Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

Asked for a salary review and now have to reapply

123 replies

BeBlueAnt · 13/05/2026 08:12

I've been at my job for 3 years and recently raised to my manager that I do more than is in my JD and would like my salary to be reviewed. They agreed and also said they would like to change some aspects of my JD. I was then informed that because my JD and salary are changing I will need to re-interview for my job and it will be externally advertised too.

I have a job interview for another job of much higher pay for similar work, I'm in the mindset now of fuck my current job and put all my time outside of work towards preparing for this other interview.

Any advice or thoughts on this??

I'm so annoyed and humiliated that I'll possibly lose my current job to a better candidate

OP posts:
Didimum · 13/05/2026 18:41

OldGothsFadeToGrey · 13/05/2026 18:40

We don’t have to advertise regraded roles or even the same role with slight changes and a new job title.

OK. I know of differently.

PrettyPickle · 13/05/2026 18:47

Sorry if I have missed you saying this but how long have you been in that role (I know you have been there for 3yrs) but is it a fixed term contract? Are you employed directly with the company or paid through someone else? Normally after you have been somewhere for 2 yrs you are deemed as having some protection under employment law so they can't just let you go and re-apply for your job, albeit a slightly different job description, its not as simple as that.

If you are a permanent employee I would have said it sounds very off. Changing a job description or reviewing a salary does not normally require you to “re‑interview” for your own role, especially when you’ve been doing the job for 3 years.

A few things to be aware of:

  • If the role is genuinely changing, an employer can consult with you and offer a revised contract. That’s a negotiation, not a competitive recruitment process.
  • If they want to advertise externally, that usually happens when they are restructuring or removing the original role — and they must follow a proper process, including consultation and potential redundancy.
  • They can’t just make you reapply for your own job because you asked for a salary review. That would look retaliatory and potentially unfair.
  • If the job is “substantially the same”, forcing you to compete for it is generally not considered reasonable.

I’d be asking them to put in writing:

  1. What exactly is changing in the JD
  2. Why those changes require a full recruitment process
  3. Whether your current role is being made redundant
  4. What happens if you don’t “pass” the interview

If they can’t give a clear, lawful reason, then it’s worth getting proper advice (ACAS is a good starting point). This doesn’t sound like standard practice at all.

In the UK, once you’ve been with the same employer for 2 years, you gain full statutory employment rights (unless you have been employed through a third party). That includes protection from unfair dismissal, proper redundancy rights, and the right to a fair process if your role is changing. So after 3 years, you are definitely protected. What people often mix up is this: having 2+ years’ service gives you rights, but it doesn’t automatically make you a “permanent” employee if your contract is fixed‑term. The contract type is separate. But regardless of whether you are fixed‑term or permanent, the employer cannot just make you “re‑interview” for your own job because you have asked for a salary review. If the role is genuinely changing, they must consult properly. If the old role is disappearing, that’s a redundancy process, not a competitive recruitment exercise. After 2 years, they can’t simply not “pick” you at interview, that would count as a dismissal, and they’d need a fair reason and a fair process. What they’re doing sounds very questionable.

Pessismistic · 13/05/2026 18:48

Op that is shitty behaviour are they pissed off with you asking for the pay review or are they hoping you will say it doesn’t matter either way they should have been sitting you down first tbh. Had they already advertised it it or have you pushed them to.

AlexaStopAlexaNo · 13/05/2026 19:15

Everyone in this situation will know it’s retaliatory but unfortunately (for you) it’s virtually impossible to prove.

GeriatricSupport · 13/05/2026 19:16

OP I'm really confused on what basis you're employed on, is it a fixed term contract which ends in June? When was your contract last renewed? Are you in or outside IR35?

Blushingm · 13/05/2026 19:49

Didimum · 13/05/2026 18:36

My DH works in the NHS, been in three different trusts now. They have always had to advertise externally. He is a band 9 and recruits a great deal – it’s in their policy requirements.

I’m a recruiting manager. Many jobs are advertised as restricted to internal applicants only. Roles do not have to be advertised externally. If you look at the vacancies advertised by UHBs/trusts you’ll see several that are restricted to internal applicants only

Blushingm · 13/05/2026 19:53

Didimum · 13/05/2026 18:36

My DH works in the NHS, been in three different trusts now. They have always had to advertise externally. He is a band 9 and recruits a great deal – it’s in their policy requirements.

https://nhspayscales.co.uk/do-nhs-jobs-have-to-be-advertised/#:~:text=Although%20normal%20practice%20is%20advertise,specific%20groups%20of%20internal%20staff.

Ginnnny · 13/05/2026 20:27

This is pretty standard if a JD changes, especially if it’s with more responsibility and/or money. I work in HR and have dealt with this a lot, where maybe 5-ish years ago the person doing the job would automatically get it, they now need to advertise it.
i would advise you to apply and interview - only once have I seen the current person not get the role (out of about 40 times), but they were genuinely crap.
you’re in a good position to also have an interview set up elsewhere!
wishing you good luck also!

Avoidtheloo · 14/05/2026 09:16

Are you sure about this OP?

DaisyDaisy133 · 14/05/2026 17:55

BeBlueAnt · 13/05/2026 08:12

I've been at my job for 3 years and recently raised to my manager that I do more than is in my JD and would like my salary to be reviewed. They agreed and also said they would like to change some aspects of my JD. I was then informed that because my JD and salary are changing I will need to re-interview for my job and it will be externally advertised too.

I have a job interview for another job of much higher pay for similar work, I'm in the mindset now of fuck my current job and put all my time outside of work towards preparing for this other interview.

Any advice or thoughts on this??

I'm so annoyed and humiliated that I'll possibly lose my current job to a better candidate

Unfortunately this is legal. The company will revise the JD and advertise the role, possibly at the same salary as you are currently on, and interview yourself and other suitable candidates. If you are then offered the job you then either accept or decline but your employer may offer to another candidate willing to accept the role and salary as it stands. If you have a union rep they will fight the case for you (and likely win) but do you want to stay at a company that is treating you so unfairly ? I’d put all my efforts into getting the other job. (Ps my husband is ex union steward/rep)

Bifster · 14/05/2026 18:00

Very fishy. If in the uk then this sounds highly illegal and due process does not appear to be followed. Go for the other job. If not given a 90 day consultation period then you may have a constructive dismissal claim.
If in the States it probably depends on your age, colour or gender.

chocolateaddictions · 14/05/2026 18:29

There’s some terrible advice on this thread but the OP doesn’t sound like she knows what she’s doing so 🤷‍♀️

Yokodoko · 14/05/2026 18:51

🤔🤬🙄 NHS by any chance, classic!

MeandT · 14/05/2026 19:00

@BeBlueAnt made a play for more money assuming her existing contract terminating 30 June would be extended.

They got played.

Welcome to the game!

(NB depending on exact circumstances of previous roles & continuity of service, OP may still be entitled to 3 weeks of redundancy pay on 30 June. By all means have a chat with ACAS & HR to understand what position you'd have been in if the contract was just terminated as planned.

Then you have the option to apply for a new role that is being created as of 1 July, or not - as you see fit...)

ElectoralControversy · 14/05/2026 19:00

ThreadGuardDog · 13/05/2026 18:07

I don’t know what the situation is now as l think the rules on workers rights have changed, but previously you needed 104 weeks of continuous service to have full rights, so it depends on how often the contract was renewed. My DH worked as a contractor and contracts were renewed after 103 weeks, so the two years continuous service was never achieved.

103 weeks followed by 103 weeks makes 206 weeks' continuous service, whatever way the company tries to fiddle it... Unless they deliberately refused to employ people for a gap between contracts and I'm pretty sure a tribunal would see through that

Sally20099 · 14/05/2026 19:00

Hi Op - unless you role profile is changing at least 30% they cannot do this.

Laurmolonlabe · 14/05/2026 19:07

I wouldn't completely concentrate on a job you don't have yet- you have a track record at your current company and none at the one you are interviewing for, so also put plenty of effort into retaining your slightly changed job, even if you would rather have the other one- or you could end up with no job.
Asking for a pay review after three years is reasonable, but unless you were told you would get more relatively soon (as is used routinely in interviews) you are opening the door to renegotiation- and the job market is worse than it was 3 years ago, so it might have served you better to wait a little longer before forcing the issue.

BettyBoh · 14/05/2026 19:08

The fact that you weren't clear about being on a fixed-term contract (and didn’t see the relevance of this) tells me your attention to detail isn’t great. It’s possible they don’t want to extend it and this is their way of getting rid if you if there’s someone better.
in order for us to advise you, we need more info:
was it a 3 year fixed term contract from the start or has it been extended once (or more) already?
are you employed directly or via an agency/umbrella?

Panjandrum123 · 14/05/2026 19:14

BeBlueAnt · 13/05/2026 09:28

@Franjipanl8r I was told it would be extended but as this is a new role if don't get it I'll have to find a new job which I only found out yesterday.

@BeBlueAnt sadly this is often the way these days. Due to transparency issues, my employer will advertise a role. We all know the incumbent is the person most likely to get it.

I feel it’s very unfair on the people applying, who put effort into their applications with minimal chance of landing the job. I’ve only heard of one occasion when the “sitting” candidate was outshone by an outside applicant. But it’s stressful for everyone.

DoubleMM · 14/05/2026 19:17

This is against employment law I am pretty sure. You are in the job which has been regraded on the basis of your work in post. The regrading is for you

keepincool · 14/05/2026 19:25

BillieWiper · 13/05/2026 14:55

I'm sure OP can use AI fairly easily herself.

There's always one 🙄

Safarisagoody · 14/05/2026 19:27

Op you drip fed in to the end of your contract. You don’t have a permanent position, you’re a contractor? If so, then yes this would be correct process.

PrettyPickle · 14/05/2026 19:31

Safarisagoody · 14/05/2026 19:27

Op you drip fed in to the end of your contract. You don’t have a permanent position, you’re a contractor? If so, then yes this would be correct process.

Not if she has been there for 2+years as she now has employment rights so they can't do this to her - well thats assuming she is employed directly and not through an agency.

FattyMallow · 14/05/2026 19:49

What an indecent employer... Union membership is a must (only union reps are allowed to be present with you in all your interviews, not lawyers but union reps) get in touch with ACAS ASAP, describe your situation and see how they can help if things get worse. Communicate only via emails, so you have hard evidence about their illegal actions. Stay calm, as this could be the start if something great. Get ready for your new interview too, you'll ace it!