What are your career aspirations? What does "best career progression" mean to you? Earning the most money? Working for big names? Having a powerful position? Being renowned as an expert in your specialism?
All of those quals are well recognised. All of them offer more or less the same career progression in practice. The things that will affect your future career path are broader than the qualifications. The rungs up the ladder look the same whichever qualification you do, they're just the gateway. The lateral options are more varied.
Surely you researched them before applying and know which role best suits you and your goals?
One route is a tax specialist and the other is general practitioner with options to specialise by experience. They are quite different - what did you tell each employer at interview about why you wanted to be a tax specialist and generalist?
You wouldn't do ACA and ACCA. You'd do one of them. What's the role for that pathway? Audit? Accounts? Corporate finance? Tax? Management accounts?
If you don't want to be a tax specialist or aren't sure about committing to tax then take that route as it's a generalist route.
If you're sure tax is what you want to do, then take ATT/CTA.
It's not impossible to pivot out of tax, especially at early career stage, but it will be harder if you only have tax quals than if you had ACA or ACCA plus CTA.
If there is a big difference between the employers offering you these roles then you should also factor that in. The employer may open more opportunities than the quals.
I haven't voted because you haven't defined what you want from your career and they all take you up the same career ladder in the same order anyway - junior, semi senior, senior, assistant manager, manager, senior manager, associate director, director, partner.
The qualifications get you to senior. Promotions beyond that level are determined by your ability to generate fee income, manage relationships, win work, etc.
If you're considering a career in industry instead of practice then that is less rigidly structured and often flatter, but still reasonably consistent.