Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

can I get fired for this? how bad is it?

220 replies

Snowowls · 31/01/2025 10:52

I work in a company where I enter data manually into a system. I do about 8000-10000 entries per annum (it's about usage of a certain product which is linked to invoice creation). I was informed last week that in the last few months, 3 entries were incorrectly entered (though the have been corrected after the customer complained), all invoices had been corrected. I have been told that is is an unacceptable standard of working and I am having an urgent meeting with my line manager about it next Monday to discuss my poor performance. I have been in my job for 5 years but I worry I will let go. There were innocent mistakes. Not sure how they happened, just human nature. It's the first time in 5 years such a mistake has been flagged to but I am absolutely terrified as I have now a (disciplinary?) meeting about it. Any advice on how to respond? I am not in a union.

OP posts:
SleepyHippy3 · 31/01/2025 14:18

OP this sounds crazy! You are a human being with clearly an excellent track record, at work. Every human makes mistakes, and the mistakes that you did make are nothing in the grand scheme of things, because they were rectified. The fact that you management are treating you like this, is a complete over reaction. I think you need to start looking for another job, somewhere where you are appreciated and treated as a human being and not as a robot.

Inthebleakmidwinter1 · 31/01/2025 14:27

Jesus I would have been fired after a week. How on earth is zero errors a target?!

OldieButBaddie · 31/01/2025 14:32

Another thought on this, their system seems not to have any checks and balances. Any normal financial system (I work implementing them) has a header and a line, you put the total amount in the header, add the line(s) and the system checks that the total of the lines adds up to the amount on the header.

If this isn't happening, you should suggest the system is modified or implemented properly to ensure this happens. Even if it's in Excel or a web form you can do this.

Rainingalldayonmyhead · 31/01/2025 14:32

Snowowls · 31/01/2025 11:26

Well, it's not. It's 3 mistake which I know should have never ever happened.

No but my point is if you round that number which is common in business practise it rounds down to zero percent so thr amount is really really marginally small.

Ineedashero · 31/01/2025 14:41

depends on the job. DH works in a national security type job where data entry errors can mean a fine for the organisation each time.

Karatema · 31/01/2025 14:44

"I expect my job to be done my a machine soon."
In that case they are looking at avoiding your redundancy payout!
Do NOT resign. Speak to ACAS.

As an employer this is totally unacceptable; they are trying to bully you out of your rights!

hamsandyams · 31/01/2025 14:51

Ineedashero · 31/01/2025 14:41

depends on the job. DH works in a national security type job where data entry errors can mean a fine for the organisation each time.

I work in a similar environment, so there is a second person who reviews significant and judgemental work, a systems check that catches most typos (like the header and line system referred to above) and spot checks on a random sample. And still we sometimes get fined.

If no mistakes is required, then you need to implement a system to identify the inevitable mistakes.

AcquadiP · 31/01/2025 15:00

You've been in your job 5 years so your employer has to follow disciplinary procedures (unless it was gross misconduct, which this isn't.) You've not previously made mistakes so there is no pattern here. This could be a chat/ an off the record warning/ a verbal warning or a written warning (harsh given your previous track record.) Give some thought to what may have caused the error: illness, not sleeping well, any mitigating stress factors and use those in your "defence."
Frankly, given your previous 100% track record over the last 5 years, your talents might be appreciated more elsewhere. You're a human being not a bloody robot!
Good luck.

hellywelly3 · 31/01/2025 15:15

There has to be an allowance of human error. In every job there’s minor errors.

reenon · 31/01/2025 16:26

this thread has got to be a wind up.

faithbuffy · 31/01/2025 16:48

reenon · 31/01/2025 16:26

this thread has got to be a wind up.

Why? If I make 2 errors in a month I lose all my bonus for that month which can be a fair amount of money (difference between min wage or an extra £1000)

That's not even a data entry job

Zanzara · 31/01/2025 17:55

Snowowls · 31/01/2025 11:48

No, they are not obvious to me as I don't deal with the invoices as such. I have no visibility of the total sum otherwise it would be easy to see. It's a different department that deals with that.

This is a very good point to firmly state in your meeting OP.

I know it's all new and scary, but your employers are being totally unrealistic in their stated expectations.

For what it's worth, at one stage of my career I was a senior audit manager in a billion pound a year undertaking. There's no way we would ever have expected employees to have a zero error rate. That's just nonsense.

Just stay calm as best you can, go along and see what they say. I would expect them to offer you the possibility to take a witness along with you at the least.

From where I'm standing and what I currently know, you are more professional and on the ball than your employer. You definitely sound like the kind of employee most employers would bend over backwards to employ. Don't panic. x

SoNiceToComeHomeTo · 31/01/2025 18:08

Snowowls · 31/01/2025 11:18

no change of any sort. I don't know how it happened. no idea.

Could there be a change in you, OP? Menopause maybe or a thyroid problem or something? If you’ve been so accurate for more than four years, three mistakes in a few months might have a clinical cause. Though it seems very very low to me and acceptable.

ZimbleFox · 31/01/2025 18:12

Tdp123 · 31/01/2025 12:25

If the target is zero, then a secondary check is not good enough, the business needs to have a process where each figure is entered twice independently and then compared, and any mismatches rejected. With the associated resource cost.

Yep, if it's that critical it should all be double keyed.

Snowowls · 31/01/2025 18:14

SoNiceToComeHomeTo · 31/01/2025 18:08

Could there be a change in you, OP? Menopause maybe or a thyroid problem or something? If you’ve been so accurate for more than four years, three mistakes in a few months might have a clinical cause. Though it seems very very low to me and acceptable.

I have no medical or personal problem I can think of. not menopausal either (and even if, it wouldn't make a difference as the target is zero). these were just genuine errors I suppose. I really haven't got a clue how I let this happen so many times. The more I think about it, the more mortified I am - esp the the not knowing what caused it. If I could identify a reason, it would be easier to address the root cause but I really don't know what it is.

OP posts:
PrimitivePerson · 31/01/2025 18:17

Snowowls · 31/01/2025 18:14

I have no medical or personal problem I can think of. not menopausal either (and even if, it wouldn't make a difference as the target is zero). these were just genuine errors I suppose. I really haven't got a clue how I let this happen so many times. The more I think about it, the more mortified I am - esp the the not knowing what caused it. If I could identify a reason, it would be easier to address the root cause but I really don't know what it is.

"So many times?"

I'm really concerned about how badly you're beating yourself up over this. You have done absolutely nothing wrong at all, and your employer is treating you appallingly badly.

SoNiceToComeHomeTo · 31/01/2025 18:19

Snowowls · 31/01/2025 18:14

I have no medical or personal problem I can think of. not menopausal either (and even if, it wouldn't make a difference as the target is zero). these were just genuine errors I suppose. I really haven't got a clue how I let this happen so many times. The more I think about it, the more mortified I am - esp the the not knowing what caused it. If I could identify a reason, it would be easier to address the root cause but I really don't know what it is.

It must be so worrying for you. You are doing your best but your best is less good suddenly. I’ve never managed more than about 98 percent accuracy with data entry and I don’t know why either. I could not apply for a job like yours.

Peachynose · 31/01/2025 18:19

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Cattreesea · 31/01/2025 18:24

This sounds a soul-sucking job...

You are a human being, not a machine.

reenon · 31/01/2025 19:44

faithbuffy · 31/01/2025 16:48

Why? If I make 2 errors in a month I lose all my bonus for that month which can be a fair amount of money (difference between min wage or an extra £1000)

That's not even a data entry job

But you can make one error without penalty... And then it resets the next month.

The OP is not allowed to make even one! Ever!

Peachynose · 31/01/2025 19:58

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Horses7 · 31/01/2025 22:40

Don’t be harsh on yourself, try to enjoy your weekend. Hope all goes well in your meeting, prepare, stick up for yourself and make your points clearly and calmly.

Meeatcheese · 01/02/2025 18:18

It’s not misconduct, but performance. It’s seems such a small human error - are ther any precedents with other staff?

Snowowls · 01/02/2025 18:23

Meeatcheese · 01/02/2025 18:18

It’s not misconduct, but performance. It’s seems such a small human error - are ther any precedents with other staff?

I have a colleague who now left and she made mistakes like that often and was never pulled up. Other staff have been let go bit there were usually also other things involved. The response to me seems unusually heavy handed. I suppose some posters further up had it - AI is coming in soon. I wonder if its a means to get rid of people slowly without paying redundancy. but I made the mistakes. I cannot argue with that.

OP posts:
poetryandwine · 01/02/2025 18:26

We don’t think they can fire you or make you resign for this. They may try, to minimise redundancy pay, if they are moving to AI. Don’t help them.

Please call ACAS on Monday.