Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

Replaced me but didn’t tell me

19 replies

Bellex · 22/07/2025 20:31

I’m a Senior UX Lead responsible for the end-to-end design strategy on a high-profile digital product. Recently, some unexpected internal decisions have left me feeling undermined, misrepresented, and excluded from key discussions — and I’m looking for perspective.

During a design leadership review on a Monday, the Director of Product (Alan) casually mentioned that another UX Designer would be joining the team “to help out.” No details were shared about why, or how that would impact my current role or responsibilities.

By Friday, Alan had set up a meeting to introduce the new hire (Mark). During the session, I was told Mark would be helping take on some of the design governance responsibilities because another team member (Lisa, a Senior Researcher) had apparently raised that she was “doing everything herself.”

That feedback was a complete surprise — I hadn’t received any prior concerns or performance-related conversations. I questioned it during the session and expressed that I felt blindsided. The session ended shortly after I voiced my concerns.

Wanting to understand what was going on, I spoke to Lisa directly on Monday. She told me she never said I wasn’t pulling my weight. She had only mentioned that parts of the workflow (like stakeholder design reviews) were outside our agreed scope, and that my stream of the product was less complex than others. Nothing to suggest I was underperforming or that extra help was needed on my part.

I raised the issue with Tom, our Head of Experience. I asked why no feedback had been shared with me before this move, and who was now responsible for what. Tom said Mark was being brought in to “handle stakeholder comms” because I apparently couldn’t manage both design delivery and stakeholder engagement — which was completely different from the justification Alan had given. I was also told that Mark is technically a Lead Product Designer but also has programme-level experience.

Tom then refused to continue the conversation until he had spoken to Alan. I followed up over Slack and got no reply. Alan later messaged to check in, and I replied candidly that I wasn’t okay with how things had been handled.

On Tuesday, I reached out to Tom again, this time regarding alignment around service design responsibilities and ownership of some third-party tools. In response, he told me to “check with your Design Lead, Mark.” This was the first time anyone stated I now report to Mark, effectively placing me under someone who is, by title and role, junior to me.

For context: my role as Senior UX Lead was clearly defined, with full ownership of the experience strategy across the product. This change was made with no formal feedback, no consultation, and no documented change in role or structure. Being told I now report to someone in a lower-grade position without process feels like a functional demotion, and potentially a breach of contract.

I’m now considering a formal grievance. I worry this could constitute constructive dismissal if not addressed especially as it fundamentally alters my responsibilities and reporting line, all without due process.

Has anyone been through something similar in a design, product, or tech team structure? Would really appreciate advice especially from anyone with HR experience or who’s escalated something like this before.

OP posts:
YouWillFindMeInTheGarden · 22/07/2025 21:32

All that messing around for another ‘digital product’ nobody will buy or need!

TheCannyBishop · 22/07/2025 21:58

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

TheCannyBishop · 22/07/2025 21:59

OP I’m sorry this has happened to you - it sounds awful. I don’t have any experience of this kind of thing, but if I were you I’d speak to ACAS and get their advice. Good luck

Danzdanzdanz · 22/07/2025 22:21

this sounds very unprofessional. Have they actually said that you are now reporting to Mark? Have you requested a meeting to understand roles and responsibilities and change in structure? I would ask for more clarity before jumping to conclusions

cosietea · 22/07/2025 22:25

YouWillFindMeInTheGarden · 22/07/2025 21:32

All that messing around for another ‘digital product’ nobody will buy or need!

You say, using an application to type a comment on a digital discussion forum

Bellex · 23/07/2025 07:45

I’ve asked for clarity on what I’ll do and what mark will do and they won’t clarify. I’ve asked for a meeting so I’ll see if they attend. I’ve rephrased what it is as I know ‘Lisa’ sometimes reads here. So details have been changed. Nobody has put anything formal in or informed me the impact of the change

OP posts:
AntiquePenguin · 23/07/2025 07:54

I think you should give them one chance to address this in the meeting, and if it isn't resolved, initiate the grievance process.

You need to be very clear about the outcome you want - I would suggest requesting confirmation in writing of your role scope and reporting line, to be mutually agreed and signed off. In particular, it needs to be clear who the design lead is - not Mark as he is junior to you. If this isn't clarified, it's going to lead to problems for the whole team in future - you need to be clear about the need generally for transparent and logical reporting lines.

Good luck. It's awful when a role you enjoy is suddenly muddied by this kind of toxic politics.

OllyBJolly · 23/07/2025 07:57

From what you've said, this isn't constructive dismissal. Sounds like a badly communicated restructure in a not very well managed team.

I'd argue it's not a "fundamental" change - the management have increased resource because one of the team has too much of a workload. You haven't said your job title has changed; you now report into someone charged with leading the project. The business will say this is for business reasons.

You can ask if they perceive any performance issues in your work, and you can raise a concern about poor communication. Constructive dismissal is when the company has effectively made it impossible for you to do your job. That doesn't seem to be the case here.

dogcatkitten · 23/07/2025 08:08

Simplifying this a bit and knowing nothing about your business model. Has Mark been brought in as an additional layer of management to supervise you and Lisa (and possibly others)? I assume you and Lisa are at the same level and she has been muttering that she has too much to do and you too little? So Mark will be doing some of the work and managing who does what between you and Lisa. You feel you have been demoted does Lisa feel the same or have I totally misunderstood the situation, it's a bit complicated.

PhilippaGeorgiou · 23/07/2025 08:14

Being told I now report to someone in a lower-grade position without process feels like a functional demotion, and potentially a breach of contract.

None of that is constructive dismissal or breach of contract. There is no such thing as a functional demotion - you have had no change in your terms and conditions, and your pay is the same. Having people within a team lead on different aspects of a project is common - you were asked only to check with the lead on that aspect, because that is not you. His place in the structure doesn't change that. That said, it does happen that people can be managed by people of lower salary and grade - there is no law that says otherwise. That is a matter for the company to decide, not you.

Responsibilities and reporting lines are rarely contractual, and are frequently subject to change.

Whilst the whole thing seems to be rather chaotic - something you are helping with given that you are going to everyone and their dog to discuss your situation - the employer clearly has concerns that the project is not functioning as they want it to and are making changes to get things as they want. That is their right.

tanstaafl · 23/07/2025 08:42

Is it possible that Lisa didn’t tell you the whole truth?
That is, once you were in front of her she softened her story?

Is Mark a temporary hire to see the project through?

AlohaRose · 23/07/2025 10:19

tanstaafl · 23/07/2025 08:42

Is it possible that Lisa didn’t tell you the whole truth?
That is, once you were in front of her she softened her story?

Is Mark a temporary hire to see the project through?

That’s exactly what occurred to me. If Lisa has been unhappy with her workload compared to yours and has gone to someone more senior to complain/discuss it, she’s hardly going to admit to you that she is unhappy with you and your work is she?

Your company also sounds like an awful lot of directors/managers/team leader/whatever and jockeying for position as to who is more senior and who reports into whom. Is anybody doing any actual work?

If you arr going to institute a formal complaint about this, then you need to stop speaking to all and sundry in a very short time frame because it’s just confusing the matter. Do you have a HR department?

RockyRogue1001 · 23/07/2025 10:27

I'd put the sequence of events in writing and send it to everyone concerned asking for confirmation that this is correct.

Then I'd contact my union

PhilippaGeorgiou · 23/07/2025 12:17

tanstaafl · 23/07/2025 08:42

Is it possible that Lisa didn’t tell you the whole truth?
That is, once you were in front of her she softened her story?

Is Mark a temporary hire to see the project through?

TBH that is what I thought too. I don't think the manager should have mentioned anything about someone making a comment or complaint by name, but it is pretty bad to then go and confront that person. And if, as the OP reads, she also raised her issues in front of "Mark" then I would have thought that an inappropriate thing too - even if the managers could have been more sensitive in the way they introduced the changes, complaining that you hadn't been told of performance concerns (if there were any) and being blindsided etc., in front of the new hire, is really unprofessional.

shellyleppard · 23/07/2025 12:19

I lost the story at tom dick or hwrryt🤣🤣

BoredZelda · 23/07/2025 12:23

That’s a whole lot of unnecessary words and characters to say “My job has been changed without my agreement.”

Presumably you can talk to Sheila in HR?

Bellex · 23/07/2025 16:01

dogcatkitten · 23/07/2025 08:08

Simplifying this a bit and knowing nothing about your business model. Has Mark been brought in as an additional layer of management to supervise you and Lisa (and possibly others)? I assume you and Lisa are at the same level and she has been muttering that she has too much to do and you too little? So Mark will be doing some of the work and managing who does what between you and Lisa. You feel you have been demoted does Lisa feel the same or have I totally misunderstood the situation, it's a bit complicated.

Lisa is one grade above but doesn’t sit in the same org if that makes sense. I’m drowning in work as I’ve not the right support roles so had additional tasks. My LM said he believed they were brought in to work for me and had no clue (and doesn’t see it as a demotion ) they change my job title to a more junior one and he’s thinks it’s fine as I’m being paid the same

OP posts:
Bellex · 23/07/2025 16:09

Contractual my line manager is in my contact along with job title and job spec is assigned so when I moved role previously I had to agree to the job spec change.

LM did tell me what Lisa said infront of new hire. Lisa also has form of doing this because she doesn’t agree with how I do my role. She’s the kind of character where you have to confront in order to get her to stop.

They are also not taking the feedback for Lisa as something I’ve formally done wrong and still won’t tell me if I have done anything wrong.

The roles are still not aligned or outlined.

The project is chaos as things that should have been nailed down were not and a lot of enablers are not available yet as they weren’t planned for by the team requesting it.

Large organisation multiple levels of directors and managers which also make delivery really hard as you’re battling the politics around all those layers.

We have a HR department and due to complaints about this person already I have to have a more senior HR person assigned.

OP posts:
Absentmindedsmile · 23/07/2025 16:13

Sounds like the civil service

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread