Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think my dd is very young to be pregnant

254 replies

Nantobeb777 · 01/05/2026 20:02

Just 23

OP posts:
BrownBookshelf · 01/05/2026 21:23

I think any age beginning with a 2 is stretching it to say very young to be pregnant, but certainly not mid 20s like DD.

MasterBeth · 01/05/2026 21:22

Calliopespa · 01/05/2026 21:04

Interesting how old it was in the 1920s and 30s

Men lost in the First World War, presumably.

TheSocialHermit · 01/05/2026 21:22

Nantobeb777 · 01/05/2026 20:02

Just 23

It depends.. do you think she will be relying heavily on you for support? Does she have her own home, job, stable relationship, sensible with money etc? Of course you don’t need all of those things but they certainly help

Haribosweets · 01/05/2026 21:21

How I look at it is - its not too young and a 37 year old is not too old. What effects is the life you will have. For me I had my baby at 30. I spent all my 20s until I fell pregnant few months before my 30th going on holidays, out every Friday Saturday nights with friends, enjoying life with my husband and no worries at all. But now my 16 year old is autistic and I my life how it use old to be is no existent. I mean I do go out but like 2-3 times a year for a night out.
My friends who had baby in early 20s now have their life back as their child are adults and I do have jealousy!
I have friends who had baby early 40s and they are similar situation to me, enjoyed their 20s and 30s but won't get their life back until 50 +

MikeRafone · 01/05/2026 21:20

Papyrophile · 01/05/2026 21:17

Only if you are unfit. I had mine at 44, and never struggled with running around!

how do you know, if you haven't had a baby in your 20s you don't have the comparison

MikeRafone · 01/05/2026 21:19

both my daughters were in their twenties having their first baby, I was 24, eldest was 29 and youngest was 25

23 is hardly young, she has been an adult for 5 years

ImFinePMSL · 01/05/2026 21:18

Jesus before I opened the thread I thought you were going to say 14/15 🤣🤣🤣

Not that it’s any of our business but are there other factors here that’s worrying you? Is she homeless, out of work, addiction issues, unstable relationships that make it seem she would be unable to cope with a baby?

Hankunamatata · 01/05/2026 21:18

It is young but then depends on her circumstances. I knew people who had house, jobs and steady relationships from 19, had their kids in early 20s

Wyki · 01/05/2026 21:17

I was 23 when I got married and had my first baby 🤷🏼‍♀️

Papyrophile · 01/05/2026 21:17

GreenTraybake · 01/05/2026 21:15

It's fine. She has more energy to run around after them now. Having children in your 30s is a bit tough energy wise and overall healing.

Only if you are unfit. I had mine at 44, and never struggled with running around!

HariboFrenzy · 01/05/2026 21:16

Personally I think having the right partner is more important than the age of the mother. A 23 yo in a happy, stable relationship with a supportive partner is in a much better position than a woman in her 30s who 'accidentally' gets pregnant in a shit relationship because she's worried about 'time running out.'

GreenTraybake · 01/05/2026 21:15

It's fine. She has more energy to run around after them now. Having children in your 30s is a bit tough energy wise and overall healing.

Calliopespa · 01/05/2026 21:14

MikeRafone · 01/05/2026 21:13

after the First World War and Spanish flu, this may well have had a bearing on the age

Yes, I was thinking about that too.

MikeRafone · 01/05/2026 21:13

Calliopespa · 01/05/2026 21:04

Interesting how old it was in the 1920s and 30s

after the First World War and Spanish flu, this may well have had a bearing on the age

Papyrophile · 01/05/2026 21:13

Delici · 01/05/2026 21:07

I was 22. I love that now mine are adults I’m still in my 40’s.

I can admire that. My DC is 26 and I shall be 70 too soon. Obviously, I shall try to enable in every way possible, but it might not mean offering regular child care. However, distance meant that I didn't get any either.

PyongyangKipperbang · 01/05/2026 21:12

Its a difficult one.

On the one hand she is an adult and perfectly free to make her own decisions. I was married and trying for a baby at 23, had her at 24. But......I would be sad if that daughter (now late 20's) had had a baby that young herself.

I can see what I missed out on by having her and her brother so young. Building a career, travel, freedom, building a good financial buffer first, that sort of thing. I dont have a private pension for example, which didnt seem so important at the time, but now at 50 odd I realise what an issue that is.

When I look back I wouldnt say I was too young in terms of life experience or maturity, but I do think it would have been better if I had waited. But, on the basis that she is pregnant and presumably happy about it, I think you just need to keep it to yourself and go with the flow. But I do sympathise.

AcrossthePond55 · 01/05/2026 21:11

It depends on the woman.

At 23 I was in no way ready for motherhood. Did I have the needed skills to care for a baby? Yes. But that doesn't mean I was ready. At 23 I was still too self-oriented and focused on having a good time.

My sister had her first at 20, she was absolutely ready for it and slipped into motherhood as if it were a pair of comfy slippers.

suburberphobe · 01/05/2026 21:10

Does she have the money to bring up a child?

I am a solo mum. At 36.

Not easy at all.

weegiemum · 01/05/2026 21:10

My dd2 is 22 and her baby girl is due in September. She has a career in spa therapies and a really good job with fantastic maternity provision. Her partner also has a good job. They bought their own flat recently, and have their heads screwed on right. They’re going to be fine!
im 55 so not young to be a Gran. Dh is still processing being a grandpa but he’ll be fine.
Very much looking forward to being grandparents!

TheEasterBunny3 · 01/05/2026 21:10

It depends on her stage of life. I had DC1 at 23, DC2 at 24 and DC3 at 37. All three were planned, all with my husband and we're still very happily together now.

By 23 we had bought our first house, both had careers that paid well enough for us to buy a 3 bed semi in a good area, both had a car each & were ready for the next step.

The only thing I wish I could have done differently is had DC3 one year after DC2 - it would have been much easier logistically than the big age gap we have now!!

However if your DD still lives at home, has no employment & is not in stable relationship that you may be correct - it all depends on her current situation.

SusiQ18472638 · 01/05/2026 21:09

Dublassie · 01/05/2026 20:48

Agree . Way too young to get bogged down with kids . I think 30 is perfect . Young people should live their lives first .

I never felt “bogged down” by having children in my 20s, I genuinely loved it and I am now early 40s with 2 teenagers who I get on great with!

Delici · 01/05/2026 21:07

I was 22. I love that now mine are adults I’m still in my 40’s.

liamharha · 01/05/2026 21:07

Nantobeb777 · 01/05/2026 20:02

Just 23

When I look at my own now at 24 and 27 yea it seems young but I had my first at 17 ,depends on your daughter and her life style and maturity .

Papyrophile · 01/05/2026 21:06

And her career prospects seem decent.

SusiQ18472638 · 01/05/2026 21:06

I think that’s fine, I was 24 when we started trying for a baby and we had both of our children in our 20s, have never regretted it!

Swipe left for the next trending thread