Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder why the UC savings threshold is £6,000?

856 replies

GiddyLurker · 18/04/2026 21:55

Why is the Universal Credit savings threshold set at £6,000? What’s the reasoning behind that number?

It feels quite specific and I just wondered whether there’s a particular logic or policy decision behind it?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
AllSerene · 19/04/2026 13:11

Atleastthedoglikesme · 19/04/2026 12:35

If that is the case then it's a dereliction of duty that this wasn't explained to us. We were just told the claim had to be stopped.

I can't disagree with you there! If you don't have any joy when you say you want to do this, it could be worth talking to the CAB, or similar, to check the situation with them.

A couple of websites I found, when I was checking just now, which may be helpful are:

https://contact.org.uk/about-contact/news-and-views/what-families-need-to-know-about-preparing-for-universal-credit/

and

https://www.gov.uk/national-insurance-credits/eligibility

Good luck!

What families need to know about preparing for Universal Credit

As disabled young people approach adulthood, many families want to understand what benefits they’re entitled to. One of the most important but often misunderstood steps is making a “credits only” claim for new-style Employment and Support Allowance (ES...

https://contact.org.uk/about-contact/news-and-views/what-families-need-to-know-about-preparing-for-universal-credit/

RodJaneandBungle · 19/04/2026 13:08

@BooneyBeautiful very well put to echo a PP. Do you mind me asking as I did not know you could claim a full state pension early? But I’m not v clued up on this. Do you become eligible if you have a disability? Are there threats to this eligibility being disproved in the way that welfare reforms are trying to re-write eligibility for disability support? I hope you don’t mind me querying. I’m anti welfare reforms in the direction they’re going & pro improving quality of life & all other social metrics, amongst improving access to employment for disabled people in general. Something the government claim they’re doing but patently aren’t.

StrippeyFrog · 19/04/2026 13:04

I think there should a savings limit but it should be adjusted based on family size and location. A single person with 6k savings is very different to a family in a high cost of living area.

DamageLimitation101 · 19/04/2026 13:03

Worth clarifying (if it hasn't been done so already) that the £6k isn't specifically "savings" - it is "total money across any and all bank accounts" - so this includes income that you will be spending to live on. So, practically speaking it really means you can only have "savings" of £6k minus your monthly expenses.

It's also very tricky for people who are self-employed and receive income on an inconsistent basis.

RodJaneandBungle · 19/04/2026 12:56

But how does anyone have a buffer of savings for unforeseen eventualities to protect them from financial destitution - for say a new boiler or worse - new roof? Health costs that can’t be met on the BHS (no not cosmetic surgery). £6K doesn’t go v far. Losing any reliable income from benefits bcos you aren’t allowed to also insure yourself against financial insecurity - if you can’t work due to disability or health problems - seems unfair. But yes a line & a figure needs to be drawn. Perhaps it’s a calculation based on a percentage of income that is a generally accepted amount relative to income, that is considered the general rule to have as savings. Any more then suggests you can afford not to be economically dependent on the state. I don’t agree with those maths however.

Gall10 · 19/04/2026 12:53

DotAndCarryOne2 · 19/04/2026 09:59

Because:

a) it leaves no contingency funds for unavoidable expenses, meaning that the state ends up having to provide crisis funding.

b) a starting point of zero for someone working and claiming UC top ups would mean that every time a claimant got paid they would be over the savings threshold and UC would stop. It’s unworkable. Maybe try coming at this from the pov that if you have worked and become unemployed, you have more than likely paid into the system that is paying your benefits, so are perfectly entitled to claim. Benefit claimants can be tax payers too.

sorry … still don’t understand!

Unexpectedlysinglemum · 19/04/2026 12:42

I had six months of living off savings when I had low and no pay for maternity leave and only got pittance in child maintenance. I didn’t clock at the time I could have used savings to over pay mortgage but I wouldn’t have felt comfortable doing that. In hindsight I was a bit of a mug as everyone else probably would have overpaid and then claimed!

BillieWiper · 19/04/2026 12:40

Cos they're tight fucks. It should be higher.

BringBackCatsEyes · 19/04/2026 12:40

Imacelebritygotit · 19/04/2026 12:19

If you are working and have no savings that is your fault (certain exceptions aside)

You should be asking yourself why

Edited

I think you should be asking yourself why some working people have no savings - broaden your mind a bit.

Unexpectedlysinglemum · 19/04/2026 12:39

youalright · 18/04/2026 22:09

I think 6k is to low how are you suppose to save for a new car (not actually new) or a holiday or a new boiler etc a lot of people on uc work aswell

But I don’t think people on uc should be taking thousands of pounds holiday surely? Why is the tax payer subsidizing that?
I agree with a car though - when I sell one car to buy another (eg when I needed to change to a five door bay seat friendly car) I had a few thousand in my account for a few days - if I’d been on uc it would have been very upsetting if that got stopped due to buying a new car! I guess that’s the kind of reason for the limit - people need to have a few thousand available for house moves, emergencies etc and if you don’t allow this it’s just encouraging credit card debt

Atleastthedoglikesme · 19/04/2026 12:35

AllSerene · 19/04/2026 12:32

I'm all but certain that you can do exactly that. You can have a NI Credits only claim for LCWRA, even if you don't qualify for any cash from UC. I'm not sure if there's any small print which might exclude your child but it's something you need to double check.

If that is the case then it's a dereliction of duty that this wasn't explained to us. We were just told the claim had to be stopped.

AllSerene · 19/04/2026 12:32

Atleastthedoglikesme · 19/04/2026 10:45

My adult child is disabled and has 20k in the bank, because they are too disabled to buy anything and their PIP and LCWRA built up fast.

I don't mind them only having PIP as an income but I do wish - like for families with children under 12 - that disabled people unable to work due to their disability could build up NI stamps. It was only when DC had been 3 years with only PIP as their income that I discovered that they are not getting NI credits, and that it's imperative that we set up a private pension for them.

I want there to be a disabled person's UC arrangement that confirms entitlement to LWCRA and UC but with a nil award, so that DC like mine can still get a full state pension. As is, we are being encouraged to buy a load of stuff to get the money below 16k and then restart the application, then have to stop the claim again when it gets to 16k, spend more money needlessly and restart the claim and so on....and every time the LWCRA process is lengthy, beaurocracy, and distressing for my DC.

I'm all but certain that you can do exactly that. You can have a NI Credits only claim for LCWRA, even if you don't qualify for any cash from UC. I'm not sure if there's any small print which might exclude your child but it's something you need to double check.

Coffeeandbooks88 · 19/04/2026 12:27

Tedsnan1 · 19/04/2026 10:12

There wasn't. I had to borrow from my daughter.

We had to get a boiler through finance. Also on UC.

BananaPeels · 19/04/2026 12:25

Imacelebritygotit · 19/04/2026 12:19

If you are working and have no savings that is your fault (certain exceptions aside)

You should be asking yourself why

Edited

When I had 2 children under 4 my childcare costs were exactly the same as my income. I literally worked for free in order to keep my career going and benefit from the resultant increased salary years down the line.

if it wasn’t for my husband’s salary we’d have had zero money to live on. There was no savings at that point in time at all.

ForWittyTealOP · 19/04/2026 12:24

Imacelebritygotit · 19/04/2026 12:23

Why is it so bad for encourage and motivate the country to save? At least for an emergency fund?

If you could point out where I've said that it is "bad (to) encourage and motivate the country to save" I may be able to give you an answer.

EsmeSusanOgg · 19/04/2026 12:23

BooneyBeautiful · 19/04/2026 12:15

Well said! I became physically disabled quite unexpectedly at the age of 46, having just started a new job with a view to taking on more hours the following year when DS started at high school. I was a single parent and couldn't have afforded childcare (very little funded childcare in those days). I wasn't able to work after that. I now claim my full state pension plus DLA (I was never invited to claim PIP as I was approaching retirement). I am slightly better off than I was, but not much.

These people sitting in their ivory towers complaining that UC claimants shouldn't have any savings have no idea what it's like. Any one of us can experience a life-changing event at any time. I worked as a volunteer benefits advisor for a local charity, and some of the people I came across were going through horrendous times! If you have a good job, are in reasonably good health, and have a roof over your head, then please count your blessings. Many people would be so grateful to be in that position.

Very well put.

Imacelebritygotit · 19/04/2026 12:23

ForWittyTealOP · 19/04/2026 12:05

Oh right. I'm not sure about manipulating behaviour through social control, not when it means people's means of subsistence are at stake. I also don't think social policy should be built on unevidenced assumptions.

Why is it so bad for encourage and motivate the country to save? At least for an emergency fund?

EsmeSusanOgg · 19/04/2026 12:22

Imacelebritygotit · 19/04/2026 12:19

If you are working and have no savings that is your fault (certain exceptions aside)

You should be asking yourself why

Edited

This is a little unfair. There are different periods in people's lives where they are likely to have no savings - versus other items when they may have a large amount. As an example - Pre-kids we had a decent savings buffer - to cover maternity leave and the early childcare costs. Obviously that was then spent.

EsmeSusanOgg · 19/04/2026 12:21

It has been £6k for a long period of time. Essentially you could reasonably have £6k a following redundancy - and need the funds to move house/ similar when getting a new job.

Not 100% sure on UC, but with the old style JSA the first 6 months were not means tested - but based on having enough national insurance credits. This meant you could claim benefits and national insurance stamps after losing a job, hopefully with the view that you would find a new appropriate job quickly.

£6k used to cover reasonable moving costs (deposit/ first month's rent/ moving vans). I suspect it does not go that far anymore.

Imacelebritygotit · 19/04/2026 12:19

Livelovebehappy · 19/04/2026 09:13

It’s not a question of empathy but a question of equality and fairness. Someone receiving UC should not be better off than a large percentage of people not on UC with no savings.

If you are working and have no savings that is your fault (certain exceptions aside)

You should be asking yourself why

BooneyBeautiful · 19/04/2026 12:15

DotAndCarryOne2 · 19/04/2026 08:48

I also have an issue with posters referring to benefits as ‘free handouts’ when they are provided as part of the social contract. When you are working you pay into the system to provide a safety net for when/if you need it. Expecting people to wipe out their savings before they can claim is counter productive as it removes any safety net for emergencies, thus reducing them to reliance on the state for everything.

Well said! I became physically disabled quite unexpectedly at the age of 46, having just started a new job with a view to taking on more hours the following year when DS started at high school. I was a single parent and couldn't have afforded childcare (very little funded childcare in those days). I wasn't able to work after that. I now claim my full state pension plus DLA (I was never invited to claim PIP as I was approaching retirement). I am slightly better off than I was, but not much.

These people sitting in their ivory towers complaining that UC claimants shouldn't have any savings have no idea what it's like. Any one of us can experience a life-changing event at any time. I worked as a volunteer benefits advisor for a local charity, and some of the people I came across were going through horrendous times! If you have a good job, are in reasonably good health, and have a roof over your head, then please count your blessings. Many people would be so grateful to be in that position.

BringBackCatsEyes · 19/04/2026 12:14

IDontHateRainbows · 19/04/2026 08:52

I have a friend who got made redundant last year, no fault of her own..she had savings over the threshold and it took her a long time to get a job. During her unemployment she went on a couple of nice holidays, bought some new furniture etc and I really don't blame her as she was doing it to get her savings under the threshold. The system really does penalise/ disincentivise those who try to stand on their own 2 feet

I think that's really feckless.
I was in the same situation last year. The thought of deliberately using my savings/redundancy money for fun stuff rather than paying my bills sits really badly with me.
What a model to show your kids, and where is her pride?

ForWittyTealOP · 19/04/2026 12:05

Imacelebritygotit · 19/04/2026 11:37

Everyone in this country needs to be managed and encouraged

EVERYONE.

financial literacy is horrible in this country

im glad Martin Lewis is at least doing something about it, campaigning for this basic stuff to be taught in schools.

bad knowledge about investing keeping people poor.

but the topic and the thread is about benefit claimants

and also let’s be real. Quite a few People on benefits tend to come from underprivileged/badly educated backgrounds

Oh right. I'm not sure about manipulating behaviour through social control, not when it means people's means of subsistence are at stake. I also don't think social policy should be built on unevidenced assumptions.

Imacelebritygotit · 19/04/2026 12:01

IDontHateRainbows · 19/04/2026 09:09

Her bank statements were checked as part of the initial claim yes but not ongoing

they monitor your accounts anyway though? I’m saying this because my friends relative was contacted about deprivation of funds and had to explain

Tedsnan1 · 19/04/2026 11:52

OldGothsFadeToGrey · 19/04/2026 11:00

Mobility allowance. Schemes like motability for the car (which several of my family members have accessed), ECO4 or LEAP, grants for the boiler. Again which family members have benefitted from.

No one wants to see people with disabilities at a disadvantage.

Like other have pointed out, UC is to provide support. If someone can save 16k (or even 6k!) on it then they probably don’t need it. It’s not meant to replace the benefits of working/working full time - and yes I know some people on UC ARE working , but 67% of claimants are not in employment, and half of these are not due to disability, illness or caring duties.

Edited

You do know that not every benefit claimant gets high rate mobility allowance ( which gives access to the motability scheme) don't you?

Swipe left for the next trending thread