Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

Have you ever coasted and gotten away with it?

110 replies

foreverhidden · 07/07/2024 11:53

I'm curious to know if coasters are as obvious as we think, or if anyone out there has been a closet coaster and actually gotten away with it.

Ie have you coasted but still managed to gain good performance reviews and not been pulled up on it. If so, how long for.

If you've been caught, how long did you coast for? What was the process once you were caught.

I've seen so many people in my company who I knew coasted, get caught up with eventually. Wondering if there are some getting away with it all the same.

OP posts:
foreverhidden · 07/07/2024 12:59

Waterboatlass · 07/07/2024 12:49

Your update doesn't make sense. The bare minimum means meeting objectives and no more.

On what grounds can employees be let go or placed on PIP for meeting their objectives? If they're expected to do more that should be stated clearly IN the objectives/ job description which sounds like it needs amending.

Employees can totally legitimately coast if the job is well within their capabilities. It means getting the work done without breaking a sweat or caring to do more. Swinging the lead/ getting away with not meeting requirements even quietly or subtly is not the same. Which are you asking?

Edited

It's subjective and relevant to every company. Doing the bare minimum in my company would be replying to correspondence, attending calls and meeting task deadlines.

However, at manager level, if you are not running projects to improve your region, developing your team, understanding and reporting on metrics to a level where it has an impact and not contributing effectively in meetings, you are not performing.

In other companies this kind of coasting might be acceptable or go unnoticed.

Someone coasting will 'keep the lights on' but make no real impact. It's the same as someone under performing.

Again, different for each company.

I would bet many people are not putting in the hours but are getting away with it under cover and that was my question.

OP posts:
Abstractthinking · 07/07/2024 13:00

No. I aspire to coasting, working for a company and in a profession that wrings every last drop out of you for a basic wage.

foreverhidden · 07/07/2024 13:01

OttersAreMySpiritAnimal · 07/07/2024 12:50

I know someone who looks busy all the time but in fact does FA. They network a lot, post on internal and external social media a lot and are very gregarious and outgoing. Does absolutely no work at all but is very successful and highly thought of because they give the impression of being committed and working hard. Any deliverables have 100% been done by the team but this person claims credit and says they've done their bit when they haven't.
The whole department know it, it's just the bosses who don't. We're all quietly waiting to see what happens long term. I also think no-one really cares that much as it's not putting extra burden on the team and they benefit from the profile raising and recognise the value in that, so it's a detached watching and waiting with mild interest.

This.... a perfect answer and example. This person probably gets good performance reviews but clearly is not getting fully away with it. This is what I'm interested in.

I had a manager like this and eventually her manager did and investigation and she was let go.

OP posts:
SwedishEdith · 07/07/2024 13:01

foreverhidden · 07/07/2024 12:04

Maybe. So I would change my question to have you ever coasted/ under performed and gotten away with it?

In my company, we are all paid very well, so coasting is not tolerated. Someone doing the bare minimum will be put on a PIP and shown the door.

In fact, as a company, we 'cleanse' at least 5% of employees every year with under performers. This is done with bi-annual performance reviews and people who are 'behind the curve'.

Sounds like your company uses a stack ranking appraisal system. Quite outdated now as results in a loss of a contrived "bottom 10%" of talent who may still, nevertheless, be good employees.

https://www.performyard.com/articles/stack-rankings-what-theyre-good-for-and-where-they-fail#:~:text=Companies%20such%20as%20GE%2C%20Microsoft,rankings%20in%20their%20performance%20appraisals.

Employee Stack Ranking: Pros and Cons

Learn what employee stack ranking is with real-life examples, alternatives, and a detailed rundown of its pros and cons.

https://www.performyard.com/articles/stack-rankings-what-theyre-good-for-and-where-they-fail#:~:text=Companies%20such%20as%20GE%2C%20Microsoft,rankings%20in%20their%20performance%20appraisals.

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 07/07/2024 13:02

Yeah in the 80’s l was a designer in Manchester.

We used to go to the Hacienda then the next day have a little nap on our drawing boards. No one noticed or cared. If anyone important was approaching we’d wake each other up.

Not like that now.

Waterboatlass · 07/07/2024 13:08

foreverhidden · 07/07/2024 12:59

It's subjective and relevant to every company. Doing the bare minimum in my company would be replying to correspondence, attending calls and meeting task deadlines.

However, at manager level, if you are not running projects to improve your region, developing your team, understanding and reporting on metrics to a level where it has an impact and not contributing effectively in meetings, you are not performing.

In other companies this kind of coasting might be acceptable or go unnoticed.

Someone coasting will 'keep the lights on' but make no real impact. It's the same as someone under performing.

Again, different for each company.

I would bet many people are not putting in the hours but are getting away with it under cover and that was my question.

'at manager level, if you are not running projects to improve your region, developing your team, understanding and reporting on metrics to a level where it has an impact and not contributing effectively in meetings'

Then this should be the bare minimum. That is to say, qualified in the objectives/JD. Isn't it? I'd be surprised if 'project delivery' and 'answering correspondence' were the only requirements for a manager. It sounds likely some element of development, good quality reporting and regional improvement are expected. Therefore that isn't really doing the bare minimum. You're talking about underperforming or badly managed expectations. Which is it?

Beelavinder · 07/07/2024 13:08

Well I'm currently not volunteering for additional responsibilities, because I wouldn't get paid more! Does that count?
I do work hard and am completely overloaded with work. Work for NHS pay crap and poor treatment.
I do not get paid enough to also volunteer to for example take on students, be the link person for XYZ.
But if suddenly by some miracle we got paid more I would be a much more enthusiastic employee. Pay be properly and I may even fit more patients in and do more notes in own time. I have made a stand recently not to this as was working late into the night unpaid doing notes and reports etc.
I am considered hard working BTW!

StripedPiggy · 07/07/2024 13:09

I work only my contracted hours, take a full lunch hour every day, never volunteer for extra work or responsibilities, don’t check emails, take calls do work stuff or attend work events in my own time and don’t socialise with colleagues. I always use all my annual leave entitlement plus the maximum number of additional days I’m allowed to purchase.
If this would be considered ‘coasting’, so be it.

ReignOfError · 07/07/2024 13:09

You’re still conflating coasting and under-performing.

I’ve never under-performed; I’ve been commended on my over-and-above contributions to, and impact on, organisational and colleague development, my work rate and quality, exceeding my targets etc etc in every job I’ve had. And in some of those jobs, I was absolutely coasting, working at 75-80% of my capacity/ability, because at those points in my life, that sort of not particularly taxing job worked for my circumstances.

Fudgetheparrot · 07/07/2024 13:19

I used to “coast” in the sense that I didn’t really give my all and would sit and do half my work in front of the tv. But either I am incredibly efficient or my coworkers were coasting worse as both my volume and quality of work was generally one of the best in the team. It was really mind numbing monkey work for the most part in my defense

greenwoodentablelegs · 07/07/2024 13:26

I have really really coasted before, that was because the rest of my team was rubbish, so if I had an hour’s work that only I could do (the rest of the team too stupid / lazy) then I’d say that was a fair day.

it was a lovely few years as was also well paid. In IT.

now still well paid but much more demanding role. It is a shame. Tho I still never work weekends or evenings. And make sure I have lunch / exercise time everyday.

In my last role I could have flogged myself to death to get promoted, then the company got bought and that would have all been for nothing - so hurrah for coasting!

Morishe · 07/07/2024 13:42

I was a real coaster at my last job- I just left because I was so bored (I might learn to regret that).

I was suppose to be working from home for 37.5 hours per week but I was probably on average doing 2 hours a week max. It wasn’t exactly my fault, I’d ask my manager for more work (marketing) and she would say oh just focus on your projects. Would give me 6 weeks to do something that takes 2 hours max and it would always come across great.

I also had teams on my phone so I could appear “online” on the laptop even if I was out. I would do the food shopping, whole house cleaning and even days out with my DP. I’d watch box sets and go to the gym
I never ever get called up on it.2

but in the end, it actually made me a bit depressed. Sitting around all day and I don’t have DC so I’d just sit bored a lot doing nothing. Ended up not getting out my pyjamas most day and didn’t want to go out as I’d end up spending money.

So now I’m going to start a new job.

SecondhandTable · 07/07/2024 13:49

Thatsfrenchforstopahorse · 07/07/2024 11:59

Well it depends on coasting. I’ve had a job where I was capable of much more so achieved everything I needed to but with minimum effort. So that would class as coasting but I don’t think I’d count that as untoward in the way you allude to.

Yes, same experience here. I got great performance reviews because I was exceeding all the targets and not making any errors. Even though the workload was low and the work not difficult so I was certainly not working hard.

coasting24 · 07/07/2024 14:36

I probably do it a bit now
My job is based on one thing really but then there is also upselling a side thing
I'm crap at the upselling but the main part of the job I excel at and am top, year after year
The people upselling get raved about even if the main part of the job they are bottom at
Yet I am consistently excellent at the actual main job and nobody notices so I wonder why I bother as nobody ever mentions it

I guess that's why people start coasting. All it would take would be someone to notice that I'm actually ok at what I do but I'm invisible

foreverhidden · 07/07/2024 14:39

@SecondhandTable I have a performance review the week after next and I'm curious to know if my feedback will be acceptable. I've done the bare minimum. I have done for a few years but have always been ranked ahead of the bell curve. I've been in my sector almost 20 years, so maybe my experience says a lot for my performance. I work on average 5 hours a day.

Funnily enough I saw a thread on here about someone's DH who was pulled up by IT for not working 2 hours each day and given a disciplinary hearing. The MNs were up in arms about it, how can he miss 2 hours everyday?! What was he expecting?!

Judging by my thread, it's not that uncommon...

OP posts:
WhereIsMyLight · 07/07/2024 14:55

Ah ok, your question makes a bit more sense now. I’d probably say I’m coasting in my current job, I don’t use my whole brain but my manager is happy I’m achieving what I need to. If you’ve been in the sector for 20 years, then yes some of that experience will be making your job easier and you will be more efficient at getting stuff done.

I’m interested to know if your company “cleanse” the bottom 5% each year, they are continually pushing performance up. So does your pay increase by at least 5% every year to accommodate this extra performance or do they just expect more for less?

Fudgetheparrot · 07/07/2024 16:28

foreverhidden · 07/07/2024 14:39

@SecondhandTable I have a performance review the week after next and I'm curious to know if my feedback will be acceptable. I've done the bare minimum. I have done for a few years but have always been ranked ahead of the bell curve. I've been in my sector almost 20 years, so maybe my experience says a lot for my performance. I work on average 5 hours a day.

Funnily enough I saw a thread on here about someone's DH who was pulled up by IT for not working 2 hours each day and given a disciplinary hearing. The MNs were up in arms about it, how can he miss 2 hours everyday?! What was he expecting?!

Judging by my thread, it's not that uncommon...

Can anyone point me at this thread about the DH getting caught because I keep seeing it mentioned everywhere!

foreverhidden · 07/07/2024 17:03

@Fudgetheparrot it was removed unfortunately. The jist was OP DH was facing a disciplinary hearing the following week for not working 2 hours each day, OP was furious as financiallly they couldn't afford him to lose his job. MNs were convinced there was more to the story than he said, aka going to bathroom, making lunch. They were outraged mainly that anyone would take that amount of time each day for themselves on the clock.

OP posts:
Psspsspssssss · 07/07/2024 17:09

foreverhidden · 07/07/2024 17:03

@Fudgetheparrot it was removed unfortunately. The jist was OP DH was facing a disciplinary hearing the following week for not working 2 hours each day, OP was furious as financiallly they couldn't afford him to lose his job. MNs were convinced there was more to the story than he said, aka going to bathroom, making lunch. They were outraged mainly that anyone would take that amount of time each day for themselves on the clock.

No, he was fired for underperforming. An investigation was carried out, noticing he took long breaks, which was implied to be the cause.
But it was the underperformance and not the time off that was the issue!

Fudgetheparrot · 07/07/2024 17:12

foreverhidden · 07/07/2024 17:03

@Fudgetheparrot it was removed unfortunately. The jist was OP DH was facing a disciplinary hearing the following week for not working 2 hours each day, OP was furious as financiallly they couldn't afford him to lose his job. MNs were convinced there was more to the story than he said, aka going to bathroom, making lunch. They were outraged mainly that anyone would take that amount of time each day for themselves on the clock.

Thank you!

Wogglefoot · 07/07/2024 17:16

I've always had excellent appraisals and my output has been getting less and less over the years. No one seems to have noticed. I think experience tells you which bits you need toy make sure happen and what you can get away with (what is pointless?). I never ket anyone down, but there are plenty of tasks I no longer bother with.

One of my very early managers used to prioritise tasks, A must be done today, B must be done this week, C leave it until someone chases it up, and half the time they won't because it was never very important.

MulberryBushRoundabout · 07/07/2024 17:16

I’ve certainly found myself in roles which I could complete in half the contracted hours. I definitely coasted there in terms of not having to work particularly hard, but I did get all my work done and even picked up some for other people on the team!

llamajohn · 07/07/2024 17:49

Yes 15 years. Noone asked more of me at work, so I didn't do anything apart from the bare minimum, which they were pleased with.

SpeedyMrsToad · 07/07/2024 17:51

I have a technical role that’s paid £11.80 per hour (which was fair pre Covid). They refused my pay rise despite a glowing review and my manager and my managers manager fought for me. Still, the £300k job hopping CEO denied it.

So I now coast with my managers permission. I’ve dropped some of the technical aspects from my job spec and I spend a few hours of my work day looking for a new job.

(Meanwhile CEO gets awarded Leader of the Year!!)

llamajohn · 07/07/2024 17:53

MN is full of people who apparently work their arse off from 8-6 every day, with hardly any breaks.
Madness.

I say either they're not that efficient, or they're not that good or the job is too big and should be shared.