I have an HR query and don’t know who to ask for an informed and impartial opinion, so here I am!
For context I returned to work after mat leave doing 4 days a week of 7.5 hours a day and was entitled to 19 days holiday. Prior to mat leave I worked 5 days a week of 7.5 a day and was entitled to 24 days holiday. My little one started school in September and I changed my working pattern to accommodate so now work 5 days of 6 hours - effectively the same hours as before September (30 hours a week), but spread over more days.
As of January our holiday entitlement refreshes in the booking system and I tend to book the essential days off (to cover school holidays) at the beginning of the year. However my holiday calendar still says I’m entitled to 19 days holiday as this was the allowance when I worked 4 x 7.5hr days a week.
I queried this and the operations manager came back and said that as my hours haven’t changed the entitlement remains the same.
So I said the total weekly hours remains the same (30 hours a week), but I now work 5 short days, so the days the time is spread over has increased. So, instead of booking off 19 x 8hr days, I believe I should be able to book off 24 x 6hr days.
So, in simple maths terms
My 4 day working week: 19 x 7.5 = 142.5 hours holiday (this calculation makes me think I should have actually had 19.5 days holiday pro rata’d from my previous entitlement of 24 days)
My 5 day working week: 24 x 6 = 144 hours holiday
Does that make sense? Have I got this wrong? I don’t want my employer thinking I’m taking the mick, but equally don’t think I should only get 114 hours holiday, when up until Christmas I was getting 142.5.
HELP!