Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder whether, as per this claim, Annabel was really seen as a 'yuppie' name in the 80s?

136 replies

Giselle374 · 04/05/2026 00:57

I read Lady Colin Campbell's book a while ago about Harry & Meghan. A lot of the claims seemed ridiculous- they can certainly be criticised but the book went beyond reasonable. Anyway, one of the points I found odd was that Campbell claimed naming rules have always been very strict for royals, and mentioned an earlier name choice for Beatrice being vetoed.
I googled and found this choice was Annabel, which the Queen apparently vetoed for being 'too yuppie'. Was it really seen that way in the 80s or was this just some eccentricity of hers? I was born early 2000s and knew quite a few Annabels and Isabel/Isabellas, also one Arabella. It just seemed like a classic name, hardly one to complain about.
Not a traditional royal one : but then she was OK with Zara.

(Not the main point, but while I think they were wrong to choose Lilibet, I didn't agree with Campbell's argument that the Annabel veto meant the Queen remained just as strict in the 2010s. She clearly wasn't if she allowed Savannah, Sienna and Mia, all nice names but arguably more non traditional than Annabel)

OP posts:
Giselle374 · 04/05/2026 01:49

EconomyClassRockstar · 04/05/2026 01:32

Two of the highest profile royal journalists of the time had a daughter together called Arabella. I can see why ol' Liz would be, "Absolutely not"!

Aha, that could be part of it.

OP posts:
Giselle374 · 04/05/2026 01:46

Hmm, interesting! Thanks for the replies. It's funny as if you look on the Baby Names board, nearly all the threads are almost totally positive. I suppose by the early 2000s the associations had gone away.

Whereas names like Sharon or Tracey still seem much more frowned on but I suppose the associations there were more recent.

OP posts:
FernsInValley · 04/05/2026 01:32

I just don't care for it. I'd go by Anna is my parents had named me Annabelle.

EconomyClassRockstar · 04/05/2026 01:32

Two of the highest profile royal journalists of the time had a daughter together called Arabella. I can see why ol' Liz would be, "Absolutely not"!

DramaAlpaca · 04/05/2026 01:30

Annabel in the 80s was the epitome of yuppie.

Mama2many73 · 04/05/2026 01:29

Personal pref, i d say yes to Annabel, definitely to Arrabella, but not to Isabelle/isabella.

Creepybookworm · 04/05/2026 01:26

I don't know about yuppie. It was posh but not royal posh. I grew up working class and didn't meet an Annabelle until my child started nursery in 2003.

TheChicDreamer · 04/05/2026 01:22

Yes it was absolutely yuppyish. There was / is even a club called Annabel’s where all the Annabels hung out.

Bunnyofhope · 04/05/2026 01:13

Annabel = pure yupster.

OP posts:
Flowersdie · 04/05/2026 01:01

Annabel was the ultimate 80s yuppie name

Swipe left for the next trending thread