Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be sick of hearing about 'the housing crisis'?

556 replies

GoldfinchFeather · 10/02/2025 09:03

This is related to the thread about Angela Rayner wanting to build 1.5 million new homes. Is anyone else sick to the back teeth of hearing about the supposed housing crisis in this country?

I live in a semi-rural area, and the amount of house building around here over the last few years has been crazy. Hundreds of houses appearing on pretty much any vacant piece of land, turning what was once a small village into something that feels closer to a town in size. Roads getting busier and busier, and and all the while nothing has been done to provide any new facilities like doctors or schools.

I understand people's frustration of not being able to buy a home. But surely just concreting over more and more of the countryside is completely unsustainable?

If the housing crisis is really so bad, why isn't the Government taking more of an innovative approach? How many town centres/high streets have empty shops that could be converted to residential use? Or properties that have stood empty for years and haven't been brought back to market? Surely just through that, there would be an enormous surplus of homes available, and less need to concrete over more and more of the countryside?

OP posts:
Duckinahat · 10/02/2025 10:29

TheTigerWhoCameToEatMyArsehole · 10/02/2025 10:25

They have build a shitload of homes near me. Can we afford one? Can we fuck! Not without an absolutely hefty deposit which we can't save because our rent is so high. We earn decent money too.

The government has been hammering landlords with taxes. Landlords just pass the cost onto tenants. Tenants can’t afford to save for a deposit.

dovetail22uk · 10/02/2025 10:29

GoldfinchFeather · 10/02/2025 09:03

This is related to the thread about Angela Rayner wanting to build 1.5 million new homes. Is anyone else sick to the back teeth of hearing about the supposed housing crisis in this country?

I live in a semi-rural area, and the amount of house building around here over the last few years has been crazy. Hundreds of houses appearing on pretty much any vacant piece of land, turning what was once a small village into something that feels closer to a town in size. Roads getting busier and busier, and and all the while nothing has been done to provide any new facilities like doctors or schools.

I understand people's frustration of not being able to buy a home. But surely just concreting over more and more of the countryside is completely unsustainable?

If the housing crisis is really so bad, why isn't the Government taking more of an innovative approach? How many town centres/high streets have empty shops that could be converted to residential use? Or properties that have stood empty for years and haven't been brought back to market? Surely just through that, there would be an enormous surplus of homes available, and less need to concrete over more and more of the countryside?

I love the way you assume that the government give a crap about any of us. But also - there are 700,000 empty homes in the UK. Since the 1980s, 2 million council houses were sold. There are 1.2 million people currently waiting for social housing. "Market rates" for renting are just as high as landlords can get away with - hording resources and renting them back to people for huge profits is not a business. It would appear that you are in a very fortunate position where none of this impacts you negatively, therefore you find it annoying.

Moglet4 · 10/02/2025 10:28

GoldfinchFeather · 10/02/2025 09:03

This is related to the thread about Angela Rayner wanting to build 1.5 million new homes. Is anyone else sick to the back teeth of hearing about the supposed housing crisis in this country?

I live in a semi-rural area, and the amount of house building around here over the last few years has been crazy. Hundreds of houses appearing on pretty much any vacant piece of land, turning what was once a small village into something that feels closer to a town in size. Roads getting busier and busier, and and all the while nothing has been done to provide any new facilities like doctors or schools.

I understand people's frustration of not being able to buy a home. But surely just concreting over more and more of the countryside is completely unsustainable?

If the housing crisis is really so bad, why isn't the Government taking more of an innovative approach? How many town centres/high streets have empty shops that could be converted to residential use? Or properties that have stood empty for years and haven't been brought back to market? Surely just through that, there would be an enormous surplus of homes available, and less need to concrete over more and more of the countryside?

There is nothing ‘supposed’ about the housing crisis

WestwardHo1 · 10/02/2025 10:28

We keep hearing this "only x% of the UK is built on" as though that is some massive gotcha moment. Huge amounts of the UK are wet, waterlogged - or in danger of becoming so rather soon - and/or important for wildlife and biodiversity. Other areas are important for food production. We know how dangerous and short sighted it is to simply concrete over such areas and expect everything to be ok.

If we build all the houses Angela wants in the areas she wants, it will never be enough and we will have done incalculable harm in doing so. Developers are the one who do the investing and selling - are they really going to create such a glut of product that they see the profits of their investment falling away before their eyes?

The UK is one of the most nature deprived countries in the world, and this government want to make it more so. Simply building more and more and more isn't the answer.

ClassicBBQ · 10/02/2025 10:28

I don't understand it either. Surely someone on the council register or stuck in a B&B won't be able to afford the 350k needed for a 3 bed rabbit hutch new build anyway. In my area we've had thousands of the things thrown up on every scrap of land, and usually they have to be heavily reduced because no one wants them or can afford them.

Autumn1990 · 10/02/2025 10:27

I agree with the OP that building lots of new builds in rural areas doesn’t help. The new builds are often too expensive for local people to buy so people from outside the area move in.
I do agree that more town centre accommodation should be available instead of empty shops. Local market towns have lots of empty shops. There are also many empty pubs, some have been empty for over 10 years as the planners will not change the use to residential without a significant battle. These areas would make really good low price rental accommodation for people living and working in the area.
Much more social housing is needed, it is still being sold off locally.
And finally, holiday cottages. These are the little cottages in the towns and villages that were cheap to buy or rent, 10-15 years ago. Whole streets in local market towns are holiday lets and some villages it’s over half the cottages are holiday lets. In a nearby market town 2 bedroom bungalows on 1970s housing estates are now being let for holiday accommodation. The village of staithes had a few years ago less than 10 cottages occupied full time in the old part of the village.

TheTigerWhoCameToEatMyArsehole · 10/02/2025 10:25

They have build a shitload of homes near me. Can we afford one? Can we fuck! Not without an absolutely hefty deposit which we can't save because our rent is so high. We earn decent money too.

Thirteenblackcat · 10/02/2025 10:24

The population is increasing faster since the turn of the century, with the biggest increase due to immigration. The government need to be stricter with immigrants, like they are in NZ and Australia

To be sick of hearing about 'the housing crisis'?
Digdongdoo · 10/02/2025 10:22

GoldfinchFeather · 10/02/2025 10:17

It's not the "only " solution, though, is it?

Like I said in my first post, there are plenty of innovative ways to tackle this problem if there was the wherewithal to do it. Brown field sites are another resource that could be used much more. A CPRE report from a few years ago found that there would be space for over a million homes on these sites. https://www.cpre.org.uk/resources/state-of-brownfield-report-2022

Yet still it seems to be greenbelt that seems to come under the most strain! During a time when we're all supposed to be doing our bit to look after the environment, how does building at such a rate on land that is often habitat for wildlife help with that? But sure, let's all go buy electric cars...

Plus maybe if the Government did more to get a grip on the out of control population increase in this country, we wouldn't need so many houses building anyway. Just a thought.

Did I say it was the "only" solution?
Why don't you move onto a brownfield site or a flat then? It's always someone else's responsibility. Someone else who should sacrifice the pleasant house in a nice location... We should all be doing our bit, you can't just demand that other people shouldn't want the same things you already have. It won't work.

EmmaEmEmz · 10/02/2025 10:22

Clearly doesn't affect you

Meanwhile some if us are stuck in overpriced rental properties with landlords who don't even do the legal bare minimum to make their houses that we pay over the odds for to make like them safe but we don't have any chance of moving because the next landlord down the road wants us to earn a frankly ridiculous amount for another subpar property.

theadultsaretalking · 10/02/2025 10:21

To echo some of the posters - I am from the EU and when I first moved to the UK many years ago, I was really surprised at the British obsession of living in a house with a garden (even if the garden is the size of a stamp).

There is just not enough land to build on, realistically. There should be more flat developments for different budgets etc, inside the cities, rather than expanding into the countryside.

MidnightPatrol · 10/02/2025 10:20

Do you think there isn’t a housing crisis?

What’s your own housing situation?

Lemonyyy · 10/02/2025 10:20

I think it’s easy to complain that there is no housing crisis if you have secure housing. Stunning lack of empathy from the NIMBY op 🙄

Autther · 10/02/2025 10:19

TY78910 · 10/02/2025 10:03

Just thinking out loud here as I don’t know, but surely if it’s farmland somebody owns that in the first place? Developers can’t just come in and build, they would need to purchase that land from whatever farming family was in there in the first place and felt they can no longer sustain it.

Yes they buy the land, I've no idea of the background as to why the farmers are selling though. Doesn't change the impact on the deer that live there though

Duckinahat · 10/02/2025 10:19

Crikeyalmighty · 10/02/2025 10:14

@Duckinahat personally I'm more pro a sales tax on moving of 2% of value. That's for everyone

Hence those that have never bought before or dont have anything to sell don't hit this tax at all

But the issue with stamp duty is that it reduces the number of moves people are prepared to make, makes them less likely to move for work, and less likely to have a house that meets their needs, and any tax on house moves still has the same issues.

People should not be financially penalised for choosing / needing to move house. They should be incentivised to do so instead.

WestwardHo1 · 10/02/2025 10:18

ThatMerryReader · 10/02/2025 09:25

Look mum, a NIMBY !

Edited

Such a lazy, brainless insult.

Wingingitnancy · 10/02/2025 10:18

AnonymousBleep · 10/02/2025 10:00

There is a housing crisis but it won't be addressed if they don't build the right type of housing. Loads of over-priced, badly-built 'executive' homes are not the answer - we need lots of affordable flats, it's the most economic use of space and money.

I'm also worried about the countryside being absolutely fucked and the UK becoming one massive Wimpey homes estate but I think there are ways of doing this sustainably. Whether Labour will achieve this is another thing altogether - I certainly hope so.

I agree. I think if they built flats with people living in mind (better insulation, sound proof) they would be a long-term option lucrative option.
I like flat living, I find it much more practical on one floor, shared gardens i can enjoy and don't need to worry about gardening. There are a lot of positives. But they are seen as negatively and not sought after therefore not much thought or investment goes into building them to be realistic accommodation and they prefer to focus on houses which isn't cost-effective, affordable to many people and take up a lot of space.

Flats if built with thought could be a great option for families on a tight budget. (Bills would be cheaper, in one flat I lived in never had to put heating on, as my flat was toasty from the other properties heating 😂)

LindorDoubleChoc · 10/02/2025 10:18

The UK is the most densely populated country in Europe apart from Belgium and The Netherlands. It feels overcrowded. It doesn't matter what % of the land is built on if we are too densely populated. Our closest neighbour France has a very similar sized population to us. France is 551,000 square km, UK is 244,000 square km.

Springsunflower · 10/02/2025 10:18

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 10/02/2025 09:47

Yes. There is no developer interest in building modest and "affordable" property, because there is next to no profit in it.

Regulations now compel developers to build a certain number of modest properties in every single development, and every single time it's the bare minimum number which are built. It's now at the point where the developers just don't bother building actual housing, and now everything is horrible student accommodation shoeboxes, because they are cheaper, more profitable, and they don't come with the same strictures regarding Social/Affordable housing.

Expecting private developers to cater for the needs of the poorest in society is just yet more "trickle down" lunacy.

This is really interesting,what your saying.i was recently driving round one of the new build sites near me ,and there was huge houses with gardens and front drives ,really nice streets all nicely planned.then I turn a corner and I felt shocked to see what were clearly social housing,two rows of two up two down houses no side access all in a row, 15 on one side and 15 facing ,and in the middle just tarmac with numbers for parking.
No grass ,so that's where the children will play amongst the parked cars .all the doors identical and no car charging access like every other house ..and these 30 or so identical houses were surrounded by huge individual houses ..it was shocking and sad the lack of thought gone in to the social housing

GoldfinchFeather · 10/02/2025 10:17

Digdongdoo · 10/02/2025 10:06

You're sick of hearing about it because you have a house....
Unless people want to start using existing housing stock more efficiently (downsizing), then construction is the only solution. Don't moan if you're not doing anything to help the situation.

It's not the "only " solution, though, is it?

Like I said in my first post, there are plenty of innovative ways to tackle this problem if there was the wherewithal to do it. Brown field sites are another resource that could be used much more. A CPRE report from a few years ago found that there would be space for over a million homes on these sites. https://www.cpre.org.uk/resources/state-of-brownfield-report-2022

Yet still it seems to be greenbelt that seems to come under the most strain! During a time when we're all supposed to be doing our bit to look after the environment, how does building at such a rate on land that is often habitat for wildlife help with that? But sure, let's all go buy electric cars...

Plus maybe if the Government did more to get a grip on the out of control population increase in this country, we wouldn't need so many houses building anyway. Just a thought.

OP posts:
Mummyoflittledragon · 10/02/2025 10:16

housemaus · 10/02/2025 10:05

From this article - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-41901297

Although this page from the Government makes it a bit clearer and is probably more accurate - it says '8.6% of land in England is of developed use, with 91.2% of non-developed use and the remaining 0.2% being vacant.', but developed use includes transport (so roads etc) and residential is just 1.2%.

The issue is that the remaining land will become increasingly less available for food production. Water is diverted from the houses to agricultural land, coupled with climate change means that a considerable percentage of the non-developed land is or will be considered flood plane.

DemonicCaveMaggot · 10/02/2025 10:15

I wish the government would fund a huge research project into soundproofing buildings. There are some beautiful flats near us that an acquaintance moved into. He loved the flat but could hear absolutely everything his neighbours did and they could hear him so he moved out to a house.

Humans are social creatures but people don't want to hear and smell their neighbours when they are in the privacy of their own homes, hence why many people don't like the idea of living in a flat.

Crikeyalmighty · 10/02/2025 10:14

@Duckinahat personally I'm more pro a sales tax on moving of 2% of value. That's for everyone

Hence those that have never bought before or dont have anything to sell don't hit this tax at all

Porkyporkchop · 10/02/2025 10:13

Right to buy sold off the council
housing stock. This is the main issue. There are loads of houses to buy, but no social care housing stock which is the real issue. The government are also crippling landlords , so there are few rentals now as well.

FastFood · 10/02/2025 10:13

Long post to say "not in my backyard".

Swipe left for the next trending thread