Unions and representation

[72milo]

Is it normal practice for unions to use senior legal solicitor and barrister in a discrimination claim

When it’s defending itself or on behalf of a member claiming discrimination against an employer?

Defending a union member

It would probably depend on whether winning the case is of benefit to the wider membership. The union solicitors e.g. Thompsons are only interested in winnable cases.

Yes it is normal - also normal that experienced union officials represent, particularly in cases that are expected to be settled outside courts.
If a member raises a case normally legal advice/ consultation is sought and decision by union to take the legal case forward (and fund it) is taken on the basis of that. Union is not likely to instruct legal representation if no strong case.

Thank you

Yes love, for discrimination claims it's pretty standard to have both a solicitor handling the case preparation and a barrister for the actual tribunal hearing, especially if it's complex or high value. Solicitors do the groundwork, gathering evidence, witness statements, and building the case, while barristers specialise in advocacy and presenting arguments at tribunal. The fact your union is providing senior level representation suggests they think your case has merit and are taking it seriously. That's a good sign. If you're unsure about anything, ask your rep to explain who's doing what and at which stages, you're entitled to understand how your case is being handled.

It depends on the case. Unions take forward cases where there is a realistic and reasonable prospect of winning. Ans generally only for members who were already in membership I.e. you wouldn't be able to join just to obtain access to a lawyer.