Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think a big reason to birth rate is falling is because mothers are made to feel they must do more for their children than in previous times?

339 replies

TheJoyOfWriting · 13/09/2025 15:45

Now there's a lot more focus on mothers needing to do a lot, the whole 'concerted cultivation' thing where kids have a lot of activities that need help and travel time etc, pressure to get into top schools & unis arguably more than there was in the past, and for support & extra activities from an early age to enable this.

Wheras say, children in the 60s and 70s or before had a lot more independent play time and time outside without adult supervision
The gentle parenting thing ties in to this too, whereas before parents generally did not use such high-intensity strategies.

Working mums are made tp feel guilty often of they can't make the school run. But in previous times children often walked alone or with friends at pre-seckndary school age..my gran was walking to school at 6, tho admittedly this wad as an evacuee in the country
I think it's good we're more safety conscious now but also think that it's gone a bit too far in some ways and put too much pressure mainly on mothers.

otoh there's obvs areas where children are unsafe, and this must be addressed.
Maybe also an effect of the climate crisis will be to have less driving, so this would also make streets safer.

There's a lot of talk that mothers spend less time w kids now and this is why there is too much screen time. But I think that's wrong.
Studies show mothers, including both working and SAHM, spend more time with children than most SAHMs in the 1960s did

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2017/11/27/parents-now-spend-twice-as-much-time-with-their-children-as-50-years-ago&ved=2ahUKEwjuxsiS-dWPAxW3YEEAHXHsO044ChAWegQINhAB&usg=AOvVaw0RS-idWHNILw0SaKskdwRI

I don't think online stuff is bc mothers aren't spending time. I think it's bc there's a perception of less safety so kids are kept inside more than previously and are allowed screen access, so that takes place instead.

I'm saying this as a Gen Z who's really happy that my single mother (we lived w my gran tho who helped a lot) helped w my music & other hobbies. I don't think this is necessarily bad at all, I just think there needs to be more balance.

So what do people think? Is the expectation for children to be much more supervised now making women feel that children require much more effort than they actually do, and therefore affecting the birth rate?

https://www.google.com/url?opi=89978449&rct=j&sa=t&source=web&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.economist.com%2Fgraphic-detail%2F2017%2F11%2F27%2Fparents-now-spend-twice-as-much-time-with-their-children-as-50-years-ago&usg=AOvVaw0RS-idWHNILw0SaKskdwRI&ved=2ahUKEwjuxsiS-dWPAxW3YEEAHXHsO044ChAWegQINhAB

OP posts:
MumChp · 13/09/2025 18:55

JenniferBooth · 13/09/2025 18:51

Maybe thats because you dont get a social housing house UNLESS you have kids. If you are child free by choice as i am all you will get is a one bedroom flat or possibly just a bedsit now.

Even families don't get social housing in 2025.

bapples1 · 13/09/2025 18:55

We can't afford to fund better state education, we already have more over 65 yr olds than under 15 yrs olds.

Pregnantgrumps · 13/09/2025 18:54

I think it’s because women are now somehow expected to be perfect mothers and homemakers while getting on with life and work like they don’t have children.

I was shocked at the attitudes to a recent post I did (from men and women!) that if a woman ‘chooses’ to get pregnant no allowances should be made, including tiny things like just getting a priority seat on the tube!

MumChp · 13/09/2025 18:54

TheJoyOfWriting · 13/09/2025 18:52

Yes we need much better state education...

I would like that. Very much.
But would people have more children because of improved state schools?

JoshLymanSwagger · 13/09/2025 18:53

TheJoyOfWriting · 13/09/2025 18:36

Would it be OK to say what kinds of things you were expected to do? It sounds extremely pressured. Do you think all this extra stuff actually helps children succeed more or is it unnecessary pressure?

I'll have a go (as a barren woman):
Be pregnant, give birth, recover, breast feed, nappies, teething, maternity leave (for around year meaning lack of career progression), nursery, potty training, pick ups, bigger house and mortgage, bigger car, school, playdates, birthday parties, pets, Christmas😱
bigger house, monitoring internet access, designer crap, uniform, detention, make-up, phones, TEENAGERS🤯, periods, condoms, that discussion 😳 about sex, drugs, alcohol (the last one not necessarily for them) vaping, bullying, mums taxi, exams, more bloody exams, all night parties, driving lessons, university or apprenticeships, jobs...

You can see now why I took the cowards way out and let others replicate for me...

ETA I know I've missed a lot (my cousin had to make an Easter Bonnet), but there's only so much I can type in one go.

bapples1 · 13/09/2025 18:53

Maybe thats because you dont get a social housing house UNLESS you have kids.

Plenty of people with dc are on waiting lists.

MumChp · 13/09/2025 18:53

TheJoyOfWriting · 13/09/2025 18:49

Companies need to change, ridiculous to have so much stress from primary school etc for degrees that are not needed.

I think you need a degree today if you are supposed to support a family.

bapples1 · 13/09/2025 18:52

We should want an educated population though & without children/new blood societies stop progressing & evolving.

TheJoyOfWriting · 13/09/2025 18:52

IfThenElse · 13/09/2025 16:46

I think another feature of the 80s was that you tended to just go to the closest school. There was no discussion over whether it was “good” or not. And most schools were fairly decent because you didn’t have all the middle class parents clumping together in one or two chosen ones.

Yes we need much better state education...

OP posts:
JenniferBooth · 13/09/2025 18:51

Thechaseison71 · 13/09/2025 16:46

Seems the people that say they " can't afford " kids are the ones that are generally doing OK. They just want a certain lifestyle

Strangely enough it's not generally heard said by the very poorest

Maybe thats because you dont get a social housing house UNLESS you have kids. If you are child free by choice as i am all you will get is a one bedroom flat or possibly just a bedsit now.

bapples1 · 13/09/2025 18:51

World is also more global now so dc are competing with dc from all over the world.

Swissmeringue · 13/09/2025 18:51

TheJoyOfWriting · 13/09/2025 18:20

I'm saying these school expectations sound very unfair. Parents should help w homework & take their kids to stuff like museums, read to them etc but I don't think parents should be pressured to attend so many school events. Children from previous generations were able to succeed without constant parental involvement in school events, why is this expected now?

I actually don't think they were. I was at primary school in the 90's and remember there being loads of events where parents attended/made outfits etc etc. I think the difference is that a lot of the mums didn't work or worked part time. Whereas now more families have two working parents so who is free to go to all the events.

TheJoyOfWriting · 13/09/2025 18:49

bapples1 · 13/09/2025 18:44

@TheJoyOfWriting I don't think the degrees were necessary but if companies demand them for a CV sifting purpose want can you do? Don't forget companies don't invest in staff so much these days which is one reason productivity is so low.

Companies need to change, ridiculous to have so much stress from primary school etc for degrees that are not needed.

OP posts:
CrispySquid · 13/09/2025 18:47

The birth rate is declining very rapidly in almost every single country in the world, every religion, every ethnicity, every race, every culture. It’s declining amongst women of all political persuasions, all levels of education, and all income levels. The decline is happening in everything from progressive countries with strong womens rights to extremely oppressive, totalitarian countries who give women little to no rights.

There are countries who have trialed extreme measures to increase the birth rate - everything from taxing childfree people heavily to incentivise them to procreate to wiping out student loans for mothers to giving free houses to mothers to severe income tax reduction for parents to offering obscenely generous childcare and maternity provisions. Not one of these things has had even the slightest impact on stopping the declining birth rate. It’s had no effect at all.

More and more women don’t want kids anymore. It’s not down to one reason but a multitude of reasons - economic reasons, cultural reasons, increased industrialisation and access to education, changing tastes and values, opportunity costs, dating landscape and quality of prospective male partners changing drastically, future prospects, politics, increasing womens liberation in developing and underdeveloped countries, cost of living, living further away from parents and friends… So many variables causing the decline.

There are a multitude of reasons leading to the declining birth rate.

The reason you stated in your OP is just one of very very many. I wouldn’t even say it’s close to the primary reason, as it’s birth rate decline is happening just as rapidly in cultures/countries/ethnicities that have a completely different parenting and child-rearing style to the one you describe in your OP.

Bushmillsbabe · 13/09/2025 18:46

Sitdowny · 13/09/2025 16:29

The Grandparents of today don’t want to help even if they are working less. They see that they have done their job raising their own children.

Not always true. DD1's nursery place fell through a couple weeks before I was due back at work. My mum and my MIL both cut their hours at work to each have her 2 days a week. And subsequently each had DD2 1 day a week. And are only too happy to help out after school/weekends/school holidays.

My grandmother on the other hand moaned at being asked to look after my brother for a few hours so my Dad could take my mum to hospital to have me, and only looked after is once a year so my parents could attend my Dads work Christmas do. They had absolutely no interest in us.

TheJoyOfWriting · 13/09/2025 18:46

CurlyKoalie · 13/09/2025 16:55

Childcare costs certainly are eye watering and fewer parents live near to grandparents to help with childcare. However, I also think modern parents are more materialistic than previous generations and have different views on essentials and luxuries.
My grown up family say they can't afford children but they are not prepared to make some of the compromises myself and my husband made.
We renovated an ex council house whereas they are looking at new builds or not what I would call" first time homes".
We ran 1 car despite us both working whereas they run 2.
We had 2 " abroad" holidays in 20 years to save money and avoid taking the children out of school, whereas they go abroad regularly.
We bought lots of furniture, clothes, uniform etc secondhand but they don't think about this.
I think children can be affordable but you have to decide what your priorities are.

Yes, my family had no car (my mum never learnt to drive) & we've never had an abroad holiday (I did luckily go on school trips abroad tho). Just not financially possible. Living w my gran did save a lot tho, but as I said upthread this is not possible for some for many reasons

However, this was possible bc my mother luckily had work near the house. Lots of people have to drive & if both are working, both need to drive often ofc..

Better public transport might help maybe?

OP posts:
GagMeWithASpoon · 13/09/2025 18:46

Lack of affordability is the main reason , closely followed by women actually having a choice.

whoamI00 · 13/09/2025 18:45

Birth rates have been declining almost everywhere in the world. The main reason is the improvement of women’s rights, which enabled access to contraception and the legalisation of abortion. Consequently more women are educated and have joined the workforce. Raising children requires both money and time, and with more women working, it has become more difficult to balance these demands. Therefore the decline in birth rates compared to the 1960s can be seen as a natural phenomenon.

DarkForces · 13/09/2025 18:45

TheJoyOfWriting · 13/09/2025 18:41

Thank you! I can see in a perfect world having 2 but the job I want to do (criminal barrister) has v demanding hours & realistically I don't see how I could be an involved mother to more than 1 & juggle the hours. I know some do & that's great but I don't have boundless energy.

One is bloody lovely. I promise. I did slow down in work when dd was younger but I've got going again now and my career is taking off again. Dh is hands on in every way and we're having a ball.

bapples1 · 13/09/2025 18:44

@TheJoyOfWriting I don't think the degrees were necessary but if companies demand them for a CV sifting purpose want can you do? Don't forget companies don't invest in staff so much these days which is one reason productivity is so low.

Nextdoormat · 13/09/2025 18:43

Sitdowny · 13/09/2025 16:29

The Grandparents of today don’t want to help even if they are working less. They see that they have done their job raising their own children.

I don't agree, I am still working full-time (was single parent to four) I have my DGD every week overnight take to school, pick up from after school club, repeat. I do it to help my DD1 as she needs to travel for work, but also because I love spending time with my DGD. All my friends help out if they live near enough with GC.
I think birth rate going down maybe down to more choices with contraception, what ppl can now do with their lives etc. I helped out with my nephews and nieces from being really young and knew I wanted a big family, my kids only want 2 kids max although they love having a close knit bigger family.

TheJoyOfWriting · 13/09/2025 18:42

bapples1 · 13/09/2025 18:38

Children from previous generations were able to succeed without constant parental involvement in school events, why is this expected now?

But it was so much easier to succeed back then. My job wanted a degree, no one in the management team had been to university. Then newer graduates were required to have specific degrees & from certain places.

Are these degrees necessary? Could people do the jobs just as well without? Maybe if degrees were demanded less, there would be as a result less pressure on parents

OP posts:
bapples1 · 13/09/2025 18:41

@Allswellthatendswelll but voters won't go for that so we are stuck.

TheJoyOfWriting · 13/09/2025 18:41

DarkForces · 13/09/2025 18:35

If you want one have one. It's wonderful. You could have 20 kids and it'll have no impact on population levels. Do what's best for you and your family.

Thank you! I can see in a perfect world having 2 but the job I want to do (criminal barrister) has v demanding hours & realistically I don't see how I could be an involved mother to more than 1 & juggle the hours. I know some do & that's great but I don't have boundless energy.

OP posts:
MumChp · 13/09/2025 18:38

TheJoyOfWriting · 13/09/2025 18:36

Would it be OK to say what kinds of things you were expected to do? It sounds extremely pressured. Do you think all this extra stuff actually helps children succeed more or is it unnecessary pressure?

What I think doesn't matter.
You just show as parents.

Swipe left for the next trending thread