I work for a company with thousands of employees. During Covid times many people took advantage of remote working by relocating far away from the office, in some cases to the other end of the country.
Over time our employer has introduced a policy to be in 2 days a week, but they haven’t taken any action against those who live too far away to reasonably come in. It’s just been accepted that they won’t be coming in. No one’s contract changed to say remote work, everyone still has the office as their contractual base.
Because they have made these allowances for some to never come in, managers have largely felt they can’t enforce the 2 days a week too harshly , but most people have been in 2 days most weeks if not one day.
But I feel quite resentful about it - the area we live in (to be commuting distance to office) is one of the most expensive areas to live in the country, while others have upped sticks to live in much more affordable areas. I have to commute (costing money and time) while they never have to. I hate working in the office and suffer when I do so (headaches, stress etc) and have to have prescribed medication to deal with this. If working from office is so important for the job, why do others keep their job while not having to come in.
If I wanted to go down that route, would I (and others) have a case for there being unfairness here? If I refuse to go in so regularly, could they take disciplinary action against me while not doing it against others? It’s not fair some people can get away with never going in while we have to on a regular bases. Most of the people I work with are people who live in other countries (but still in UK) as they have moved while I’m talking to them from the office.
And no, I can’t just up sticks and move myself.