Paul was previously a member of parliament from 1997 to 2015, where he served on the Health, Select and Public Accounts Committees, and worked cross party to secure debates and lobby Ministers on social care and health. From 2010 to 2012 he was the Minister of State for the Department of Health and led the development of the “No Health Without Mental Health” strategy.
see thread on politically driven conflation of gender and sex within NHS.
OP Barracker wrote:
" medium.com/@anneharperwright/sex-gender-the-nhs-1e8f4e6363a6
They were ALWAYS based upon 'gender'.
The evidence is in NHS documents from 2010.
And the Department of Health were told, by the NHS team, not to tell people wards were segregated by sex, because they knew the policy was based on gender.
But the DOH purposefully used the word sex to the public instead.
We've been deliberately misled."
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3396859-Weve-been-lied-to-about-Single-SEX-wards-since-2010
Anne Harper Wright's important work also here:
medium.com/@anneharperwright/sex-gender-the-nhs-bb86b0c3ebb
collation of information by HairyLeggdHarpy, see link for Hansard transcript:
"The Gender Recognition Bill
(extract)
I'm going to tweet out a few of the illuminating comments from the debates that led to the GRA 2004, to save you all ploughing through Hansard.
One of the primary motivations (if not the foremost) for the bill was to avoid legalising same sex marriage. This featured VERY heavily in the discussions.
It was, in the Govt's eyes, FAR preferable to convert a same sex couple into a heterosexual couple via 'sex change' than it was to make same sex marriage legal:
#GRA2004
Note how it was supposed to be only a 'small number'
And the justification of "if we allow sex to change we can sidestep same sex marriage" appeared over and over again...
and again
One of the obvious flaws in the entire process was the deliberate confuscation of sex and gender. The govt admitted that the two concepts were NOT THE SAME
Note the NO.
And then note the utter balderdash that follows. In this order:
- Gender is not sex.
- Govt will legally recognise gender
- Gender should be legal sex
- Acquired gender = legal sex
- Something unexplained about man, woman and male and female
- Sex = Gender
To recap, sex and gender are not the same, govt acknowledges, but we'd like to create a law that pretends they are, whilst still knowing they are not. Cool.
This paved the way for what we've now seen evidence for: that 'female' people with penises can commit rape.
As we now know, this happens
Tebbit anticipated it, and the Govt acknowledged this would happen." (continues)
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1049289194370002945.html
thread:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3388967-Illuminating-Twitter-thread-about-the-origins-of-the-Gender-Recognition-Act?