Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

I’m a Cover Supervisor and I just walked out.

266 replies

tellmesomethingtrue · 29/01/2026 14:22

At the end of my tether. Pupils have been shouting at me, arguing with me for 3 hours straight today. I’ve told HR that I can’t cope with the final lesson and I’ve gone to sit in my car. I welcome the classes pleasantly, I am organised and the kids know me. Just because “I’m a sub” they are disrespectful and just awful. As soon as another teacher comes in to support me, the kids are fine. Today, I’ve sent 9 pupils to work elsewhere and called SLT three times. On the verge of (another) panic attack, enough is enough. I don’t think employment should be like this. Usually half the class are absolutely fine, do the right thing and work. Surely their parents would be mortified.

OP posts:
Safxxx · 29/01/2026 15:40

Even some teachers can't cope with certain children in class...as a cover you will get the worst out of them.... something really needs to be changed in the system....how are the kids getting away with such awful disruptive behaviour against cover teachers.

Coverteacher177 · 29/01/2026 15:40

Sorry you've had a day like today. I'm a cover supervisor in a primary school (so the difference is that all the children know me and I know them) and although I've had days where children have made me cry, I've always said secondary cover would be too much of a challenge for me. Are you planning on going back?

What does annoy me is the phrase 'low level disruption'. Talking when the teacher is talking, singing in class, wandering around the room, asking silly questions/making silly comments or noises, chucking paper/pens around...they might not sound too bad, but they add up to a very disrupted learning environment which is unfair on the children who actually want to learn.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 29/01/2026 15:41

FerriswheelsKissesandLilacs · 29/01/2026 15:10

Unfortunately, my experience of parents of those types of children is that they either don't believe they act that way, or think they do act that way but it's not a big deal and the teachers are making a fuss over nothing, or that it's your fault they act that way and nothing to do with them.

One Y6 boy I taught announced proudly to the class that women shouldn't be in positions of leadership because they weren't as intelligent as men and then refused to engage in the rest of the lesson (about the roles taken on by women in WW1). When I told his parents, his mother laughed and said he was just joking, he didn't really think that, and his father said should have made the lesson more engaging for boys because obviously they weren't going to listen if it was all about women. (Before any assumptions are made, this was a white British, middle class family in the Home Counties, both parents in professional roles).

Another one got in trouble for using homophobic language in one of my lessons and I agreed with him to smooth out the issue with his Mum at breaktime. By the time I called her, it transpired that he had sneaked off school premises to tell her his side of the story and I got a barrage of abuse about how I was picking on him because I didn't like him. There were no further consequences for the boy, and the (male) head said that I needed to do more to build a positive relationship with the child and prove I liked him.

These same boys would now be completing secondary school and I have no doubt their behaviour and attitudes have only escalated.

I could tell 100 more stories about boys (and girls, but not as many) who were already displaying shocking behaviour but being coddled and enabled by their parents before leaving primary school.

Bloody hell. Awful awful awful. This bit particularly stood out for me: the (male) head said that I needed to do more to build a positive relationship with the child and prove I liked him.. Back in the Stone Age when I was at school there was no expectation whatsoever that our teachers had to like us! We had to behave ourselves or we would be in trouble at school and in the vast majority of families also in trouble at home. Yes, they were tough times and some teachers and parents were bullies and abusive. Not all, though, and there were far fewer problems of discipline then than there seem to be now.

AmazingGraced · 29/01/2026 15:42

FerriswheelsKissesandLilacs · 29/01/2026 15:37

No-one is trained to manage behaviour on the scale that it is now. I'm not sure there is any such training, outside of the military. Teachers are trained to teach, not withstand hours of abuse.

Cover supervisors aren’t trained teachers in general though. They aren’t paid as well as supply teachers either.

Beautifulbracelet · 29/01/2026 15:43

Sending hugs. How was your afternoon? Before teaching, I did a year as a cover supervisor. It’s absolutely draining. I remember having to send notes out of the classroom via the good kids to get help. Sometimes it came but most of the time it was a riot. Hope tomorrow is a better day for you x

DearestItIsSnowing · 29/01/2026 15:50

AmazingGraced · 29/01/2026 15:42

Cover supervisors aren’t trained teachers in general though. They aren’t paid as well as supply teachers either.

Edited

Supply teachers aren’t paid all that well, either. I see advertisements from agencies offering £100 - £120 per day before deductions.

The schools will be paying more than that, though.

FerriswheelsKissesandLilacs · 29/01/2026 15:55

AmazingGraced · 29/01/2026 15:42

Cover supervisors aren’t trained teachers in general though. They aren’t paid as well as supply teachers either.

Edited

No, they're not, and I agree that qualified teachers should be teaching (and if behaviour wasn't so out of control, there wouldn't be so much sickness and attrition and there'd be less need for subs) but the point is that there comes a point when the problem is not behaviour management but behaviour. There's very little that can be done if 30 teenagers collectively decide to go up against 1 adult.

AmazingGraced · 29/01/2026 16:01

FerriswheelsKissesandLilacs · 29/01/2026 15:55

No, they're not, and I agree that qualified teachers should be teaching (and if behaviour wasn't so out of control, there wouldn't be so much sickness and attrition and there'd be less need for subs) but the point is that there comes a point when the problem is not behaviour management but behaviour. There's very little that can be done if 30 teenagers collectively decide to go up against 1 adult.

Yes, I agree. I think if most parents could see what actually goes on in classrooms they would be really shocked.

PardonMe3 · 29/01/2026 16:03

Are you following the behaviour policy? I found that you can't be soft. They see it as weakness. I found that fair but firm works best.

Thegrassroots26 · 29/01/2026 16:03

It’s an awful job. I did it for a bit. Teenagers bully cover supervisors, don’t treat them properly. I’d get out as soon as you can.

BCBird · 29/01/2026 16:03

I don't blame u OP. I'm doing supply as and when at the moment. I have specified a particular school i will go to. I taught for 31 years before relocating and trying supply. I have made it clear to supply agency not prepared to go anywhere where the kids are difficult. If that means I don't get any work, then so be it. I don't see why you should have to put up with such disgusting behaviour. I feel sorry for the kids who want to learn.

ForEdgyHare · 29/01/2026 16:07

I mean I knew secondary education was challenging but this thread has made me absolutely cringe. If I got an email that my kid had been disruptive in class, anything electronic would be removed from them until further notice and other consequences.
No one should have to work like this. Im sorry things have been so bad OP. Can you get signed off to help for a bit?

Vroomfondleswaistcoat · 29/01/2026 16:10

I left my very much loved job as a support technician in a school when the Head decided that, rather than recruit actual qualified teachers to cover lessons, the school would use technicians and other support staff. So for our pitiful wages we were going to be expected to stand in front of classes - no training, no prep - and keep order. We might even be expected to teach work if a teacher had left some.

How were we, with no behavioural training, going to keep control of a class of 30+ kids many of whom did not even want to be in school?

Education needs a big rethink. And a lot of kids need a big wake up shock.

DontGoJasonWaterfalls · 29/01/2026 16:18

Sorry you've had such a shit day OP.

I contemplated going onto supply teaching recently and remembered how sorry I felt for the cover supervisors and supply teachers when I was teaching full time. This thread has cemented my decision not to do supply. Flowers

Firebox64 · 29/01/2026 16:21

Thinking of you. I did exactly the same when a Year 11 girl shoved me. I was walking across the playground at the time, saying nothing to nobody. I said to SLT that I considered it assault and the response was, “it doesn’t work like that here.” It works like that everywhere, it’s called the Health and Safety At Work Act. I got up and left. I put my c.v on Indeed and got my dream job 3 weeks later.

Don’t let anyone tell you this is your failing. Good teachers have fair, strong and consistent boundaries. You were clearly professional and caring. Now they will have to manage without you. Take care and be kind to yourself.

Bulbsbulbsbulbs · 29/01/2026 16:23

I knew I couldn't be a supply teacher any more when I one day had a tot of whisky to ease the pain when I got home at 4.30. That night I had a dream that I poked a particularly vile child's eye out with a pencil. This was after a day I had been slow handclapped and cried in the toilets. I never went back.

The only time supply was good was when I did long term sick cover or maternity leave.

AmazingGraced · 29/01/2026 16:24

BCBird · 29/01/2026 16:03

I don't blame u OP. I'm doing supply as and when at the moment. I have specified a particular school i will go to. I taught for 31 years before relocating and trying supply. I have made it clear to supply agency not prepared to go anywhere where the kids are difficult. If that means I don't get any work, then so be it. I don't see why you should have to put up with such disgusting behaviour. I feel sorry for the kids who want to learn.

Kids are difficult in all schools in the state sector.

Bulbsbulbsbulbs · 29/01/2026 16:26

DearestItIsSnowing · 29/01/2026 15:50

Supply teachers aren’t paid all that well, either. I see advertisements from agencies offering £100 - £120 per day before deductions.

The schools will be paying more than that, though.

Bloody hell I was paid £85 a day 30 years ago!

BCBird · 29/01/2026 16:28

The thing is the behaviour does not have to be like this if parents and staff work.together. I have only ever worked in state schools.

AdaDex · 29/01/2026 16:32

I saw a cover supervisor role advertised and rang the agency for more details. She offered me the job and set up a trial visit in about 10mins.

Afterwards, I wondered how awful this job is that they'll more or less drag people in from the street. I didn't pursue it.

There's a reason there's so many job adverts for these positions.

PoliteSquid · 29/01/2026 16:34

I taught for about 20 years. When I went to do cover lessons I would open with “you don’t know me but I have been teaching in the school for * years, I know the school and the expectations for behaviour” It shouldn’t be like that and hats off to you OP for sticking out this long!

Delphiniumandlupins · 29/01/2026 16:36

This is horrific. I don't know whether I am more shocked at how you have been treated or that this is not surprising!

District66 · 29/01/2026 16:37

I’m amazed that the senior leadership team even picked the phone up. My daughter did supply last year and was literally head out the door looking up and down the corridor and could hear their phones ringing as she dialled their numbers and they just completely ignored her.

Bulbsbulbsbulbs · 29/01/2026 16:38

This might cheer you up a bit by making you laugh.

One day I was sent to a secondary school in Central London. They airily told me I was to teach at 'the unit' and told me to get a bus to it.

Off I went to this 'unit' which I learned was for excluded/ highly dispruptive/ no hope of getting any GCSE's kids. I was LOCKED IN to a room with 15 teenagers and a panic button. I kid you not. I was meant to teach them design technology ( I didn't have a clue and there was no lesson plan) I think I lasted 20 minutes before I hit the panic button and a uniformed security guard rescued me.

District66 · 29/01/2026 16:38

DearestItIsSnowing · 29/01/2026 15:50

Supply teachers aren’t paid all that well, either. I see advertisements from agencies offering £100 - £120 per day before deductions.

The schools will be paying more than that, though.

Not much more, which is why you can’t find recruitment agencies that work in the education sector that give a shit. The margins have been cut to the bone