Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

"First they came for the rapists and I did not speak out because I was not a rapist..."

37 replies

PimmsnLemonade · 02/10/2018 21:43

twitter.com/AllieLia/status/1039280808140451841

Communists, trade unionists, Jews, rapists.

Spot the odd one out!

OP posts:
PierreBezukov · 02/10/2018 21:45

First they came for the rapists.

If only.

Serfisafleur · 02/10/2018 21:51

WTF that thread is bonkers there are serious head cases on Twitter.

doctorbarbie · 02/10/2018 21:56

I've loved that thread. It highlights the extent of the mental gymnastics required to believe this nonsense. If your belief system has got you to the point where you're defending rapists wholesale as a group then surely that's time to sit down and reflect on where those beliefs are taking you.

#rapisthill I mean come on. Its got to be a parody?!

AngryAttackKittens · 02/10/2018 22:02

Are we sure this isn't a GC double agent? If not then Poe's Law applies, or would if we hadn't already seen so many TRAs saying appalling things.

FermatsTheorem · 02/10/2018 22:03

Well, I applaud their honesty. They may be bonkers, but they do at least have the merit of being logically consistent (if you accept their totally bonkers starting position).

Because if TWAW, and self ID is the only criterion by which to decide whether someone is a woman, then, yes, logically, if you accept those two premises, Jacinta Brooks is every bit as much a woman as Pips Bunce, AllieLia, me, Mother Theresa...

Or alternatively, if you reject those two premises, and instead take biology to be the defining criterion, then three of the above list are not women, and two are.

I know which view I hold.

FermatsTheorem · 02/10/2018 22:04

(We need to make sure proof by contradiction and reductio ad absurdum somehow makes their way back onto the school syllabus).

LangCleg · 02/10/2018 22:10

Like I said on the AIBU thread - Jacinta is self-ID. Either self declaration is for none or it is for all. So I agree with Fermats that this is at least honest.

But you know - there are times to be logically consistent when defending your ideology and times to shut the fuck up and hope nobody notices what your ideology means.

I give Allie all the lack of self awareness points for hashtagging #RapistHill. That is a spectacular level of echo chamber own goal, right there.

Badstyley · 02/10/2018 22:17

I thought it was just going to be some random troll, but I’ve seen this person’s tweets before and they’re just your garden variety abusive TRA. They’re becoming really nasty, nastier than usual. Think they might be a tad rattled?

SlowlyShrinking · 02/10/2018 22:23

I checked Alison’s account because I assumed it was a parody account, but apparently it isn’t 😳

WeWantJustice · 02/10/2018 22:49

Oh put First they came for the rapists into the twitter search, it's great

FermatsTheorem · 02/10/2018 23:01

we want your post prompted me to put the phrase into Google and what do you think... Turns out that the rewrite actually dates from 2011, from some sad MRA git on Tumblr.

Further indications that TRAs are in fact MRAs/incels/misogynistic sad bastards in a new sparkly guise.

AnonymousIsAWoman · 02/10/2018 23:12

Wow. Just....wow.

MagicMix · 02/10/2018 23:21

Sexual violence against women is acceptable collateral damage in my struggle to make everyone pretend I'm a woman.

Right sure, and I bet he'd say he wasn't a misogynist.

AngryAttackKittens · 02/10/2018 23:47

I think that if you find yourself saying that you stand with rapists it may be time to reevaluate your life choices.

FloralBunting · 02/10/2018 23:53

Oh come on! Surely, surely the point at which you are passionately defending the rights of rapists over women is the point when some distant chime of disquiet echoes in your skull?
Or is that the reason this is happening? The distant chimes are ringing loud and clear and this is an example of someone desperately trying to drown them out?

heresyandwitchcraft · 03/10/2018 14:20

First they came for the rapists, then they came for the paedophiles, then they came for the narcissistic psychopaths with a clear fetish...
And by "they came for" I mean they annoyed the rapists/paedophiles/psychopaths by calling out manipulative lies and using biologically correct pronouns. And eventually these dangerous assholes were stopped from using their newfound way to abuse women/children by pretending to be women...

Still not really seeing the problem here.

ErrolTheDragon · 03/10/2018 14:53

Ah... while Allison is passionate about not erasing rapists identity by misgendering them, Allison's solution to the problem of TW rapists being put in women's prisons and abusing women there is:

so kill them, prisons don't work anyway

(In a subsequent tweet clarifies that's for being a rapist not for being trans so that's ok...)

With friends like that, TW rapists don't need enemies.

Melamin · 03/10/2018 14:55

Batshit Hmm

NaturalBornWoman · 03/10/2018 15:07

Alison also has a porn account, they have a Thai twat allegedly. Lovely. 🤢

Oldstyle · 03/10/2018 15:21

'a Thai twat' - do you recommend that with lentils or rice Natural?

deepwatersolo · 03/10/2018 15:25

Well, for what it's worth, the person ready to die on #rapisthill is, indeed, logically consistent. Either everyone can be a woman and needs to be treated as such, if demanded, or there is an objective feature that makes one a women, no matter what one does. Either way, you can't lose womanhood because of some crime you commit.

Of course, I personally could never bring myself to, say, die on #definitivelyprovenpaedochildmurdererhill, when it comes to the death penality, even though I am really, really opposed to the death penalty. I guess, I am not totally consistent in that regard.

BigChocFrenzy · 04/10/2018 00:40

Yes, it's logically consistent .... once you accept the original batshit proposition that men can beome women

As a scientist, if I ended up with a batshit conclusion, I would go back to the start - with an open mind - and see where I had gone wrong

FloralBunting · 04/10/2018 00:44

Well yes,that's an excellent way of looking at it. If you start from an erroneous assumption, then even if your logic is thereafter consistent, your conclusion is going to be dead wrong.

Q.E.D.

AngryAttackKittens · 04/10/2018 01:25

AKA "garbage in, garbage out", ie if you start with bad information then don't expect to get an accurate or useful result.

GetOffMyTERF · 04/10/2018 01:39

The cognitive dissonance is actually painful! ‘Misgendering’ is a worse crime than rape. A trans woman is a woman, even if she uses her penis to rape. If we don’t protect vulnerable rapists from the incredible pain of having it pointed out that they used their MALE organ to commit a MALE crime and are MEN, then we are opening the door to Nazism. What the actual fuck. Surely to god this absolute shite must affect the woke leftist no debate bullshit??