Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Was sex at school less stigmatised in the late 90s?

193 replies

blubberball · 29/04/2026 19:34

I was at school in the late 90s. I see things online now about "body count" and how that can be used by some to shame people (women). I don't know about your school and the general attitude around at the time, but it really seemed like the opposite was true back then. The cool people at school were the ones who had experience. Admittedly my town did have the highest teenage pregnancy rate in Europe at the time. Was this the case when others were at school? People didn't seem ashamed of sex when I was at school. It was the opposite, they were very proud of it and laughed at the inexperienced people.

OP posts:
Ormally · 30/04/2026 11:59

People were not ashamed of it, but it felt as if the sex question was linked greatly to 'maturity' as well. For girls, getting into a couple with someone older, sometimes a lot older (able to drive, working, clubbing), was the more glamorous thing. A few of the 16 year olds had actually moved in with men who were working (possibly unhappy with their parents, but from the outside it didn't seem like it either from their, or their parents' points of view), were still going to school, but were dismissive about exams and had plans to train in something that wouldn't be on a school curriculum the minute that 16 was passed. I can't imagine that happening so calmly now. Under 16, there were a couple who became pregnant under age. At least half of both sexes would not have wanted to stay in education after 18.

But the thing I hate turning over in my mind as an adult, now, was the odd scene where as a pupil you either heard or glimpsed teachers trying to have a conversation with younger teens - and these were both boys and girls - about abuse. Sometimes of them, often of a sister. When I say 'heard' it was because of the high volume distress and occasional going ballistic involved, hence not always discreet. As it happened more than once, I would imagine there were also other 'quieter' conversations that weren't given away. So horrible.

This in a small, average northern suburb of a big city, a large school.

mustwashmycurtains · 30/04/2026 11:23

blubberball · 29/04/2026 20:53

I wonder what the magic number between virgin and slag was?

any more than ‘one’ probably

blubberball · 30/04/2026 11:18

Ohnoyoudont2 · 30/04/2026 10:49

Enraged frothing intensifies 😆

If you say so 🤷‍♀️

OP posts:
Katemax82 · 30/04/2026 10:56

At my school if you were a virgin you were "frigid" and all that crap. I threw my virginity away at a party because my 2 best friends lied about not being virgins (from when I first met them in year 7!!!) because they made me feel like the odd one out. Fuck that. I hate that it was how things were back then, it being acceptable for older men to sleep with 16 year olds and all that.

rememberingthem · 30/04/2026 10:54

It was way more stigmatised in the 90’s when i was a teenager than nowadays. I was even called a “ slag” for getting ( what i now know is raped) by a boy a few years older than me!

Ohnoyoudont2 · 30/04/2026 10:49

blubberball · 30/04/2026 10:48

Enjoy your life 🤷‍♀️

Enraged frothing intensifies 😆

blubberball · 30/04/2026 10:48

Ohnoyoudont2 · 30/04/2026 10:47

You typed with spittle frothing from your lips, desperately trying to insult me as you project your own issues, and I laugh at you 😆

Enjoy your life 🤷‍♀️

OP posts:
Ohnoyoudont2 · 30/04/2026 10:47

blubberball · 30/04/2026 10:29

I'm not enraged, illogical people care about it. Logical people don't use phrases like "sloppy seventy seconds". They say "safe, consensual sex". Laugh it up

Edited

You typed with spittle frothing from your lips, desperately trying to insult me as you project your own issues, and I laugh at you 😆

EmeraldShamrock000 · 30/04/2026 10:36

No, not in my experience.
I would have thought it was better today.
In my school in the 90’s “slut shaming” brought joy for many dick-heads, male and female.
Horrendous rumours were spread, mud sticks. I made the mistake of confiding in a “friend” about a first experience, the whole year group knew.

blubberball · 30/04/2026 10:29

Ohnoyoudont2 · 30/04/2026 10:20

I know it enrages you that the majority of people do care (a lot) about sloppy seventy seconds. But they do. So that's that :)

But you keep trying to insult me and projecting your emotional problems on to me, and I will keep laughing at your attempts 😆

I'm not enraged, illogical people care about it. Logical people don't use phrases like "sloppy seventy seconds". They say "safe, consensual sex". Laugh it up

OP posts:
Ohnoyoudont2 · 30/04/2026 10:20

blubberball · 30/04/2026 08:19

So the magic number is below 10. When it gets to 11, that's when it turns bad. There's a lady online who makes extremely good points about why body count doesn't matter (to logical people who stick to facts), and why body count does matter (to illogical people who go in their imagination and make up stories, give themselves unnecessary emotions, and then blame other people for their emotions, and want to control other people)

I know it enrages you that the majority of people do care (a lot) about sloppy seventy seconds. But they do. So that's that :)

But you keep trying to insult me and projecting your emotional problems on to me, and I will keep laughing at your attempts 😆

blankcanvas3 · 30/04/2026 09:44

Went to school for 14 years in Ireland, catholic school taught by nuns and there was absolutely zero sex education, but we were all terrified of having sex because God would know. Then I moved to England, it was completely different. Everybody was so open about it in school! I remember being absolutely horrified. Then I started to have sex too, to fit in I think, got pregnant at 16 because I’d never been taught about safe sex!

DinoDoughnut81 · 30/04/2026 08:59

blubberball · 30/04/2026 08:21

From what I've seen online, a virgin would be highly desirable and fetishised. There's a bit of indoctrination culture and religion mixed in as well that might not apply to UK culture

I've seen this as well, stuff like " when I marry she will be a teenage virgin as what's the point of getting one that's been used" Twitter/X was rank for it. I stopped using and it was so depressing and so rife. They talk about women like livestock.

I read this 15 year olds account in the guardian and I did not experience anything near these levels in school: www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/feb/23/15-year-old-girl-misogyny-social-media-online-abuse

I've read about young women decentering men and it's easy to see why.

ClashCityRocker · 30/04/2026 08:42

I remember feeling a lot of pressure to lose my virginity before 16 at school in the early noughties. From Y8/Y9 it felt pretty much expected that if you had any boyfriend there would be some sort of sexual activity, if not full sex.

I don't know if that was more to do with my immediate peer group rather than the prevailing social norms - we were the ones who thought of themselves as 'the cool kids', smoking behind the bike shed and cutting class and all that. I suspect the other groups thought it was all a bit pathetic!

I do recall some of my female friends being referred to as 'car slags' as they usually had older boyfriends with a car.

It was all very toxic and I'm quite glad things seem to have changed!

blubberball · 30/04/2026 08:21

Waitingforthesunnydays · 29/04/2026 23:24

It might not be cool to have a high ‘body count’ for girls these days but I’m guessing it’s probably still a bit embarrassing/uncool to get to 16 or 17 and still be a virgin..although I don’t know, my kids are still in primary, maybe someone with teenagers can comment on whether that’s accurate or not?

From what I've seen online, a virgin would be highly desirable and fetishised. There's a bit of indoctrination culture and religion mixed in as well that might not apply to UK culture

OP posts:
blubberball · 30/04/2026 08:19

Ohnoyoudont2 · 29/04/2026 23:21

High body count has always been looked down on, always will be unless we change in some huge evolutionary sense. Nobody likes sloppy seventy seconds - and that goes for both sexes. The actual number may vary, below ten was ok for both sexes, now it's probably below 20.

But you are fooling yourself badly if you think it doesn't matter to most people. It just does.

Men always pushed the narrative that slutty men were somehow cool, but most women always preferred men with a low body count too, they just weren't as vocal about it.

Fashions in everything including how we talk about or societally endorse screwing around come and go. Human nature remains basically stable.

So the magic number is below 10. When it gets to 11, that's when it turns bad. There's a lady online who makes extremely good points about why body count doesn't matter (to logical people who stick to facts), and why body count does matter (to illogical people who go in their imagination and make up stories, give themselves unnecessary emotions, and then blame other people for their emotions, and want to control other people)

OP posts:
blubberball · 30/04/2026 08:15

Salsa2026 · 29/04/2026 22:54

Really? Was it a very working class area (no disrespect there)?

None of the boys made fun of slim girls with small breasts at my school. The prettiest girls were asked out and fancied most by the lads. I can understand that some teenage boys were probably Lads Mag and Page 3 obsessed though. I hope the “flat” (hate that term) girls put those lads back in their place; doubt they were Brad Pitts 🤣

Also yes, very much a working class area

OP posts:
blubberball · 30/04/2026 08:14

Salsa2026 · 29/04/2026 22:54

Really? Was it a very working class area (no disrespect there)?

None of the boys made fun of slim girls with small breasts at my school. The prettiest girls were asked out and fancied most by the lads. I can understand that some teenage boys were probably Lads Mag and Page 3 obsessed though. I hope the “flat” (hate that term) girls put those lads back in their place; doubt they were Brad Pitts 🤣

They definitely were not Brad Pitts 😅 I think it was absolutely a lad mag culture at the time. Seemed to me at the time if you didn't have big tits and blonde hair, you weren't a worthy girl or woman. I desperately wanted to dye my hair blonde, but no hairdresser would allow it due to the damage it would do to my hair

OP posts:
PrincessBing · 30/04/2026 08:07

I was at secondary and sixth form in the 00s early to mid-late 00s. Sex was cool within parameters. Starting too early was weird somehow and to be too casual was unattractive and got you talked about. I went to a private all girls school for school years 7-11. It was always cool to know boys/ hang out with boys but I don't think as a year group on the whole, we really did very much more than kissing or occasionally a bit of fondling with any of these boys before roughly quite late on in year 10. So around 15 heading for 16.

The cooler girls had boyfriends and the loss of virginity started around then really, as a bit of a trickle that picked up in sixth form. Because we were so nearly legal, beyond a little curiosityw no one cared as long as you had a boyfriend- it was seen as normal. I remember someone a couple of years below me being viewed as REALLY slutty for having sex very young though. Anyone known for boyfriend pinching or being too casual about finding partners was judged. The faster starters were seen as a bit cool and could be a little patronising but it wasn't really much of a thing.

I think the school worried though as we had some very comprehensive sex ed in year 9 re stds and contraception. A friend who joined for sixth form mentioned the schools "notorious" teen pregnancy rate, heard from someone else in our year. This was news to me and I had been at the attached junior school too, and was well aware of loads of school lore! Certainly no one was ever known to pregnant and I think only 1 I know of ever "had to leave" because of it during my era. Only 1 in my year was ever rumoured to have had an abortion. No one really said anything but she was seen as a bit too keen behind her back. Anyone having a baby not long after leaving- that was their look out.

I went to a mixed, private sixth form with the same sort of vibe. A few people had slept with boyfriends in year 11 and they seemed the most grown up but no one cared in a negative way. It was a mixed sixth form attached to an all boys school so we got a lot of jokes etc but no one really judged sex with a boyfriend; we all did it during sixth form and no one cared as long as you were dating them and you weren't cheating. Cheating etc got you a rep - slutty for a girl, untrustworthy arsehole for a boy. I also recall boys with a supposed high body count not being seen as that attractive, either. They were seen as a bit obvious or sleazy. It was certainly a bigger deal to be gay than to be sexually active in a heterosexual relationship. Neither of the gay boys on my year came out til after school (after uni for one of them) and my openly bi friend was teased. She batted it off but it didn't go away until quite near the end of school. One guy is supposedly still in the closet.

We had some sex ed as girls from a nurse in lower sixth but it was less empowering or useful than I'd had before! I also know the MAP was available from the nurse (boarding school) as the girls once all got lectured about it being requested too frequently. It was supposedly aimed at the year above me - they were considered a golden year in terms of achievement etc. But they were legendary for boyfriend stealing, and lots of getting up to no good in various dark corners of the school.

EatingHealthy · 30/04/2026 05:12

I was at school mid 90s to early 2000s and it wasn't cool at my school but equally wasn't openly stigmatised. Those who had sex underage (starting at 14) thought themselves cool, but to others they weren't particularly liked and weren't cool (at the time I would say they were viewed as trouble, in hindsight I am sad for them, they were clearly vulnerable and 'dating' 18+ year old men).

In the sixth form it was the cool girls who had sex, but they were having sex because they were cool and popular and therefore had boyfriends, not cool and popular because they had sex iyswim. Casual sex wasn't widespread and definitely wasn't seen as cool.

Ohnoyoudont2 · 30/04/2026 03:35

Carla786 · 30/04/2026 02:16

I wouldn't want a partner who had been highly promiscuous either as I don't have casual sex and it would indicate potential incompatibility. But calling someone 'sloppy seconds' is awful, and even if pp (and you) meant it to apply to both sexes,,it's generally women who get nasty language like that used about them.

And what would qualify someone as 'seconds' anyway? Sex with any previous person?

Nope, it's perfect and it is deliberate. Shaming people for doing things you find disgusting is a great societal tool, and it works.

So, no sloppy seventy seconds for me, or any normal person then :) The more things change, the more they stay the same :)

Ohnoyoudont2 · 30/04/2026 03:33

Carla786 · 30/04/2026 02:14

'Sloppy seventy seconds'

  • so does that apply to women only? Or men as well? And what would the line be where someone has slept with too many people- I'm assuming you think some level of dating before marriage is OK?

As I stated in a previous post women find sloppy seventy seconds disgusting too. I don't care whether you hate that fact, you know it's a fact and that's that :)

Already also said under ten was the norm years ago, now it's under 20. The fewer the better for both sexes, obviously. Already all asked and answered. More than that, you're considered gross - both men and women. Reality doesn't care how you feel just bw :)

And stop using chat GPT, it's truly embarrassing for you that you can't just craft a simple response.

MarmaladeorJam · 30/04/2026 02:34

blubberball · 29/04/2026 22:11

I agree. I hope gay kids can openly be themselves now, without any fear or shame. I remember one gay lad at school, and he did not have good mental health. I thought he was so cool. Statistically, there must have been more gay kids in the school, but only one was open about it.

I remember girls being quite homophobic about teachers they thought might be lesbian

Culture has changed.

I think that pornography and music has really locked into debasing and degrading women.

That results in less freedom.

I think that I had more freedom than my dd and her friends have now.

Not to say it was perfect, because it certainly wasn't.

But you could get away from things - now they can't.

Carla786 · 30/04/2026 02:16

DiveStraightIn · 30/04/2026 00:49

What’s wrong with thinking that way? I’d never have wanted a partner who had slept around. People can choose to, but not everyone would want to be with them. 🤷🏻‍♀️

I wouldn't want a partner who had been highly promiscuous either as I don't have casual sex and it would indicate potential incompatibility. But calling someone 'sloppy seconds' is awful, and even if pp (and you) meant it to apply to both sexes,,it's generally women who get nasty language like that used about them.

And what would qualify someone as 'seconds' anyway? Sex with any previous person?

Carla786 · 30/04/2026 02:14

Ohnoyoudont2 · 30/04/2026 00:29

She is being honest though, not liking it doesn't change that. It is exactly what most people still think - source: the entire internet. Nobody (or very few people) actually wants sloppy seventy seconds.

Edited

'Sloppy seventy seconds'

  • so does that apply to women only? Or men as well? And what would the line be where someone has slept with too many people- I'm assuming you think some level of dating before marriage is OK?