Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Four events this week at school during working hours…

374 replies

Breakfromschoolrequestsplease · 22/10/2026 17:56

…followed by an email “have a great half term…here’s some homework plus a half term project”…and no doubt another virus.

OP posts:
SirChenjins · 22/10/2026 22:09

ThankYouNigel · 22/10/2026 22:01

This fear mongering needs to stop. Plenty of people in single income families bounce back from these things. My own mother was a SAHM, widowed when we were under 5, eventually remarried SAHM again/WFH, divorced, bounced back to working mum very quickly. She’s incredibly resilient and now alone and working, but always preferred being a SAHM. Many Mums switch between the two over their lifetime.

Edited

It's interesting that you see it as fear mongering. I see it simply as pragmatism - being able to put food on your own table as an adult is incredibly important. The job market is very different to what it was in years gone by, with so many people chasing far fewer vacancies, and being out of the workforce for any length of time puts you at a huge disadvantage. Knowing that you're capable of bringing income into the family if the other parent isn't able to for whatever reason is so reassuring - many of us have seen this happen to others when it's all gone tits up.

ThankYouNigel · 22/10/2026 22:09

wwdd365 · 22/10/2026 21:33

Good luck with that darling /says it all -you love and respect him ,nothing about how he values you .

Yeah, he values me very highly, he understood when he met me 20 years ago that I was never going to leave my babies and wanted to look after myself, and he works his backside off making sure I’ve been able to stay at home. I am very lucky, and would have absolutely hated to have returned to work, so yeah, I’m very happy my husband understands and respects MY values.

CurlyhairedAssassin · 22/10/2026 22:11

Monty36 · 22/10/2026 19:19

I remember once watching a programme about teachers. Where one stressed that there were days when she never got home until 6pm. She had done her marking before anyone says about that. She did not have lessons all day so did it then. But then had to organise an after club. So actually got home at 6pm. She seriously thought this was late.

And there was I thinking sitting on a train at 6pm with a hour and half to go to get home was okay.

That isn’t true to life. Primary school teachers do have lessons all day, except for the half day a week they have PPA. Occasionally they are covered while they attend a training course. Marking is just one of the tasks that teachers have to do outside of the core teaching day. The teachers I know are in at 7.30am. Generally leave between 5 and 5.30/5.45pm (they do at my infant school anyway). Most do try to do the marking in school as it saves taking piles of books home.

but they get home, have something to eat then get back on it doing the other tasks they need to do. Planning for the next day takes up a lot of time.

i suspect the one teacher you saw on one programme was not indicative of what most teachers actually do.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

ThankYouNigel · 22/10/2026 22:12

SirChenjins · 22/10/2026 22:09

It's interesting that you see it as fear mongering. I see it simply as pragmatism - being able to put food on your own table as an adult is incredibly important. The job market is very different to what it was in years gone by, with so many people chasing far fewer vacancies, and being out of the workforce for any length of time puts you at a huge disadvantage. Knowing that you're capable of bringing income into the family if the other parent isn't able to for whatever reason is so reassuring - many of us have seen this happen to others when it's all gone tits up.

Genuinely, why do you care? You’re in work? People on here like to dress up this faux concern to try to put fear/shame people who prefer to care for their loved ones. You do realise there are plenty of other unpaid carers, not just SAHP, in this country? Those who save the government caring for their spouse/elderly parents/grandparents? Society would collapse socially and morally if everyone worked full time. Utterly soulless.

InfoSecInTheCity · 22/10/2026 22:14

ThankYouNigel · 22/10/2026 20:23

Nope, just absolutely, passionately and unapologetically owning my life choices 😊

And judging and criticising everyone else’s. You are not just owning your own life choices you are sanctimoniously preaching to everyone else why the choices they made are wrong.

Tryagain26 · 22/10/2026 22:15

Besidemyselfwithworry · 22/10/2026 18:18

I found daytime stuff like open classrooms, summer/christmas fairs In the afternoons, assemblies, carol concerts, the book fair, the craft fair, phonics sessions, parents meetings
all in the daytime at infants very annoying when I work full time - it’s a nightmare! It’s even more annoying when they email to say they’re disappointed to say x/y/z was poorly attended!
read the room!!!

it’s not so bad now they’re in juniors/secondary as these tend to be in the evening.

When are they supposed to have them? They can't have an open classroom , assemblies etc in the evening the children won't be there! Would you prefer schools didn't invite parents to any events? If you can't go that's fair enough but sometimes I think schools can't win. If parents aren't invited to anything parents complain, if they are invited they still complain!

SirChenjins · 22/10/2026 22:17

ThankYouNigel · 22/10/2026 22:12

Genuinely, why do you care? You’re in work? People on here like to dress up this faux concern to try to put fear/shame people who prefer to care for their loved ones. You do realise there are plenty of other unpaid carers, not just SAHP, in this country? Those who save the government caring for their spouse/elderly parents/grandparents? Society would collapse socially and morally if everyone worked full time. Utterly soulless.

Again, very defensive language from you. I wonder why? There's nothing I've said in that post that isn't true. There's nothing shameful about staying at home, but it's certainly risky - unless you can claim enough in benefits to pay your bills and put food on your table if something does go wrong with your dh's ability to earn money. Just be glad there are enough net tax payers like me to support you if you ever do need to claim them.

ThankYouNigel · 22/10/2026 22:17

InfoSecInTheCity · 22/10/2026 22:14

And judging and criticising everyone else’s. You are not just owning your own life choices you are sanctimoniously preaching to everyone else why the choices they made are wrong.

I just don’t believe in moaning on and on about stuff…work and parenting are often incompatible…life with children is unpredictable…none of this is new…but work and parenting demands and expectations have both arguably increased to unreasonable and definitely incompatible levels…so I say NO. No feels powerful. Saying ‘yes’ to everything depletes you.

SnowflakesandSlippers · 22/10/2026 22:19

ThankYouNigel · 22/10/2026 22:12

Genuinely, why do you care? You’re in work? People on here like to dress up this faux concern to try to put fear/shame people who prefer to care for their loved ones. You do realise there are plenty of other unpaid carers, not just SAHP, in this country? Those who save the government caring for their spouse/elderly parents/grandparents? Society would collapse socially and morally if everyone worked full time. Utterly soulless.

Soulless? Why? Because some people take pleasure in going to work and then enjoying their family when everyone is home? I missed dd terribly when she started school, it's not soulless to want to do a job.

ThankYouNigel · 22/10/2026 22:19

SirChenjins · 22/10/2026 22:17

Again, very defensive language from you. I wonder why? There's nothing I've said in that post that isn't true. There's nothing shameful about staying at home, but it's certainly risky - unless you can claim enough in benefits to pay your bills and put food on your table if something does go wrong with your dh's ability to earn money. Just be glad there are enough net tax payers like me to support you if you ever do need to claim them.

Edited

Because it’s largely unimportant to SAHPs. They want to spend time with their children and don’t care if something goes wrong. I genuinely don’t care, I’d still make the same choice. Are you trying to put people off making that choice? Why does it bother you they do things differently and are not worried? You don’t have to worry about them!

Kitte321 · 22/10/2026 22:20

ThankYouNigel · 22/10/2026 22:17

I just don’t believe in moaning on and on about stuff…work and parenting are often incompatible…life with children is unpredictable…none of this is new…but work and parenting demands and expectations have both arguably increased to unreasonable and definitely incompatible levels…so I say NO. No feels powerful. Saying ‘yes’ to everything depletes you.

Sadly, having no income and children is also incompatible 🤷‍♀️

SnowflakesandSlippers · 22/10/2026 22:21

ThankYouNigel · 22/10/2026 22:19

Because it’s largely unimportant to SAHPs. They want to spend time with their children and don’t care if something goes wrong. I genuinely don’t care, I’d still make the same choice. Are you trying to put people off making that choice? Why does it bother you they do things differently and are not worried? You don’t have to worry about them!

Why do you assume working means less time with a child? It often doesn't.

ThankYouNigel · 22/10/2026 22:21

SnowflakesandSlippers · 22/10/2026 22:19

Soulless? Why? Because some people take pleasure in going to work and then enjoying their family when everyone is home? I missed dd terribly when she started school, it's not soulless to want to do a job.

Society becomes soulless if everybody works full time because everything is outsourced to institutions instead of the home and family, which used to run far more. It’s already happening- I don’t like or engage with it. Our family has always cared for our young and old at home, where they feel more comfortable and loved.

ThankYouNigel · 22/10/2026 22:22

Kitte321 · 22/10/2026 22:20

Sadly, having no income and children is also incompatible 🤷‍♀️

Nope, not when a child lives with 2 parents. 1 earns, 1 cares. Easy!

SirChenjins · 22/10/2026 22:23

ThankYouNigel · 22/10/2026 22:19

Because it’s largely unimportant to SAHPs. They want to spend time with their children and don’t care if something goes wrong. I genuinely don’t care, I’d still make the same choice. Are you trying to put people off making that choice? Why does it bother you they do things differently and are not worried? You don’t have to worry about them!

I don't worry about you - you're just a random person on MN.

SnowflakesandSlippers · 22/10/2026 22:23

ThankYouNigel · 22/10/2026 22:21

Society becomes soulless if everybody works full time because everything is outsourced to institutions instead of the home and family, which used to run far more. It’s already happening- I don’t like or engage with it. Our family has always cared for our young and old at home, where they feel more comfortable and loved.

Edited

Hmm, it's rather difficult to imagine you in a caring role given your lack of empathy and inability to understand a range of viewpoints.

PickAChew · 22/10/2026 22:24

ThankYouNigel · 22/10/2026 18:31

So you’ve both decided you’ve got more important things to do, so stop moaning and complaining as plenty of parents love going to these things, they will continue! It’s not all about you, it is fairer to children to perform when they are fresh and to teachers, who have a high enough workload, to do all of this during the day when best suits them.

I'm sure you would be thrilled if your children's teachers decided they would rather go to their child's art exhibition than teach your child or your GP would rather sit through a school poetry recital than keep the appointment you need.

SirChenjins · 22/10/2026 22:24

ThankYouNigel · 22/10/2026 22:22

Nope, not when a child lives with 2 parents. 1 earns, 1 cares. Easy!

If one earns then there is an income - not no income. Although there would be if that one person isn't able to earn anymore...

ThankYouNigel · 22/10/2026 22:25

SnowflakesandSlippers · 22/10/2026 22:23

Hmm, it's rather difficult to imagine you in a caring role given your lack of empathy and inability to understand a range of viewpoints.

Ha, I’ve managed 2 households single handedly caring for under 4s and our elderly relative who was unable to stand up and needed round the clock care, zero whinging about it or outsourcing, so yeah, I’m pretty capable of caring for others thanks! 😂

SnowflakesandSlippers · 22/10/2026 22:26

ThankYouNigel · 22/10/2026 22:25

Ha, I’ve managed 2 households single handedly caring for under 4s and our elderly relative who was unable to stand up and needed round the clock care, zero whinging about it or outsourcing, so yeah, I’m pretty capable of caring for others thanks! 😂

Doing the caring for others is very different to actually caring for others.

SirChenjins · 22/10/2026 22:27

ThankYouNigel · 22/10/2026 22:25

Ha, I’ve managed 2 households single handedly caring for under 4s and our elderly relative who was unable to stand up and needed round the clock care, zero whinging about it or outsourcing, so yeah, I’m pretty capable of caring for others thanks! 😂

How did you look after your children if your relative in another household needed round the clock care?

ThankYouNigel · 22/10/2026 22:29

SirChenjins · 22/10/2026 22:24

If one earns then there is an income - not no income. Although there would be if that one person isn't able to earn anymore...

Obviously then the other would work, it’s really not the big deal people on here make it out to be though.

I don’t actually know anybody in a two-earner family who could sustain their so-called independence without their husband, they’ve all massively over-stretched themselves financially and would struggle wayyy more than me.

Plenty also way too dependent on parents/ILs, several have had to switch childcare arrangements due to their ill heath…that rarely gets mentioned…but it gets sorted. I’d rather be dependent financially on my husband, and would find it highly embarrassing to have my mother taking my kids to A & E, washing my clothes and cooking my dinner at 40- I know plenty of women who do this, it is thoroughly embarrassing. I stopped needing my mother to do stuff like this at 15!

Kitte321 · 22/10/2026 22:29

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

seahorsessky · 22/10/2026 22:30

Do you have any family nearby that don't work, who could go instead of you? I seldom manage to go, but some of our family no longer work, so they can go. I respect a lot of parents don't work, but there's not many people who do work who could get 4 sessions off in one week, so is there any way you/your partner/the grandparents etc could manage to split it?

ThankYouNigel · 22/10/2026 22:30

SirChenjins · 22/10/2026 22:27

How did you look after your children if your relative in another household needed round the clock care?

Easily…took them with me as I moved between the 2. In the real world, loads of people do stuff like this.

Swipe left for the next trending thread