Hi all, a bit of a work dilemma here... I currently work as a senior executive, when I was approached about the role it was marketed as an exec role but I asked for the title to be changed to senior exec (purely for the way this would look on my CV). I was offered the role at the top band of the scale (£40,000). When I accepted the role I was told I would be promoted to manager within the year and an unapproved job description was shared with me (by my manager, HR hadn't seen it) this showed the salary would be £50,000-£55,000 - I was very happy with this. This week I was told that HR had approved my promotion but were offering £46,000 (£2000 of this I had already received due a company wide cost of living pay increase) so an increase of £4000. I highlighted I wasn't happy and asked my manager to share with HR that other places of work were increasing the salary between these roles (exec to manager) by £7000 - £15,000. I also highlighted I had exceeded targets all year and that I would be becoming a line manager soon (this was not part of the JD they saw) I also highlighted the additional responsibilities the role would see me take on. My manager has come back and said they will not budge and that they think it is a fair increase and in line with the market - this is also worrying as I took on the role understanding pay was better here due to the prestige of the company, £40,000 is higher than the going rate for the kind of exec I am but £46,000 is about standard across the industry for a manager role so it seems unfair that they are willing to pay a lot when you are joining but this is forgotten about once you work there. It seems silly that there is only an increase of £4000 between a role advertised as an exec and a managerial role with line managing responsibilities... Does anyone have an advice on where I can go from here, I know I might not get the full £50,000 but it seems unfair that they wouldn't compromise at all. Thank you!