Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

NHS Admin

37 replies

deepseaargyllfish · 05/07/2026 17:53

I have an interview for a support medical secretary job in the week coming.

The issue is, it’s 32 hours per week, probably rising soon after to 37.

I’m in a decent position financially (low outgoings and low mortgage, with no kids to support) but still, I need a stable income. I need some hours each week which are fixed and guaranteed. I have an ad hoc side hustle (exam marking), and need to keep a day or two free for that - as well as for my own peace (I’m not that young).

If I’m offered the job, which obviously hasn’t happened yet, would the offer conversation be the right time to say that I can only do three or 3.5 days, or a 50:50 job share? I’m worried that if I said this (either at interview or if and when I’m offered the job) the offer would be withdrawn.

I could do the near-f/t job for six months, and ask after six months; I’d definitely do this if there was a high chance of them saying yes. But I can’t do near f/t in the medium to long term. So I wouldn’t want to do six months in a post only to have to leave quite quickly.

I live in a remote area with high levels of deprivation; there are vanishingly few opportunities.

If anyone has experience of flexibility working NHS admin, I’d be grateful for any advice. Thank you.

OP posts:
socks1107 · 05/07/2026 22:21

As an nhs manager I wouldn’t consider if I’d offered you a full time and could in theory refuse a request for part time after several months in post. To get jobs out to advert we have to jump through hoops at the moment so it’s clear the department needs full time so any request of reducing hours may not be approved

NoEffingWay · 05/07/2026 22:32

I would tell them before the interview that you are limited to the hours you can work, the issue is that filling a day or two a week to jobshare is impossible a lot of the time, and the cost of employing someone includes training and that cost is doubled by having two people in post.

Autumngirl5 · 05/07/2026 22:38

deepseaargyllfish · 05/07/2026 18:46

It’s not a question of ‘wasting their time’. There is no work in this area, and I’m not in a position to be choosy. I think I’m realising I’ll have to take it on whatever terms I can get. I haven’t even attended the interview yet.

They will be in a position to be choosy though. Jobs like this are highly sought after and my guess is that they will offer the position to the candidate who can work the hours that are required.

thenightsky · 05/07/2026 22:44

Autumngirl5 · 05/07/2026 22:38

They will be in a position to be choosy though. Jobs like this are highly sought after and my guess is that they will offer the position to the candidate who can work the hours that are required.

As a recently retired med sec, I agree with this. We had over 200 applicants for my job. Some didn't even have med sec experience so were screened out straight away. If you have an interview you've done well to get this far.

Out of interest, what band are they pitching it at?

WallaceinAnderland · 05/07/2026 22:47

deepseaargyllfish · 05/07/2026 22:15

I would , but only across four days.

Then you have to call them before you put your application in and ask them if this would be considered.

They might need cover every day. If they've advertised it over 5 days, then they want someone over the 5 days. If they are at all flexible they would usually advertise that in the job advert.

deepseaargyllfish · 05/07/2026 22:52

WallaceinAnderland · 05/07/2026 22:47

Then you have to call them before you put your application in and ask them if this would be considered.

They might need cover every day. If they've advertised it over 5 days, then they want someone over the 5 days. If they are at all flexible they would usually advertise that in the job advert.

They haven’t stated the working pattern. I already said this. Made no mention of it at all.

OP posts:
deepseaargyllfish · 05/07/2026 22:54

socks1107 · 05/07/2026 22:21

As an nhs manager I wouldn’t consider if I’d offered you a full time and could in theory refuse a request for part time after several months in post. To get jobs out to advert we have to jump through hoops at the moment so it’s clear the department needs full time so any request of reducing hours may not be approved

It’s less than a full-time post.

OP posts:
deepseaargyllfish · 05/07/2026 22:55

thenightsky · 05/07/2026 22:44

As a recently retired med sec, I agree with this. We had over 200 applicants for my job. Some didn't even have med sec experience so were screened out straight away. If you have an interview you've done well to get this far.

Out of interest, what band are they pitching it at?

It’s close to minimum wage.

OP posts:
thenightsky · 05/07/2026 22:57

deepseaargyllfish · 05/07/2026 22:55

It’s close to minimum wage.

Shocking. Shocking and sad that the job is so devalued.

deepseaargyllfish · 05/07/2026 23:00

Autumngirl5 · 05/07/2026 22:38

They will be in a position to be choosy though. Jobs like this are highly sought after and my guess is that they will offer the position to the candidate who can work the hours that are required.

I can’t imagine that, in this area, there is a large pool of good administrators with medical and (fast) audio-typing secretarial experience who would work full time for minimum wage. Many would be curtailed by, for example, school chucking-out times.

OP posts:
deepseaargyllfish · 05/07/2026 23:01

thenightsky · 05/07/2026 22:57

Shocking. Shocking and sad that the job is so devalued.

Indeed. I was genuinely shocked when I looked at the hourly rates that match up with the bands.

OP posts:
NewLifter · 07/07/2026 22:59

I would be shocked if you couldn't do 32 hours over 4 days.

If they stated 32 & FT, maybe there's two posts?

Good luck!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread