Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Cannot handle Nigel Farage being PM

417 replies

Designless · 17/02/2026 10:46

The goofy toad of toad hall-faced wanker

At least other countries have sexy right wing twats, why do we get him?

1.Please say his name as it is supposed to be said - farage like garage

  1. Please don't vote for him he's one of Those Guys - smug, sweaty faced supercilious thickies
  1. All his policies are gash
OP posts:
DiySteve · 17/02/2026 15:08

StandFirm · 17/02/2026 15:04

It is QUITE legitimate for Remainers who did nothing to deserve this clusterfuck to moan about new restrictions linked to moving to the EU. So, yep, we'll keep on whining about that. Brexiters whined for 40 years about leaving the EU.

Crack on - bark at the moon.

Let me know how that works out for you, or don’t.

It’s all good.

Miggledyhiggledy · 17/02/2026 15:08

TrashHeap · 17/02/2026 15:04

I call him the Frog Faced Fascist Fuck. Nasty shitbrick of a man.

You can call him as many puerile names you want. I doubt your bizarre obsession will rattle a man who can hold his own. BTW, if you're going to employ alliterative techniques, at least make it original.

Eskarina1 · 17/02/2026 15:07

Rubyring444 · 17/02/2026 12:07

The concern is the departure of high rate tax payers.

If the personal allowance increases to £20,000 at least you will have more money in your pocket to counter balance the above mentioned cuts. Autonomy over your own spending is preferable.

Not to me. I'm a high rate tax payer. I work in the public sector but would be an additional rate tax payer if I did my role in the private sector. For me a functioning health, welfare and education system that benefits all regardless of ability to pay is important.

However, if Reform get in I will take full advantage of my personal autonomy. I will shift into the private sector (a significant proportion of my colleagues would quit rather than work in a reform led public sector). I will get tax advice so I pay the absolute bare minimum in tax. I will cancel every subscription and buy as little as possible (2nd hand/local) for the duration of parliament to avoid vat. I will donate everything I can to causes I care about.

menopausalfart · 17/02/2026 15:06

If you're white, have money and you're male, you'll be fine.

StandFirm · 17/02/2026 15:04

DiySteve · 17/02/2026 12:09

The PP was bemoaning the potential for a right wing government, and posted that they intended to emigrate.

It’s not for me to decide where they planned to go - presumably they have an idea, but bringing up FOM seems a bit daft.

People should go, or stay - but don’t whine about restrictions relating to the EU.

It is QUITE legitimate for Remainers who did nothing to deserve this clusterfuck to moan about new restrictions linked to moving to the EU. So, yep, we'll keep on whining about that. Brexiters whined for 40 years about leaving the EU.

TrashHeap · 17/02/2026 15:04

I call him the Frog Faced Fascist Fuck. Nasty shitbrick of a man.

Miggledyhiggledy · 17/02/2026 15:03

Quite, while weaponising them to appear virtuous.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 17/02/2026 15:01

stargirl27 · 17/02/2026 15:00

What does it have to do with Muslims?

Some people seem to be obsessed with Muslims.

stargirl27 · 17/02/2026 15:00

Smilesinthesunshine · 17/02/2026 11:04

I rather doubt he will ever be the prime minister.
Your childish personal insults make you sound very ignorant though. Imagine the outrage if someone started calling out a Muslim name or insulting their physical appearance.

What does it have to do with Muslims?

EasternStandard · 17/02/2026 15:00

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 17/02/2026 14:49

In your dreams!

Having two different far right parties isn't going to encourage more people to vote for the far right. It will merely split the vote and hopefully discourage the other parties from chasing after that cohort anyway.

Strategically, it would make much more sense for Labour to ignore the right wingers. It doesn't align with their values, they are never going to win that cohort over in any case, and they need to appeal instead to the majority of voters who really don't want to see a far right party in power.

Definitely a good idea to do this. Who knows maybe they will now McSweeney is gone and Labour can see how it goes.

Miggledyhiggledy · 17/02/2026 14:57

The surge of Tories defecting to Reform is indicative of a bigger ploy. Whatever happens, Labour are sitting ducks and so far, their implosive response is predictable - much like their supporters. All virtuous hot air AKA fur coat no knickers.

Rubyring444 · 17/02/2026 14:56

Jc2001 · 17/02/2026 14:46

A few years back I would have made a bet that Trump would never be elected, but he was. Twice.

I wouldn't bet on reform not getting in. Can't stand the thought of it, but I don't think it's beyond the realms of possibility.

As of February 2026 I would be very surprised if Reform don't win the next General Election

The talk of an early 2027 election would favour Reform (especially post May 2026 local elections).

BUT who knows what is round the corner as a lot can change.

DiySteve · 17/02/2026 14:55

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 17/02/2026 14:49

In your dreams!

Having two different far right parties isn't going to encourage more people to vote for the far right. It will merely split the vote and hopefully discourage the other parties from chasing after that cohort anyway.

Strategically, it would make much more sense for Labour to ignore the right wingers. It doesn't align with their values, they are never going to win that cohort over in any case, and they need to appeal instead to the majority of voters who really don't want to see a far right party in power.

What values?

Pander to the back bench welfare vote, you mean?

As for your use of the trite ‘far right’…it’s so tired.

This government is akin to a 12th man for the opposition. Tell your PM to keep going - don’t change a thing.

OhDear111 · 17/02/2026 14:54

I don’t think it’s beyond the realms of possibility either. People are openly saying how they will vote in 2029 or before and I believe them. They are easily led and shallow but it’s also a reflection of the poor politicians we’ve had for a number of years now.

However he’s a “look at me” politician and is more of a protest voice picking up the worst of the busted flush Conservatives on the way. What sane person would want Nadine Dorries and Suella Braverman again? But - people just vote against parties now, so they are not remotely discerning. Sadly, this is the nation we have become and in 2024, we only had 59.7% turnout. If you don’t want Reform, get out and vote!

PandoraSocks · 17/02/2026 14:53

DiySteve · 17/02/2026 14:46

Don’t tell me that He is being taxed to oblivion too?

The current state of humanity is very taxing on God, yes.

Dragonscaledaisy · 17/02/2026 14:53

DiySteve · 17/02/2026 14:41

Well, those bloody foundations are not going to fix themselves, and those gangs are not going to smash themselves, are they?

Whatever happened to the old Hokey Cokey 1 in, 1 out? Seems to have gone quiet recently…

Every one they remove nips back in at the earliest opportunity. Two for the price of one. 😂

Miggledyhiggledy · 17/02/2026 14:51

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 17/02/2026 14:49

In your dreams!

Having two different far right parties isn't going to encourage more people to vote for the far right. It will merely split the vote and hopefully discourage the other parties from chasing after that cohort anyway.

Strategically, it would make much more sense for Labour to ignore the right wingers. It doesn't align with their values, they are never going to win that cohort over in any case, and they need to appeal instead to the majority of voters who really don't want to see a far right party in power.

Talking of dreams ...

Miggledyhiggledy · 17/02/2026 14:50

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 17/02/2026 14:49

DiySteve · 17/02/2026 14:43

On the contrary, with a combined 35%, the right is more likely to drag Starmer that way, despite his rediscovered ‘I am working class bollocks’.

It will tear Labour apart.

In your dreams!

Having two different far right parties isn't going to encourage more people to vote for the far right. It will merely split the vote and hopefully discourage the other parties from chasing after that cohort anyway.

Strategically, it would make much more sense for Labour to ignore the right wingers. It doesn't align with their values, they are never going to win that cohort over in any case, and they need to appeal instead to the majority of voters who really don't want to see a far right party in power.

Miggledyhiggledy · 17/02/2026 14:48

DiySteve · 17/02/2026 14:43

On the contrary, with a combined 35%, the right is more likely to drag Starmer that way, despite his rediscovered ‘I am working class bollocks’.

It will tear Labour apart.

Look forward to trying out some new flavours of popcorn. The implosion of the government hasn't even got started yet. With Restore throwing their hat into the ring, the left will be clutching those pearls at an alarming rate.

Jc2001 · 17/02/2026 14:46

GOATYOAT · 17/02/2026 10:48

I really wouldn’t worry about this because it’s not going to happen

A few years back I would have made a bet that Trump would never be elected, but he was. Twice.

I wouldn't bet on reform not getting in. Can't stand the thought of it, but I don't think it's beyond the realms of possibility.

DiySteve · 17/02/2026 14:46

PandoraSocks · 17/02/2026 14:44

of course I am omnipresent.

Don’t tell me that He is being taxed to oblivion too?

PandoraSocks · 17/02/2026 14:44

DiySteve · 17/02/2026 14:38

Must confess, I was not aware that you were omnipresent on ALL Starmer-related threads - that must be taxing (poor-taste pun, soz).

Re Labour, noted.

Edited

of course I am omnipresent.

morgan freeman GIF
DiySteve · 17/02/2026 14:43

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 17/02/2026 14:40

Farage not quite far enough to the right for you?

You might find that Rupert Lowe's new party will just end up splitting the far right and keeping them out of power.

If he can get the far right to destroy itself through infighting, then he will have been of great service to the country as a whole.

On the contrary, with a combined 35%, the right is more likely to drag Starmer that way, despite his rediscovered ‘I am working class bollocks’.

It will tear Labour apart.

Miggledyhiggledy · 17/02/2026 14:42

The idea of Labour voters telling Reform voters they will get what they wish for. To use the lefties words, it's just a shame they've taken the rest of us down with them when they voted Labour at the last GE. I wish they would be honest and admit how much they fucked up. Instead they get round the party who despises women by labelling Farage at every opportunity. Destract and derail anyone?