Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Only knickers in the Co-op

306 replies

1981RickyVilla · 12/04/2026 18:02

A teenage girl (aged 15 or 16, roughly) in front of me in the Co-op was wearing a crop-top and a pair of knickers only. Not bikini bottoms, not short shorts but cotton M & S midi style knickers. I didn’t say anything (none of my business and she probably wouldn’t have approved my sartorial choices either). If I had been her mother, seeing her before she left the house, I would have said that it looked unhygienic and wasn’t an appropriate way to go to the shops.
YABU: People of whatever age can dress how they like when they go to the Co-op.
YANBU: A mini-skirt or pair of shorts are a minimum requirement when you’re off to the shops.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
Nanny0gg · 13/04/2026 12:06

I'm not quite that old, but sometimes I'd like to go back to the fashions of the 50s...

LeedsLoiner · 13/04/2026 12:00

Newmeagain · 13/04/2026 11:46

I do think some people have completely lost perspective on what is reasonable. I do wonder whether seeing “celebrities” on social media etc has contributed to that. They see someone wearing pants and a bra to an awards ceremony or on a night out and think that is something appropriate or even expected for everyday wear.

My dd is at university and as part of the course had various sessions in settings such as GP practices, etc, interacting with patients, professionals and members of the public. She said the head of that course module had to send a message out to the students because some were turning up in completely inappropriate clothing - e.g. many of the male students turning up at their placements in baggy joggers pulled down to show their underwear.

I worked with a woman who had a little girl aged about five and she was horrified when she came into the living room and found her daughter dancing in front the of TV, with a music channel on.
She was wearing just her knickers and had pulled up her vest so it was like a crop top, before she could say anything the little one shouted "Look mummy, I'm Rhianna!!".

Beachtastic · 13/04/2026 11:58

BeanQuisine · 13/04/2026 11:46

Yes, sometimes it turns out to be no big deal, even when you find yourself sitting on the lavatory in the middle of the office.

...but you are still struggling to wipe your bum/flush without anyone noticing. It is very tense!!!!

Flushitdown · 13/04/2026 11:57

There's a difference between "underwear as outerwear" and just wearing actual underwear. Which as the name suggests, should be under something.

Underwear as outerwear is a fashion choice and quite frankly they don't look like m&s cotton knickers, they look like fancy hot pants etc. They were a thing when I was in my 20s as well - I had a sequinned pair. Worn with knickers and tights underneath!

LeedsLoiner · 13/04/2026 11:54

Wheresthebeach · 13/04/2026 10:03

The problem is parents stopped saying 'you are NOT going out dressed like that young lady' in an attempt to be cool. Cool parenting has a lot to answer for.

As someone who was a punk rocker/Goth in the late 1970's/early 80's - leather jacket, black skinny jeans, dayglo socks, red patent leather brothel creepers, band t shirt, dyed hair and more make up than Joan Collins, I never really felt able to tell my kids "You're not going out dressed like that !!" 😀

nomas · 13/04/2026 11:51

AntiqueBabyLoanSmurf · 13/04/2026 11:44

Nobody else knows the actual motivation of people who dress in a boundary-pushing norm. All they can know is that the person likes to push boundaries in a public place, where other people have no option not to see it. They haven't 'accidentally forgotten' to put anything on that properly covers their underwear.

Unless you think that all women and (teenage) girls are innocent, delicate little flowers with no knowledge of sexuality at all?

Given that the ONS statistic that the overwhelming majority—nearly 100%—of individuals who commit in-person indecent exposure (flashing) are male, we can make an educated guess that young teen girls aren’t wearing their clothes to distress others.

I’m a conservatively dressed woman, and I do think that women are being sold a lie that being naked = empowerment, but I don’t subscribe to the view that you can’t look away from women’s bodies, you absolutely can.

Newmeagain · 13/04/2026 11:46

I do think some people have completely lost perspective on what is reasonable. I do wonder whether seeing “celebrities” on social media etc has contributed to that. They see someone wearing pants and a bra to an awards ceremony or on a night out and think that is something appropriate or even expected for everyday wear.

My dd is at university and as part of the course had various sessions in settings such as GP practices, etc, interacting with patients, professionals and members of the public. She said the head of that course module had to send a message out to the students because some were turning up in completely inappropriate clothing - e.g. many of the male students turning up at their placements in baggy joggers pulled down to show their underwear.

BeanQuisine · 13/04/2026 11:46

Dollymylove · 13/04/2026 11:39

Ive had dreams in the past that I have gone to work naked, and that nobody seemed to notice, just carried on with their workday 🤣🤣

Yes, sometimes it turns out to be no big deal, even when you find yourself sitting on the lavatory in the middle of the office.

AntiqueBabyLoanSmurf · 13/04/2026 11:44

nomas · 13/04/2026 11:32

Being provocative is not the same as being a perv, which is what that poster was saying these girls should be treated as.

Nobody else knows the actual motivation of people who dress in a boundary-pushing norm. All they can know is that the person likes to push boundaries in a public place, where other people have no option not to see it. They haven't 'accidentally forgotten' to put anything on that properly covers their underwear.

Unless you think that all women and (teenage) girls are innocent, delicate little flowers with no knowledge of sexuality at all?

nomas · 13/04/2026 11:39

PickyTits · 13/04/2026 11:38

I can't believe some posters are falling over themselves to try and defend this shit. Remember that next time you see me in Tesco fondling the tomatoes with my stray grey pubes hanging out of my flimsy Shein thong ... this is what you're advocating for.

You could report that person to Tesco.

nomas · 13/04/2026 11:39

AntiqueBabyLoanSmurf · 13/04/2026 11:31

Why should people have to look away when out in public, because somebody else ignores socially-accepted norms of decency? It's not about stopping to have a big leery ogle; you shouldn't have to see it and be forced to react defensively in the first place.

It's not unreasonable to want to walk around in public with your eyes open. Do you think the same for women if they're the targets of flashers in the park: as long as he isn't trying to approach or speak to you, they just need to look away and not try to shame him for dressing/undressing as he sees fit?

Flashers are different because there is a documented correlation between flashers (vast majority of which are men) escalating their behaviour to sexually assaulting women.

There are public decency laws, and shops can also implement a dress code and ask people to leave it if they don’t adhere to it.

So yes, you can report people AND look away, you don’t have to stare to see how much the wind jiggles them, as one poster was doing.

Dollymylove · 13/04/2026 11:39

BeanQuisine · 13/04/2026 10:16

Stuff of nightmares, quite literally. I have recurring bad dreams in which I'm walking around city streets in my bra and knickers, having somehow lost the other clothes, and forlornly hoping that nobody notices.

Ive had dreams in the past that I have gone to work naked, and that nobody seemed to notice, just carried on with their workday 🤣🤣

PickyTits · 13/04/2026 11:38

I can't believe some posters are falling over themselves to try and defend this shit. Remember that next time you see me in Tesco fondling the tomatoes with my stray grey pubes hanging out of my flimsy Shein thong ... this is what you're advocating for.

KimberleyClark · 13/04/2026 11:38

AntiqueBabyLoanSmurf · 13/04/2026 11:31

Why should people have to look away when out in public, because somebody else ignores socially-accepted norms of decency? It's not about stopping to have a big leery ogle; you shouldn't have to see it and be forced to react defensively in the first place.

It's not unreasonable to want to walk around in public with your eyes open. Do you think the same for women if they're the targets of flashers in the park: as long as he isn't trying to approach or speak to you, they just need to look away and not try to shame him for dressing/undressing as he sees fit?

Hard agree. Should people really have to be prepared at all times to look away from indecently dressed people while walking round the supermarket/ the high street?

nomas · 13/04/2026 11:32

AntiqueBabyLoanSmurf · 13/04/2026 11:26

So you don't think that women and teenage girls have any interest in or knowledge about sex and sexuality and in attracting the opposite (or indeed the same) sex - in ways that they know are deliberately provocative or pushing social norms?

Who said anything about violence?

Being provocative is not the same as being a perv, which is what that poster was saying these girls should be treated as.

AntiqueBabyLoanSmurf · 13/04/2026 11:31

nomas · 13/04/2026 11:08

It’s not more difficult for men to look away. Their eyes have the same swivel ability as women’s. They don’t need to cop an eyeful.

Why should people have to look away when out in public, because somebody else ignores socially-accepted norms of decency? It's not about stopping to have a big leery ogle; you shouldn't have to see it and be forced to react defensively in the first place.

It's not unreasonable to want to walk around in public with your eyes open. Do you think the same for women if they're the targets of flashers in the park: as long as he isn't trying to approach or speak to you, they just need to look away and not try to shame him for dressing/undressing as he sees fit?

EstherGreenwood63 · 13/04/2026 11:30

Oh oh has ArseintheCoopWindow arrived yet? The PERFECT thread for them...

AccordingToWhom · 13/04/2026 11:29

Dollymylove · 13/04/2026 09:51

It shouldn't take a genius to work out that going for a job interview half naked is not a good look. Unless its an interview for a stripper of course 🤣

I doubt it happened.

AntiqueBabyLoanSmurf · 13/04/2026 11:26

nomas · 13/04/2026 11:06

Maybe when 97% of violence is committed by young girls we’ll start being as suspicious of them as we are of men.

So you don't think that women and teenage girls have any interest in or knowledge about sex and sexuality and in attracting the opposite (or indeed the same) sex - in ways that they know are deliberately provocative or pushing social norms?

Who said anything about violence?

Gardenquestion22 · 13/04/2026 11:16

nomas · 13/04/2026 11:08

It’s not more difficult for men to look away. Their eyes have the same swivel ability as women’s. They don’t need to cop an eyeful.

I was saying it's difficult for anyone to look away male or female at times.

SapphireSeptember · 13/04/2026 11:09

BoarBrush · 12/04/2026 20:31

I saw a similar dressed teen in tesco a couple weeks ago. Dd 15 was with me and she said she does dance classes. Doesn't seem like an appropriate outfit for a supermarket, I'd imagine I'd get huckled by security if I walked about in my knickers.

Maybe if a bunch of Mumsnetters started walking around in just their knickers it would stop being trendy? It just seems ridiculous.

nomas · 13/04/2026 11:08

Gardenquestion22 · 13/04/2026 10:36

I'm a late 50s hetero woman and I feel uncomfortable when I see someone half dressed in the street, not turned on or anything. I can see how it makes men uncomfortable and for them it's worse as inadvertenly 'copping an eyeful' is going to make them look like a dirty old man.

It’s not more difficult for men to look away. Their eyes have the same swivel ability as women’s. They don’t need to cop an eyeful.

nomas · 13/04/2026 11:06

aspirationalferret · 13/04/2026 09:04

Exactly. Someone else said (sorry I’ve lost the post) that if this was a man walking around in his pays he’d be labelled a perv. Yet somehow we’re excusing girls and women in their pants in the shops!

of course you’d look and think “huh where’s her clothes?”

we are social beings and need to open our eyes to be able to move around safely etc. I notice if someone has nice trainers I like or some colourful earrings etc.

we can’t all look down at the ground in case we accidentally see someone’s bum!

Maybe when 97% of violence is committed by young girls we’ll start being as suspicious of them as we are of men.

nomas · 13/04/2026 11:02

RanchRat · 13/04/2026 10:59

I am 73, I used to charge about London in skirts that barely covered my arse.

Ah but apparently because that was the 1960s it was ok.

Nofeckingway · 13/04/2026 11:00

I do pause at those thong bikini bottoms . Basically it's your bare arse with string around it . OK if you are with a group of other young people but this girl I saw was with her family I presume . So her father mother and teen brother and sister. It just seeming such a jarring context . And they I start your wonder why I think that way . Like it's OK if you are tanned and hanging with others but not OK if you are a typical pasty white slightly chubby teen with your mum . Hard to know what is the right way to be thinking these days .