Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

Calling all Health Practitioners - Connecting for Health

13 replies

Blackduck · 17/11/2008 06:26

Okay, I have an interview as Project Support (IT) for a local NHS trust - I have to give a presentation of which the title is 'From what you have seen of Connecting for Health projects what factors do you believe could inhibit progress and/or success?" As I don't (and never have) worked in the NHS I haven't got the foggest! So heres your chance - what are your views?
Many thanks for the help!

OP posts:
remote · 17/11/2008 14:42

Inihibiting factors - lack of trust from the public, bad press re recent losses of data.

Lack of funding.

Not much else really. you could cheat a bit and look at the connecting for health website and check the FAQ section.

Sorry - that's the best I can do!

stealthsquiggle · 17/11/2008 14:50

From the other side (IT supplier to both trusts and CfH) - badly written contracts with commercial partners leave a service which lags real requirements and make change VERY slow.

The trust won't want to hear this but the one thing which IMHO would speed things up most would be if trusts were obliged to take CfH services - ATM they have the choice so the service has to be 'sold' to each trust and designed to take account of the fact that CfH has no control over the client interface (NHS mail being a prime example)

Blackduck · 17/11/2008 19:15

SS thanks - so are you saying the trust can customise the front end? So you would say implementation issues are key? Does this lead to lack of an championing of the projects on the part of the user base?

OP posts:
stealthsquiggle · 17/11/2008 22:50

The trust owns the user device (PC, thin client, PDA, whatever) so the service cannot depend on certain software or levels of software being deployed - neither can they require agents to be pushed out to client devices - so everything is limited to lowest common denominator browser-based access. Hence it is impossible to deliver the service the users really want/need so they resist deployment - it's a vicious circle and one that I am not sure there is a way out of because it is so fundamental to the structure of the NHS.

This has to be the wierdest conversation I have ever had on MN

this site has some interesting articles about CfH which could be worthwhile reading?

Blackduck · 18/11/2008 10:44

But thats the power of mumsnet! Knew someone would know something/have a view - and yes it is weird.......
Sounds fundementally rubbish.....

OP posts:
stealthsquiggle · 18/11/2008 11:11

It does (sound fundamentally rubbish) - it is - but it means lots of work for IT people, both in CfH and in the trusts.

When is the interview? Good Luck!

Blackduck · 18/11/2008 14:45

Interview is on Thursday morning - beginning to wonder if it is a good idea . Project support is probably thankless in this situation....

OP posts:
stealthsquiggle · 18/11/2008 18:02

It depends what stage they are at - if they have already made the decision to roll things out it could be OK - as long as the trust's bits get done OK, then any lack of functionality could be passed off as 'not our problem, blame CfH'

Blackduck · 19/11/2008 06:45

Isn't it always blame CfH? website useful - many thanks - and insightful as to the whole thing.....All those big companies getting BIG money and not delivering ...

OP posts:
Blackduck · 20/11/2008 17:31

SS thanks again - that website was a good heads up as they asked me about resources and said that was up there as one of the top ones Anyway thanks for everything and we'll see how it goes...!!

OP posts:
stealthsquiggle · 21/11/2008 10:17

fingers crossed - when will you hear?

Blackduck · 21/11/2008 13:05

didn't get it - just heard....suspect it went to someone already working in NHS...

OP posts:
stealthsquiggle · 21/11/2008 14:38

Bugger. Better luck next time..

New posts on this thread. Refresh page