Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

New employee (Gen Z} doesn’t want to meet in person

577 replies

outofofficeon · 01/09/2025 22:14

I took on a graduate for a new position, she’d been job hunting for a few years, I felt good about giving her a hand up into a great career.
She lives about an hour away so works remotely. She bright and polite and reliable and a good member of the team.

The problem I have is that she doesn’t want to visit the office in person or meet her colleagues in person, I offered to put her up in a nice hotel and pay travel costs so that she could spend a few days with us in person. She declined. My latest issue is that she doesn’t put her camera on when we are communicating at work as part of daily work or chats. I understand she might not be very confident but I think that you have to get out of the house / your comfort zone if you want a career.

im not sure what to do- any advice oh wise ladies.

OP posts:
Scalextricks · 04/09/2025 10:24

Sidelined101 · 03/09/2025 23:50

This is one of the most ableist posts I’ve read in a long time, what a lot of inflexible responses.

Anyone with any knowledge of the equality act would not insist on a blanket ‘cameras must be on’
the woman was hired for a remote job and that’s what she’s doing.

I work for a huge public service employer and at most meetings there’s at least a quarter of attendees with their camera off, including people from other agencies.

OP, if you are not happy with the terms and conditions you’ve hired her on then you need to take some legal advice or refer to your hr/ personnel team before you start enforcing the opposite of what she’s applied for

Wow, and you haven't thought about the ableism in your post? Neurodiversity is not the only disability.

I am hearing impaired. I rely on lip reading and it is hugely problematic for me if people don't put their camera on.

Cameras on makes a huge difference to people with hearing difficulties

Scalextricks · 04/09/2025 10:28

Ratafia · 04/09/2025 10:03

It's perfectly possible to have an Equality Act compliant cameras-on policy. You simply make it clear that you will make reasonable adjustments for evidenced disabilities. If you apply for a remotely based job, it can't possibly automatically mean that your employers are never entitled to see you. The assumption would have to be that you will work to your employers' direction and will attend meetings with cameras on unless you can show there is a good reason why you particularly can't work that way.

Plus a lot of workplaces are insisting on cameras on now for internet security reasons. That, alongside the point I made about how much cameras on helps hearing impaired people, are both pretty compelling reasons

SerendipityJane · 04/09/2025 10:52

From my notes in 2010

If someone is eating - no one wants to watch each other chewing

Unless it is a (rare) working lunch, you don't eat in a meeting

	<span class="italic">In large meetings when most people are just listening </span>✅

When someone else is presenting in a meeting or the meeting is being hosted in person and the rest of us are dialling in (the tech involved would usually mean either you'd appear in vast size on a display screen or alternatively no one is looking at a screen of people at all)

Acceptable. But just shows you're cosplaying at remote working.

If your Wifi is playing up and the bandwidth isn't there (and this applies to some people more or less all the time - they'll explain to new people generally)

If you work remotely, you make sure you have resilience. Use a a backup 5G router, or your phones 5G

If there's disruption where you are and the visuals would be distracting - eg pet has wandered in

See my point about cosplaying remote working.

If your camera isn't working.

Should be so rare as to be insignificant. Faulty kit gets swapped out by courier

Otherwise they're on but there is scope for individual adjustments in line with the law obviously. I'm sure most people have a bad day every now and then and keep them off but that's rare.

My recommendation (which was accepted) was that homeworkers should be provided with a dedicated internet connection to ensure it was provided under commercial terms with a grown up SLA, not the "in a weeks time" you get with your domestic contracts. That's why I had a BT and Virgin connection for 6 years 😀

HarrietBond · 04/09/2025 10:59

SerendipityJane · 04/09/2025 10:52

From my notes in 2010

If someone is eating - no one wants to watch each other chewing

Unless it is a (rare) working lunch, you don't eat in a meeting

	<span class="italic">In large meetings when most people are just listening </span>✅

When someone else is presenting in a meeting or the meeting is being hosted in person and the rest of us are dialling in (the tech involved would usually mean either you'd appear in vast size on a display screen or alternatively no one is looking at a screen of people at all)

Acceptable. But just shows you're cosplaying at remote working.

If your Wifi is playing up and the bandwidth isn't there (and this applies to some people more or less all the time - they'll explain to new people generally)

If you work remotely, you make sure you have resilience. Use a a backup 5G router, or your phones 5G

If there's disruption where you are and the visuals would be distracting - eg pet has wandered in

See my point about cosplaying remote working.

If your camera isn't working.

Should be so rare as to be insignificant. Faulty kit gets swapped out by courier

Otherwise they're on but there is scope for individual adjustments in line with the law obviously. I'm sure most people have a bad day every now and then and keep them off but that's rare.

My recommendation (which was accepted) was that homeworkers should be provided with a dedicated internet connection to ensure it was provided under commercial terms with a grown up SLA, not the "in a weeks time" you get with your domestic contracts. That's why I had a BT and Virgin connection for 6 years 😀

Sorry, you did see that I said these were the exceptions to a cameras on policy that is used across the firm? No one is 'cosplaying' at remote working. Although we are hybrid working not remote working which means often at least one person in the meeting is in an office and most if not all of these exceptions apply to them too.

Life happens, people need to grab a late lunch, big meetings don't gain from lots of tiny people watching a presentation, tech issues can and do happen to everyone (even companies - quite often the wifi issues are the people sitting in the meeting in the office) - but for the most part cameras on is the policy and none of these exceptions undermine that.

KimberleyClark · 04/09/2025 11:05

I was wondering whether there is some aspect of her appearance she is very self conscious about, or whether she is Muslim and usually covers her face in public, whereas at home working remotely with camera off she would not need to?

SerendipityJane · 04/09/2025 12:15

KimberleyClark · 04/09/2025 11:05

I was wondering whether there is some aspect of her appearance she is very self conscious about, or whether she is Muslim and usually covers her face in public, whereas at home working remotely with camera off she would not need to?

A work meeting is not a public place.

TalkToTheHand123 · 04/09/2025 13:32

9/10 it is because they are up to mischief.

IzzyHandsIsMySpiritAnimal · 04/09/2025 13:37

FourIsNewSix · 03/09/2025 22:26

It is impacting work.

When a small group of people is meeting online 2-4, the conf call can simulate natural conversation, you see people nodding/looking concerned, you see that someone wants to speak, or is done speaking.

When a bigger session is running, there is a big difference between talking to your own screen and talking to a set of small heads.

A friend of mine is agoraphobic and has massive anxiety. She can cope with 1-1 face to face over a screen but beyond that, it's too difficult.
In this case the other employees seem to feel slighted. But if the person is doing their work to the appropriate standard guidance and timeliness then I can't see how it matters.
People may want further engagement but they don't need it.

BruFord · 04/09/2025 13:55

IzzyHandsIsMySpiritAnimal · 04/09/2025 13:37

A friend of mine is agoraphobic and has massive anxiety. She can cope with 1-1 face to face over a screen but beyond that, it's too difficult.
In this case the other employees seem to feel slighted. But if the person is doing their work to the appropriate standard guidance and timeliness then I can't see how it matters.
People may want further engagement but they don't need it.

If the employee has a condition that makes it difficult/impossible to meet in person or turn their camera on, surely the best thing to do is to disclose it. The OP can certainly make adjustments once they’re aware. It doesn’t sound as if the employee has disclosed any conditions though.

Amberlynnswashcloth · 04/09/2025 14:13

Could it be a technology issue? I had difficulty with teams meetings during covid because I had an ancient laptop and terrible reception on a PAYG dongle. I could only connect if I sat on the floor in DCs bedroom and didn't use the camera. I would be embarrassed to admit that to anyone in real life especially at work where I want to present as organised and savvy which I couldn't be due to circumstances beyond my control.

Pickyourbattlescarefully · 04/09/2025 14:24

BruFord · 04/09/2025 13:55

If the employee has a condition that makes it difficult/impossible to meet in person or turn their camera on, surely the best thing to do is to disclose it. The OP can certainly make adjustments once they’re aware. It doesn’t sound as if the employee has disclosed any conditions though.

It isn’t easy to disclose issues like this though, so the OP needs to give her the opportunity by broaching the subject sensitively

99bottlesofkombucha · 04/09/2025 14:30

BruFord · 04/09/2025 13:55

If the employee has a condition that makes it difficult/impossible to meet in person or turn their camera on, surely the best thing to do is to disclose it. The OP can certainly make adjustments once they’re aware. It doesn’t sound as if the employee has disclosed any conditions though.

This. Managers cannot tiptoe through work life letting every sub par behaviour pass unremarked just in case that employee might have a disability. There is an obligation on the employee.

BruFord · 04/09/2025 14:32

Pickyourbattlescarefully · 04/09/2025 14:24

It isn’t easy to disclose issues like this though, so the OP needs to give her the opportunity by broaching the subject sensitively

Agreed but the onus is still on the employee to disclose any conditions. Employers aren’t mind readers, none of us are.

daleylama · 04/09/2025 14:57

outofofficeon · 01/09/2025 22:17

I should add that it’s a people business we’re in and the lack of ‘contact’ is starting to affect the team’s progress. I am also finding it hard to foster a team feeling when she’s acting distant.

Maybe indicate an in person meet, just the two if you, even if it means you travelling to her? You might get a better feel for resolving this if face to face. That's if she's worth the extra effort. Depends on her employment status , you may be obliged to.

HarrietBond · 04/09/2025 15:03

BruFord · 04/09/2025 14:32

Agreed but the onus is still on the employee to disclose any conditions. Employers aren’t mind readers, none of us are.

And the law is very clear that the employee needs to disclose. The statutory obligations work both ways.

InMyShowgirlEra · 04/09/2025 15:30

BruFord · 04/09/2025 14:32

Agreed but the onus is still on the employee to disclose any conditions. Employers aren’t mind readers, none of us are.

Neither are employees.

If OP wants her to switch her camera on, she can just tell her straight that her camera needs to be on.

It sounds like she's just hoping that the employee with just know what's expected without actually telling her.

BruFord · 04/09/2025 16:52

InMyShowgirlEra · 04/09/2025 15:30

Neither are employees.

If OP wants her to switch her camera on, she can just tell her straight that her camera needs to be on.

It sounds like she's just hoping that the employee with just know what's expected without actually telling her.

@InMyShowgirlEra Yes, the OP needs to set out clear expectations.

FourIsNewSix · 04/09/2025 16:56

IzzyHandsIsMySpiritAnimal · 04/09/2025 13:37

A friend of mine is agoraphobic and has massive anxiety. She can cope with 1-1 face to face over a screen but beyond that, it's too difficult.
In this case the other employees seem to feel slighted. But if the person is doing their work to the appropriate standard guidance and timeliness then I can't see how it matters.
People may want further engagement but they don't need it.

True, if she works in absolutely separate way.

If a few people need to agree on something as a part of our work, the one not turning camera on is making the meeting less efficient. If there is a specific reason for adjustment, we will have to cope, but otherwise it comes to that person's want vs a standard

InMyShowgirlEra · 04/09/2025 16:58

FourIsNewSix · 04/09/2025 16:56

True, if she works in absolutely separate way.

If a few people need to agree on something as a part of our work, the one not turning camera on is making the meeting less efficient. If there is a specific reason for adjustment, we will have to cope, but otherwise it comes to that person's want vs a standard

Why? Can the person not communicate verbally?

party4you · 04/09/2025 18:13

Daygloboo · 03/09/2025 17:44

Even a remote worker needs to meet face to face occasionally. Or put a bloody camera on. What do they do when they go to the shops. Put a paper bag over their head ?

Agree about the camera, and face to face if it has an actual purpose. Saying hi to someone isn’t a genuine reason to travel.

Imdoodleladie · 04/09/2025 20:41

At a guess she most probably has some sort of disfigurement. Prepare yourself and your staff so that you don't looked shocked when she comes online. It's the quality of her work that counts not her appearance.

CoffeeLipstickKeys · 04/09/2025 20:45

Imdoodleladie · 04/09/2025 20:41

At a guess she most probably has some sort of disfigurement. Prepare yourself and your staff so that you don't looked shocked when she comes online. It's the quality of her work that counts not her appearance.

You’ve been watching too many bad tv dramas. That’s a truly unsubstantiated leap

FourIsNewSix · 04/09/2025 20:52

InMyShowgirlEra · 04/09/2025 16:58

Why? Can the person not communicate verbally?

If you check the quote history, you'll see I've started by giving examples including:

When a small group of people is meeting online 2-4 people, the videocall can simulate natural conversation, you see people nodding/looking concerned/ other expressions, you see that someone wants to speak, or is done speaking, not just making a short pause.

It is more efficient conversion.

C4r4m3lL4tt3 · 04/09/2025 21:04

This would not be allowed in my company and although not explicity stated in the contract there are some meetings where it is mandatory for your camera to be on unless you have valid reason for it not to be. It seems odd if one person is opting out of putting their camera on and raises concerns for me that the person is maybe hiding something. I think you need to speak to the individual and set some ground rules about your expectations. Would they also be off camera if it were a one on one meeting? If there is no good reason for the camera being off then I would insist that it is required going forward. Perhaps try and have more meetings or team catch ups where possible setting out your expectations beforehand. Were there any requirements in order to work remotely i.e do you have to live in the UK, are you allowed to live with other people or flat share, do you have adequate work set up etc. If you have a review/progress meeting perhaps you can raise your concerns then.

Not wanting to mingle with colleagues is normal for some people as they keep work and personal very separate. I would not feel obliged to attend the office if I am not required to but perhaps there is is a deeper reason behind it

ThesebeautifulthingsthatIvegot · 04/09/2025 22:09

Smurfette63 · 03/09/2025 18:12

Oh dear, I hope you haven't got the problem I had. Same sort of sinario, no camera interaction, wouldn't come into the office and wanted everything to be sent electronically or mailed. Wonderful employee, never let the team down, but after 6 months I decided to drive to his address. I know, not a good move, but I knocked on the door anyway. His neighbour came out and said 'he never opens the door or goes out. His mother works and looks after him'. Well that only caused more questions than answers. Long story short, he had been in a near fatal car crash and his face was disfigured. He was very self conscious.
I never let on that I knew and I didn't tell colleagues either.
I hope yours is nothing like this but probing may cause problems.

That's not probing. It's a massive invasion of privacy and an abuse of the data shared with you.

Swipe left for the next trending thread