Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

We don't want the government to lurch to the left

583 replies

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 13:57

I am absolutely astounded that Labour think it's democratic to decide that they can lurch to the left despite being elected with a very clear promise to not tax and spend. I believe this is absolutely not what the general public want and I am really worried that the economy isn't going to survive this and we will end up with an IMF bailout that will lead to very painful spending cuts for our most vulnerable.

Please vote:
YABU :I want Labour to lurch to the left in order to increase taxation and spending
YANBU: I don't want Labour to lurch to the left and would be against further tax and spending rises

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
DrPrunesqualer · 10/02/2026 18:17

treeowl · 10/02/2026 17:53

You cant compare public and private pensions

I didn’t compare them to each other. I said pensions are less generous today because they are and that the age for state pension has increased. Don’t put words in my mouth

Mortgage. If you lose your job you can get a short term loan to help pay for it whilst you’re looking for work. In the past you got nothing

Why are you forgetting about MIRAS?

My parents didn’t have private pensions
They had no UC and were low earners so couldn’t afford it and
there was no compulsory employer contributions
so
Whats better than Nothing !!
Today employers pay money in. That’s again better than nothing

My pension is going well but that’s because I went for high risk investments. My husbands is utterly crap because he went safe
Private pensions were all over the place and vary hugely so we can’t compare
Nor can we compare when many of us went for many years with no employer contributions

Yes
We will have to work longer but the only big difference is for women with the jump from 60.

Which I absolutely agree with for the sake of equality

On balance whilst you say you are not young you don’t seem to remember what was available when older people were young.

As I said before. Ask an unmarried mother what is was like having to give up their child, how keeping one meant no one would give you a job. How there was actually no free childcare. It’s all not that long ago. Mother and baby slave camps for example were around into the 1990s.

sweetsardineface · 10/02/2026 17:58

David Cameron introduced tax cuts. I got one while austerity was pursued relentlessly and public services were falling apart around us. That didn’t help, nor did Truss’s crazy ideas about slashing taxes, regulation and government spending. We are still suffering the effects of supporting the banks during the crash, years of under investment in pretty much everything that can stimulate an economy and of course, Brexit. I don’t envy anyone trying to sort it out, and anyone who claims it will be easy is a liar.

DrPrunesqualer · 10/02/2026 17:58

treeowl · 10/02/2026 17:48

Im afraid thinking there is less financial support for young people now compared to the past is woefully incorrect

Again there isn’t free childcare.

There is less social housing now for one which was a huge support for families in the past. Housing costs are crippling. As I said pointless debating with someone who can’t see that the youth of today face a very different landscape. I’m not young but I have dc.

and I have three sons.

Your posts have changed the goalposts though, now switching to ‘ it’s all about housing costs’ etc
I responded to your pps about support
and
your posts blaming the elderly

There is much more support , including for childcare and I have explained already we cannot blame a demographic for being born at a boom post war time and the fallout from that

I have not denied the fallout exists , which is obvious if you actually rmps.

Why people twist stuff and misrepresent other's on these threads is very telling.

treeowl · 10/02/2026 17:53

You cant compare public and private pensions

I didn’t compare them to each other. I said pensions are less generous today because they are and that the age for state pension has increased. Don’t put words in my mouth

Mortgage. If you lose your job you can get a short term loan to help pay for it whilst you’re looking for work. In the past you got nothing

Why are you forgetting about MIRAS?

treeowl · 10/02/2026 17:49

@DrPrunesqualer read my posts then before you reply to them 😆

treeowl · 10/02/2026 17:48

Im afraid thinking there is less financial support for young people now compared to the past is woefully incorrect

Again there isn’t free childcare.

There is less social housing now for one which was a huge support for families in the past. Housing costs are crippling. As I said pointless debating with someone who can’t see that the youth of today face a very different landscape. I’m not young but I have dc.

EarthlyNightshade · 10/02/2026 17:47

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:32

But we know from recent history i.e. Jeremy Corbyn that the British public don't want a left wing government. They had their opportunity and they overwhelmingly voted against it. Manifestos can't reasonably be binding but it is blatantly undemocratic to come into power making some clear assurances to the general public that would place your party more in the centre of the political spectrum and to then lurch to the left. As I said upthread, what would happen if Reform got in and then lurched to the right. Would you really be ok with that and all it would entail? Would you simply repeat that manifestos aren't binding?

If Reform lurched any more to the right they would be out the other side and mid-Jeremy Corbyn.

DrPrunesqualer · 10/02/2026 17:47

treeowl · 10/02/2026 17:25

@DrPrunesqualer childcare costs are prohibitive & governments want more mothers in work. Free childcare doesn’t actually mean free childcare… look at birth rates.

Even with auto enrolment pensions today are better than what younger generations will have access to as public & private schemes are less generous & the state age has increased.

Support in paying a mortgage ( be it limited ) is a very recent thing , in the past people’s homes were repocessed. Helping all those with a mortgage

What support do you get with paying a mortgage? MIRAS is no longer a thing.

But I can’t really argue with someone who doesn’t think wage stagnation, housing to salary ratio etc hasn’t disproportionately impacted the young…

Read my posts!

I haven’t commented on wage stagnation or salary to housing costs

please Don’t put words in my posts.

DrPrunesqualer · 10/02/2026 17:43

treeowl · 10/02/2026 17:25

@DrPrunesqualer childcare costs are prohibitive & governments want more mothers in work. Free childcare doesn’t actually mean free childcare… look at birth rates.

Even with auto enrolment pensions today are better than what younger generations will have access to as public & private schemes are less generous & the state age has increased.

Support in paying a mortgage ( be it limited ) is a very recent thing , in the past people’s homes were repocessed. Helping all those with a mortgage

What support do you get with paying a mortgage? MIRAS is no longer a thing.

But I can’t really argue with someone who doesn’t think wage stagnation, housing to salary ratio etc hasn’t disproportionately impacted the young…

Yet there was no free childcare at all not that long ago

You cant compare public and private pensions

In my working life so far I have had take out ‘new’ pensions with every different employer. Now employers are forced to pay into existing staff pensions from other employers. I have lost in costs 3 pensions because of this and lost my jobs because of babies. a job offering as much as 2% paid into a pension is a luxury in the private world
meanwhile 25% was recently offered to a dc along with a good salary in the public sector.
Before 2018 many private employers offered nothing other than ( if you were lucky ) a guy coming into the office to advice you on a pension. They weren’t paying anything in though.
There is no comparison and predicting how pensions will go in the future is pointless, hence the increase ‘in the past’ in pension landlords

Mortgage. If you lose your job you can get a short term loan to help pay for it whilst you’re looking for work. In the past you got nothing

Im afraid thinking there is less financial support for young people now compared to the past is woefully incorrect.

Talk to older unmarried mothers and see how you go

BlackCatDiscoClub · 10/02/2026 17:40

nearlylovemyusername · 10/02/2026 17:36

Absolutely! but they can be trained in two hours ...
Who knew they aren't meeting any needs

I was specifically responding to the PP who invested money in a cake business. People who cant be bothered to make a cake will pay for that service, but the fact PP said the business went under because it didnt make enough money to make a profit demonstrates that not enough people needed it. Lots of people need cleaners now, but won't in the future. Drones will replace posties. And all those people will become economically stagnant and will buy less things and put less into the economy and pay less tax.

Edit to say, to be fair to you, it was old fashioned of me to think that manual jobs that are easy to learn and mechanise will be most effected. All the writing, maths and arts jobs are already on the way out due to AI!

nearlylovemyusername · 10/02/2026 17:36

BlackCatDiscoClub · 10/02/2026 17:34

Supply and demand babes. A cleaner solves a problem for a busy person who hates cleaning. Once a robot comes along that cleans your house from top to bottom, all those jobs go too.

Absolutely! but they can be trained in two hours ...
Who knew they aren't meeting any needs

BlackCatDiscoClub · 10/02/2026 17:34

nearlylovemyusername · 10/02/2026 17:28

If the business you own is providing a service which anyone could do after two hours training, then its not meeting a need and is unlikely to survive.

OMG! this is a new high of stupidity!

so all those cleaning businesses, delivery, postal service, even shops etc, they aren't meeting any needs... because those at the bottom of the ladder, like PP's batch operator, can be trained in a few hours to drop a post at a front door or stock shelf.

Supply and demand babes. A cleaner solves a problem for a busy person who hates cleaning. Once a robot comes along that cleans your house from top to bottom, all those jobs go too.

treeowl · 10/02/2026 17:30

@Dragonflytamer but surely you would have always moved to a machinery model even with the lower minimum wage?

CarefullyCuratedFurniture · 10/02/2026 17:29

Bargepole45 · 10/02/2026 14:05

Wow I'm genuinely shocked. Do any of you actually pay tax at the moment or run a business?

Oh course i pay tax, you absolute teatowel. I still want the government to "lurch to the left" 🙄 and spend money on things that it needs to spend money on.

nearlylovemyusername · 10/02/2026 17:28

BlackCatDiscoClub · 10/02/2026 17:10

If the business you own is providing a service which anyone could do after two hours training, then its not meeting a need and is unlikely to survive. Its lovely as a hobby that pays a little pocket money, but its not going to be a business unless you're offering something that solves a problem for someone.

If the business you own is providing a service which anyone could do after two hours training, then its not meeting a need and is unlikely to survive.

OMG! this is a new high of stupidity!

so all those cleaning businesses, delivery, postal service, even shops etc, they aren't meeting any needs... because those at the bottom of the ladder, like PP's batch operator, can be trained in a few hours to drop a post at a front door or stock shelf.

sweetsardineface · 10/02/2026 17:28

Dorisbonson · 10/02/2026 15:42

I suggest if you are going to come on here and say things like "I would be happy to pay more tax" but you fail to take the option when presented to so then you are either:

A) Insincere
B) Hypocrite
C) Liar
D) All of the above

Take your pick.

If you say you are happy to pay more tax, do so, otherwise don't go round saying how eager you are to pay more tax for better services.

Or: E. Donate to charities which support crumbling social services. That’s what I do. What I will never do is to complain about paying more tax so that millions of children can be lifted out of poverty.

treeowl · 10/02/2026 17:28

@Dorisbonson I was recently in hospital
and they would scan my wristband and sync the obs machine with my results so no need for paper.

I did think perhaps we should be making a contribution towards the food/tea & biscuits and also the transport system that some used.

treeowl · 10/02/2026 17:25

@DrPrunesqualer childcare costs are prohibitive & governments want more mothers in work. Free childcare doesn’t actually mean free childcare… look at birth rates.

Even with auto enrolment pensions today are better than what younger generations will have access to as public & private schemes are less generous & the state age has increased.

Support in paying a mortgage ( be it limited ) is a very recent thing , in the past people’s homes were repocessed. Helping all those with a mortgage

What support do you get with paying a mortgage? MIRAS is no longer a thing.

But I can’t really argue with someone who doesn’t think wage stagnation, housing to salary ratio etc hasn’t disproportionately impacted the young…

DrPrunesqualer · 10/02/2026 17:22

DiySteve · 10/02/2026 17:00

The NHS is a leviathan, and is protected, chiefly because the majority of those who work for it, vote Labour, I suspect.

Slash and burn waste, punitive contracts, overpaid consultants, time wasting patients presenting with self-inflicted dependencies on alcohol/recreational drugs.

How’s that for a start.

No idea if you followed the recent court cases eg Sandie Peggie
Id get rid the astonishing number of staff in nonsence roles and
Prioritise all medical staff

I wouldnt refuse care to anyone eg drug dependency
where does that stop

nearlylovemyusername · 10/02/2026 17:21

Noras · 10/02/2026 17:07

The cost of borrowing went up yesterday just with the thought of a change of Labour leader being more left wing. That way leads to higher borrowing costs and the IMF coming in

you're trying to reason...

but some on here believe that government is bailing the business out unless they put taxes up 🙄

Cakeandcardio · 10/02/2026 17:20

Well it must be better than a lurch to the right. But then I am always absolutely baffled by how astounding silly some people can be.

Dorisbonson · 10/02/2026 17:18

JustAloeVera · 10/02/2026 16:36

But then you have to factor in costs of iPads/TVs and their replacements, software and licensing, IT support for said software and you would still realistically need a member of staff to man a desk for enquiries/issues etc.

I agree you could probably make a saving in the long term (after initial outlay and roll out) but nowhere near the 150k per year mark.

This is a sideshow, but 2 staff salaries per shift plus pensions saved times 2-3 shifts is vastly in excess of 150k. Gives enough left over for ipads, tech support and fractional salary costs associated with helping those who can't use ipads/follow instructions. This is just an easy one.

Dragonflytamer · 10/02/2026 17:16

BlackCatDiscoClub · 10/02/2026 17:10

If the business you own is providing a service which anyone could do after two hours training, then its not meeting a need and is unlikely to survive. Its lovely as a hobby that pays a little pocket money, but its not going to be a business unless you're offering something that solves a problem for someone.

It turned over £6.7m so it wasn't really in hobby territory. In the end we industrialised we let go 90% of the workforce invested in machinery, now we produce less fancy cakes but in higher volume but at 20% of the wage bill.

BlackCatDiscoClub · 10/02/2026 17:10

Dragonflytamer · 10/02/2026 17:04

I used to have an investment in a business that made medium fancy cakes. It would take 1 person about 3 person hours to a make a batch and we could sell the batch for about £33. At the time minimum was about £6.5. It was low skilled work that pretty much anyone could do with 2 hours training. So roughly £19.5 of labour and then £8 of ingredients/other costs. Therefore we made a profit of £5 about 15% which was ok. Minimum wage increased about £8.5. But weren't willing to pay any more the batch. So now we made a loss of 0.5p. At that point our viable business because unviable and we closed it down. This is a bit simplified and I can't remember the exact numbers but for those staff it meant their job was gone. It was heart breaking at the time to close a business due to government policy but there was no point making cakes for a loss.

If the business you own is providing a service which anyone could do after two hours training, then its not meeting a need and is unlikely to survive. Its lovely as a hobby that pays a little pocket money, but its not going to be a business unless you're offering something that solves a problem for someone.

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 10/02/2026 17:10

nearlylovemyusername · 10/02/2026 16:54

Do you have any credentials in Economics?

I can't afford to pay a decent wage!!!" is as straightforward an indicator as there is that your business isn't viable.

That business could've afforded market rate wages before NI and business rates hikes. What do you believe a decent wage is? the rate is define by eternal laws of supply and demand. One of the reasons for our inflation, esp in services, is rising wages. But for SME to pay higher wages on the top of higher costs and taxes the only way is to increase prices. But their customers are hit by increased taxes as well, so can't pay more, despite rising wages.

Economics?

No.

I did run a perfectly successful, profitable small business for nearly two decades though, paid my staff well over and above NMW, gave them more than statutory minimum leave entitlement, had no issues with staff retention etc, so think I'm entitled to suggest that if you can't do this yourself the problem isn't legislation, the government of the day, or "left wingers", it's your business model.

Swipe left for the next trending thread