Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Ex disputing CMS and making rival Child Benefit claim in 50/50 care

465 replies

fixatedplanet · 22/03/2026 14:34

Hi all,

I’m really struggling with this and could do with some advice.

We’ve had a proper 50/50 week-on/week-off arrangement for the last 4.5 years. The boys (14 and 11) split their time equally between us week on/week off and we’ve always split the costs of shared things 50/50. He does his bit when they’re with him and I do mine. It has been working fine but....

The issue is income. I earn around £60k and he earns well over the £156k threshold. Because of that, even though it’s 50/50, I applied to CMS for child maintenance so he pays his fair share (it comes out at the maximum rate, around £800 a month which is a 50% discount as he has them 7 nights out of 14). I thought that was reasonable as his salary is much higher and he should pay more than half.

He immediately challenged it with a Mandatory Reconsideration, which was rejected because I receive the Child Benefit (he gave it up due to the high income charge and then during divorce said I could have it which only seemed fair). Now he’s put in a rival Child Benefit claim for one of the children AND lodged a tribunal appeal with the CMS. He’s basically trying to get out of paying anything through CMS and I could lose some of the child benefit now!!!

We are completely 50/50. He does everything on his time and I do everything on mine. But because he earns more, he should contribute more and CMS should sort this I would have thought, I should not have to go to a tribunal.I have started to gather evidence to try and show that I do more so it gives me a good chance at the tribunal and I guess he is doing the same now. I am going to get a barrister to help out at the tribunal to try and prove I do more but he does stuff too so not sure if that will help me.

I’m worried he might actually get the Child Benefit (even though he can’t claim it himself because of the high income charge) and that the tribunal might side with him. Does he have any chance of winning that? It just doesn’t feel fair because he earns much more than me even though we share all the care equally. He did offer to cover all of the shared costs but I have said no and decided to go down the CMS route as that will be more money than simply covering the shared costs.

Has anyone been through this? Can he really do the rival Child Benefit thing and what are his chances? I guess he has lots of evidence to show that we share care equally and have done for several years but he cannot even claim it so I would miss out! And what are the chances at tribunal? Surely they will see my side of things? He has started to pay me the £800 a month now so I have had a few months payment so far so that is good at least but I am worried I might lose it or be told to give it back.

Thanks in advance.

OP posts:
dadtoateen · 22/03/2026 17:48

fixatedplanet · 22/03/2026 14:34

Hi all,

I’m really struggling with this and could do with some advice.

We’ve had a proper 50/50 week-on/week-off arrangement for the last 4.5 years. The boys (14 and 11) split their time equally between us week on/week off and we’ve always split the costs of shared things 50/50. He does his bit when they’re with him and I do mine. It has been working fine but....

The issue is income. I earn around £60k and he earns well over the £156k threshold. Because of that, even though it’s 50/50, I applied to CMS for child maintenance so he pays his fair share (it comes out at the maximum rate, around £800 a month which is a 50% discount as he has them 7 nights out of 14). I thought that was reasonable as his salary is much higher and he should pay more than half.

He immediately challenged it with a Mandatory Reconsideration, which was rejected because I receive the Child Benefit (he gave it up due to the high income charge and then during divorce said I could have it which only seemed fair). Now he’s put in a rival Child Benefit claim for one of the children AND lodged a tribunal appeal with the CMS. He’s basically trying to get out of paying anything through CMS and I could lose some of the child benefit now!!!

We are completely 50/50. He does everything on his time and I do everything on mine. But because he earns more, he should contribute more and CMS should sort this I would have thought, I should not have to go to a tribunal.I have started to gather evidence to try and show that I do more so it gives me a good chance at the tribunal and I guess he is doing the same now. I am going to get a barrister to help out at the tribunal to try and prove I do more but he does stuff too so not sure if that will help me.

I’m worried he might actually get the Child Benefit (even though he can’t claim it himself because of the high income charge) and that the tribunal might side with him. Does he have any chance of winning that? It just doesn’t feel fair because he earns much more than me even though we share all the care equally. He did offer to cover all of the shared costs but I have said no and decided to go down the CMS route as that will be more money than simply covering the shared costs.

Has anyone been through this? Can he really do the rival Child Benefit thing and what are his chances? I guess he has lots of evidence to show that we share care equally and have done for several years but he cannot even claim it so I would miss out! And what are the chances at tribunal? Surely they will see my side of things? He has started to pay me the £800 a month now so I have had a few months payment so far so that is good at least but I am worried I might lose it or be told to give it back.

Thanks in advance.

If it’s 50/50 share why should he have to pay anything? Doesn’t matter what his earnings are.

JustAnotherWhinger · 22/03/2026 17:48

fixatedplanet · 22/03/2026 17:38

Ok I did not expect it to blow up like this, from my perspective it does not seem at all fair if he has all the money which he could spend on the children and I don't have access to the same.We agreed through divorce and actually I came out with almost 70% of the assets and half of his pension, no spousal maintenance was due and that is what was agreed then but that was a few years ago. And they did say that during divorce if the children were 50/50 then there is no CMS due but that does not appear to be the case as they have already awarded it to me and he is paying it, so clearly there is! It is not fair to make me go to a tribunal at my own expense to have to fight this he should pay the CM that they have said is due! He can afford it comfortably. We both have our own careers and when we were together we all benefited from his salary and now the children do not benefit from his salary when they are with me so he can afford to take them on lavish holidays whereas I cannot so I look like the poorer parent. I am going to fight this and I am going to show that I do more than he does and I am going to win at the tribunal and I am also going to contest his CB claim as he cannot even get the money so that is taking it away from me. A few of you have said I can challenge this through a court so if the tribunal route does not make things fair then that will have to be next.

CMS use the blunt tool of having CB = entitled to CM.

He’s obviously now realised it’s not actually as simple as that if he disagrees and there are ways to mitigate in these circumstances.

If he takes it back to court (which as a high earner he can) your previous agreement could be put back in place.

If he has 50/50 then he’ll be awarded one of the CB and you’ll owe him maintenance for that child unless you both agree on no payments.

Tableforjoan · 22/03/2026 17:46

Cms also doesn’t deal with wages of his size normally so will of just awarded you based on two child benefit and not looked further.

Once he gets awarded one child and he will and they dig deeper once he then proves one resident and one 50/50 which is how it will look when you both have one child Ben. They will close the claim and you will owe him back.

Velumental · 22/03/2026 17:46

fixatedplanet · 22/03/2026 17:38

Ok I did not expect it to blow up like this, from my perspective it does not seem at all fair if he has all the money which he could spend on the children and I don't have access to the same.We agreed through divorce and actually I came out with almost 70% of the assets and half of his pension, no spousal maintenance was due and that is what was agreed then but that was a few years ago. And they did say that during divorce if the children were 50/50 then there is no CMS due but that does not appear to be the case as they have already awarded it to me and he is paying it, so clearly there is! It is not fair to make me go to a tribunal at my own expense to have to fight this he should pay the CM that they have said is due! He can afford it comfortably. We both have our own careers and when we were together we all benefited from his salary and now the children do not benefit from his salary when they are with me so he can afford to take them on lavish holidays whereas I cannot so I look like the poorer parent. I am going to fight this and I am going to show that I do more than he does and I am going to win at the tribunal and I am also going to contest his CB claim as he cannot even get the money so that is taking it away from me. A few of you have said I can challenge this through a court so if the tribunal route does not make things fair then that will have to be next.

,you ARE the poorer parent. You earn less than he does. That's just reality. Beyond your children benefiting while he's with them, if he has them 50% of the time then they benefit from his salary half he time your salary the other half.

I'm always on the side of maintenance being paid but YOU don't need to benefit from his salary. You should be living your life as a woman whose earns 60k. Not as a woman in a relationship with someone wealthy because you aren't.

AirborneElephant · 22/03/2026 17:46

OP, please look at the previous thread. You are not going to win this in the way you want. You look like the poorer parent because you ARE the poorer parent, you earn less than him and it’s no longer his responsibility to equalise that.

The most likely outcome if care stays 50:50 and while there are two eligible children is that he gets child benefit for one child, and he then claims child maintenance off you for that child. You keep child benefit for the other, and can claim CMS for that child. So you may still end up slightly benefiting, but not by much and at the risk of completely destroying your coparenting relationship. And like the other poster, you may well end up alienating both children instead and losing them completely.

Tableforjoan · 22/03/2026 17:43

They benefit when they are with him. You got 70% of assets. He does 50/50. You are being greedy. It’s your job to provide extras on your time.

Strictly1 · 22/03/2026 17:42

fixatedplanet · 22/03/2026 17:38

Ok I did not expect it to blow up like this, from my perspective it does not seem at all fair if he has all the money which he could spend on the children and I don't have access to the same.We agreed through divorce and actually I came out with almost 70% of the assets and half of his pension, no spousal maintenance was due and that is what was agreed then but that was a few years ago. And they did say that during divorce if the children were 50/50 then there is no CMS due but that does not appear to be the case as they have already awarded it to me and he is paying it, so clearly there is! It is not fair to make me go to a tribunal at my own expense to have to fight this he should pay the CM that they have said is due! He can afford it comfortably. We both have our own careers and when we were together we all benefited from his salary and now the children do not benefit from his salary when they are with me so he can afford to take them on lavish holidays whereas I cannot so I look like the poorer parent. I am going to fight this and I am going to show that I do more than he does and I am going to win at the tribunal and I am also going to contest his CB claim as he cannot even get the money so that is taking it away from me. A few of you have said I can challenge this through a court so if the tribunal route does not make things fair then that will have to be next.

This is not a good look. You got 70% of assets - so already looked after but you want more. Greedy.

Mooselooseinmyhoose · 22/03/2026 17:42

fixatedplanet · 22/03/2026 17:38

Ok I did not expect it to blow up like this, from my perspective it does not seem at all fair if he has all the money which he could spend on the children and I don't have access to the same.We agreed through divorce and actually I came out with almost 70% of the assets and half of his pension, no spousal maintenance was due and that is what was agreed then but that was a few years ago. And they did say that during divorce if the children were 50/50 then there is no CMS due but that does not appear to be the case as they have already awarded it to me and he is paying it, so clearly there is! It is not fair to make me go to a tribunal at my own expense to have to fight this he should pay the CM that they have said is due! He can afford it comfortably. We both have our own careers and when we were together we all benefited from his salary and now the children do not benefit from his salary when they are with me so he can afford to take them on lavish holidays whereas I cannot so I look like the poorer parent. I am going to fight this and I am going to show that I do more than he does and I am going to win at the tribunal and I am also going to contest his CB claim as he cannot even get the money so that is taking it away from me. A few of you have said I can challenge this through a court so if the tribunal route does not make things fair then that will have to be next.

As the other poster was told A LOT but didnt accept.. CMS will award it even if its not due because it works on brackets. It says in small on the website on pure 50/50 cms is not owed.

He WILL be awarded one child benefit if it is pure 50/50.

My advice would be read the other thread and its not too late to offer to drop the claim if he returns the child benefit to you.

Laura95167 · 22/03/2026 17:40

fixatedplanet · 22/03/2026 14:34

Hi all,

I’m really struggling with this and could do with some advice.

We’ve had a proper 50/50 week-on/week-off arrangement for the last 4.5 years. The boys (14 and 11) split their time equally between us week on/week off and we’ve always split the costs of shared things 50/50. He does his bit when they’re with him and I do mine. It has been working fine but....

The issue is income. I earn around £60k and he earns well over the £156k threshold. Because of that, even though it’s 50/50, I applied to CMS for child maintenance so he pays his fair share (it comes out at the maximum rate, around £800 a month which is a 50% discount as he has them 7 nights out of 14). I thought that was reasonable as his salary is much higher and he should pay more than half.

He immediately challenged it with a Mandatory Reconsideration, which was rejected because I receive the Child Benefit (he gave it up due to the high income charge and then during divorce said I could have it which only seemed fair). Now he’s put in a rival Child Benefit claim for one of the children AND lodged a tribunal appeal with the CMS. He’s basically trying to get out of paying anything through CMS and I could lose some of the child benefit now!!!

We are completely 50/50. He does everything on his time and I do everything on mine. But because he earns more, he should contribute more and CMS should sort this I would have thought, I should not have to go to a tribunal.I have started to gather evidence to try and show that I do more so it gives me a good chance at the tribunal and I guess he is doing the same now. I am going to get a barrister to help out at the tribunal to try and prove I do more but he does stuff too so not sure if that will help me.

I’m worried he might actually get the Child Benefit (even though he can’t claim it himself because of the high income charge) and that the tribunal might side with him. Does he have any chance of winning that? It just doesn’t feel fair because he earns much more than me even though we share all the care equally. He did offer to cover all of the shared costs but I have said no and decided to go down the CMS route as that will be more money than simply covering the shared costs.

Has anyone been through this? Can he really do the rival Child Benefit thing and what are his chances? I guess he has lots of evidence to show that we share care equally and have done for several years but he cannot even claim it so I would miss out! And what are the chances at tribunal? Surely they will see my side of things? He has started to pay me the £800 a month now so I have had a few months payment so far so that is good at least but I am worried I might lose it or be told to give it back.

Thanks in advance.

So you do 50:50 & Ex offered to pay all shared costs but you went via CMS because you want MORE money?

YABVU

fixatedplanet · 22/03/2026 17:38

Ok I did not expect it to blow up like this, from my perspective it does not seem at all fair if he has all the money which he could spend on the children and I don't have access to the same.We agreed through divorce and actually I came out with almost 70% of the assets and half of his pension, no spousal maintenance was due and that is what was agreed then but that was a few years ago. And they did say that during divorce if the children were 50/50 then there is no CMS due but that does not appear to be the case as they have already awarded it to me and he is paying it, so clearly there is! It is not fair to make me go to a tribunal at my own expense to have to fight this he should pay the CM that they have said is due! He can afford it comfortably. We both have our own careers and when we were together we all benefited from his salary and now the children do not benefit from his salary when they are with me so he can afford to take them on lavish holidays whereas I cannot so I look like the poorer parent. I am going to fight this and I am going to show that I do more than he does and I am going to win at the tribunal and I am also going to contest his CB claim as he cannot even get the money so that is taking it away from me. A few of you have said I can challenge this through a court so if the tribunal route does not make things fair then that will have to be next.

OP posts:
Laura95167 · 22/03/2026 17:38

YerMotherWasAHamster · 22/03/2026 14:42

I thought no child support was payable if the arrangement was 50/50.

CMS accepts if someone has the CHild Benefit they're the main parent.. however if theyre 50:50 OPs ex can make a rival claim and will likely get one child.

He can get the claim and decline payments (or pay it back in tax)

And if they have one each OP isnt entitled ro CMS

Laura95167 · 22/03/2026 17:33

fixatedplanet · 22/03/2026 14:34

Hi all,

I’m really struggling with this and could do with some advice.

We’ve had a proper 50/50 week-on/week-off arrangement for the last 4.5 years. The boys (14 and 11) split their time equally between us week on/week off and we’ve always split the costs of shared things 50/50. He does his bit when they’re with him and I do mine. It has been working fine but....

The issue is income. I earn around £60k and he earns well over the £156k threshold. Because of that, even though it’s 50/50, I applied to CMS for child maintenance so he pays his fair share (it comes out at the maximum rate, around £800 a month which is a 50% discount as he has them 7 nights out of 14). I thought that was reasonable as his salary is much higher and he should pay more than half.

He immediately challenged it with a Mandatory Reconsideration, which was rejected because I receive the Child Benefit (he gave it up due to the high income charge and then during divorce said I could have it which only seemed fair). Now he’s put in a rival Child Benefit claim for one of the children AND lodged a tribunal appeal with the CMS. He’s basically trying to get out of paying anything through CMS and I could lose some of the child benefit now!!!

We are completely 50/50. He does everything on his time and I do everything on mine. But because he earns more, he should contribute more and CMS should sort this I would have thought, I should not have to go to a tribunal.I have started to gather evidence to try and show that I do more so it gives me a good chance at the tribunal and I guess he is doing the same now. I am going to get a barrister to help out at the tribunal to try and prove I do more but he does stuff too so not sure if that will help me.

I’m worried he might actually get the Child Benefit (even though he can’t claim it himself because of the high income charge) and that the tribunal might side with him. Does he have any chance of winning that? It just doesn’t feel fair because he earns much more than me even though we share all the care equally. He did offer to cover all of the shared costs but I have said no and decided to go down the CMS route as that will be more money than simply covering the shared costs.

Has anyone been through this? Can he really do the rival Child Benefit thing and what are his chances? I guess he has lots of evidence to show that we share care equally and have done for several years but he cannot even claim it so I would miss out! And what are the chances at tribunal? Surely they will see my side of things? He has started to pay me the £800 a month now so I have had a few months payment so far so that is good at least but I am worried I might lose it or be told to give it back.

Thanks in advance.

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5340011-child-benefit-rival-claim-ex-partner-earning-loads-part-2?postsby=ProlongedAffair read this about someone in circs so similar its uncanny. By @prolongedaffair

CMS will find you primary carer if you get Child Benefit. If you have 50:50 your partner has grounds for a rival CB claim, and likely will get awarded the elder of your sons which will mean his CMS appeal will likely be upheld.

Log in | Mumsnet

Mumsnet makes parents' lives easier by pooling knowledge, advice and support on everything from conception to childbirth, from babies to teenagers.

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5340011-child-benefit-rival-claim-ex-partner-earning-loads-part-2?postsby=ProlongedAffair

hahahaaa · 22/03/2026 17:23

You’ve really screwed yourself here

scoobydeedoo · 22/03/2026 17:19

I don't understand how you would be eligible to claim Child maintenance if it's a true 50/50 arrangement. Did you sacrifice your career while your kids were young so he could progress?

Tableforjoan · 22/03/2026 17:17

I’d imagine on their joint incomes the children are in private school. So again I’d imagine is paying at least half of that.

Haystackhunting · 22/03/2026 17:17

Elektra1 · 22/03/2026 17:16

I’m not sure why you thought you could get CM if it’s 50/50. My ex earns over £600k. We have 50/50 shared care and my solicitor made clear to me during the divorce that if I agreed to 50/50, no CM would be payable. Seems like this may have been an own goal for you. I’d try to discuss with your ex and agree to withdraw your application on the basis that he withdraws his application for the child benefit.

You should’ve got a better Solicitor

Haystackhunting · 22/03/2026 17:17

BringBackCatsEyes · 22/03/2026 17:14

Isn't that all meant to be taken into account during the divorce? Pension, proportion of the home, assets etc.

can absolutely hand on heart assure you that it isn’t

Elektra1 · 22/03/2026 17:16

I’m not sure why you thought you could get CM if it’s 50/50. My ex earns over £600k. We have 50/50 shared care and my solicitor made clear to me during the divorce that if I agreed to 50/50, no CM would be payable. Seems like this may have been an own goal for you. I’d try to discuss with your ex and agree to withdraw your application on the basis that he withdraws his application for the child benefit.

Haystackhunting · 22/03/2026 17:15

YourWildAmberSloth · 22/03/2026 16:57

Child maintenance should be based on the costs of raising the children and the needs of the child. Once you separate or divorce, you shouldn't then benefit from the other parents income. Assuming your DC's needs were being met just fine, you now have another £800 per month, to spend on what? I'm not surprised he's pushing back. A case where an otherwise healthy co-parent relationship might have been messed up through greed.

That simply isn’t true if we look at it as a cold hard Contract when I ended into the contract to have a child with this person and it was on the basis that we had such and such income
Now as a whole as a collective if that income dropped for either of us, then the other one would support the other one for the duration of the child rearing.
Equally, if it improves the person that should benefit from it is the child.
If you’re going to look at what the office of national statistics claims it cost costs to raise a child when you look at the Mortgage application for example example apparently we should all be able to manage it on three grand a year.
Does that mean that the CMS should be capped at £225 a month? No matter what their parents earn.
And remember that has to cover accommodation, water gas electric food transport hobbies clothes
Doing a lot of heavy lifting that child support calculation

ForMerryMauveDreamer · 22/03/2026 17:15

Why should he have to pay maintenance if it’s 50/50 and he’s already paying for shared expenses? At £60k with a high earning co parent who pays more than his share already, your kids are very well provided for. You’re being greedy and suffering the consequences now. If he does end up paying maintenance don’t be surprised if he stops paying all shared expenses and you lose your good co-parenting relationship. And yes he might well be awarded CB.

When men talk about money grabbing exes, this is what they mean.

BringBackCatsEyes · 22/03/2026 17:14

Anyahyacinth · 22/03/2026 16:41

Particularly if a mother has sacrificed career progress, hours to support said children in earlier years (and part of the agreement within the marriage)

Isn't that all meant to be taken into account during the divorce? Pension, proportion of the home, assets etc.

BringBackCatsEyes · 22/03/2026 17:13

Holdmybeermoment · 22/03/2026 17:03

She is not a single parent. She is a very well supported co-parent on a good salary with an ex who pays his share of everything and offered to pay more. He also let her claim both set of child benefit despite her not actually being entitled to both. Then she did get greedy.

I think she would be regarded as a single parent.
If you told someone you were a co-parent I think they'd assume some sort of non-romantic relationship under the same roof.

People tend to say lone parent when they have no support from the other parent (for whatever reason)

Blondeshavemorefun · 22/03/2026 17:09

I don’t think @fixatedplanet is coming back

Mcdhotchoc · 22/03/2026 17:05

Well presumably the rule is to allow some equalisation of the children's standard of living in both homes.
I don't think you were wrong to pursue it if you could not agree it equitably.

Holdmybeermoment · 22/03/2026 17:03

babyproblems · 22/03/2026 17:00

Good luck @fixatedplanet

Youre not greedy. It’s not a race to the bottom bottom. CMS is a scandal of our times.. it’s shocking things are still shit for single parents and the societal expectation on single mothers is insane.. there is still no equality and even less if you are a single mother in 2026. Best of luck Xo

She is not a single parent. She is a very well supported co-parent on a good salary with an ex who pays his share of everything and offered to pay more. He also let her claim both set of child benefit despite her not actually being entitled to both. Then she did get greedy.

Swipe left for the next trending thread