Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

parkrun defending their position

780 replies

Funtime2 · 26/04/2026 11:52

I used to be a parkrunner and do not understand how parkrun can defend their position of allowing trans identfying males into the female category.

I read that 280 published race winners in the female category are actually men identifying as women. How is this fair to women? Some women don’t care about this but some women do, just as some men take it as a race and care about the rankings and some men don’t

The other option of course is they could stop the timing, stop recording winners and records?

AIBU to genuinely not understand why parkrun claim not to be a race when they time the runners, publish times by category, rank times and runners, and have record holders by category.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
ThatBlackCat · 28/04/2026 16:28

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · 28/04/2026 16:11

How? The community element is still there! How does parkrun taking timings remove the 'community element'? I'd really love you to explain that

I mean, I literally did. I said that some want a race that's community based, emphasis on everyone being able to join in, without telling newcomers who may have never done it before and feeling nervous that they have to have a stopwatch to time themselves or whatever.
It's just extra levels of stress towards what's supposed to be a chilled community race in the park.
So many reasons people could be put off. Not to mention the volunteers having this level of crap thrown at them.

'I mean', you literally didn't. Why does a community event need volunteers with a stopwatch? It's just a run around the park. No timings needed. Volunteers can cheer on people. They don't need to record timings. So you 'literally' have not explained anything except you think community elements only exist if there is a stopwatch. Nothing else matters.

igelkott2026 · 28/04/2026 16:23

Catiette · 28/04/2026 08:32

If there are male bodied people in the stats they are so diluted that it really isn't an issue, it's not like them taking course records (or the Lia Thomas's of this world taking medals and team places away from women).

This epitomises what I'm saying.

"It's only Chloe and Nathan - there are 2000 other kids in the school and they don't even know Chloe and Nathan. And Chloe and Nathan are in Year 7, so the sixth formers aren't affected, anyway, and they're the ones that really matter!"

No.

If we want a fair school society, and for students people to believe in that, and uphold it, it matters. If we want to argue that no kids should fight in the corridors that nothing can ever justify sidelining women to advantage men, it really does matter - right the way through the school our society.

ETA: I'd also suggest that a bit of give and take is fine if and when it's established that Chloe and Nathan are equal - common sense, flexibility and all that. But the problem is that WE'RE NOT THERE YET. Chloe and Nathan aren't equal. Not anywhere close. And we can see that in the denial about the impact on Nathan (Huh. I also now realise it would have been far clearer as a sex-based rights analogy if Chloe was the one being disadvantaged in the above, not Nathan 😅... but it doesn't matter anyway, as I doubt the it's-not-a-competition-ers will respond...)

Edited

I'm being pragmatic. If someone somewhere is competing as a woman even though they were born a man, that dilutes the results. Same if someone is competing in the wrong age group. There's nothing you can do about that because age gradings are international but it is a tiny number of people. It really is completely different to having an Identifiable person who has taken part as a woman when they shouldn't have done.

However, I think age gradings are based on elite performances and at least they will now be checked.

slug · 28/04/2026 16:18

Parkrun times can be used as qualifying times for other events. If these spaces are given out to men who pretend to be women based on their Parkrun times, actual women lose out. Because how can women compete with Parkrun times set by men become the baseline for women?

But let's not upset the men. Especially the men who get really upset when their cheating is pointed out to them. Because "Who cares!!!!"

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · 28/04/2026 16:16

As a human, being 'barcode scanned' is pretty darned insulting

WTF 😂

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · 28/04/2026 16:11

How? The community element is still there! How does parkrun taking timings remove the 'community element'? I'd really love you to explain that

I mean, I literally did. I said that some want a race that's community based, emphasis on everyone being able to join in, without telling newcomers who may have never done it before and feeling nervous that they have to have a stopwatch to time themselves or whatever.
It's just extra levels of stress towards what's supposed to be a chilled community race in the park.
So many reasons people could be put off. Not to mention the volunteers having this level of crap thrown at them.

ThatBlackCat · 28/04/2026 16:10

RunningAndSinging · 28/04/2026 16:07

What about the community element amongst the volunteers working together to get the times out as accurately as possible? What about that small social interaction when you get your barcode scanned? Also the numbers would plummet and there would be much fewer community members to interact with.

Is there no community element of volunteers cheering people on? Marshalling people? Looking out for people? Do you need to use a clock to the second just to get 'community element'?

We don't need to be 'barcode scanned'. We are not chocolate bars or cans of beans at the checkout. As a human, being 'barcode scanned' is pretty darned insulting.

RunningAndSinging · 28/04/2026 16:07

What about the community element amongst the volunteers working together to get the times out as accurately as possible? What about that small social interaction when you get your barcode scanned? Also the numbers would plummet and there would be much fewer community members to interact with.

ThatBlackCat · 28/04/2026 16:01

Can someone - if they have the guts - please explain to me how not timing people to the second removes 'the community element'? I thought the community element was running together. Not the 'timing'. I've heard of hyperbole but this thread is next level ridiculous.

ThatBlackCat · 28/04/2026 15:59

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · 28/04/2026 15:55

Even if they did, you're taking away the community element there.
People go as they want to be part of a community event and maybe get fit alongside others.
As someone said upthread, you might as well go do it round your garden instead with a couple of mates.
Bye bye parkrun
Well done.

How? The community element is still there! How does parkrun taking timings remove the 'community element'? I'd really love you to explain that.

Well done

Blame men for that. But I suspect you are resorting to the first rule of misogyny. Women are responsible for men's actions. Blame the men. Not feminists.

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · 28/04/2026 15:55

ThatBlackCat · 28/04/2026 15:38

Everyone has a watch or a phone. That's what we did before 'parkrun'.

Even if they did, you're taking away the community element there.
People go as they want to be part of a community event and maybe get fit alongside others.
As someone said upthread, you might as well go do it round your garden instead with a couple of mates.
Bye bye parkrun
Well done.

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · 28/04/2026 15:45

Cups?! Stupid autocorrect. Should have said chips! 😁

BananaPeels · 28/04/2026 15:42

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · 28/04/2026 15:38

Yes, and there are no cups at Park Run to my knowledge. As I said earlier it would be interesting to know how many have ever actually been!

I have been - I meant it has short hand to explain it was their official timing )whether approximate or not). Not people just submitting their own times. Sorry will be more accurate with terminology in the future

givemushypeasachance · 28/04/2026 15:40

BananaPeels · 28/04/2026 15:37

It’s a way of measuring someone’s time. From start to finish using tech rather than someone just using their own watch.

Chip-timing is a very specific thing in paid for events though. The timing at parkrun is me and a 15yo doing their bronze DofE award volunteering, with mobile phones, going "tap tap tap" as people cross a patch of grass marked with some cones. And you may have mistakenly run two laps of our three lap course and be almost a mile short of the 3.1 mile route, I wouldn't know. You still get that as your time for the parkrun.

WorstPaceScenario · 28/04/2026 15:40

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · 28/04/2026 15:34

I'm confused too 😕
Chips?

A chip (often attached to a race bib) triggers automated timing points which accurately track your running time - it measures when you cross the start and finish lines, and sometimes points along the way. It accounts for things like how long it was before you actually crossed the start line, rather than a rough timing.

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · 28/04/2026 15:38

WorstPaceScenario · 28/04/2026 15:36

Yep, when you say chip timed it means you have a chip to give a precise time.

Yes, and there are no cups at Park Run to my knowledge. As I said earlier it would be interesting to know how many have ever actually been!

ThatBlackCat · 28/04/2026 15:38

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · 28/04/2026 15:30

People want timings to see how they've done though. To see their timing and how they did compared to last week, and compete only against themselves. Not everyone has a stopwatch, and nor should they be expected to go out and get one if they don't.
Completely agree that Parkrun should be left alone though, but by the competitive ones trying to bend it their way. Wish they'd piss off and leave everyone else alone.

Everyone has a watch or a phone. That's what we did before 'parkrun'.

BananaPeels · 28/04/2026 15:37

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · 28/04/2026 15:35

Cross posted
Clearly not everyone knows

It’s a way of measuring someone’s time. From start to finish using tech rather than someone just using their own watch.

ThatBlackCat · 28/04/2026 15:37

givemushypeasachance · 28/04/2026 15:30

Can you go and set up your own non-timed non-recorded non-categorised runpark event and leave parkrun alone.

Can you go and set up your own timed, recorded and categorised event and leave parkrun alone as what is was meant to be? A fun run?

WorstPaceScenario · 28/04/2026 15:36

BananaPeels · 28/04/2026 15:34

Exactly . Everyone knows what someone means when they say chip timed.

Yep, when you say chip timed it means you have a chip to give a precise time.

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · 28/04/2026 15:35

BananaPeels · 28/04/2026 15:34

Exactly . Everyone knows what someone means when they say chip timed.

Cross posted
Clearly not everyone knows

WorstPaceScenario · 28/04/2026 15:35

Funtime2 · 28/04/2026 15:32

barcoded, same difference

It's not the same difference - chipped means the timing is exact, parkrun times are good approximations.

My point, @Funtime2 is that I was agreeing with you - whilst the timings are approximations, the fact that they bother to create stats means that it does matter that people are split accurately and appropriately

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · 28/04/2026 15:34

WorstPaceScenario · 28/04/2026 15:32

What parkrun are you attending that's chipped?!

I'm confused too 😕
Chips?

BananaPeels · 28/04/2026 15:34

Funtime2 · 28/04/2026 15:32

barcoded, same difference

Exactly . Everyone knows what someone means when they say chip timed.

Funtime2 · 28/04/2026 15:32

WorstPaceScenario · 28/04/2026 15:32

What parkrun are you attending that's chipped?!

barcoded, same difference

OP posts:
WorstPaceScenario · 28/04/2026 15:32

BananaPeels · 28/04/2026 15:31

It is a chip timed race though. This is so bizarre. You get the chips, the times, the stats and the records and the shout outs in the local paper but then you get comments like yours suggesting they are weird for partaking in the manner it is designed for and originally set up for.

What parkrun are you attending that's chipped?!