Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be depressed that lockdown would happen again tomorrow if there was another new disease

819 replies

Pavementworrier · 05/01/2026 07:35

We talk about all the things that are worse "since the pandemic"but government prep is based on all the same mad nonsense that caused the worsening

Grim

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 05/01/2026 08:56

Happyjoe · 05/01/2026 08:53

Instead of doing your normal thing on here, I suggest you go read the report. Cheers.

I’m good, I don’t care that much. Repeating lines from it is probably driven by politics so wondered if there was more to your views based on the virus. If not, fine.

SpringsOnTheWay · 05/01/2026 08:54

Iocanepowder · 05/01/2026 08:51

So at what point do people get to think of themselves rather than others then?

It’s like people forget others are humans. It’s little things like blocking roads instead of letting people go, pulling out on people at round abouts. Being rude to serving staff etc. it’s those sort of things

BringBackCatsEyes · 05/01/2026 08:54

vanillalattes · 05/01/2026 07:37

Nobody would comply if they tried it again.

I would. Of course there were incorrect decisions made last time, many of which they only learnt in hindsight. I’d like to see the collective MN know it alls make a better job of it.

EasternStandard · 05/01/2026 08:54

MrMucker · 05/01/2026 08:48

During the lockdown I saw, a selfish streak to the human race which I hadn't known could exist., and this thread proves it's not only still there, but greater.

A lockdown is for everybody, for the greater good, and those who resist it are all about themselves. My children, my welfare my fun, my freedom. Me me me.

So sad about this aspect of the human race.

Not at all, people mostly complied. And for some there was damage from that.

landslide51 · 05/01/2026 08:53

Why on earth would you be depressed over that OP?

You might as well be depressed about the fact that you might die from sudden death syndrome tomorrow. Or that you might be run over by a bus next week.

It's utterly, utterly pointless.

Happyjoe · 05/01/2026 08:53

EasternStandard · 05/01/2026 08:49

‘Too little’? So do more, such as?

Instead of doing your normal thing on here, I suggest you go read the report. Cheers.

Fulmine · 05/01/2026 08:53

TheKeatingFive · 05/01/2026 08:36

A lockdown as we knew it during Covid wouldn't work in these circs. If young people were dying, no way would essential workers skip obediently off to work. You'd be looking at societal collapse.

But more young people would be dying without lockdown, and I think most people are sensible enough to realise that. There are also basic imperatives like needing to keep your job that incentivise people to go to work.

Womaninhouse17 · 05/01/2026 08:53

PInkyStarfish · 05/01/2026 08:23

People won’t fall for it again.

I remember a few days before lockdown when we first heard that it was a possibility and all my friends saying they weren't going to stay home and the government couldn't tell them what to do. Then we had lockdown and they all stayed home.

x2boys · 05/01/2026 08:52

JLou08 · 05/01/2026 08:50

I think a lock down would be very, very unlikely. The negative impact on children and young people was too great. Increases in mental health, SEND, unemployment and disability benefits would put off any government.

Surely there would be more peoole becoming disabled needing disability payment ,s with no restrictions?

Newbutoldfather · 05/01/2026 08:52

What a lot of people don’t seem to get is that there is no good way to manage in a pandemic, just the least bad way.

Once you have a pandemic, it will hurt society a lot.

So, lockdowns are very damaging in many ways. There is no doubt of that.

But a lethal virus, even not that lethal, burning through a population like a wildfire is far worse. Fortunately we never got to see this alternative.

TheKeatingFive · 05/01/2026 08:51

SpringsOnTheWay · 05/01/2026 08:48

those things are what help with Covid. That doesn’t mean they’ll help with the next one

Which equally applies to a lockdown strategy. It was feasible for Covid because (generally speaking) healthy people of working age were at little risk, so essential services could be maintained.

But try convincing essential workers to put themselves at risk everyday if the mortality rate was high for them.

SpringsOnTheWay · 05/01/2026 08:51

MrMucker · 05/01/2026 08:48

During the lockdown I saw, a selfish streak to the human race which I hadn't known could exist., and this thread proves it's not only still there, but greater.

A lockdown is for everybody, for the greater good, and those who resist it are all about themselves. My children, my welfare my fun, my freedom. Me me me.

So sad about this aspect of the human race.

Covid seemed to accelerate it didn’t it. People are so angry and so selfish now.

Iocanepowder · 05/01/2026 08:51

MrMucker · 05/01/2026 08:48

During the lockdown I saw, a selfish streak to the human race which I hadn't known could exist., and this thread proves it's not only still there, but greater.

A lockdown is for everybody, for the greater good, and those who resist it are all about themselves. My children, my welfare my fun, my freedom. Me me me.

So sad about this aspect of the human race.

So at what point do people get to think of themselves rather than others then?

x2boys · 05/01/2026 08:51

LittleDeeAndME · 05/01/2026 08:48

I think we would have a lockdown but not as strict - with just the vulnerable looked after, and we would go on with life with the right PPE

Unfortunately " the vulnerable" often have families ,they are your GP,s your teachers ,your supermarket cashier .

chaosmaker · 05/01/2026 08:50

Liondoesntsleepatnight · 05/01/2026 08:47

History of the whole includes pandemics, you and I are not bigger, stronger or smarter than a Global Pandemic.

There wouldn’t be a knee jerk reaction to lock down, as there wasn’t before. Look at the devastating numbers affected by the Spanish Flu, between 50 - 100 million people died, more than the number of WW1. The plague killed a third of the population of Europe.

I work in risk, Astroid, Pandemic and Cyber Are the big worries for mankind.

Isn't human overpopulation one of them. Nature will keep us in check somehow and something like a pandemic is a pretty good way to do it

SpringsOnTheWay · 05/01/2026 08:50

lovescats3 · 05/01/2026 08:48

Vaccines enabled us to come out of lockdown. Also young, healthy Drs and nurses died. People including children with no previous health issues have been left with long term illness, such as diabetes, asthma and cardiac problems just to name a few conditions- there was a sting in the tail with covid for some people, it wasn't a mild illness

My MIL was front line NHS. She’s got long covid, had to leave work, can’t manage her stairs without sitting down half way. It’s awful how it’s left her.

JLou08 · 05/01/2026 08:50

I think a lock down would be very, very unlikely. The negative impact on children and young people was too great. Increases in mental health, SEND, unemployment and disability benefits would put off any government.

EasternStandard · 05/01/2026 08:49

Parker231 · 05/01/2026 08:47

My view - if you ignore advice to lockdown should there be another pandemic, you aren’t entitled to medical care if you then get the virus!

That’s not going to work, I’m glad it’s just your view though

EasternStandard · 05/01/2026 08:49

Happyjoe · 05/01/2026 08:48

"Too little, too late" was the inquiries findings.

‘Too little’? So do more, such as?

SpringsOnTheWay · 05/01/2026 08:48

CremeCarmel · 05/01/2026 08:45

We know what to do to avoid illness. Ventilation, masks, distancing. We now are very skilled at working from home. We have a lot of online shopping etc. so it would not be the same as the last lockdown. We would know how to make it less miserable and there would hopefully be fewer deaths.

those things are what help with Covid. That doesn’t mean they’ll help with the next one

lovescats3 · 05/01/2026 08:48

Vaccines enabled us to come out of lockdown. Also young, healthy Drs and nurses died. People including children with no previous health issues have been left with long term illness, such as diabetes, asthma and cardiac problems just to name a few conditions- there was a sting in the tail with covid for some people, it wasn't a mild illness

MrMucker · 05/01/2026 08:48

During the lockdown I saw, a selfish streak to the human race which I hadn't known could exist., and this thread proves it's not only still there, but greater.

A lockdown is for everybody, for the greater good, and those who resist it are all about themselves. My children, my welfare my fun, my freedom. Me me me.

So sad about this aspect of the human race.

wp65 · 05/01/2026 08:48

Dolphinnoises · 05/01/2026 07:45

Oh for God’s sake, grow up. Lockdown was awful and had awful down sides, and we had the politicians we elected who were exactly the clowns we all knew they were, and utterly unsuited to the task.

But we didn’t know we would find a vaccine, or that it would be as effective - we were realistically hoping for 50% effectiveness, and on the first strain it was 94% effective, but as it was a coronavirus it did what they all do and evolved.

Everything we are suffering from - the hit to the economy, the trauma of loss and illness-based bodily damage / after-effects - it was all caused by the disaster which is a pandemic. It’s like arguing that we won’t put up with our house falling down next time there is an earthquake.

Ask anyone who worked in a hospital during Covid if we could skip masks and lockdown next time. We can’t. The other thing we can’t avoid - making mistakes. Hindsight is 20:20 but these are insanely difficult choices.

For years we knew we were overdue a global pandemic - the expectation was that they were a one-in-a-hundred-year event but so many factors change - global travel and deforestation on one hand, the facts of novel illnesses on the other - incubation periods, how it spreads. We aren’t in control of everything.

Edited

Exactly this. Lockdown was a disaster in many ways, and messily implemented, but it also - just about - did what it was supposed to do, which was prevent the total collapse of the health service.

LittleDeeAndME · 05/01/2026 08:48

I think we would have a lockdown but not as strict - with just the vulnerable looked after, and we would go on with life with the right PPE

Happyjoe · 05/01/2026 08:48

EasternStandard · 05/01/2026 08:47

I doubt it was possible. Melbourne had some of the strictest actions and the longest repeated lockdowns.

"Too little, too late" was the inquiries findings.

Swipe left for the next trending thread