Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

We don't want the government to lurch to the left

583 replies

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 13:57

I am absolutely astounded that Labour think it's democratic to decide that they can lurch to the left despite being elected with a very clear promise to not tax and spend. I believe this is absolutely not what the general public want and I am really worried that the economy isn't going to survive this and we will end up with an IMF bailout that will lead to very painful spending cuts for our most vulnerable.

Please vote:
YABU :I want Labour to lurch to the left in order to increase taxation and spending
YANBU: I don't want Labour to lurch to the left and would be against further tax and spending rises

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
DiySteve · 11/02/2026 18:13

HRTQueen · 11/02/2026 17:40

14 months in to turning around the damage that the previous government did over 14 years I do not expect miracles

That Labour have and are working towards creating a fairer society

Increase in healthcare spending, working towards recruiting more healthcare professionals, increasing minim wage, laws passed to support workers rights and better support for working families, changed laws to protect tenants better, laws to protect, laws passed to protect victims of domestic abuse better, funding for green projects

this is just some. no one is claiming Labour are perfect but Labour inherited a country where the divide between rich a poor had increased to levels not seen in living memory and that is utterly shameful, we are a country that has a lot of wealth but less and less of this wealth is shared that has to change, that is what Labour are working towards (they should be braver) and that can not happen over night

How do you explain Labour’s dire polling versus Reform, please?

EilonwyWithRedGoldHair · 11/02/2026 18:04

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 16:35

Higher taxation absolutely doesn't work for the individual if you are a net contributor. Especially once it goes beyond a certain level and all the arguments about a 'civilised society' can't be made. Clearly some people would be financially better off in a low tax economy where they fund just their own needs privately. This is why Dubai etc is attracting a lot of these people. You can think whatever you want about the ethics of this but it's clear that the people going there feel that they are better off there.

It is fundamentally selfish to want tax increases funded by someone else to fund spending that will be spent on you. You are essentially asking one family to fund another. It isn't a selfless stance to take when you're the beneficiary. It is by definition selfish.

So if a net contributor supports tax increases it's fine, but if they, say, have an accident, become disabled and need support from the state and still hold the same view they become selfish?

I've probably never been a net contributor because my wages weren't high enough, but I've worked and gone out of my way not to claim JSA or UC. Would have accepted paying more tax even though it would have caused mild difficulties. I'm currently barely earning above the personal allowance, would still accept paying more tax even though it would cause real difficulties now. (And if it's relevant - still not claiming UC, took part-time job to avoid claiming JSA. Do get DLA for DS, DH claims Carers Allowance).

And, no, I'm not going to donate extra money to the government, because me giving an extra £5 on my own won't save any services but will mean skipping an extra meal, and I'm already usually not eating lunch on days I'm in work.

SleeplessInWherever · 11/02/2026 17:46

DiySteve · 11/02/2026 17:39

30% of the budget is welfare - so let’s start there.

I also have private health and use private schooling, and have paid seven figures in personal tax in just the past few years alone.

I am now mitigating my liability everywhere I can - I will not pay this government a penny more than I have to. I am not alone.

7 figures in personal tax is a lot of money, and explains why cutting welfare would be a priority - you're never likely to need it.

I can see a PP has asked if you’re leaving the country, if not I assume your money is?

EasternStandard · 11/02/2026 17:43

HRTQueen · 11/02/2026 17:40

14 months in to turning around the damage that the previous government did over 14 years I do not expect miracles

That Labour have and are working towards creating a fairer society

Increase in healthcare spending, working towards recruiting more healthcare professionals, increasing minim wage, laws passed to support workers rights and better support for working families, changed laws to protect tenants better, laws to protect, laws passed to protect victims of domestic abuse better, funding for green projects

this is just some. no one is claiming Labour are perfect but Labour inherited a country where the divide between rich a poor had increased to levels not seen in living memory and that is utterly shameful, we are a country that has a lot of wealth but less and less of this wealth is shared that has to change, that is what Labour are working towards (they should be braver) and that can not happen over night

Their approach so far has been to increase NI which is a tax on jobs pretty much. It’s why payroll numbers are falling, graduates are finding it harder and young people generally. It also means more on benefits.

You can see the hit on jobs on here too look at the ‘brutal job market’ and other threads.

Since were going into AI era actively decreasing jobs for young adult dc is the last thing we need.

HRTQueen · 11/02/2026 17:43

DiySteve · 11/02/2026 17:39

30% of the budget is welfare - so let’s start there.

I also have private health and use private schooling, and have paid seven figures in personal tax in just the past few years alone.

I am now mitigating my liability everywhere I can - I will not pay this government a penny more than I have to. I am not alone.

Are you leaving the country

HRTQueen · 11/02/2026 17:40

hattie43 · 11/02/2026 17:15

And when do you think that success might come because there’s precious little sign of it so far .

14 months in to turning around the damage that the previous government did over 14 years I do not expect miracles

That Labour have and are working towards creating a fairer society

Increase in healthcare spending, working towards recruiting more healthcare professionals, increasing minim wage, laws passed to support workers rights and better support for working families, changed laws to protect tenants better, laws to protect, laws passed to protect victims of domestic abuse better, funding for green projects

this is just some. no one is claiming Labour are perfect but Labour inherited a country where the divide between rich a poor had increased to levels not seen in living memory and that is utterly shameful, we are a country that has a lot of wealth but less and less of this wealth is shared that has to change, that is what Labour are working towards (they should be braver) and that can not happen over night

DiySteve · 11/02/2026 17:39

SleeplessInWherever · 11/02/2026 17:33

By “taming” spending do you actually mean cuts?

I’d be interested to understand what you think should be cut, and what your personal stake in that is?

For example - we have private health care, so cuts to NHS services wouldn’t impact us as much as others. I still don’t want those cuts, but if that service further deteriorates, it’s no skin off my personal nose.

30% of the budget is welfare - so let’s start there.

I also have private health and use private schooling, and have paid seven figures in personal tax in just the past few years alone.

I am now mitigating my liability everywhere I can - I will not pay this government a penny more than I have to. I am not alone.

SleeplessInWherever · 11/02/2026 17:33

DiySteve · 11/02/2026 17:29

Taming spending and avoiding performative taxation which raises little to nothing. I.e. PS VAT.

Labour have tried the former with the Welfare reform bill, but ran into the back benches, of course.

Stop pandering to the unions, and the NHS should also not be treated as a holy cow, just because it’s politically expedient.

What you don’t do is chase away capital and investment, entrepreneurs and high earners.

By “taming” spending do you actually mean cuts?

I’d be interested to understand what you think should be cut, and what your personal stake in that is?

For example - we have private health care, so cuts to NHS services wouldn’t impact us as much as others. I still don’t want those cuts, but if that service further deteriorates, it’s no skin off my personal nose.

DiySteve · 11/02/2026 17:29

SleeplessInWherever · 11/02/2026 17:22

Sorry, what I meant is do you have an idea of what a reasonable taxation and spend system would look like.

From your posts I can see that you don’t like the idea of taxing wealth, or applying VAT to private education, but what solutions would you suggest?

Taming spending and avoiding performative taxation which raises little to nothing. I.e. PS VAT.

Labour have tried the former with the Welfare reform bill, but ran into the back benches, of course.

Stop pandering to the unions, and the NHS should also not be treated as a holy cow, just because it’s politically expedient.

What you don’t do is chase away capital and investment, entrepreneurs and high earners.

SleeplessInWherever · 11/02/2026 17:22

DiySteve · 11/02/2026 16:02

Stopping the lies would be a decent start.

What’s your view?

Sorry, what I meant is do you have an idea of what a reasonable taxation and spend system would look like.

From your posts I can see that you don’t like the idea of taxing wealth, or applying VAT to private education, but what solutions would you suggest?

hattie43 · 11/02/2026 17:15

HRTQueen · 11/02/2026 16:53

Well that is good that in your opinion Labour shall be able to bring the country up a little as the Tories pulled the UK down to the gutter

I personally have faith that Labour shall be more successful than you predict

And when do you think that success might come because there’s precious little sign of it so far .

DrPrunesqualer · 11/02/2026 17:01

glitterpaperchain · 11/02/2026 16:51

My opinion IS based on research, I'm just not going to spend my time laying it out to you. Asking for research isn't argumentative, but your tone is.

Obviously without posting anything we don’t know that of course
Much the same as writing a research paper….proof is required

but as Ive already said this ( and it’s not my call of course ) is mumsnet and not an exam so you do whatever you like

just as others will chose not to believe it without proof.

Im done !! with people who call people names just for asking for proof. It’s actually entirely normal !

DiySteve · 11/02/2026 16:58

HRTQueen · 11/02/2026 16:53

Well that is good that in your opinion Labour shall be able to bring the country up a little as the Tories pulled the UK down to the gutter

I personally have faith that Labour shall be more successful than you predict

18 months vs 14 years (With Brexit and a global pandemic).

Hmmm….

HRTQueen · 11/02/2026 16:53

hattie43 · 11/02/2026 16:42

Labour will bring this country to its knees .

Well that is good that in your opinion Labour shall be able to bring the country up a little as the Tories pulled the UK down to the gutter

I personally have faith that Labour shall be more successful than you predict

Litning · 11/02/2026 16:52

hattie43 · 11/02/2026 16:42

Labour will bring this country to its knees .

Did you miss 2010-2024? It’s been on its knees for a long time.

glitterpaperchain · 11/02/2026 16:51

DrPrunesqualer · 11/02/2026 16:39

Opinions based on proven and copied facts are worth more in terms of a reasoned argument. It’s very normal for research and backing up information
That’s not to say people can’t believe and say whatever random stuff they like of course…free speech and all that
It’s interesting that a request for stats in your opinion makes me argumentative. Disagreeing with an opinion when there’s no proof offered is sensible, not argumentative

but I’ll leave you there if you don’t have the proof ( or don’t want to post it? ) that’s all fine and you could have just ignored the requests. That’s what others do when they don’t have it.

Edited

My opinion IS based on research, I'm just not going to spend my time laying it out to you. Asking for research isn't argumentative, but your tone is.

hattie43 · 11/02/2026 16:42

Labour will bring this country to its knees .

DrPrunesqualer · 11/02/2026 16:39

glitterpaperchain · 11/02/2026 16:24

I'm here to express my opinion which I did. I'm not going to spend my time laying out all the research I've done to a random argumentative person on a forum, that's a waste of time. Just because I don't want to engage with you doesn't make me wrong. Maybe you have more time on your hands than I do

Opinions based on proven and copied facts are worth more in terms of a reasoned argument. It’s very normal for research and backing up information
That’s not to say people can’t believe and say whatever random stuff they like of course…free speech and all that
It’s interesting that a request for stats in your opinion makes me argumentative. Disagreeing with an opinion when there’s no proof offered is sensible, not argumentative

but I’ll leave you there if you don’t have the proof ( or don’t want to post it? ) that’s all fine and you could have just ignored the requests. That’s what others do when they don’t have it.

DiySteve · 11/02/2026 16:32

GlomOfNit · 11/02/2026 16:30

I'm just getting a bit befuddled by how many times I've now read the utterly agenda-less OP writing 'lurch to the left'. OP, why IS is that political parties 'lurch' to the Left?

I'm also getting an ear worm from Rocky Horror now ... 'It's just a LURCH to the Left ...'

In fairness, this government has done a significant amount of ‘lurching’ - crisis to crisis, u-turn after u-turn, so perhaps the OP can be forgiven.

GlomOfNit · 11/02/2026 16:30

I'm just getting a bit befuddled by how many times I've now read the utterly agenda-less OP writing 'lurch to the left'. OP, why IS is that political parties 'lurch' to the Left?

I'm also getting an ear worm from Rocky Horror now ... 'It's just a LURCH to the Left ...'

glitterpaperchain · 11/02/2026 16:24

DrPrunesqualer · 11/02/2026 14:19

I was just wondering if you actually had any figures etc. you don’t. That’s fine

Assume you are aware most European countries that introduced wealth taxes found them both unsuccessful and damaging and have since backtracked.

There is clear precedent that it is an unsuccessful long term method
Which is why the IFS are against it.

Edited

I'm here to express my opinion which I did. I'm not going to spend my time laying out all the research I've done to a random argumentative person on a forum, that's a waste of time. Just because I don't want to engage with you doesn't make me wrong. Maybe you have more time on your hands than I do

glitterpaperchain · 11/02/2026 16:21

Bargepole45 · 11/02/2026 14:21

What would you do about those that don't pay anything or very little and take an awful lot? I'm not talking about the severely disabled before people pounce. More those that could clearly do more to contribute and don't. Surely you would agree that we need to resolve this too if we talking about people paying their fair share?

We do need to resolve it as part of an overhaul of the tax system yes. But studies have shown that instances of actual benefit fraud are pretty low. So if you're looking to gain as much tax money as possible, you'll gain more going after huge profitable businesses than you will going after the few people claiming benefits fraudulently. So it's about the effectiveness of where you spend your time and resources.

DiySteve · 11/02/2026 16:02

SleeplessInWherever · 11/02/2026 15:51

What would you suggest?

Stopping the lies would be a decent start.

What’s your view?

Mishmosher · 11/02/2026 16:00

The effect of sure start: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/short-and-medium-term-impacts-sure-start-educational-outcomes

we certainly could do with reducing send costs just now.

Mishmosher · 11/02/2026 15:57

SleeplessInWherever · 11/02/2026 15:51

What would you suggest?

Sure start was so much more effective in improving lives than cash handouts.

Swipe left for the next trending thread