I had an interview this week which I thought went really well but I didn't get the job. No problem, it happens...
One thing I was left wondering about though was how much they seemed to focus on where I live, which they knew because I put my address on my CV. The role was mostly WFH with occasional attendance at meetings in a particular London borough. I live about an hour away, in another borough, so really not an unusually long commute in London. It was just the focus on it that bothers me, partly because I live where I do because I can't afford to live more centrally! I have lots of evidence that the commute is not an issue (similar commute to my current job and a previous place of study etc).
Anyway, it's made me wonder if I should just leave my address out of my CV given all communication is via email and phone anyway? Is there potential for an unconscious bias based on where someone lives? I'd understand being asked if I lived hours away in another city perhaps but commuting across London shouldn't be so unusual.