Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

New renter rights act is a bloody good thing!

596 replies

Pineapplewhip · 30/04/2026 06:24

Naturally landlords have some justifiable concerns/questions but those that are up in arms about the whole thing are completely bloody immoral. The slum landlords have spoilt it for the good ones and the decent landlords should blame them and not the government for protecting people.

If you arent aware of the actual points of the bill - I've listed them below. I cant see how any reasonable person can disagree that it's just enforcing the most basic human decency and regulation.

  • End to no fault evictions: landlords can only evict renters if they want to sell, move in themselves, move their family into the property or there are serious rent arrears. They have to prove they are selling too - they cant just say they are!
  • Rent can only rise once a year, any rise above market rate can be disputed fairly and 2 months notice is given.
  • Landlords can't refuse you for having children or being on benefits (if you prove that benefits/finances make the property affordable). This isnt about being on full benefits either. Many single parents need benefits to top up income.
  • Landlord ombudsman - tennants can raise fair disputes and repair issues for free online and landlords cannot just ignore it/grey rock. Repeat offenders will be visable in the database. Landlords legally must act on the complaints.
  • Faster action must be taken on damp and mould. Basic human rights! No more shitty emails from a middle man letting agent just blaming the tennant for not opening a window - when actually (for example) a house needs its brickwork repointing.

The only legitimate thing I have empathy for is the concern that it will be more of a process to evict non paying tennants as it will need to go through a court. However - this is why landlord insurance exists!!

Please ask yourself - if your child was renting - wouldn't you want them protected like this?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
HRTQueen · 30/04/2026 10:56

I’m a landlord and in agreement with the changes

but I have declined potential renters based on them being on benefits as that goes against my agreement with my mortgage provider which in turn cancels cancel out my landlord insurance

Landlords still have a choice who they rent to landlords just now can’t claim it’s for this reason

Dorisbonson · 30/04/2026 10:56

I made some lovely homes for people to rent, then had an absolute nightmare with the tenants under the old system. I lost money and had tenants damaging properties that I had renovated to a standard that I was happy to live in.

Frankly I would never let out residential property again. The law is not on the side of landlords and I can see why most property to let is very basic rather than nice - tenants don't maintain it so why make it any nicer than it needs to be?

The new laws won't help anyone. I and many other responsible landlords have left the market.

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 30/04/2026 10:54

PracticalPolicy · 30/04/2026 10:47

All those landlords selling up! Just think of the glut of properties on the market.

House prices will fall. Younger people can afford to buy and the rest of the rental market will be full of landlords complying with the law.

Renters will have more security and can raise their kids inpeace knowing they won't have to move house mid-GCSEs.

I’ve already heard that flats are increasingly hard to sell, though admittedly the market in general is slow at the moment, largely due to uncertainty/Trump’s war.

I dare say that the fact of many of them being ‘optimistically’ priced will have something to do with it…

nOlives · 30/04/2026 10:52

TeenagersAngst · 30/04/2026 06:31

There was already plenty of regulation of the PRS that is woefully enforced meaning good landlords who comply have a harder time and bad landlords carry on regardless.

Bad landlords will carry on regardless of the RRA as well.

If the government really wanted to help tenants, they would leave the private sector alone and focus on building social housing. The private sector would then operate on its own merits and either fail or succeed.

The worst of all worlds is the system we have - an over-regulated private sector.

Edited

This ^
It is lazy and counterproductive. The rules were there but the money wasn't spent to uphold them. Why would anyone think it will be there to enforce them now?
All this does is push private sector rentals even further (almost totally) into the hands of big faceless companies. And let's be honest, the overwhelming majority of health and maintenance horror stories are already from pseudosocial housingassociations and other huge landlords.
Another policy of taking from the average little guy or the community and giving to the faceless machine.

The only real difference will be no fault evictions, which is why that is all that gets talked about.

Greenwitchart · 30/04/2026 10:52

I agree OP. There is nothing drastic or unreasonable in these new rules.

I can only see how it would upset cowboy landlords who evict tenants if they complain about poor maintenance of the property and/or fail to do essential repairs in a timely fashion.

Any decent landlord should not be negatively affected by any of it.

sesquipedalian · 30/04/2026 10:52

Lugol · 30/04/2026 07:11

Or just keep their properties empty. 🤷🏻‍♀️

I understand that there are many in Singapore and the Arab States who buy new property off plan, such as apartments in London, and then keep them empty as an investment, because it’s so much less trouble than renting them out. That is the sort of thing the government should be cracking down on, not penalising existing landlords by imposing draconian conditions on them. Landlords will vote with their feet, and it’s the would-be tenants who will be the losers.

Decoratingisnotmyforte · 30/04/2026 10:52

You have to find landlords willing to agree to the terms set out in the OP for this to work. Landlords are selling up. In the deprived city I work hostels are already full and now landlords are leaving. It is often easier to find short term Foster carers for the DC and leave Mum on the streets.

Mapletree1985 · 30/04/2026 10:51

puddingwisdom · 30/04/2026 07:10

Whats wrong with making a choice to rent out your property?

I inherited my nan's bungalow when she died and I was too attached to it to sell it so I rented it out.

Thats not an immoral decision 🙄 I dont know why people are acting like this is some evil choice to make

They want someone to give them house for free and then pay to maintain it for them.

Upstartled · 30/04/2026 10:51

Katemax82 · 30/04/2026 10:48

Good thing too! If someone has 20k in savings they might as well buy!

I have a ds who will rent in his second and third year at uni, then rent another place in-between to do his year in industry, and will move again for his first job. I don't think £20k would cover buying up/ selling/ paying stamp duty at each turn.

laveritable · 30/04/2026 10:51

RRA, is just nonsense! I've had rental properties for 25 years and NOT once have I issued section 21. No sane LL would ever think of evicting a GOOD tenant! The government should stop deflecting and build enough houses!

trumpIsDEMENTED · 30/04/2026 10:50

I don't see the buy to let method of investment disappearing
I'm not so sure about that, it's only a good investment if prices are rising...

PropertyD · 30/04/2026 10:49

Agix · 30/04/2026 06:55

Landlords SHOULDN'T be able to "easily get their property back". That's someone's home. They have jobs likely in the area, kids going to school, all their mail going there, that address registered with their banks and energy providers. Landlords shouldn't be able to turf them out on a whim, that's the whole point.

The fact that you think they should be able to is part of the problem.

That is someone's home. The centrepoint of how they are building their lives.

Landlords not being able to easily chuck someone out SHOULD be the sacrifice landlords have to make for the privilege of keeping multiple properties and profiting off of it.

And if with thet comes not being able to chuck out disrepesectful tenants easily either, that's just another risk. Because you are dealing in homes, not mere bricks and mortar.

I was on the fringes of rentals. We dont do them any more. We had people who didnt pay after a few months, ignored any reminders, changed the locks and then sat back and waited for someone to evict them. The courts are clogged up with these cases which are taking on average 8-12 months.

We go two properties back not through the courts but because the next door flat was complaining about the smell and the flat below was getting dripping water through their ceiling. The scumbags had literally tipped any rubbish from the communal bins that they could carry back into their flat and left the water running. They then made a run for it.

The other person used an apartment as a 'party flat' and gave the keys to his mates. We got them removed because we could prove that it wasnt their only property.

What is going to happen now is that landlords are going to be VERY choosy about who they rent to. There is going to be less housing.

I know a development where someone is causing immense issues in their apartment block. They clearly have MH issues. Police have been called etc. I know the landlord is at their wits end with this person who has also decided not to pay any rent.

I have two friends who had 2 beds flats in West Midlands. They have now sold. I had some money with my sister to buy a property to rent out. I wouldnt do it in a million years now.

LightDrizzle · 30/04/2026 10:49

NoYouCantComeToTheWedding · 30/04/2026 07:02

Nobody is an "accidental landlord" it's always a choice they make. Was there a mysterious clause in their relative's will preventing them from selling the property? Of course not!

“Accidental” landlords include people posted abroad or a long distance away for a fixed period who don’t want to lose their own house in the the UK or whose house failed to sell so they pass it over to the rental side of the agency to rent out.

Some arise when established singles or single parent first cohabit with a new partner and are told or consider it wise not to just sell their house and move in in case the relationship doesn’t work out, particularly if they are planning to move into the other partner house in which they have no equity and to which they will have no rights.

Yes, these instances still involve a decision; they are not accidental like slipping on a banana skin is, but these people are not professional landlords, and they have will have other jobs. For them it’s normally about avoiding the risk of being out of the UK property market, which historically rises over the long term, and ending up unable to to get in back in at the same level once their posting ends or if their relationship ends.

You may think they shouldn’t be landlords then, and your wish may come true but these situations provide a lot of good quality family rentals to the market and landlords whose priorities are usually that “it washes its own face” - the rent meets the costs of ownership, and having the house or flat to go back to if needed. They don’t want their house in bad condition any more than any decent tenants.

If these people exit the market and sell instead of rent out and invest any money they clear as a hedge against rising house prices then private tenants will have even slimmer pickings. They’ll be left with a market supplied by professional landlords who will usually charge higher rents and have to be assiduous about raising them in line with the market because it’s their livelihood, unlike the “accidental” landlord who is often so thrilled when they get a good tenant that they are happy to let the rent fall back behind market increases as long as it is still covering their costs of ownership. Private landlords will do their best to factor in the considerable risks of damage, and rent refusal when setting rents on their portfolio and if they can’t rent properties at a level that makes profit they will sell. They don’t want the option of moving back into it themselves.

I agree with any measures that make it harder for landlords to shirk their responsibilities to maintain their properties but I think this legislation will make things worse for people looking to rent, particularly families.

Katemax82 · 30/04/2026 10:48

Cosyblankets · 30/04/2026 10:43

You can't do that with the new law

Good thing too! If someone has 20k in savings they might as well buy!

PracticalPolicy · 30/04/2026 10:47

All those landlords selling up! Just think of the glut of properties on the market.

House prices will fall. Younger people can afford to buy and the rest of the rental market will be full of landlords complying with the law.

Renters will have more security and can raise their kids inpeace knowing they won't have to move house mid-GCSEs.

Katemax82 · 30/04/2026 10:47

As a tenant who's last landladies evicted us out the blue after saying we could stay as long as we like them taking our entire deposit (after years of saying we are grade A tenants) I welcome the renters rights act with open arms. Imagine getting a section 21 when you have bad credit and no savings due to some personal struggles. Being faced with homelessness is no joke and as long as I never go through that again I'll be happy

Mapletree1985 · 30/04/2026 10:44

I rent out the family home while I work abroad (I'm a renter in my work country) and I think this act is a probably a good thing. It remains to be seen whether too many tenants abuse it by refusing to pay the rent they owe. (If my tenant did that, I'd put the house up for sale.). If it works as intended to, it is a step forward. If renters abuse it, that will more proof of why we can't have nice things.

Cosyblankets · 30/04/2026 10:43

NeelyOHara · 30/04/2026 06:43

Just as many shitty tenants as landlords, even more so imo. All they’ve done is made it so that only wealthy people will be considered worth the risk renting to. I have just gotten a tenant who has paid 6 months upfront, it’s made things less stressful for us both and I won’t rent it out again unless the person can do that.

You can't do that with the new law

hahabahbag · 30/04/2026 10:43

It has made it more difficult to rent out your home for a set period - we enquired about the possibility with our local estate agent who advised we were better off short term letting it than to a standard tenant because we’ll need it back after a year (to live in) the estate agent manages multiple short term lets and suggested we offer it with a discount for longer let’s eg 1-2 months as there’s lots of demand. I’d happily rent it at a lower rate for a full year to a family (I’ve personally rented for a year twice between buying due to the difficulty buying and selling at once) but they say it’s not worth the risk of having to go to court to remove them. I’m hoping that we’ll find someone by word of mouth who does need a one year let. The alternative is we leave it empty, we don’t need the money from it, but seems wrong

Ithinkofawittyusernamethenforgetit · 30/04/2026 10:42

glitterpaperchain · 30/04/2026 10:40

You couldn't afford to buy? I wonder what has driven up the prices...

North London - getting a deposit and mortgage is out of the question but renting is fine.

glitterpaperchain · 30/04/2026 10:40

Ithinkofawittyusernamethenforgetit · 30/04/2026 10:39

Not everyone wants to buy or is ready to settle on an area. Of my three children renting, none would want to buy yet even if they could. I rent and I couldn’t afford to buy in the area I’ve chosen.

You couldn't afford to buy? I wonder what has driven up the prices...

HobGobblynne · 30/04/2026 10:39

Shineonyoucrazydiamond1 · 30/04/2026 10:04

A couple of thoughts- If landlords are forced to have insurance against tenants that don't pay/damage the property, and if the risk increases due to the change in regulations making it harder and slower to evict bad tenants, therefor increasing the cost of the insurance, who do you think will pay for this? It will be added to rent, because so many small private landlords are already running close to the wire/ at a loss. This increases rent for everyone- the tenants that cause the issue won't carry the cost, because they will continue to not pay their rent/damage property, so it will be the 'good tenants' who pay their rent on time and look after their property who really take the hit. As a good tenant will you be happy to effectively subsidising the bad ones? There's no doubt that the changes to regulation have caused a huge exodus of good small private landlords, which has led to a reduction in rental accomodation available- you only have to look on rightmove to see that where there might have been 10-20 nice properties available there are now 1 or 2 pretty shite looking ones, the result is that it's going to be alomost impossible for people starting their career or moving from 1 area to another to rent. This is going to impact social mobility, career progression and those in jobs who move around. Is that net progress? Could improvements have been made in other ways? Could an annual inspection to check the condition of the property that protects landlords and tennants been more beneficial? There's no doubt it's decimated the private rental sector and I'm not sure who that benefits....

Landlords should absolutely have insurance - this isn't a new thing from the RRA, it's always been good practice. Insurance is a business expense that needs to be factored in.

Ithinkofawittyusernamethenforgetit · 30/04/2026 10:39

glitterpaperchain · 30/04/2026 10:16

But who can afford to buy them? Currently we have so many renters because people are unable to buy.

So if the market is flooded by landlords selling up, prices go down, more renters can afford to become homeowners. Win win

Not everyone wants to buy or is ready to settle on an area. Of my three children renting, none would want to buy yet even if they could. I rent and I couldn’t afford to buy in the area I’ve chosen.

Ithinkofawittyusernamethenforgetit · 30/04/2026 10:34

I agree as all my children rent, I do too. Damp is a tricky one however. I used to let a lovely airy flat which for at least 8 years hadn’t had a whiff of damp. Suddenly had a message from letting agent with terrible photos - the new-ish tenants had pulled their furniture out to reveal damp on the walls and sides of furniture that faced the walls. They had a new baby but they admitted they hadn’t had the heating on much. Letting agent was sure it was their fault but advised us to get an independent survey. We got the tenants to choose who to go with, we had to pay. The company also did remedial work, I was slightly sceptical but went with it. The report was very detailed and completely exonerated the property itself. In fact it said it had the right balance of air-flow and heating. The tenants then handed in their notice, then asked to buy it! We had all the remedial work done and redecorated, fine ever since.

Nanny0gg · 30/04/2026 10:32

greenappletasty · 30/04/2026 07:01

Short sighted OP and naive. Unless you’re been a landlord you have no idea what reality is like. I’ve rented privately for 15 years before I bought and I’ve been a landlord too.

I was a landlord. I bought a house and the market crashed. If I had sold I would have lost money so I rented it out. I had over a decade of the most horrendous tenants and it showed me the very worst in people. Every single tenant trashed the house. Every single tenant disputed the deposit after trashing the house. Here’s just a small sample: left dog regularly overnight alone so it pissed, howled and barked. It took 6 months to get rid of the smell of piss and I had to take up an entire hard floor costing me over £5k in damages. Used a saw to cut off half a kitchen cupboard. Left so much shit in that house at end of tenancy that I had to order a skip. Ignored my repeat warnings not to remove the hair blocker from the shower, then flooded the entire lounge ceiling bringing it down and lied trying to pin it on the neighbouring house. The drain man I was made to pay for confirmed the pipes were blocked with copious amounts of hair yet tenant still demanded I pay it. Set fire to lounge carpet but refused to replace. Drilled 40 plus bolts into brand new painted bedroom walls and attached fitted cupboards. Cost me £1000s to repair. One tenancy change over I opened the oven door to find I was looking at the foundations of my house. They’d refused to clean the oven once and it was that bad the bottom of it had fallen out - when I said I needed to keep some of the deposit they screamed and shouted claiming it was fair wear and tear. Ripped out bathroom ceiling lights, smashed toilet pan, never ever weeded gardens, never ever handed back the house in the same pristine and clean state they got it, refused to pay for professional cleans at changeover despite it being in the contract, smashed ceiling light shades, defaulted on rent many times.

I had 5 tenants over a decade and they were all horrendous and entitled.

And as for mould and damp. I spent thousands because of their refusal and thick as mince attitude to old Victorian houses. I told each and every one repeatedly, “This is a Victorian house. It is designed to BREATHE. That means you must open windows every single day, no matter the season. You must not dry clothes on radiators. You must open the window every single time you shower.”

But no. Every single tenant refused to do this then complained repeatedly about the damp and mould spores forming on the walls everywhere. I even paid £900 for a specialist damp surveyor who presented them with a report saying this is not rising damp, or atmy other kind of damp. It is condensation caused by the inhabitants who are not treating the house as it needs to be treated. But they never listened. I’d lived in the house for nine years before I rented it out and never had any damp at all because I opened windows every day. It’s not rocket science. The damp inspector said most of his work was due to stupid tenants.

I could go on. I never made any profit and made a loss every year for a decade. Tenants have NO IDEA the costs of being responsible for the upkeep of a house. They have no idea that stress and time lost putting right their abuse of the property.

I did not increase rent once in ten years.

selling that house was the best thing I ever did. And it was in an area crying out for rental properties. Of which now there are hardly any and the demand is greater than ever.

The new bill has driven thousands of great landlords out and you will all be even more stuffed than you already are.

Did you do regular inspections?
Every three months would have stopped them getting so bad surely?