DH works on a rota that includes both day shifts and night shifts. Each shift is 12 hours. For 10 years his rota system worked well for him, and included one full week off every 6 weeks after a block of 4 night shifts.
About a year ago, the shift pattern was changed by his employer who said that they were doing it to reduce sickness absence across staff. They said working 4 nights in a row (once every 6 weeks) was disruptive to circadian rhythms and after a consultation period introduced a new rota that involved a maximum of 3 nights in a row. The new rota is generally hated as it involves lots of chopping and changing between days and nights and shorter blocks of rest.
Sickness days have risen.
They are now consulting about possibly changing the rota again. None of the proposed rotas look great. Again there is a maximum of 3 night shifts in a row, but there are lots of times in the draft new rotas when DH would come off a set of day shifts and immediately the next day work a night shift. The chopping and changing between days and nights without a break are really disruptive. There are also times when DH would do 5 12 hour day shifts in a row, which will be really tough. Previously there were never more than 4 shifts in a row (day or night).
His employer is refusing to consider a return to the previous, original rota on the basis that 4 night shifts in a row is detrimental. However, there's nothing to prevent someone doing overtime and working 4 or more night shifts in a row.
Is anyone aware of any studies about night work that could help demonstrate that rotating from days to nights without a break is detrimental? Something to help DH argue that a return to the original rota should be included in the consultation?