Employers loathe receiving AI-aided or AI-driven CVs, that stand out for all the wrong reasons. We want to see and hear the individual and their style; this comes out from how they construct a CV and what they choose to put in it.
I know so many employers who immediately bin all the AI-aided CVs and letters. They are instantly recognisable for being formulaic, repetitive and dull, just the same way as when we watch a video, we can instantly tell that AI was used.
Each video begins to sound the same, using fragmented sentences and 'flowery' language, as well as being full of identifiable statements appearing in every video (or CV). The problem with people using AI is that the people who use it the most are those who lack confidence in their abilities, so they think the results look great by comparison to what they feel they can usually produce alone.
But sadly, using AI only exacerbates the flaws and shows up their weaknesses more, all the CVs and letters beginning to use the same phraseology and sentence structure. It almost becomes a game of CV bingo; spot the same things popping up time and again!
The great thing about human-drafted applications is that each one is uniquely styled. We can glean the applicant's personality through it.
We can also see who put the most effort into the application, which counts for far more than people think.
The last job I advertised got 1450 applicants on Indeed.
Telling the unique attributes, styles and personalities apart was crucial, and I hired on personality as well as skill set. AI also makes appalling grammar and spelling errors by misunderstanding context.