophet, but the name that they're known by, will often be something else entirely.

Green policy

https://greenparty.org.uk/about/our-manifesto/a-fairer-greener-welcome/

• An end to the hostile environment.
• An end to the minimum income requirements for spouses of those holding work visas.
• Safe routes to sanctuary for those fleeing persecution.
• The dysfunctional Home Office to be replaced with a new Department of Migration, separating this function from the criminal justice system.
• An end to immigration detention for all migrants unless they are a danger to public safety.
• Abolition of the ‘no recourse to public funds’ condition that exacerbates social, economic, and racial inequalities.
• Those seeking asylum and protection to be permitted to work while their application is being decided.

What are you on about? Housing for refugees is nothing to do with this nonsense fake policy. Presumably you know that refugees can't be detained. Would be a bit embarrassing to defend a policy you have absolutely no understanding of.

Yeah I did, invite migrants to come live in a more welcoming area to refugees. Be clear about it, greens want migrants, not detention centres, thats fine, then they can make it a priority to create good standard housing for migrants in their towns.

Whats the problem with that as a policy? It’s perfectly reasonable as a suggestion.

Also if the problem is detention centres then the greens can make it clear they will welcome people with asylum status into the constituencies they control but they will object to detention centres full stop.

Did you read any of the thread?
Greens don't want detention centres. I'm pretty sure no-one who votes green would want a detention centre in any area. Nor do they think asylum applicants should be stuck in shitty hotels or HMOs (assuming that is what you're getting confused with) and banned from working while awaiting an asylum application to be determined. Either in their town or anywhere. There's no "shrodinger" (it's Schrödinger) about it.

Yeah I knew loads of muslim growing up who never used their actual given first name, it’s quite normal tbh.

I wouldn’t have thought the open border greens would see housing migrants in their area as a threat. You can’t simultaneously be open borders and then also freak out at the idea of random migrants moving to your town. It’s shrodingers migrant, simultaneously enriching and threatening. Fascinating.

He deliberately conceals it.
Please don't try to defend him.

What makes you think Green voters (for clarity - I'm not one of them) want detention centres? I thought it was Reform voters that wanted to carry out more deportations?

But beyond that - a potential PM is meant to act as PM for the whole country - not to act only for those constituencies that vote for him, and punish those who do not. It's just a further illustration that Farage does not have the character for the role.

Yep, but apparently we aren't supposed to say so.

Much as it pains me to defend a Reform idiot, virtually all first born sons of Muslim parents are traditionally named Mohamed, but most of them are known by their middle name. He may never have been actually called Mohammed.

Exactly. The level of stupidity on this thread is quite startling.

Again, there's no reason for anyone not to want an IDC in their area (other than that they're big, fairly ugly buildings). The detainees are locked up. No-one local will ever see one.

This makes no sense. Are you confusing temporary housing with detention centres?

Oh joy. My post has been deleted because I asked if a pp was hard of thinking.

It's weird how MNHQ often allow the most outrageous content to stand while mildly pointing out that truly idiotic posts are a bit stupid apparently isn't allowed.

Completely agree - this is straight from the orange one’s playbook.

Why does Zia Yusuf from Reform not use his first name 🤔 mohammed?
He knows why.

Because his faithful followers won't like it one bit.

Yeah, I mean, that ain’t gonna be why I don’t vote Green.
They’re both massively racist based parties, they just approach it from different angles .