Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to feel frightened about the risk of AMOC collapse?

142 replies

rockinrobins · 24/04/2026 09:42

The likelihood of an apocalyptic ice age scenario happening in our lifetimes is now higher than not.

Is no one else scared about this for themselves and their children? Why aren't we talking about it?

If the AMOC collapses, we will be living in temperatures of -20 to -30 degrees Celsius within our lifetime. There is nothing we can do, but it's terrifying, and no one is discussing it.

From Google:

Recent studies suggest a high likelihood of an Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) collapse, with some projections estimating a 42%–76% chance of collapse before 2050 or 50%–70% within this century. A 2026 study predicts a 42%-58% slowdown by 2100, which is likely to end in collapse. This is no longer seen as a low-likelihood event.

Before you continue to Google Search

https://www.google.com/search?q=Atlantic+Meridional+Overturning+Circulation+%28AMOC%29&sca_esv=e42243e293ad428e&biw=1440&bih=664&sxsrf=ANbL-n6zRNwifxLgsWv9YpA8xTabmZk8iw%3A1777019432239&ei=KCrracOgDquvhbIPtoCbgQc&ved=2ahUKEwjStZbtioaUAxVNQ0EAHbY3M4kQgK4QegYIAQgAEAU&uact=5&oq=how+likely+is+amoc+collapse&gs_lp=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-w_CBwYwLjEuMjfIB3KACAE&sclient=gws-wiz-serp

OP posts:
ColdAsAWitches · 24/04/2026 15:16

rockinrobins · 24/04/2026 15:04

I mean, after the response to Covid, I'm pretty sure that an ice age would cause some issues 😅

It would, but there isn't agreement that that would happen!

rockinrobins · 24/04/2026 15:06

KoiTetra · 24/04/2026 14:39

Having just done some quick research:

There also appears to be huge disagreement in the scientific community over both the timescales of this happening and the effects of it happening.

Unlike global warming which is pretty much universally accepted as happening this seems to vary, I came across peer reviewed models suggesting 2063 and other models suggesting no major changes for over 1,000 years.

The outcomes if it does collapse also seem to vary from low end models suggesting >1 degree global temp change and 4-6 degrees in northern Europe which would cause issues for home grown crops but would not change society dramatically.

So I think this is a lot of guesswork still going on.

You need to check the dates on what you are researching because new data has emerged very recently, hence it's currently in the news.

OP posts:
rockinrobins · 24/04/2026 15:04

ColdAsAWitches · 24/04/2026 13:57

You're still catastrophising though. The odds may be high of it happening ~(although I'd question the source of your 50-70% odds), but it is far from agreed that even if it does happen,that it would lead to societal collapse!

I mean, after the response to Covid, I'm pretty sure that an ice age would cause some issues 😅

OP posts:
TheLivelyAzureHedgehog · 24/04/2026 14:54

but also I just think it's a strange thing about human nature how much we stick our heads in the sand.

Do you? It’s a normal part of human behaviour. It’s how we evolved. There are always more immediate problems to deal with, which makes the potential bad things happening tomorrow feel less important. If I can’t feed my children or protect them from wolves today, who cares of the sky falls in next year? Can you think of any animal that plans ahead to that extent? Why would you expect human animals to be different?

Like a pp I did a degree in Ecology and Environmental Science a long time ago. We’re fucked and we’ve about known it for a long time. Why haven’t we done anything about it? Because here and now we need to feed our children and protect them from wolves. Anything that’s happening at the global environmental level - good and bad - is really just background noise to that, at the species scale.

Gillettegirl · 24/04/2026 14:46

No sorry

Isekaied · 24/04/2026 14:40

rockinrobins · 24/04/2026 13:49

Sure, we 'could'.

But there is a difference between something that 'could' happen and something that scientists are stating is 50-70% certain to happen. That's more chance than the flip of a coin.

If you were told someone would flip a coin and if it's heads, you and your loved ones will be killed, you would be worried.

And it will not be a sudden meteor - it will be a prolonged period of societal collapse, freezing cold, breakdown of food supplies, hunger.

Knowing with a fair level of certainty that this is highly likely to happen within our lifetimes, is different to when people say 'we could be hit by a meteor any day or get blasted by big flares from the sun'.

I think those saying I am catastrophising are not really understanding the situation.

But I do take the point about not being able to do anything about it, and I am indeed enjoying the sunshine today as well!

I am just wondering why everyone is being so quiet on this issue and so many people refuse to even engage with it or learn about it.

But what do you want us to do about it?

Ok yes it might happen and we might all die and our families obliterated.

Now what???

KoiTetra · 24/04/2026 14:39

Having just done some quick research:

There also appears to be huge disagreement in the scientific community over both the timescales of this happening and the effects of it happening.

Unlike global warming which is pretty much universally accepted as happening this seems to vary, I came across peer reviewed models suggesting 2063 and other models suggesting no major changes for over 1,000 years.

The outcomes if it does collapse also seem to vary from low end models suggesting >1 degree global temp change and 4-6 degrees in northern Europe which would cause issues for home grown crops but would not change society dramatically.

So I think this is a lot of guesswork still going on.

Isekaied · 24/04/2026 14:30

MediumHigh · 24/04/2026 13:10

@Isekaied what was 2012?

Apparently there was a prophecy a very lpng time ago that the world would end in 2012.

Unsure if it involved an asteroid.

But it was in all the news.

Even a movie called 2012 was made about the World ending.

My 12 year niece was so scared and truly believed the World was gon a end that year- had to work very hard to reassure her.

Look it up. Might still be info re this on the net.

My daughter also comes home worried about the world ending- usually the Geography teacher causing her to worry.

Sometimes the a different subject.

EasternStandard · 24/04/2026 14:27

I might chance the southern hemisphere if it happens but no point worrying beyond that. Enjoy the sunshine.

Plus we can see what disruption to oil is doing rn, there may be fewer flights etc it’s not easy to do.

ColdAsAWitches · 24/04/2026 14:26

nevernotmaybe · 24/04/2026 14:19

That's not how weather systems work, certainly not one as vast as this.

The system warms the entire northern hemisphere, keeps ice sheets from advancing, pulls water with it meaning a collapse would result in North America getting a fairly rapid 0.5 metre increase in sea level over 50 years (the collapse takes a while, ot would be more like a shutdown over a few decades once it starts), the jet stream would be disrupted causing many issues, violent cold winters and storms would increase across North America. The entire northern hemisphere is impacted, substantially.

The biggest changes would be localised further north, and the biggest before and after difference will be in Europe that is true. But Europe will be worse than Canada is now, and the entire northern hemisphere will be screwed and worse in various ways.

Every "will" in that is doing a lot of heavy lifting. There is no certainty about what would happen.

KoiTetra · 24/04/2026 14:26

rockinrobins · 24/04/2026 10:34

It makes sense that people don't have headspace with everything else going on... but also I just think it's a strange thing about human nature how much we stick our heads in the sand.

This thread currently has 17 votes and 9 replies and it is literally about the end of the world within our lifetimes and horrible deaths for us and our children, of either starvation or cold or both. That is now more likely than not going to be our future.

...Whereas there is a thread about grandchildren's inheritance which is trending and has 800+ votes on the AIBU.

The truth is your grandchildren are more than likely going to inherit an ice age and there is little that any amount of money will do to save them :(

Its simple psychology.

What do you propose the average person does about this?
Nothing, the average person can do nothing.

What does worrying about this acheive?
Nothing, there is nothing worrying will acheive.

It feels like something so far out of our control and so far away from day to day life that it is not worth thinking about.

Inheritance however is something that people can relate to, they have likely received some, will receive some, plan to leave one etc.

It is a simple case that humans think about things they can relate to.

southcoastsammy · 24/04/2026 14:19

You should be more worried about the companies laying at the feet of ‘AI’, the likelihood of WW3 ( if that’s not already started) and the US and/or Israel firing off nukes than anything else at the moment OP.

nevernotmaybe · 24/04/2026 14:19

turkeyboots · 24/04/2026 11:09

The world won't end, but the British Isles will get significantly colder. Look to northern Canada for an example, we're on a parallel with Labrador and Newfoundland. But also Norway and Sweden. Insulate your house and learn cross country skiing?

That's not how weather systems work, certainly not one as vast as this.

The system warms the entire northern hemisphere, keeps ice sheets from advancing, pulls water with it meaning a collapse would result in North America getting a fairly rapid 0.5 metre increase in sea level over 50 years (the collapse takes a while, ot would be more like a shutdown over a few decades once it starts), the jet stream would be disrupted causing many issues, violent cold winters and storms would increase across North America. The entire northern hemisphere is impacted, substantially.

The biggest changes would be localised further north, and the biggest before and after difference will be in Europe that is true. But Europe will be worse than Canada is now, and the entire northern hemisphere will be screwed and worse in various ways.

Lilifer · 24/04/2026 14:16

MistressoftheDarkSide · 24/04/2026 12:03

During lockdown, I read a book called State of Fear which was written by a journalist and broke down factually how governments are very invested in behavioural psychology in times of crisis. It was pandemic focused, but lead to about 7 threads that branched off into all sorts of "conspiracy theories" until the threads were pulled because it was suggested we were inciting riots.

I mention this only to illustrate that while awareness of all sorts of issues can be prudent, one is best served by remembering that what we are served via the internet / media is partly agenda driven, partly for monetisation, and partly "just because we can".

I remember on the 70s as a child hearing about impending Ice Age. Now we seem to be cycling back to that after years of global warming talk. The planet goes through cycles, and I'm not denying our activity may well be contributing to disrupting / influencing those cycles but if those with power - which is not us, the end consumer in the capitalist model - just keep greenwashing while simultaneously pursuing profit above all else, all we can do is hope for the best, and live in the moment.

AI is being pushed, promoted and worshipped because of short term profit and its capability to help "manage" us, yet the environmental impact of that is largely brushed off.

What I'm trying to say, as someone who has reached saturation point, and been in very dark places due to personal events, is to try and detach. Observe by all means, but fixating on one issue is where madness lies.

I wake up every day, check the status of WW3, grumble at AI slop, mutter about general social injustice, pet my cats, drink coffee and hope to live to fight another day, if necessary, although I'm not really good at "fighting" and wonder why we're continually being loaded with information designed to apparently keep us in - well, a state of fear.

I wish the OP well. We live in strange and interesting timez, and how much is by accident, and how much by design is difficult to parse given how odd we are as a species, hard wired for survival yet paradoxically apparently hell bent on self destruction.

The sun is shining. What can we do but make the most of it?

Best post, perfectly expressed 👌🏻👌🏻

Instructions · 24/04/2026 14:16

Things like this are too big for me to worry about, if that makes sense . It's like worrying about nuclear war or a giant asteroid: it would be the end of life, I can do nothing about it, it's not like worrying about my gas bill or job or kid's exam grades. It's too big to carry. I will continue trying to limit the harm I do, voting for people and parties who recognise the risks and want us all to limit the harm we do, etc, but day to day I don't worry about it much.

Boxoffrogs21 · 24/04/2026 14:10

I think you’re unreasonable to be frightened because it’s not helpful for you or for the wider issue. Concerned, absolutely.

  1. the prediction is that the shutdown would begin by 2050. The shutdown would then play out over the following 50-100 years. So, while we shouldn’t put our fingers in our ears over it, the likelihood of you experiencing the worst case scenario is small, though increasing impact for your children.
  2. the Earth is ‘overdue’ the next glacial period (what most people consider an Ice Age), which occur on cycles governed by changes in the orbit of the Earth and our axis. It is likely that our interference, as a species, in natural systems has delayed this climate deterioration rather than accelerated it. Now, this doesn’t change the fact that it’s going to change everything that we know, but it does mean that there’s literally nothing we can do about it other than prepare. Which leads me to:
  3. Preparing >8 billion people for the level of change a glacial period brings is far beyond anything our systems are capable of - it would/will require mass migration towards more hospitable climates but also there won’t be any way of growing enough food for everyone without major change. Humans are good at adapting to disasters, but it’s going to hurt and in quite unpredictable ways (who, what and when).

So, whilst I am concerned, I know there is no point in worrying about it now. In the same way that I’m concerned about World War III and about societal collapse due to AI. All I can do, and can encourage my children to do, is to live each day well - enjoy yourself but get a good education; make plans for the future but be prepared to be flexible.

For4fourfoor · 24/04/2026 14:03

Raccoonswillonedayrevolt · 24/04/2026 09:48

Read the latest Marc Elsberg novel, it deals with sudden extreme climate collapse, and might give you some ideas on how to prepare.

which one

NeverendingRabbitHole · 24/04/2026 14:02

At least the polar bears will have somewhere to live

ColdAsAWitches · 24/04/2026 13:57

rockinrobins · 24/04/2026 13:49

Sure, we 'could'.

But there is a difference between something that 'could' happen and something that scientists are stating is 50-70% certain to happen. That's more chance than the flip of a coin.

If you were told someone would flip a coin and if it's heads, you and your loved ones will be killed, you would be worried.

And it will not be a sudden meteor - it will be a prolonged period of societal collapse, freezing cold, breakdown of food supplies, hunger.

Knowing with a fair level of certainty that this is highly likely to happen within our lifetimes, is different to when people say 'we could be hit by a meteor any day or get blasted by big flares from the sun'.

I think those saying I am catastrophising are not really understanding the situation.

But I do take the point about not being able to do anything about it, and I am indeed enjoying the sunshine today as well!

I am just wondering why everyone is being so quiet on this issue and so many people refuse to even engage with it or learn about it.

You're still catastrophising though. The odds may be high of it happening ~(although I'd question the source of your 50-70% odds), but it is far from agreed that even if it does happen,that it would lead to societal collapse!

LoftyPlumLion · 24/04/2026 13:56

Pizzaandpasta101 · 24/04/2026 12:57

What do you propose that we should do about it op?

Stop eating meat is a low effort, high impact change that people seem to bloody mindedly refuse to do.

rockinrobins · 24/04/2026 13:49

catipuss · 24/04/2026 12:41

Is this about the reversal of the poles? (I wish people would use words rather than abbreviations.) Or is this climate change? I mean we could get hit by a huge meteor any time like the one that caused the Gulf of Mexico. There really isn't any point worrying about things we have no control over. Or we could get blasted by big flares from the sun. Did you see the recent astronauts saying how fragile the earth looks from space? Can but hope scientists will find ways to prevent or mitigate all the potential natural disasters and that humans won't do it first with nuclear, biological or chemical weapons.

Sure, we 'could'.

But there is a difference between something that 'could' happen and something that scientists are stating is 50-70% certain to happen. That's more chance than the flip of a coin.

If you were told someone would flip a coin and if it's heads, you and your loved ones will be killed, you would be worried.

And it will not be a sudden meteor - it will be a prolonged period of societal collapse, freezing cold, breakdown of food supplies, hunger.

Knowing with a fair level of certainty that this is highly likely to happen within our lifetimes, is different to when people say 'we could be hit by a meteor any day or get blasted by big flares from the sun'.

I think those saying I am catastrophising are not really understanding the situation.

But I do take the point about not being able to do anything about it, and I am indeed enjoying the sunshine today as well!

I am just wondering why everyone is being so quiet on this issue and so many people refuse to even engage with it or learn about it.

OP posts:
Selloonacup · 24/04/2026 13:48

Lots of people are discussing it, OP- I've read more than one article about it this week. I think the figures you've presented are a bit out there- not sure anyone serious is talking about 2050 and a lot of discussion is about weakening rather than collapse- but it's a well known risk and much discussed.

I think comparing it to people discussing family issues is a bit silly, I'm afraid. Even the staunchest environmentalist thinks about things other than the environment and even after massive climate change we'll all continue to do so. We'll be shivering together in some desolate hole desperately trying to stay alive and people will still be gossiping about their neighbours and grumbling about their MILs, because that's human nature and always has been.

BashfulClam · 24/04/2026 13:48

I wonder why I bother to recycle etc when I see videos from the US. Driving any distance, using a/c and dryers all the time, using aluminium trays to cook in so they can throw them rather than wash them, using disposable tableware.

CharleneElizabethBaltimore · 24/04/2026 13:45

big science not the average joe will save it

magicstar1 · 24/04/2026 13:42

I’m not worried about it. It will happen at some point but I’ll probably be dead by then 🤷🏻‍♀️