Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To say we cant take his child full time?

767 replies

DuvetInTheDaytime · 14/04/2026 17:23

Hi all long time lurker first time posting so please be gentle

AIBU here or am I being selfish

DP has a DS from previous and lately hes been saying he wants to come live with us full time instead of just weekends and odd days. I do feel for him I’m not heartless but I just dont see how it would actually work in reality

We already have a full house and its not like we have loads of spare room just sitting there (we dont). At the moment when he stays its ok-ish as its only couple nights but even then its a squeeze and everyone gets a bit on top of each other

DP keeps saying “we’ll make it work” but not actually saying HOW we would make it work if that makes sense

Theres also behaviour stuff if I’m being honest (not awful but not easy either) and my own kids are already arguing alot lately and I just feel like adding more into that isnt going to help anyone

I said maybe its better he stays how things are for now and DP got funny with me saying im being unfair and its his son so of course he should be able to live with him if he wants

I havent said no outright just that I dont think its realistic right now but now I feel like the bad one

I do feel guilty as its not his fault but at the same time I have to think about everyone already here too

AIBU to think its just not doable or should I just say yes and figure it out as we go??

(hope this makes sense abit all over the place today)

OP posts:
Autumngirl5 · 14/04/2026 22:30

As another poster said, you and your partner could have a sofa bed in the living room for now, all 6 children share the bedrooms and you make sure you don’t have any more children unless you can afford to house them all properly. I’ll probably be banned now too.

sunshinestar1986 · 14/04/2026 22:29

LiquoriceAllsorts2 · 14/04/2026 21:38

she has said no to her husbands child moving in - that is something wrong

It's never the same,
Women bear the brunt of household issues.
I wouldn't allow step kids to move in either.
I would allow my husband to move out, simples

Elsvieta · 14/04/2026 22:29

LuciferTheMorningStar · 14/04/2026 21:25

Yeah, because these two 'on-off' geniuses with 6 kids between them, who cannot even house them adequately, but continue having more, they DEFINITELY earn enough to support 8 people (6 kids and 2 adults) without being heavily subbed by a taxpayer. For sure.

Come on now. Council house. 3 kids from 'previous relationships', 3 further ones. Crystal clear what kind of people we're talking about here.

In these sort of households, they don't "support" the kids in the way that the average middle-class mumsnetter would consider to be the bare minimum. The kids don't get much. Someone who's overcrowded them like this isn't even trying to give them the stuff that most people think of as essential these days. They won't get new clothes, hobbies, school trips, any of that. There's lots of people raising 4 or 5 or 6 kids on the same money everyone else spends on 2.

Sensiblesal · 14/04/2026 22:28

AgnesMcDoo · 14/04/2026 17:24

I think you should leave so he can put his child first.

Double post

BettyBoh · 14/04/2026 22:28

oviraptor21 · 14/04/2026 22:15

@BettyBoh The council/HA as landlords don't charge rent based on the number of occupiers, they charge it based on the location and size of the property.

The people that need to know the number of people in the property are the benefits departments, so the DWP and the council housing benefit and council tax departments. If the property is under occupied then the claimant would not get full housing element/benefits (bedroom tax). If there is more than one adult then the council tax payer would not get a single person's discount.

i’m not allowed to assume she’s getting housing benefit or claiming single person CT discount, or indeed any benefits, despite the fact the partner has lived there on and off for 10 years and they have 3 kids aged 9 and younger.

most of MN want me to assume she works enough hours in the week and has adequate affordable childcare (that also takes into account the disruption of a partner who is on/off over 10 years) to hold down a job which supports 5 kids (2 from previous relationship), covers maternity and pays all rent and bills with no need for any benefits. If someone can describe what that job is, please do.

Leavesandthings · 14/04/2026 22:26

Sensiblesal · 14/04/2026 22:21

nailed it

Disney stepmom in the making. Why oh why do these women get with men who have children when they are so blooming heartless & refuse to ‘allow’ their husband to be a dad

What?
Have you read the thread and OPs background info?
Maybe try it.

Unexpectedlysinglemum · 14/04/2026 22:25

TheCurious0range · 14/04/2026 17:46

Given it's your council tenancy and you seem to already be over occupied, his father needs to move out and accommodate his son. A sofa is not a long term plan for a 14 year old. If it was a joint property my answer would differ

I agree. Dad chose to move in with a woman and her kids presumably due to the cheap rent in a home that has no space for his own child. If he wants to live with his child full time he needs to move out and rent, if he is poor he’ll get universal credit help to do so

Sensiblesal · 14/04/2026 22:21

nailed it

Disney stepmom in the making. Why oh why do these women get with men who have children when they are so blooming heartless & refuse to ‘allow’ their husband to be a dad

IrisieMendimeve · 14/04/2026 22:20

yes, you are being unreasonable.

oviraptor21 · 14/04/2026 22:15

@BettyBoh The council/HA as landlords don't charge rent based on the number of occupiers, they charge it based on the location and size of the property.

The people that need to know the number of people in the property are the benefits departments, so the DWP and the council housing benefit and council tax departments. If the property is under occupied then the claimant would not get full housing element/benefits (bedroom tax). If there is more than one adult then the council tax payer would not get a single person's discount.

HazelMember · 14/04/2026 22:15

Dunnocantthinkofone · 14/04/2026 22:11

Well there wasn’t any room for the 6yr old or the two yr old either but presumably that’s different because they are your own children?

Poor stepson.

Yes poor stepson. His dad can't even be bothered to sort out school stuff, do his washing or cook for him. OP does it all.

But carry on criticising the OP.

HazelMember · 14/04/2026 22:14

Christmastimeandwine · 14/04/2026 22:12

Poor kid with a step mum like you!

Poor kid with a dad who leaves everything to the stepmum for school stuff, washing and cooking.

Try reading the thread 🙄

ImImmortalNowBabyDoll · 14/04/2026 22:12

covilha · 14/04/2026 21:37

This poor lady came here for help, not hammering.
She has done nothing wrong.
This isn’t a step mam problem or even a step son problem.
its a housing problem.
look at the numbers and imagine livylike that, then adding one more into the mix, when it’s not necessary.
OP. you need to consALL the children, not just one. They all have EQUAL priority.
Also, reading better lines, sounds as though there is a LOT of wife work there already.
Take care

Edited

They have had 6 kids and now she's finding that it's inconvenient to have 6 kids. It's a housing problem that they created themselves.

Christmastimeandwine · 14/04/2026 22:12

Poor kid with a step mum like you!

Dunnocantthinkofone · 14/04/2026 22:11

Well there wasn’t any room for the 6yr old or the two yr old either but presumably that’s different because they are your own children?

Poor stepson.

oviraptor21 · 14/04/2026 22:11

Jemimapony · 14/04/2026 20:19

Op will be in receipt of benefits
op will be the only person on the tenancy despite her partner and her having 3 kids together and living together for benefit fraud purposes
the op will be claiming single person discount for council tax purposes - another way of defrauding the shame

guaranteed

Unfortunately jemimapony it's you that is embarrassing yourself.

OP is allowed to be the only person on the tenancy. She will almost certainly be required to inform the council/HA when occupiers come and go. Her DP may now be listed as a permitted occupier or similar but no-one would advise OP to get him named as a joint tenant.

When he moved in, if OP was claiming benefits (UC, housing benefit, council tax reduction) then she would inform the DWP and council so they can take the DP's income into account and for UC, can change the claim from a single claim to a couple claim. There is no suggestion at all from OP that she hasn't done this.

Pleaae jemimapony, stop posting misinformation.

SapphireSeptember · 14/04/2026 22:09

BettyBoh · 14/04/2026 19:46

Well here’s your opportunity to explain it…
the council don’t know that her partner lives there so how can they make the right calculations? If she has signed a form declaring she has given the correct information about the occupancy of the home in which she is the named tenant then she has committed fraud if she hasn’t named her partner.

My parents have been living in the same housing association house for nearly 30 years. My mum is the only one on the tenancy agreement, because she wanted to make sure that she and her children would never be homeless. All the relevant authorities know my dad lives there, there's never been any fraud.

DaisyDooley · 14/04/2026 22:05

People having kids they can neither adequately house or afford.
Poor bloody stepson -pushed out so his father can father ANOTHER 3 children in an unstable relationship.
I wonder what OP and Partner do to be able to afford seven kids………..

Elsvieta · 14/04/2026 22:04

RedToothBrush · 14/04/2026 21:52

This is nonsense.

Where on earth did you get this information from?

It's amazing (and terrifying) the number of people these days who don't get their ideas from anywhere but social media, GB News and the gutter press (or listening to people who read the gutter press). The age of alternative facts is here to stay.

Walker1178 · 14/04/2026 22:03

I think you’re in a bit of a lose/lose situation OP. I get what others are saying, when your DP has DC they come as a package and they should always have a place in your home. But you’re very clearly overcrowded already, I’m not sure anyone who has commented would choose to live in a regular 3 bed house with 5 boys. Unless a bigger home comes along DD is already sharing with you until DS15 leaves home and you’d be adding even more time if that had to be delayed until DSS moves out.

Realistically if DSS has a stable suitable home with his mum, I’d be encouraging him to stay there. FWIW I don’t think he’d be happier jumping into an over full house if he’s clashing in his current one.

LBFseBrom · 14/04/2026 22:02

You need a bigger house. Lobby the council.

Go to your MP who paints himself as very much a man of the people, he may help you find a bigger council house in Clacton if that is your wish.

Elsvieta · 14/04/2026 22:01

RedToothBrush · 14/04/2026 21:51

He should move out and get a three bed.

He should take your shared three and his son with him.

This way you'll all have adequate space and you can't complain about having too many children.

Or he could take just DS6 and DS9; he'd have a good chance of getting his own 3-bed then. DD would have a room and nobody would be overcrowded. He won't though, will he - doesn't want to do the work of kids alone.

DSS just doesn't want to behave for his mother and thinks his father will let him get away with more. He'll be better off with her.

springvegetables · 14/04/2026 21:59

Aren’t you already overcrowded?

Ophir · 14/04/2026 21:58

TakeMeDancing · 14/04/2026 21:53

You and your DP should get better paid jobs to ensure that you can adequately house the 6 children you’ve both chosen to have. (FYI…most families in the UK cannot afford 6 children.)

Edited

really have to agree

Elsvieta · 14/04/2026 21:57

BettyBoh · 14/04/2026 21:40

She would have signed a single occupancy tenancy agreement when she got the council house prior to meeting her current partner and having kids with him. She would have been entitled to 25% council tax reduction via a claim form. In the tenancy agreement there will be a clause about declaring if the single occupancy ends. To retain just her name on the tenancy agreement strongly suggests that there’s a reason why she wants to continue to appear a single parent.
i am in favour of welfare spending when it’s for the right reasons but I cannot stand

Once again, declaring that someone lives there is not the same thing as putting them on the tenancy. And you can inform the council that you are no longer the only adult in the property and need to stop claiming the single-person discount; it's very simply and easily done. (And unrelated to the tenancy). Just the same as with private rentals.