Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

Job candidate has presented my work as his own

246 replies

PurplePirate · 25/03/2026 14:55

Will try to keep this short. Have also changed some details for privacy.

I am on an interview panel tomorrow (via Zoom). The chair has just emailed through the pack which includes the slides prepared by the three candidates for their presentations. We ask them to send through their slides in advance in case there is a problem with the Zoom link on the day.

One candidate, I will call Bill, worked at the same company as me about six years ago. When I was there I led a project and I created a distinctive and rather lovely slide deck as part of my work.

FF six years and Bill has submitted my slide deck. The presentation task is something like "Describe a project you have led and your approach to organisational transformation". So do I assume Bill is going to pass my work off as his own? Do I tell the chair now? Wait until the interview and watch him twig?

Bill may not realise I am on the interview panel. We do tell candidates the names of the panel beforehand but I am a last minute replacement for a colleague who is ill so I don't know if HR updated the candidates. I was not involved in shortlisting Bill.

OP posts:
godmum56 · 25/03/2026 16:32

Being747 · 25/03/2026 15:52

A memory stick! Blast from the past!!

I still use them for loads of stuff

WhereYouLeftIt · 25/03/2026 16:34

PurplePirate · 25/03/2026 15:03

I was genuinely thrown and trying to think of reasons why he would do this. It's possible (because we only have a copy of the slides, not what the candidates are going to say) that he has mis-read the brief and thought he has to describe any project he was involved in. It's possible he accidently attached the wrong file to his email (I have done exactly that before for a job interview). There could be some other explanation. I don't want to immediately jump to conclusions.

"Do I tell the chair now?"

Yes! Of course you do. The possibilities you've put forward for him not to be passing off your work as his own - well if that's the case he can make his apologies at the interview. I frankly don't see them as very likely.

If I was the chair, I'd be furious with YOU if you hadn't told me in advance. Imagine the rest of your panel finding out you'd sat on this information and made them feel like fools?

Teanbiscuits33 · 25/03/2026 16:35

Personally, I’d wait till the interview and see what happens. You can then see whether or not there is an innocent explanation before giving the chair any preconceived ideas about the candidate.

If he passes your work off as his own then you have a quiet word with the chair and produce the original copy of your slides if you have them. The file should be dated.

No one can blame you for telling on him before the interview though if you want.

THisbackwithavengeance · 25/03/2026 16:36

I feel a bit sorry for Bill. The other candidates will of course all be lying through the teeth about how they personally saved the world but they get away with it and Bill won’t.

Holdmybeermoment · 25/03/2026 16:37

Teanbiscuits33 · 25/03/2026 16:35

Personally, I’d wait till the interview and see what happens. You can then see whether or not there is an innocent explanation before giving the chair any preconceived ideas about the candidate.

If he passes your work off as his own then you have a quiet word with the chair and produce the original copy of your slides if you have them. The file should be dated.

No one can blame you for telling on him before the interview though if you want.

If I was the chair, I’d be furious at you for waiting. It’s just game playing. You’ve been given the candidates presentation beforehand so if you didn’t come and tell me and waited for a gotcha moment then I’d think you were childish, or I’d assume you hadn’t looked at the candidate packs so weren’t prepared for the interview.

Tell the chair now.

Francestein · 25/03/2026 16:43

Well the fact that he wasn’t on that particular project should rule him out entirely anyway.

Lougle · 25/03/2026 16:44

You definitely need to tell the chair the facts. They can decide what they do with the information.

Shedmistress · 25/03/2026 16:45

Holdmybeermoment · 25/03/2026 16:37

If I was the chair, I’d be furious at you for waiting. It’s just game playing. You’ve been given the candidates presentation beforehand so if you didn’t come and tell me and waited for a gotcha moment then I’d think you were childish, or I’d assume you hadn’t looked at the candidate packs so weren’t prepared for the interview.

Tell the chair now.

If I was the chair, I’d be furious at you for waiting

Waiting? Within 20 mins she had messaged the chair for a chat about it.

Teanbiscuits33 · 25/03/2026 16:47

Holdmybeermoment · 25/03/2026 16:37

If I was the chair, I’d be furious at you for waiting. It’s just game playing. You’ve been given the candidates presentation beforehand so if you didn’t come and tell me and waited for a gotcha moment then I’d think you were childish, or I’d assume you hadn’t looked at the candidate packs so weren’t prepared for the interview.

Tell the chair now.

I can see both arguments and as I said I wouldn’t blame OP for telling them now. It’s just that if she thinks there might be an innocent explanation and is conscious of jeopardising the candidate’s chances then I might wait.

It depends whether OP can reasonably argue she hadn’t noticed before the interview. If it’s in no doubt she had to have noticed earlier, then she has no choice but to mention it now or the chair will wonder why information was withheld.

SnakesandKnives · 25/03/2026 16:47

Shedmistress · 25/03/2026 16:45

If I was the chair, I’d be furious at you for waiting

Waiting? Within 20 mins she had messaged the chair for a chat about it.

Right? But this is mumsnet - where there seems to be an expectation that everyone can not only deal with every situation NOW but they should obviously also know how to handle it and have updated their thread with a conclusion within hours

nam3c4ang3 · 25/03/2026 16:48

yeah i think Bill isnt going to get the job... 😑

GameOfJones · 25/03/2026 16:50

I work in HR and you absolutely should mention it to the chair now. I'd keep it factual and professional, something like:

Hi chair, having reviewed the interview packs I have realised that I know the candidate (Bill) from my time working for company X and the work he is planning to discuss as these are my slides from the time I led project Y. I wanted to let you know in advance in case of any conflict of interest.

Moveoverdarlin · 25/03/2026 16:52

PurplePirate · 25/03/2026 15:03

I was genuinely thrown and trying to think of reasons why he would do this. It's possible (because we only have a copy of the slides, not what the candidates are going to say) that he has mis-read the brief and thought he has to describe any project he was involved in. It's possible he accidently attached the wrong file to his email (I have done exactly that before for a job interview). There could be some other explanation. I don't want to immediately jump to conclusions.

The reason he would do this is because he can’t be arsed to do his own and thinks he can easily pass your work off as his.

I would pay good money to see Bill’s face when he walks in the interview room and sees you.

Ohpleease · 25/03/2026 16:53

I think it’s kind of you to be trying to give him the benefit of the doubt, would be surprised if he has misunderstood the brief at your level… either way, I think there’s a big difference between beefing up your role a bit which many do in interviews, and claiming to have led a project you did not, entirely plagiarising someone else’s slides in the process.

Holdmybeermoment · 25/03/2026 16:54

Shedmistress · 25/03/2026 16:45

If I was the chair, I’d be furious at you for waiting

Waiting? Within 20 mins she had messaged the chair for a chat about it.

What? I was replying to another poster, the poster I quoted, who told the OP she should wait until the interview to disclose anything. I was talking about that poster’s actions if she was in the situation - not the OP. What are you talking about?

DramaAlpaca · 25/03/2026 16:54

Don't mind me, I'm only here because I really want to know what happens.

Ifeeltheneedtheneedforcoffee · 25/03/2026 16:54

SnakesandKnives · 25/03/2026 16:47

Right? But this is mumsnet - where there seems to be an expectation that everyone can not only deal with every situation NOW but they should obviously also know how to handle it and have updated their thread with a conclusion within hours

Im surprised someone hasnt suggested logging it with 111 or "police/A&E NOW" 😁

Holdmybeermoment · 25/03/2026 16:55

SnakesandKnives · 25/03/2026 16:47

Right? But this is mumsnet - where there seems to be an expectation that everyone can not only deal with every situation NOW but they should obviously also know how to handle it and have updated their thread with a conclusion within hours

What? I was replying to another poster, the poster I quoted, who told the OP she should wait until the interview to disclose anything. I was talking about that poster’s actions if she was in the situation - not the OP. What are you talking about?

But this is mumsnet, where people’s reading comprehension is very poor.

Contrarymary30 · 25/03/2026 16:55

HappiestSleeping · 25/03/2026 14:59

I'd tell the other interviewers, but still hold the interview to watch the candidate squirm.

A bit unkind ! I'm shocked someone would enjoy seeing another person squirm whatever he's done .

Holdmybeermoment · 25/03/2026 16:55

Ifeeltheneedtheneedforcoffee · 25/03/2026 16:54

Im surprised someone hasnt suggested logging it with 111 or "police/A&E NOW" 😁

What? I was replying to another poster, the poster I quoted, who told the OP she should wait until the interview to disclose anything. I was talking about that poster’s actions if she was in the situation - not the OP. What are you talking about?

Easterbunnyishotandcross · 25/03/2026 16:57

Surely you let the interview go ahead and watch him squirm when he sees you?

Ifeeltheneedtheneedforcoffee · 25/03/2026 16:57

I think you've done the right thing to speak to the chair.
They may well let the interview go ahead and see what exactly bill will present. He could be talking about his input into the project or equally claiming credit for it all. You won't know until the day
Ive had 2 Internal candidates claim my work. One when I was interviewing them! Neither of them got the role and were firmly told in their feedback to not claim someone else's work (also how stupid when its internal !!)

Soontobe60 · 25/03/2026 16:59

Ifeeltheneedtheneedforcoffee · 25/03/2026 16:54

Im surprised someone hasnt suggested logging it with 111 or "police/A&E NOW" 😁

Or ‘LTB’?

Teanbiscuits33 · 25/03/2026 17:00

Holdmybeermoment · 25/03/2026 16:55

What? I was replying to another poster, the poster I quoted, who told the OP she should wait until the interview to disclose anything. I was talking about that poster’s actions if she was in the situation - not the OP. What are you talking about?

But this is mumsnet, where people’s reading comprehension is very poor.

I didn’t say the OP and should wait until the interview. I said that’s what I’d personally do, but even then I’m not 100% sure as I’m not in the situation.

I would probably enjoy watching him squirm if he was really trying to claim my work was his in front of me , so that came into play when I suggested I’d wait.

Wickedlittledancer · 25/03/2026 17:00

WTAFIsWrongWithPeople · 25/03/2026 15:17

As a HR professional, I’d advise you “out” him by asking questions he will struggle to answer, exposing his lack of actual involvement in the project. And then flag it after the interview. I wouldn’t do anything ahead of the interview.

Edited

Shocked anyone claiming to be an hr person would go for the shame them routine. Although maybe not considering some of the hr people I’ve met

op, inform the chair. He can still come to interview. You will see it there if he’s passing it off as his own, if he attempts to, which he may not, when he sees you, then address it.