Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Do you privately judge women who’ve had a high number of sexual partners?

238 replies

Ilostallthepens · 03/05/2026 10:34

If they’d slept with, say 50-60 men? Even if you claim publicly to not judge them, would you secretly? Would you judge a lesbian who’d slept with 50-60 women? If you did would it be in a different kind of judgement that you had for the straight woman? And would you judge a man who’d slept with 50-60 women? And would this be a different kind of judgement?

OP posts:
Createausername1970 · 03/05/2026 22:02

Depends what I was judging them on and why.

If I found out a bloke I was seeing had slept with 50+ women I would judge him to be someone who didn't want - or couldn't cope with - commitment. Whether that would be an issue for me would depend on what I was wanting from the relationship.

I wouldn't consider myself to be "better than", which is what I assume you mean.

Gealach · 03/05/2026 21:56

No I don’t care what consenting adults do with each other. It’s completely irrelevant. I know couples who are swingers and they have probably slept with tons of people. It’s just not a big deal for me.

KitsyWitsy · 03/05/2026 21:51

No. I don't care what other women do.

But in reference to a PP who said she wouldn't like a man who had slept with so many, I get it. The men I have had relationships with have had less than 5-10 partners. Personally, my number is over 30.

Ilostallthepens · 03/05/2026 21:40

Circe7 · 03/05/2026 21:01

I think it can say something about a person’s attitude to sex. For me, amount of sex you have simply isn’t a moral issue. It has been a moral issue for so much of history that I think it’s hard for people not to see it that way even if they haven’t put together a rational argument for doing so.

I’m in a stage where I am having a fair amount of casual sex. It’s right for me at the moment. It probably won’t be forever. I haven’t done it much in the past. I don’t care if I get to 50+ in number if it’s still working for me.

I’m not sure it says much about ability to form relationships or self esteem. It’s just life circumstances of being a single parent and not being in a position to have a serious relationship for the time being.

You can be very fussy about who you have sex with as a woman looking for casual sex. You have almost infinite choice. I usually have a pretty intellectual and wide ranging conversation with someone before we hook up - sometimes you can be more open with a stranger than someone you might want a long-term relationship with. I’m not really compromising on looks, intellect, general decency. I usually see someone a few times but not always.

It’s maybe unusual for women to have that attitude to sex but possible.

Very much agreed that you can have a high number and still be fussy. Maybe not on personality/values etc but on looks at least. I don’t think it’s accurate to say if you’ve slept with a lot of people it must mean you have low standards or sleep with strangers. My number is high but they’ve all been physically attractive, none have been strangers, and the majority of them have been women, including a sizeable number of “straight” women. I’ve never had sex with anyone just cos I was drunk then regretted it and I’ve never had sex with anyone I didn’t find attractive

OP posts:
Circe7 · 03/05/2026 21:01

I think it can say something about a person’s attitude to sex. For me, amount of sex you have simply isn’t a moral issue. It has been a moral issue for so much of history that I think it’s hard for people not to see it that way even if they haven’t put together a rational argument for doing so.

I’m in a stage where I am having a fair amount of casual sex. It’s right for me at the moment. It probably won’t be forever. I haven’t done it much in the past. I don’t care if I get to 50+ in number if it’s still working for me.

I’m not sure it says much about ability to form relationships or self esteem. It’s just life circumstances of being a single parent and not being in a position to have a serious relationship for the time being.

You can be very fussy about who you have sex with as a woman looking for casual sex. You have almost infinite choice. I usually have a pretty intellectual and wide ranging conversation with someone before we hook up - sometimes you can be more open with a stranger than someone you might want a long-term relationship with. I’m not really compromising on looks, intellect, general decency. I usually see someone a few times but not always.

It’s maybe unusual for women to have that attitude to sex but possible.

tripleginandtonic · 03/05/2026 20:29

No

HeadDeskHeadDesk · 03/05/2026 20:28

Ilostallthepens · 03/05/2026 19:38

But just because the person has had a high number of sexual partners in the past, doesn’t mean they can’t have an intense intellectual bond with you. That is judging them harshly on their past I think. Their high number could have also been for multiple different reasons. It doesn’t necessarily mean they couldn’t commit to you and you couldn’t have an intense intellectual bond

You could say that about anything though. I've heard people say they could never date a Tory or would only ever date other vegans for example. I have my own things that I would find deeply unattractive or problematic in a person. We all have our lines in the sand and in doing so we eliminate a huge number of potential partners we might have a intense bond with if we gave them a chance.

But we make our judgements in the believe that certain choices and behaviours say a lot about the kind of person someone is, so if your values are completely different, why bother?

Nobody owes anyone else a chance to have a relationship with them if they feel it's too much of a compromise of their values.

MermaidsSideEye · 03/05/2026 20:07

Ponderingwindow · 03/05/2026 19:54

Yes, they might have that bond with me, but I am interested in a person who needs that bond for sexual attraction with anyone. It’s just my preference for a partner. I’m odd. I know I am odd.

there are other people who don’t need that. They are better suited for one another.

But maybe they had it with all the other people they slept with? I did much of my sleeping around at Oxford, so there wasn’t exactly a shortage of clever people I could bind with intellectually, and I’m a total sapiophile.

faithfultoGeorgeMichael · 03/05/2026 19:59

How the fuck would I ever know unless it was my partner?? what a bizarre way to think 😂

Ponderingwindow · 03/05/2026 19:54

Ilostallthepens · 03/05/2026 19:38

But just because the person has had a high number of sexual partners in the past, doesn’t mean they can’t have an intense intellectual bond with you. That is judging them harshly on their past I think. Their high number could have also been for multiple different reasons. It doesn’t necessarily mean they couldn’t commit to you and you couldn’t have an intense intellectual bond

Yes, they might have that bond with me, but I am interested in a person who needs that bond for sexual attraction with anyone. It’s just my preference for a partner. I’m odd. I know I am odd.

there are other people who don’t need that. They are better suited for one another.

SwarmJet · 03/05/2026 19:48

MabelRoyds · 03/05/2026 15:25

It doesn’t affect me, obviously. What care? What are you talking about?

Did you read ops question?!

your attempts to attack my sexuality say nothing about me and show a lot about you.

You seem to care about other people's sexual lives, given your comment. Bit ironic that you feel it necessary to make attacking comments on others sexuality! You just want others to feel the same shame and they don't!

Ilostallthepens · 03/05/2026 19:38

Ponderingwindow · 03/05/2026 15:31

To the extent that I would not be interested in dating the person, yes, I would judge as it would provide critical information. I don’t care what someone does, but that life is not for me. It’s not the way I experience attraction. I need an intense intellectual bond to feel sexual attraction. I want a partner who reciprocates.

But just because the person has had a high number of sexual partners in the past, doesn’t mean they can’t have an intense intellectual bond with you. That is judging them harshly on their past I think. Their high number could have also been for multiple different reasons. It doesn’t necessarily mean they couldn’t commit to you and you couldn’t have an intense intellectual bond

OP posts:
NeedyExpert · 03/05/2026 17:48

No I dont judge, cant see the problem in adults enjoying their sex lives. Also dont see why people reveal their number?
Does everyone do this?x

emmetgirl · 03/05/2026 17:46

No.

canklesmctacotits · 03/05/2026 17:41

Not judge, as such. My view is people are free to do whatever they want with their bodies. I don’t think negatively of anyone who has done extreme things with their bodies. At worst I’d feel sorry for them if that thing is a reflection of low self-esteem or a troubled mind or a lack of self-respect or an inability to form meaningful connections with people (not that these things are necessarily incompatible with having had lots of sexual partners, although they almost always are ime).

I do judge men differently from women, though. I think men who sleep around generally have less than respectful attitudes towards women, unless they own their psychology and show gratitude (not the right word, perhaps) or good fortune while acknowledging their sexual behaviour. Rarer, though. So I generally find a long sexual history in men pretty disgusting tbh. Men’s sexuality is so, so different from women’s.

IWaffleAlot · 03/05/2026 17:41

Weddinghoildaywoos · 03/05/2026 10:39

Honestly yes but I judge both men and women. I wouldn't go near a man who had a high number.

Same. That’s grim and dirty to me. Both men and women

susiedaisy1912 · 03/05/2026 17:39

Yes

chichi001 · 03/05/2026 17:38

HeadDeskHeadDesk · 03/05/2026 17:35

Oh I see, so how long have you been together? Presumably it slowed down a bit after his 20s if he was in a LTR before you?

We have been together a year.

He was in a ltr/marriage for 8 years in his laye 20s and 30s.

HeadDeskHeadDesk · 03/05/2026 17:35

chichi001 · 03/05/2026 17:19

He is 46 now...

Oh I see, so how long have you been together? Presumably it slowed down a bit after his 20s if he was in a LTR before you?

SoGoodToSeeYou · 03/05/2026 17:34

I don’t judge because I think people should do what they like with consenting adults. I have friends who have slept with a lot of people, but I wouldn’t want a partner who had had a high number of sexual partners.

HeadDeskHeadDesk · 03/05/2026 17:33

EwwPeople · 03/05/2026 17:25

What tender age? He started in his 20’s, you have no idea when he stopped/got with OP. If he was done by early 30’s that’s around 6 people a year. Not as seedy as you’re trying to make it sound.

That poster said 'he was single in his early 20s so had fun.'

On that basis, I assumed she meant he'd slept with 60 people up to his early 20s, after which he met her. Or went into an LTR with someone else.

He could have started at 15, or 21, I have no idea. But it's still a lot. Let's say he started at 15 and 'early 20s' means under 25, that's 10 years at 6 people per year on average, so a new person every 2 months for 10 years straight. And that's giving him the benefit of the doubt that it was spread across 10 years. It could actually have been a lot more densely packed than that.

JohnofWessex · 03/05/2026 17:30

One point I might make from my personal experience is that while there may be issues over a partners past I did have an issue with a partner in her mid 30's who didnt have a past which might have been a warning of the subsequent issues.......

NB to make sense of the subsequent post I was 10 years her junior

She was BTW perfectly pleasant and we had good times together BUT she could not manage to move on from 'dating' over a period of about 8 years.

By the same token I met my ex wife when she was 30, she had already been divorced and had at least one subsequent 'living together' and it became painfully obvious why

EwwPeople · 03/05/2026 17:25

HeadDeskHeadDesk · 03/05/2026 17:03

That's what I was thinking. I mean there's fun, and there's having really low standards, no boundaries and no respect for either yourself or the people you are using and discarding week in, week out.

To have racked up that many at such a tender age simply indicates that no-one wanted to stay with him for long enough to slow the numbers down a bit.

I think it's sad to have nothing but a long, long string of underwhelming one night stands to your name and rarely ever think 'I'd really love to see him/her again.' Or to hope that you will, but they never call you, because you were the throwaway shag that they wouldn't have had if they'd been sober.

If all your 'relationships' consist of fleeting casual sex with people you barely know and don't especially care to see again, it's a sign that you aren't exercising very good judgement or discernment in your life. It's the equivalent of eating absolutely nothing but McDonalds and chicken shop food. It shows you have no self respect.

What tender age? He started in his 20’s, you have no idea when he stopped/got with OP. If he was done by early 30’s that’s around 6 people a year. Not as seedy as you’re trying to make it sound.

chichi001 · 03/05/2026 17:19

Flamingojune · 03/05/2026 16:47

That is alot for that age.

He is 46 now...

CoffeeCantata · 03/05/2026 17:18

Honestly?

Yes. And not for misogynistic or prudish reasons. It's because of personal experience. The women I've known who've had loads of partners (from school to university to retirement!) have not been happy people. They've suffered much more than my (shall we say) less active friends/acquaintances from insecurity, depression, low self-esteem etc etc.

They've often been people who seem to be searching for something, trying the same old, same old and not finding it. I don't think the people I've known, though, have been intending to be carefree about relationships - they've clearly been intending and hoping each time that things would develop into a longterm relationship.

I think women who can live contentedly as some men have traditionally done (lots of ONS and many partners) are few and far between. Not saying they don't exist - but I genuinely think women are more likely to want more from an encounter than a one-night-stand, and I think they're justified in that.