Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think every woman should have at least £20,000 in savings she can access independently?

266 replies

AmusedPlumMember · 07/04/2026 16:27

I’m going to be quite direct here.

I personally think every woman should aim to have at least £20,000 in savings that she can access independently, whether that’s in an ISA or another account. For me, it’s about having a level of financial security and not being completely reliant on anyone else, even in a committed relationship. I know that won’t be achievable for everyone at all times but as a principle it feels important.

AIBU to think that’s just sensible or am I being unrealistic?

OP posts:
Judellie · 07/04/2026 21:57

Possibly something to be said for keeping a small stash of cash in the house (thinking of people who need to escape dv, financial abuse etc) which is my argument for keeping cash, tangentially.
However most people are not going to be able to save anywhere near £20000; we have had nothing done in the house except absolute necessities for 20 years. I now have an inheritance from my lovely mum but when the kids were small I often had nothing at all; I remember being exceptionally grateful to find 20p on the ground!

celticnations · 07/04/2026 21:33

Yes. 100%.

Never let yourself or your kids become so trapped that you can do nothing but stay trapped.

Always have an escape.

StevieNic · 07/04/2026 21:19

Are you going to give it to me? Where am
i getting 20k otherwose since my income
goes on bills and expenses?

BountifulPantry · 07/04/2026 20:35

I think it’s great to have savings and yes gives you loads of security.

£20,000 is unrealistic for most women.

NerrSnerr · 07/04/2026 20:17

AmusedPlumMember · 07/04/2026 16:42

I don’t see it as either/or to be honest. I think you can contribute to your family and still have some level of financial independence at the same time, even if it’s just a small amount.
For me it’s more about having a bit of security, not choosing yourself over your family.

How wealthy are you and your family OP? You sound massively out of touch.

ImFinePMSL · 07/04/2026 20:03

AmusedPlumMember · 07/04/2026 16:30

I don’t think it’s something that would be achievable for everyone straight away, especially on a low income. I see it more as something to aim towards over time where possible, rather than an expectation that everyone should already have it.

I’m 30yo.

I will die of old age before I manage to save up a spare £20,000.

I am genuinely baffled how people like yourself fail to understand how real, ordinary working class people live.

Kellph83 · 07/04/2026 19:57

I wish I could save 20k! Mate at this point I wish I could save £20 at the end of the month! I’m not on a terrible salary, but I earn too much to get UC but struggle each month. I’ve even started looking at evening and weekend jobs intop of my 8-5
I’m sure a lot of Us would love to be able to have a 20k buffer , but it’s just not possible

XenoBitch · 07/04/2026 19:53

If you are on UC, you wont be allowed to have this sort of money. Your benefits would stop.
Some disabled women are totally financially reliant on their DP/DH. How would they be able to stash away £20k with no one noticing?

If you are married, your husband would get half anyway.
DM had a secret stash of savings that DF had no idea about it. But if they had divorced, he would have got half (and drank it all away, hence why it was hidden to begin with).

I remember a thread on here where OP's DM managed to save up £thousands when she gave up smoking... and she was called all sorts for keeping the money secret from her family.

Neemon · 07/04/2026 19:51

I bloody wish!

gardenflowergirl · 07/04/2026 19:48

Totally unrealistic! How will women on minimum wage ever achieve that. Even nurses and teachers wouldn't be able to do that on their salaries with the cost of living.

Bringmebacktothe90s · 07/04/2026 19:40

Low income women wouldn’t benefit from this at all. They wouldn’t qualify for benefits because of their savings. Sorry but this is lalaland. And wouldn’t benefit all women. You fill your boots though

JHound · 07/04/2026 19:39

MummyWillow1 · 07/04/2026 19:18

Family/charities/benefits can bridge a gap if needed. Being able to get a job and work your way out of that is more important.

Not all families are in a position to assist and it takes a while to apply for benefits. Any amounts received will be too low to cover costs in any meaningful way. Ditto support from charities. They won't be able to cover my rent for a month.

FeministThrowingAPrincessParty · 07/04/2026 19:38

Unrealistic but maybe we could aim for something like £2,000. Enough for a deposit for a private rental property, for example .

FlowersInTheWindows · 07/04/2026 19:31

For a lot of people the goal of saving 20 grand over time would be for a house deposit, not to just have it sitting as spare money.

JHound · 07/04/2026 19:28

Probablyshouldntsay · 07/04/2026 17:56

To be honest I think it is far more sensible for young women to never marry, have children or indeed tie themselves financially in any way to a romantic partner. Genuinely

As somebody who is in that situation (by default not necessarily 'choice') I would point out there are serious financial downsides to having lived your whole life without a partner. There is a lot of power in dual incomes.

I have, admittedly, been very financially irresponsible in the past - so maybe would have a different view had I been more sensible. But even saving a house deposit is a mountain. I will be nearing retirement before I manage to get on the property ladder and then only a flat (leasehold to boot!)

ScrollingLeaves · 07/04/2026 19:26

MummyWillow1 · 07/04/2026 19:18

Family/charities/benefits can bridge a gap if needed. Being able to get a job and work your way out of that is more important.

Yes, you are right in general, but not guaranteed. To be able have enough to leave immediately with children and get a plane or train, or go to a hotel, or put down a deposit on a flat straight away, would be nice.

( So far from being possible for most people though, I realise.)

Motheranddaughter · 07/04/2026 19:19

I earn much the same as my DH and could support myself if we split

SolidScience · 07/04/2026 19:18

Not quite the same, but I have told my young adult son and daughter that they should establish a career before they have children if possible. Without a doubt.

MummyWillow1 · 07/04/2026 19:18

JHound · 07/04/2026 18:59

But there is still a period while not working that needs to be covered.

Family/charities/benefits can bridge a gap if needed. Being able to get a job and work your way out of that is more important.

Ponderingwindow · 07/04/2026 19:16

I think every woman needs a “fuck you fund”. The exact amount can vary, but she needs to be able to escape an abusive partner without worrying about how to provide basics like food and shelter.

its actually the thing I would suggest parents save for their children instead of contributing to weddings. Just set aside a bit of money in case your child ever needs it one day.

oldFoolMe · 07/04/2026 19:14

no - ideally you should have either a considerable amount more or under 16k so you can claim benefits if you fall in hard times. But realistically most women do not and cannot save that amount.

properidiot · 07/04/2026 19:13

Where possible, all women would have at least £20k in their personal bank. They would also have a wonderful DH who was supportive, generous, hard working and earned 6 figures so he could also have £20k for himself.

Where possible, the woman would also be a size 10, cook from scratch, never feed her two perfect DCs UPFs and hold down a high flying charity job which was wfh and enabled her to do the school run.

Where possible, she would also have someone in to do the ironing so that woman (the ironing lady) could where possible, save up enough money from ironing to have her own stash of £20k for herself.

Have I forgotten anything? Sounds like Utopia 😇

threescoops · 07/04/2026 19:12

sometimes known as "running away money"! lovely idea but almost impossible to achieve, sadly. I am still amused by the memory of a train guard asking me when I once bought a single ticket to Nottingham "running away, my duck?"

Lifeomars · 07/04/2026 19:11

Probablyshouldntsay · 07/04/2026 17:56

To be honest I think it is far more sensible for young women to never marry, have children or indeed tie themselves financially in any way to a romantic partner. Genuinely

If I could go back or if I was young today I would give this serious thought

Jollyhockeystickss · 07/04/2026 19:10

RhaenysRocks · 07/04/2026 16:30

Completely unrealistic. I think women should try to ensure they achieve sufficient qualifications and a career before having babies though, so that they are able to support themselves if needed and dont become 'trapped'. Any amount in savings will eventually and quite quickly disappear if you don't have the means to replenish it.

100% agree many women rely on a man and continue working part time even when the children grow up and then if the husband leaves they are bereft but yes being trapped was never part of my plan

Swipe left for the next trending thread