Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to want politicians with strong academic and business backgrounds?

312 replies

Catsandjkr · 30/04/2026 12:33

AIBU to want politicans to be highly academically successful And have experience in running a business?

I'm so tired of these low grade politicians ruining our lives. They can lie (as Starmer exempifies), they don't need qualifications or experience to get the job. In inexplicable in other areas of life.

What a joke. But I suppose when its politicans like Lammy, Starmer, Reeves in charge, it won't ever change.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Badbadbunny · 02/05/2026 11:25

pinkstinks · 02/05/2026 10:44

Would you count running a charity as running a business? That might widen the pool and from experience managing funding, commissioning and large contracts as well as service delivery it’s very similar.

But it's still not entreprenneurial. It's business management, just like Starmer running a legal firm or a typical GP running a practice. There's a massive difference between actually being imaginative and sniffing out new opportunities, creating new products/services, seeking out new markets, etc etc compared with administering/managing an established organisation.

HughManity · 02/05/2026 11:23

Stand for parliament then, @Catsandjkr .

poetryandwine · 02/05/2026 11:21

We do have medics in Parliament. Has one ever been Health Secretary?

poetryandwine · 02/05/2026 11:19

Catsandjkr · 02/05/2026 11:13

Actually I saw that interview and was impressed by JM. I thought did he have that impact as PM? I was a bit too young to know much then, apart from how much my parents didn't like MT.

I was not in the UK but also thought MT a disaster, so I would not have voted for JM either.

Catsandjkr · 02/05/2026 11:15

PS. Scientists and Engineers that I know (I know many), have zero interest in being in politics. For obvious reasons.

OP posts:
Catsandjkr · 02/05/2026 11:13

poetryandwine · 02/05/2026 11:02

John Major’s interview on Newsnight was brilliant. He is an excellent former PM.

He made the point that growing up in a Labour dominated area he never doubted the commitments and loyalties of his councillors and MPs to (all of) their constituents. He feels that nowadays Labour is beholden primarily to one set of interest groups and the Conservatives to another, each as bad as the other.

He wants more real people - not just business people but teachers and scientists and engineers and ex military and tradespeople - in Parliament. On the surface it sounds similar to what OP is saying, but much more inclusive.

I think Westminster could also use a few more people who have transitioned from life on benefits to doing something economically and socially productive.

Actually I saw that interview and was impressed by JM. I thought did he have that impact as PM? I was a bit too young to know much then, apart from how much my parents didn't like MT.

OP posts:
poetryandwine · 02/05/2026 11:02

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 01/05/2026 14:41

@CatsandjkrI agree with you. Politicians do very little before being politicians. Starmer did but became a civil servant. I really think we need better business acumen and many MPs are just mouthpieces for poorly informed constituents. They will not tackle the big questions or long term issues - I think John Major will say this today at 3 on radio 5. Politics is in danger of being a side show that never changes anything. If MPs just see the role as campaigning for constituents, they have no true grasp on what large scale changes need to be made., let alone make them. They just look after their votes. They should work for the good of the whole country and that includes business and employment. Reeves does not have a clue.

John Major’s interview on Newsnight was brilliant. He is an excellent former PM.

He made the point that growing up in a Labour dominated area he never doubted the commitments and loyalties of his councillors and MPs to (all of) their constituents. He feels that nowadays Labour is beholden primarily to one set of interest groups and the Conservatives to another, each as bad as the other.

He wants more real people - not just business people but teachers and scientists and engineers and ex military and tradespeople - in Parliament. On the surface it sounds similar to what OP is saying, but much more inclusive.

I think Westminster could also use a few more people who have transitioned from life on benefits to doing something economically and socially productive.

Catsandjkr · 02/05/2026 10:50

poetryandwine · 02/05/2026 10:46

Any confusion is understandable. You’re pro business and both in favour of and against Oxford, in different posts.

Yet the only politician you mention by name is Bill Clinton. Zero business experience. Oxford, and before that the Foreign Service College at Georgetown and Yale Law. Difficult to devise a more strictly government/political background than that.

He was brought up by 2 very strong women - perhaps that saved him

OP posts:
Catsandjkr · 02/05/2026 10:48

pinkstinks · 02/05/2026 10:44

Would you count running a charity as running a business? That might widen the pool and from experience managing funding, commissioning and large contracts as well as service delivery it’s very similar.

Possibly? Tbh I don't know enough about running a charity / how to run a charity to say. From what you've said it might be a good idea.

OP posts:
poetryandwine · 02/05/2026 10:46

Catsandjkr · 02/05/2026 10:31

It is in the first sentence of my OP babe

'AIBU to want politicians to be highly academically successful And have experience in running a business?'

Now I am not sure where you got confused, but here we are.

Any confusion is understandable. You’re pro business and both in favour of and against Oxford, in different posts.

Yet the only politician you mention by name is Bill Clinton. Zero business experience. Oxford, and before that the Foreign Service College at Georgetown and Yale Law. Difficult to devise a more strictly government/political background than that.

pinkstinks · 02/05/2026 10:44

Would you count running a charity as running a business? That might widen the pool and from experience managing funding, commissioning and large contracts as well as service delivery it’s very similar.

Catsandjkr · 02/05/2026 10:32

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 02/05/2026 07:11

@MrsShawnHatosy They have too much compassion. It’s why a minority get a lot of benefits that others pay heavily towards. It’s not just about listening to complaining constituents. We need people with vision to unpick the issues and take long term decisions. What we don’t need is knee jerk compassion.

Agreed

OP posts:
Catsandjkr · 02/05/2026 10:31

Wordsmithery · 01/05/2026 22:40

Comprehension should not rely on guesswork by the reader. The original post was not clear - either to me or to other posters.
No need to be embarrassed for me, thanks. Your energy would be better spent editing your posts.

It is in the first sentence of my OP babe

'AIBU to want politicians to be highly academically successful And have experience in running a business?'

Now I am not sure where you got confused, but here we are.

OP posts:
Catsandjkr · 02/05/2026 10:27

MoFadaCromulent · 01/05/2026 17:11

I also don't think those things should be discounted but I still strongly believe it needs to be representative, a country is not a business otherwise we fuck off the arts, put apartments over every playground, scrap NMW, privatise everything etc

So it's important that quality of life etc is prioritized for all and representative politics helps achieve that.

It's also clear a country isn't a money tree so yeah if someone is doing the accounts I'd rather they trained in kpmg than they were just good at saving for their summer holidays.

But I think the narrow definition of the OPs with regards to business experience which would exclude those who haven't run a business is nuts.

People point to Sunak as someone with a good record in business, hard to disagree, as far as I know he never ran one so out he goes. Keir starmer, barrister and head of DPP, undoubtedly managing a huge amount of people and an important role .... Doesn't count, he didn't have to organize a payroll.

By their own assessment there's isn't one politician in the last decade that meets the criteria

Yes. And look where we are.

OP posts:
SherbetDipDap · 02/05/2026 10:25

VickyEadieofThigh · 30/04/2026 12:36

I disagree that people who've run businesses = good government. What makes good government in my opinion is a good mix of experiences, including academic, business, 'real life', etc. Starmer is an academically able, successful lawyer - that you dislike him doesn't negate those facts.

I agree.

Get some healthcare professionals (people with recent on the ground experience, not band 8s or professors who haven’t changed a bedsheet or spoken to a patient in years), emergency services, civil engineers, tradespeople etc. involved.

DH and I have a theory that they need a bloke called Jason who is a generic man (or woman tbf) that they run things by before announcing policies. If Jason who is a scaffolder, with two kids, a wife, and cares about his local community thinks something sounds a bit ‘off’, it probably is.

I don’t think self-serving billionaires/millionaires and aristocrats represent the vast majority of society.

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 02/05/2026 07:11

@MrsShawnHatosy They have too much compassion. It’s why a minority get a lot of benefits that others pay heavily towards. It’s not just about listening to complaining constituents. We need people with vision to unpick the issues and take long term decisions. What we don’t need is knee jerk compassion.

MrsShawnHatosy · 01/05/2026 23:34

I want politicians with intellect, life experience and compassion.

TopPocketFind · 01/05/2026 23:28

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 01/05/2026 23:15

@TopPocketFind It’s not nonsense. It’s policies without understanding consequences and, even worse, not caring. It’s political dogma at its worse. It’s not helping the growth agenda and it’s foolhardy. Long term growth policies are needed and that means not trying to obstruct business and understanding business needs. Most MPs are incapable of that.

The bit about Rayner was the nonsense part, the ETA

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 01/05/2026 23:15

@TopPocketFind It’s not nonsense. It’s policies without understanding consequences and, even worse, not caring. It’s political dogma at its worse. It’s not helping the growth agenda and it’s foolhardy. Long term growth policies are needed and that means not trying to obstruct business and understanding business needs. Most MPs are incapable of that.

Wordsmithery · 01/05/2026 22:40

Catsandjkr · 30/04/2026 13:30

Are you serious? Read pp I'm not explaining again (it shouldn't need explaining). It's embarrassing for people that comprehension levels are so low here. Though somehow, not surprising.

Comprehension should not rely on guesswork by the reader. The original post was not clear - either to me or to other posters.
No need to be embarrassed for me, thanks. Your energy would be better spent editing your posts.

daisychain01 · 01/05/2026 17:26

scalt · 01/05/2026 16:19

I say we need more politicians who have worked a minimum wage job at some point in their life. Too many of them were born into wealth and privilege; then Eton, Oxbridge, parliament, and at no point lived in the world many other people live in; always protected from the real world by money. What did Boris Johnson know about living in the same world as everyone else? We need more of those who worked their way up from humble beginnings. While they whisper about “national service”, I say we need a “national service requirement” for parliamentarians: that people can only run for parliament if they have worked in a customer-facing, preferably less well paid job.

There is a giant chasm between a minimum wage job and someone born into privilege including private education at elite schools and universities.

You don't need to have worked a minimum wage job in a supermarket or shifts in an Amazon warehouse to have the empathy and imagination to picture the struggles and challenges of bringing up a family while on the bones of your arse, or having to make ends meet while managing a disability.

Heidi Alexander (currently Transport Minister) is a very credible and compassionate member of the current Labour government. Whenever I hear her speak, I believe she talks a lot of sense and sounds extremely switched on and tuned into the challenges of the people in this country.

MoFadaCromulent · 01/05/2026 17:11

nearlylovemyusername · 01/05/2026 16:59

So someone who spent years in customer service, in low pay jobs, possibly with no education, will know how to run a country? How to manage budget, the impact of policy decisions, etc? ok then

I'd still strongly prefer excellent education and business experience. Education alone doesn't cut it, as proven by the current lot. They need to understand the consequences of decisions they make, not only ideology.

ETA: we actually had an example of politician you want, no education, only worked in a low paid job. Achievements - Workers Rights Bill which strongly contributed to rising unemployment and attempts to concrete green belt. Not much built still.

Edited

I also don't think those things should be discounted but I still strongly believe it needs to be representative, a country is not a business otherwise we fuck off the arts, put apartments over every playground, scrap NMW, privatise everything etc

So it's important that quality of life etc is prioritized for all and representative politics helps achieve that.

It's also clear a country isn't a money tree so yeah if someone is doing the accounts I'd rather they trained in kpmg than they were just good at saving for their summer holidays.

But I think the narrow definition of the OPs with regards to business experience which would exclude those who haven't run a business is nuts.

People point to Sunak as someone with a good record in business, hard to disagree, as far as I know he never ran one so out he goes. Keir starmer, barrister and head of DPP, undoubtedly managing a huge amount of people and an important role .... Doesn't count, he didn't have to organize a payroll.

By their own assessment there's isn't one politician in the last decade that meets the criteria

TopPocketFind · 01/05/2026 17:05

nearlylovemyusername · 01/05/2026 16:59

So someone who spent years in customer service, in low pay jobs, possibly with no education, will know how to run a country? How to manage budget, the impact of policy decisions, etc? ok then

I'd still strongly prefer excellent education and business experience. Education alone doesn't cut it, as proven by the current lot. They need to understand the consequences of decisions they make, not only ideology.

ETA: we actually had an example of politician you want, no education, only worked in a low paid job. Achievements - Workers Rights Bill which strongly contributed to rising unemployment and attempts to concrete green belt. Not much built still.

Edited

There is a thread on Angela Rayner for this nonsense in aibu

nearlylovemyusername · 01/05/2026 16:59

scalt · 01/05/2026 16:19

I say we need more politicians who have worked a minimum wage job at some point in their life. Too many of them were born into wealth and privilege; then Eton, Oxbridge, parliament, and at no point lived in the world many other people live in; always protected from the real world by money. What did Boris Johnson know about living in the same world as everyone else? We need more of those who worked their way up from humble beginnings. While they whisper about “national service”, I say we need a “national service requirement” for parliamentarians: that people can only run for parliament if they have worked in a customer-facing, preferably less well paid job.

So someone who spent years in customer service, in low pay jobs, possibly with no education, will know how to run a country? How to manage budget, the impact of policy decisions, etc? ok then

I'd still strongly prefer excellent education and business experience. Education alone doesn't cut it, as proven by the current lot. They need to understand the consequences of decisions they make, not only ideology.

ETA: we actually had an example of politician you want, no education, only worked in a low paid job. Achievements - Workers Rights Bill which strongly contributed to rising unemployment and attempts to concrete green belt. Not much built still.

TopPocketFind · 01/05/2026 16:52

The only example we got is Bill Clinton but that was down to the team he build around him?

Who in his team met the criteria?

Swipe left for the next trending thread